Open Access

Personalized analysis of pathway aberrance induced by sevoflurane and propofol

  • Authors:
    • Xianqiang Zheng
    • Jing Cong
    • Huidong Zhang
    • Xueliang Chu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 21, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7305
  • Pages: 5312-5320
  • Copyright: © Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Anesthetic agents are used in surgical operations to reversibly reduce consciousness and pain. Sevoflurane is an inhalational anesthetic. Propofol is a short‑acting intravenous general anesthetic. The mechanism of anesthetic agents at pathway level on individual patients has not been reported to date. In the present study, pathway aberrance in the human atrial tissue in response to anesthetics was examined. Microarray data of anesthesia‑treated samples were downloaded from the Array Express database. Pathway information was obtained from the Reactome Pathway Database. The individual pathway aberrance score (iPAS) was introduced to identify dysregulated pathways in individual patients. The present data demonstrated 157 dysregulated pathways in the sevoflurane group, and 44 pathways were identified with the least P‑values. A subset of 49 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were shared between the expression profiling results and the dysregulated pathways results were constructed into a co‑expression network. The top 5 ranked DEGs, nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 3 (NR4A3), JUNB proto‑oncogene, MYC proto‑oncogene, tachykinin precursor 1 and nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase, were identified as important in the topology analysis. In the propofol group, 87 dysregulated pathways were identified and 44 pathways had the least P‑values. In total 28 DEGs were constructed into a co‑expression network, of which 5 DEGs were important in the topology analysis, NR4A3, suppressor of cytokine signaling 3, cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A, C‑C motif chemokine ligand 2 and C‑X‑C motif chemokine ligand 1. A total of 72 dysregulated pathways were identified in common in the two groups. In conclusion, the two types of anesthetics induced partially similar mechanisms. The pathways enriched by DEGs, particularly those that were unique to sevoflurane and propofol, may affect surgical outcomes and aid the prevention of complications from anesthetics.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2017
Volume 16 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zheng X, Cong J, Zhang H and Chu X: Personalized analysis of pathway aberrance induced by sevoflurane and propofol. Mol Med Rep 16: 5312-5320, 2017.
APA
Zheng, X., Cong, J., Zhang, H., & Chu, X. (2017). Personalized analysis of pathway aberrance induced by sevoflurane and propofol. Molecular Medicine Reports, 16, 5312-5320. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7305
MLA
Zheng, X., Cong, J., Zhang, H., Chu, X."Personalized analysis of pathway aberrance induced by sevoflurane and propofol". Molecular Medicine Reports 16.4 (2017): 5312-5320.
Chicago
Zheng, X., Cong, J., Zhang, H., Chu, X."Personalized analysis of pathway aberrance induced by sevoflurane and propofol". Molecular Medicine Reports 16, no. 4 (2017): 5312-5320. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7305