An enhanced immune response against G250, induced by a heterologous DNA prime‑protein boost vaccination, using polyethyleneimine as a DNA vaccine adjuvant
- Authors:
- Published online on: September 4, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2537
- Pages: 2657-2662
Abstract
Introduction
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common urological conditions (1); however, due to high levels of resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the treatment of RCC is confounded by problems of tumor recurrence and metastasis (2). Since RCC is an immunogenic tumor, treatment with immunological therapies is possible. Numerous RCC patients have exhibited spontaneous, partial or complete remission, and immunotherapies have increased the reactivity of the immune system against RCC (3).
G250 protein, also known as carbonic anhydrase-9, is an isomer of the carbonic anhydrase enzyme family (4). The G250 gene can induce a malignant phenotype and is expressed in the majority of renal cell carcinomas, however it is not expressed in normal tissues (3,5). The high expression levels of G250 in RCC makes G250 a potential target for immunotherapy (6). In previous studies, the RCC-associated antigen G250 was shown to encode naturally processed epitopes, which contain cytotoxic lymphocyte (CTL), and T-helper cell recognition sites. Both of these epitopes are found within the same region of the G250 protein; within amino acids 249–268 (7,8). However the immunogenicity of G250 is low because G250 produces a small, 20-kDa protein (9). In our previous study, the G250 gene was inserted into the major immunodominant region of the Hepatitis B core Antigen gene (HBcAg), resulting in the successful generation of the fusion protein C-G250 (10).
DNA vaccine constructs have been evaluated and tested in numerous human clinical trials for generating an immune response to various diseases, including infectious, allergic and autoimmune diseases, as well as cancers (11,12). Unfortunately, the immunogenicity of plasmid DNA in humans has proven to be modest as compared with the immunogenicity observed in other species treated using microbial expression vectors. The synthetic polycationic polymer polyethylenimine (PEI), which consists of chains of ethylenimine units-CH2CH2NH-, is considered to be the gold standard technique for enhancing the in vivo expression of administered genes (13,14). PEI is superior to other non-microbial transfection agents because of its ability to protect DNA from degradation (15), to escape intracellular endosomal lysis, and to efficiently deliver DNA into the cell nucleus (16). Formulation with PEI polymers has been employed in DNA and siRNA (small interfering RNA)-based cancer immunotherapies (17) and in vaccination studies targeting infectious agents (18).
In the present study, pVAX1, a Food and Drug Administration-approved plasmid vector, was used as the carrier of G250 DNA, and combined with the synthetic PEI. The C-G250 protein was added to the immunization strategy in order to produce a prime-boost effect. The levels of humoral and cellular immune responses against G250 were observed to determine whether the DNA prime-G250 protein boost immunization strategy may provide a novel treatment strategy for RCC.
Materials and methods
Animals
BALB/c female mice, aged between 6 and 8 weeks, were housed in the Animal Experimental Center at the Medical College of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Xi’an, China). The mice received access to standard diet and water ad libitum and were housed under pathogen-free conditions in the Animal Experimental Center at the Medical College of Xi’an Jiatong University (Xi’an, China). All animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Xi’an Jiaotong University.
Construction and identification of the recombinant pVAX/C-G250 plasmid
The C-G250 gene was cloned from the pET28a(+)/C-G250 plasmid and inserted into the eukaryotic expression vector pVAX1 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with EcoRI and XhoII restriction endonuclease sites. The recombinant plasmid pVAX1/C-G250 with the inserted sequence was verified by DNA sequencing. The plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli Top10 competent cells (Invitrogen Life Technologies) for amplification purposes. Extraction and purification of the plasmid was performed using a DNA Extraction and Purification kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The recombinant plasmid was the transfected into HEK293 human embryonic kidney cells with Lipofectin® transfection reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The transfected cells were harvested and analyzed by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blotting, to determine the mRNA and protein C-G250 expression levels, respectively.
C-G250 expression and purification
The pET28a(+)/C-G250 plasmid was transformed into BL21 (DE3) E. coli cells and gene expression was induced with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside. The expressed proteins were purified using a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) purification system (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and western blotting. The bacterial lysates were resolved by Bis-Tris SDS-PAGE, and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Invitrolon™, 0.45 mm; Invitrogen Life Technologies). The western blots were probed with anti-G250 (American Research Products, Inc., Belmont, CA, USA) and anti-His antibodies (AbD Serotec, Raleigh, NC,USA) at 1:1,000 dilutions, followed by an incubation with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated rabbit antimouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) (H+L) at a 1:2,500 dilution. AP detection was performed using a picoBLUE™ Immunoscreening kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA).
RT-qPCR
For qPCR, total RNA was extracted from transfected cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed on 2 μg total RNA with the Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies) using a mixture of oligo (dT)20 and random hexamer primers. The sequences of the primers for PCR were as follows: Sense: 5′-ATGATTACGCCAAGCTTGGG-3′ and antisense: 5′-TCACGGAAGTGTTGATAGGA-3′. The PCR conditions were as follows: Denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 62°C for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 30 sec, which was repeated for 35 cycles. The PCR amplicons were then separated on 2.0% agarose gel by electrophoresis. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide, digitally photographed and scanned with the UVI Gel Analyzing system (UVI Tech, Cambridge, England).
Animal assay
BALB/c mice were divided into four groups (n=5). The mice in the DNA group were injected with pVAX1/C-G250, the DNA-PEI complex group were injected with DNA-PEI complex at a ratio of 5:1. The injections were made into the quadriceps femoris muscles. The mice of the DNA and DNA-PEI groups were immunized four times over a 10-day period. The mice were immunized with 100 μl of pVAX1/C-G250 (2 μg/μl) each. The following three immunizations, consisted of 50 μl of pVAX1/C-G250. The mice of the DNA-PEI + protein group were immunized with 100 μl and 50 μl of DNA-PEI complex for the first two injections respectively, and then immunized with 50 μl of DNA-PEI complex combined with 50 μg of purified C-G250 protein for the final two injections. The blank group were injected with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at the same time points. Blood was collected 10 days after the last vaccination, incubated at 37°C for 30 min, centrifuged at 800 × g for 10 min, and then stored at −80°C, until further use.
ELISA to determine the antibodies raised against G250
96-well plates were coated with purified C-G250 (10 μg/ml). The wells were blocked and 100 μl of test serum (pooled from the immunized mice), diluted at 1:100, was added to each well followed by a 1 h incubation at 37°C. The bound antibody was probed with goat anti-mouse IgG (1:2,000, DAKO, Carpinteria, CA, USA), followed by an incubation with tetramethylbenzidine for 15–30 min. The optical density (OD) of the plates was read at A450.
Lymphocyte proliferation assay
Mice were sacrificed 10 days after the last immunization. Splenocytes were isolated from the mice and resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco-BRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A total of 2×104 splenocytes were seeded in triplicate in 96-well flat-bottom plates and incubated with 2 μg/ml purified C-G250 for 3 days. Following this, 0.5 mg/ml MTT was added to the culture media and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Dimethyl sulfoxide was added to the culture media and the absorbance was then measured at A570. The splenic cell stimulation index (SI) was calculated by the formula: SI=stimulated group OD value/control group OD value.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) analysis
Five days following the second of two weekly vaccinations, splenocytes were collected, depleted of red cells and CD8+ T cells were purified using the CD8a (Ly-2) Microbead kit (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) on an AutoMACS device (Miltenyi Biotech). ELISPOT analysis was performed to enumerate the number of CD8+ interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-producing cells, using the BD™ ELISPOT Mouse IFN-γ kit (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and 96-well PVDF membrane plates (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) were used as antigen-presenting cells; ~1×105 PECs from naïve BALB/c mice were placed in the ELISPOT wells, which were then loaded with 25 μg/ml of recombinant enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) or G250 peptide in 100 μl of media, for 4 h at 37°C. CD8+ T cells (1×105 cells/100 ml) were added to each well for 18 h to test for antigen recognition. The spots were counted using an automated Immunospot 3 reader (Cellular Technology, Ltd., Cleveland, OH, USA).
Statistical analysis
The data were processed using SPSS version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All the results are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance was employed to determine the differences amongst the groups. A P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Construction and identification of the recombinant plasmids pVAX1/C-G250 expressing C-G250
The C-G250 gene was cloned and inserted into the eukaryotic expression vector pVAX. As shown in Fig. 1A, a band was present at ~500 bp, when the recombinant pVAX1/C-G250 was digested with EcoRI and XhoI. The DNA sequencing data confirmed that the C-G250 gene had been cloned into the pVAX1 expression vector successfully (data not shown). The qPCR and western blotting data showed that C-G250 was expressed in the HEK293 cells which were transfected with pVAX1/C-G250 at a concentration of 2 μg/ml. The bands of the qPCR and western blot analysis (Fig. 1B and C) identified that C-G250 expression 48 h after transfection was increased as compared with the expression levels 24 h after transfection.
C-G250 expression and purification from pET28a(+)/C-G250
Recombinant C-G250 was expressed in the pET28a bacterial vector, encoding an N-terminal polyhistidine-tag (His6) sequence. The proteins containing the His6 tag were purified from the bacterial lysates using a Ni-NTA column. SDS-PAGE analysis detected a new band ~20 kDa produced in bacteria that were transformed with pET28a(+)/C-G250 (Fig. 2A and B). The purified protein was also ~20 kDa and was recognized by both the anti-His and anti-G250 antibodies (Fig. 2C).
G250-specific antibodies are detected in C-G250-immunized mice
BALB/c mice were divided into four groups: Blank, DNA, DNA-PEI and DNA-PEI + protein groups. The serum IgG levels of the mice from the groups was determined by ELISA. As shown in Fig. 3, G250-specific IgG antibodies were detected in the sera of the DNA, DNA-PEI and DNA-PEI + protein groups following the final immunizations; however, they were not detected in the blank group.
The IgG level of the DNA-PEI group was significantly higher as compared with the DNA group. The highest antibody titer was found when the DNA-PEI complex + C-G250 protein was used to immunize the mice. This difference was significant at the 1:6,400 dilution as compared with the other groups (Fig. 3).
Antigen-specific responses of splenocytes
Ten days after the final immunization, splenocytes were isolated and stimulated with G250 peptide to analyze the cell proliferation. As shown in Fig. 4A, splenocytes from all of the immunized groups responded to G250 stimulation, and the SI of the DNA-PEI+C-G250 group was significantly higher as compared with the DNA and DNA-PEI groups (P<0.05). CD8+ T-cell response against G250 was also detected using an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay, in which PECs were used as the antigen presenting cells. CD8+ T cells were enriched from each group by immune magnetic selection. Control cultures, containing either T cells plus PBS or EGFP-loaded PECs, had low numbers of IFN-γ producing cells. In contrast, significant anti-G250 reactivity was found in T cells of all the immunized groups, with the highest anti-G250 reactivity in the DNA-PEI + C-G250 group (Fig. 4B).
Discussion
RCC belongs to a small group of immunogenic tumors. In patients with RCC, partial or complete remission has been observed in response to immunotherapy, and continued immunotherapy treatment can increase the immune reaction against RCC (3). The presence of CD4+ T-lymphocytes and CD8+ T-lymphocytes in RCC supports the hypothesis that the immune system is triggered in these tumors (7). Only a small number of RCC-associated antigens have been characterized that are recognized by CD8+ CTLs, including advanced glycosylation end product-specific receptor, receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2, G250 and squamous cell carcinoma antigen recognized by T-cells 3 (8,19–20).
The present study aimed at improving the efficacy of the heterologous DNA prime-protein boost vaccination strategy against the RCC-associated antigen G250, in inducing both cellular and humoral immune responses. Previous research has demonstrated the capability of a DNA prime-protein boost regimen, which can elicit both an antigen-specific antibody and cytotoxic T-cell response (22–24). Problems, including the low transfection efficiency of the DNA vector, and the low immunogenicity of the antigens, remain to be overcome. In the present study, low molecular weight PEI was used as a DNA vector carrier in order to enhance the transfection efficiency, and the G250 gene was fused with the major immunodominant region (MIR) of the HBcAg gene (C-G250) to increase the immunogenicity of the G250 antigen. Following boosting the vaccine with the fusion protein C-G250, both the CD8+ T-cell response and the CD4+ T-cell response were significantly enhanced.
PEI has been previously used in gene therapy since its initial introduction as a gene delivery vehicle (13). The PEI/DNA complex can prolong DNA retention, and enhance the transfection of the target gene (25,26). Furthermore, PEI has previously been used in a heterologous prime-boost vaccination strategy (13). Li et al (22) explored a heterologous approach using DNA prime-adenovirus boost vaccination with PEI as a DNA vaccine adjuvant. The results indicated that PEI could be used as a competent carrier for the delivery of a DNA vaccine. This idea was supported by Wegmann et al (27), who showed that PEI was a safe and efficient DNA vaccine adjuvant that induced a stronger immune response.
In the present study, PEI was used as a DNA carrier in order to improve and retain a high transfection efficiency. The DNA-PEI complex group demonstrated an improved T-cell immune response and higher antibody levels as compared with the DNA group. These results indicate that PEI has a strong adjuvant effect. Thus, it can be inferred from these results that PEI is a potent DNA vaccine carrier, which can induce a strong immune response.
The boost vaccination of C-G250 significantly enhanced the immune responses as compared with the DNA vaccination alone. In the DNA-PEI+protein group, antigen-specific antibody IgG, and antigen-specific CTL levels were measured. From the results, it can be observed that following protein boosting, the IgG titer of the DNA-PEI+protein group was significantly higher as compared with the DNA and DNA-PEI groups (Fig. 3). A significant anti-G250 reactivity was found in CD8+ T cells of all of the immunized groups, especially in the DNA-PEI+C-G250 group, indicating that the cellular and humoral immune responses, were enhanced by the DNA prime-protein boost regimen.
In conclusion, PEI was used as a DNA vaccine carrier and the effects of a heterologous DNA priming plus protein boosting vaccination strategy were evaluated in mice. The results indicated that the DNA-PEI+protein regimen significantly enhanced the anti-G250 immune response, as compared with the DNA and DNA-PEI groups. This resulted in higher CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses and cytokine production levels, which make this strategy a potential vaccine candidate against RCC. Future research may focus on the mechanism of vaccination, and evaluate its efficacy on an animal model of RCC.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from the Technology Research Project of Shaanxi Province (nos. 2012SF2-21 and 2012K16-09-02), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81200545 and 81270545).
References
Awakura Y, Ito N, Nakamura E, et al: Matrix metalloproteinase-9 polymorphisms and renal cell carcinoma in a Japanese population. Cancer Lett. 241:59–63. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dutcher JP: Recent developments in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Ther Adv Urol. 5:338–353. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tostain J, Li G, Gentil-Perret A and Gigante M: Carbonic anhydrase 9 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a marker for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Eur J Cancer. 46:3141–3148. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stadick H, Stockmeyer B, Kühn R, et al: Epidermal growth factor receptor and g250: useful target antigens for antibody mediated cellular cytotoxicity against renal cell carcinoma? J Urol. 167:707–712. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li G, Feng G, Gentil-Perret A, Genin C and Tostain J: CA9 gene expression in conventional renal cell carcinoma: a potential marker for prediction of early metastasis after nephrectomy. Clin Exp Metastasis. 24:149–155. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Muselaers S, Mulders P, Oosterwijk E, Oyen W and Boerman O: Molecular imaging and carbonic anhydrase IX-targeted radioimmunotherapy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Immunotherapy. 5:489–495. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vissers JL, De Vries IJ, Engelen LP, et al: Renal cell carcinoma-associated antigen G250 encodes a naturally processed epitope presented by human leukocyte antigen-DR molecules to CD4(+) T lymphocytes. Int J Cancer. 100:441–444. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Vissers JL, De Vries IJ, Schreurs MW, et al: The renal cell carcinoma-associated antigen G250 encodes a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2.1-restricted epitope recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 59:5554–5559. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Xiao Y, Gao J, Gao K, et al: Prokaryotic expression, purification and antigenicity identification of human renal cell carcinoma-associated antigen G250. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 29:269–272. 2013.(In Chinese). | |
Liu B, Sun Z, Liu Q, et al: Construction and prokaryotic expression of recombinant gene G250 antigenic peptide-HBcAg and the immunogenicity analysis of the fusion protein. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Medical Sciences). 1:6–11. 2014. | |
Manoj S, Babiuk LA and van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S: Approaches to enhance the efficacy of DNA vaccines. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 41:1–39. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ada G: Vaccines and vaccination. N Engl J Med. 345:1042–1053. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Grant EV, Thomas M, Fortune J, Klibanov AM and Letvin NL: Enhancement of plasmid DNA immunogenicity with linear polyethylenimine. Eur J Immunol. 42:2937–2948. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Krishnamachari Y, Geary SM, Lemke CD and Salem AK: Nanoparticle delivery systems in cancer vaccines. Pharm Res. 28:215–236. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Demeneix B and Behr JP: Polyethylenimine (PEI). Adv Genet. 53PA:215–230. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kichler A, Leborgne C, Coeytaux E and Danos O: Polyethylenimine-mediated gene delivery: a mechanistic study. J Gene Med. 3:135–144. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ma YF and Yang YW: Delivery of DNA-based cancer vaccine with polyethylenimine. Eur J Pharm Sci. 40:75–83. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bivas-Benita M, Bar L, Gillard GO, et al: Efficient generation of mucosal and systemic antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses following pulmonary DNA immunization. J Virol. 84:5764–5774. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gaugler B, Brouwenstijn N, Vantomme V, et al: A new gene coding for an antigen recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes on a human renal carcinoma. Immunogenetics. 44:323–330. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brossart P, Stuhler G, Flad T, et al: Her-2/neu-derived peptides are tumor-associated antigens expressed by human renal cell and colon carcinoma lines and are recognized by in vitro induced specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 58:732–736. 1998. | |
Kawagoe N, Shintaku I, Yutani S, et al: Expression of the SART3 tumor rejection antigen in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 164:2090–2095. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li K, Gao H, Gao L, et al: Enhancement of humoral and cellular immunity in chickens against reticuloendotheliosis virus by DNA prime-protein boost vaccination. Vaccine. 31:1944–1949. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li M, Jiang Y, Xu C, Zhang Z and Sun X: Enhanced immune response against HIV-1 induced by a heterologous DNA prime-adenovirus boost vaccination using mannosylated polyethyleneimine as DNA vaccine adjuvant. Int J Nanomedicine. 8:1843–1854. 2013. | |
Lan J, Gao Z, Xiong H, et al: Generation of protective immune responses against coxsackievirus B3 challenge by DNA prime-protein boost vaccination. Vaccine. 29:6894–6902. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang X, Xu J, Qiu C, et al: Mucosal priming with PEI/DNA complex and systemic boosting with recombinant TianTan vaccinia stimulate vigorous mucosal and systemic immune responses. Vaccine. 25:2620–2629. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Goula D, Becker N, Lemkine GF, et al: Rapid crossing of the pulmonary endothelial barrier by polyethylenimine/DNA complexes. Gene Ther. 7:499–504. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wegmann F, Gartlan KH, Harandi AM, et al: Polyethyleneimine is a potent mucosal adjuvant for viral glycoprotein antigens. Nat Biotechnol. 30:883–888. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |