Open Access

Transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals the effect of combinative treatment with low‑intensity pulsed ultrasound and magnesium ions on hFOB1.19 human osteoblast cells

  • Authors:
    • Haiyue Zu
    • Xueting Yi
    • Dewei Zhao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 11, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.9006
  • Pages: 749-762
  • Copyright: © Zu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Biodegradable magnesium (Mg) materials are considered ideal as osteosynthesis implants. However, clinical application has proven complex. This is primarily associated with the issue of reducing the extent of implant degradation to a range acceptable for the human body, while simultaneously enhancing osteogenesis or osteoinduction. In the present study, a combination of Mg ions and low‑intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) treatment was applied in hFOB 1.19 human osteoblast cells as a potential strategy to resolve this issue. A total of 7,314 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and 826 shared DEGs in hFOB1.19 osteoblast cells were identified by microarray analysis following treatment with Mg and/or LIPUS. Gene Ontology analysis demonstrated that among cells treated with a combination of Mg and LIPUS, DEGs were significantly enriched in various functional annotations, including ʻwound healingʼ, ʻtransforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayʼ, ʻtranscription, DNA‑templatedʼ, ʻreceptor complexʼ, ʻnucleusʼ, ʻSMAD protein complexʼ, ʻDNA bindingʼ, ʻmetal ion bindingʼ and ʻGTPase activator activityʼ. Notably, the transforming growth factor (TGF)‑β, mitogen‑activated protein kinase (MAPK) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling pathways were preferentially overrepresented in the Mg and LIPUS combination group, which was subsequently confirmed by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, genes involved in osteoblast mineralization promotion, including bone morphogenetic protein 6, noggin, bone morphogenetic protein receptor (BMPR)1A, BMPR2 and SMAD 5/8, were significantly upregulated following combination treatment compared with the control group. Genes involved in the promotion of migration, including c‑Jun N‑terminal kinase, doublecortin, paxillin and Jun proto‑oncogene AP‑1 transcription factor subunit, were also upregulated in the combination treatment group compared with the control group. The DEG data were supported by morphological observations of the osteoblasts using alizarin red S staining and wound healing assays, which indicated that Mg and LIPUS combinative treatment had a synergistic effect on osteoblast mineralization and migration. Additionally, the combined treatment significantly upregulated metal transporter genes associated with Mg entry, including ATPase Na+/K+‑transporting subunit α1, cyclin and CBS domain divalent metal cation transport mediator 2, K+ voltage‑gated channel subfamily J member 14, transient receptor potential cation channel (TRP) subfamily M member 7 and TRP subfamily V member 2. In summary, the findings of the present study revealed that combined stimulation with Mg and LIPUS may exhibit a synergistic effect on human osteoblast bone formation through the TGF‑β, MAPK and TNF signaling pathways, while also facilitating Mg influx. The present study demonstrated the potential of combinative LIPUS and Mg treatment as a novel therapeutic strategy for enhancing the osteoinduction, biocompatibility and biosafety of biodegradable Mg implants.

Introduction

Magnesium (Mg) and its alloys have been applied as implants in the field of orthopedics for over 100 years (1). Magnesium materials are currently regarded as ideal osteosynthesis implants due to their favorable properties, including low elastic modulus, biodegradability and osteoconductivity (2). In our previous study, specifically designed high purity Mg screws were administered during surgery to repair vascularized bone flaps in patients with stage II/III osteonecrosis (3). Mg ions are the second largest intracellular cations and the fourth most abundant cations in the human body (4). They are considered to have critical roles in various biological processes, including enzyme function, ion channel regulation, metabolism maintenance and genomic stability (5). Of the total Mg within the body, 50~60% of Mg resides as surface substituents of the hydroxyapatite mineral component of bone. Therefore, these ions are essential in skeletal metabolism and development (6). At present, the mechanism of Mg ions in stimulating bone regenerationis thought to occur through several classical signaling events, including the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, transient receptor potential cation channel (TRP) subfamily M and SMAD pathways, as well as the osteoprotegerin/tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily member 11 ratio (710). Mg ions may regulate the proliferation, migration and differentiation of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts during osteogenesis through these pathways.

However, the clinical use of Mg-based materials is restricted due to their rapid degradation rate, which leads to enhanced gas evolution, pH increase and Mg ion overdose upon degradation (11,12). Saris et al (13) reported that a Mg plasma concentration of 3.5 mM was the threshold level for human tolerance without concerns regarding health risks. Therefore, control of local Mg release while promoting efficient transport of Mg ions into bone tissue is critical for biosafety in the application of biodegradable orthopedic Mg implants. Although various modification strategies are able to reduce the corrosion of Mg, including alloying (14) and certain surface treatments (1517), the development of a strategy to reduce the degradation rate of Mg to an acceptable range for the human body, while simultaneously enhancing osteogenesis or osteoinduction, is required.

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a biophysical stimulation method that uses frequencies between 45 kHz and 3 MHz, and acoustic intensities between 5 and 1,000 mW/cm2 (18). It has been demonstrated to be a clinically safe and effective approach to accelerate or induce bone healing. In 1994, FDA approval was first granted to Exogen for a fracture healing LIPUS device, which uses a 1.5 MHz ultrasound wave pulsed at 1 kHz, with a 20% duty cycle at a spatial average temporal average intensity of 30 mW/cm2, applied for 20 min per day (18,19). This ultrasound-accelerated fracture healing system has been used in the vast majority of published research and clinical studies. LIPUS may accelerate bone formation in vitro by regulating a series of factors, including Ca2+, nitric oxide, prostaglandins and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) (2024). In vivo, LIPUS has demonstrated great potential to assist freshfracture healing and shorten both cortical and endosteal union times. Notably, LIPUS exerts a potent effect on non-operatively managed fractures (2528). Due to its efficacy, safety and conservative application, as supported by data from independent organizations, LIPUS is commonly used in clinical practice (19).

As the effects of LIPUS are evident, it is currently regarded as an auxiliary tool to accelerate bone formation in the field of biomaterial science. Zhou et al (29) observed improved osteogenesis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) following LIPUS treatment in a 3D bio-printed scaffold containing Arg-Gly-Asp-Serpeptide and nano-hydroxyapatite. Additionally, Nagasaki et al (30) demonstrated that LIPUS enhances the osteogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells on a nano-hydroxyapatite biomaterial scaffold. Therefore, the integration of LIPUS and bioactive scaffolds may overcome the limitations of bone grafting and other available surgical reconstructive techniques, by delivering osteoprogenitor cells to bone defects, which may provide novel clinical applications for bone regeneration. It has also been reported that ultrasound as a mechanical stimulus mediates cellular discharge by activating mechanosensitive ion channels embedded within cellular membranes (31). These findings provide a basis for investigation into the effects of ultrasound on ion channels expressed in neurons, retinal cells and osteoblast cells, which may have important medical applications.

Considering the promising therapeutic method of LIPUS, we hypothesized that a combinative treatment of LIPUS and Mg ions may be capable of effectively producing a synergistic effect on human osteoblasts, to ultimately promote osteogenesis in bone tissue. Furthermore, it was assumed that this application may overcome the inherent limitation of Mg materials in clinical use. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combined efficacy of administering Mg ions and LIPUS to human osteoblasts and to investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways that may be involved in the enhanced osteoinduction, biocompatibility and biosafety of biodegradable Mg implants in combination with LIPUS.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Human fetal osteoblasts (hFOB1.19; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagles medium/Ham's F12 medium (DMEM/F12; Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences), 0.1% L-glutamine and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and were harvested once a week using trypsin-EDTA solution (Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The cells were subsequently dividedinto four groups: Control (0.8 mM Mg, no LIPUS), LIPUS only (0.8 mM Mg + LIPUS), Mg only (3 mM Mg, no LIPUS) and combination (3 mM Mg+ LIPUS).

Ultrasound treatment

hFOB1.19 cells at the fifth or sixth passage were subjected to LIPUS. The LIPUS device consisted of a sonic accelerated fracture-healing system device (Exogen; Bioventus, LLC, Durham, NC, USA), which was used to generate a 1.5 MHz and 30 mW/cm2 pulsed-wave at a duty ratio of 20%. LIPUS was administered for 20 min every day for durations described below in the following experiments. The culture plates were placed on the ultrasound transducer array conducted by a thin layer of coupling gel. All LIPUS treatments were performed on the culture plates in the tissue culture in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. Furthermore, LIPUS was applied simultaneously with Mg treatment in the combination group.

Preparation of culture medium with Mg sulfate

A sterilized solution of concentrated Mg sulfate (0.5 M) was used to increase the Mg ion concentration to reach an accumulation of 0.8, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mM in the basal culture medium.

Cell proliferation assay

A colorimetric Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan) was used to assess cell proliferation. hFOB1.19 cells were seeded at a density of 4,000 cells/well in 96-well plates. The medium was exposed to treatment with Mg alone, LIPUS alone or combined stimulation with both treatments. After culturing at 37°C for 1, 3, 5 or 7 days, cells were treated with 10 µl CCK-8 reagent per well and then incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Subsequently, the optical density was determined with a spectrometer at a wavelength of 450 nm. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

Alizarin red S staining

To detect extracellular matrix calcium deposits as a measure of bone nodule formation, the cellular matrix was stained with Alizarin red S dye, which combines with Ca2+ in the matrix. hFOB1.19 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 5×104 cells per well. Cells were treated with osteogenic medium containing DMEM/F12 with the addition of 10 mM β-glycerol phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) to induce osteoblast differentiation. Control, Mg only, LIPUS only and combination treatments were performed while cells were incubated in the osteogenic medium at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 14 days. After that, cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. The cells were stained with 40 mM alizarin red S solution (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at pH 4.4 for 40 min at room temperature and rinsed twice with deionized water. Images of the stained cells were captured at ×100 magnification using the digital camera of a phase contrast light microscope. A total of 6 different fields from each sample were analyzed using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA).

Wound healing assay

hFOB1.19 cells were seeded onto 6-well plates at a density of 2×105 cells per well. Cell monolayers were wounded by scratching the surface as uniformly as possible with a pipette tip, following which control, Mg only, LIPUS only and combination treatments were performed at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. Images of this initial wounding and the movement of cells into the scratched area were captured at ×100 magnification using an inverted light microscope linked to a CoolSNAP ES charged-coupled device camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ, USA). Six different fields from each sample were analyzed using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software for quantitative estimations of the number of cells that had migrated into the wounded area.

Microarray analysis

Microarray analysis was performed by Shanghai Oebiotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) using the SurePrint G3 Human Gene Expression 8×60 K v3 microarray (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) to analyze samples of the four groups. Control, Mg only, LIPUS only and combination treatments were performed at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 7 days. Subsequently, total RNA was extracted by TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and quantified with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and RNA integrity was assessed using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). The sample labeling (Low Input Quick-Amp Labeling kit, one-color Agilent Technologies, Inc.), microarray hybridization (Gene Expression Hybridization kit, Agilent Technologies, Inc.) and washing (Gene Expression Wash Pack, Agilent Technologies, Inc.) were performed according to the manufacturers protocols. Briefly, total RNA was reverse transcribed to double stranded cDNA, then synthesized into cRNA and labeled with cyanine-3-cytidine triphosphate according to the manufacturer's protocols of Low Input Quick-Amp Labeling kit. The labeled cRNAs were hybridized onto the microarray. The arrays were subsequently scanned with an Agilent G2505C scanner (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) and the acquired array images were analyzed using Agilent Feature Extraction software (version 10.7.1.1, Agilent Technologies, Inc.) with performance of background subtractions.

Gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and heat map pathway analysis

To make pairwise comparisons of global alterations in gene expression between groups, a Venn diagram (version 2.0; http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/) was constructed. Then differentially expressed genes (DEGs; fold change ≥2 and P<0.05) were selected for GO (http://www.geneontology.org) and KEGG pathway (http://www.genome.jp/kegg) analyses, following basic analysis of the raw data with GeneSpring (version 13.1; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). GO analysis describes gene attributes in three categories: ‘Biological process’, ‘cellular component’ and ‘molecular function’. Based on the GO categories, all DEGs were classified under different GO terms according to their characteristics and the enrichment of the GO terms was calculated. The KEGG database was used to further characterize the metabolic pathways of the DEGs and the enrichment of the different pathways was also calculated. Heat map software Seaborn, version 0.8.1 (http://seaborn.pydata.org/) was employed to show graphical representation of data from top 3 KEGG upregulated pathways where individual values contained in a matrix were represented as colors.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) validation

To validate the microarray data, six differentially expressed mRNAs associated with osteogenesis were selected. Control, Mg only, LIPUS only and combination treatments were performed at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 7 days. After that, total RNA from ~106 cells was isolated using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocols. cDNA synthesis conducted via RT fromtotal RNA using the PrimeScript™ II 1st strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan), which consisted of 4.0 µl Prime Scriptbuffer, 1.0 µl oligo dT primers, 1.0 µl random 6-mers and 1.0 µl PrimeScript RT Enzyme Mix I. Reactions were performed in a RT-PCR reaction system (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for 15 min at 37°C, which was followed by heat inactivation of the RT reaction for 5 sec at 85°C. The RT reaction mixture was subsequently diluted ×10 in RNase-free water and held at −20°C.

qPCR was performed using a QuantStudio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with 20 µl PCR reaction mixture that included 1 µl cDNA, 1 µl Power SYBRGreen PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 1 µl forward primer, 1 µl reverse primer and 17 µl RNase-free water. Reaction mixtures were incubated in a MicroAmp 96-well reaction plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 95°C for 10 min, which was followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min. Melting curve analysis was subsequently performed to validate the specific generation of the expected PCR product. Three independent experiments were performed with each sample run in triplicate. The primers are listed in Table I and were synthesized by Takara Bio, Inc. The expression levels of mRNAs were normalized to GAPDH and were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (32).

Table I.

Primer sequences used in reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis.

Table I.

Primer sequences used in reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis.

GeneDirectionSequence
BMPR2F 5′-CATGGCATGGGTGGAATTAGAG-3′
R 5′-GCAGCCTGTGAACACGTAGTGA-3′
TGF-βF 5′-TTACACTGTCCCTGCTGCACTT-3′
R 5′-GGTATATGTGGAGGTGCCATCAA-3′
JNKF 5′-TGAGAAACTCTTCCCTGATGTCCTT-3′
R 5′-GATAACAAATCCCTTGCCTGACTG-3′
p38F 5′-TGTGATGTGGTGCGTGTGA-3′
R 5′-AGGAACCGAGGAGAGGGAAG-3′
TNF-αF 5′-CTGCCTGCTGCACTTTGGAG-3′
R 5′-ACATGGGCTACAGGCTTGTCACT-3′
TRPM7F 5′-ACAGAGGGAAGGGACCCTCAA-3′
R 5′-ACCAGGCAGCAAGCAAGGTATT-3′
GAPDHF 5′-GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC-3′
R 5′-TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA-3′

[i] F, forward; R, reverse; BMPR2, bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TRPM7, transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 7.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was performed at least three times. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way and two-way analysis of variance with Fisher's least significant difference post-hoc test were performed using SPSS Data Editor Version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Effect of Mg and LIPUS combinative treatment on cell proliferation

The CCK-8 assay results revealed that Mg ions influenced the proliferation of hFOB1.19 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. As presented in Fig. 1A, the proliferation of the cells was tested at Mg concentrations of 0.8, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mM for 24 h. At the relatively low concentrations of Mg ions, the proliferation of the osteoblasts gradually increased with concentration. The peak critical effective dose was determined to be 5 mM, which exerted a significant effect on proliferation compared with the control concentration (0.8 mM; P<0.05). However, no stimulatory effect of the Mg ions on osteoblast proliferation was observed when the concentration of Mg exceeded 15 mM.

The combinative treatment of Mg ions and LIPUS for 24 h resulted in a synergistic effect on cell proliferation at low Mg concentrations. The control group was treated with 0.8 mM Mg only. As above, cell proliferation was not promoted when the concentration of Mg exceeded 15 mM (Fig. 1B). However, with exposure to LIPUS in combination with Mg ions, the peak critical effective dose occurred at a lower Mg concentration of 3 mM (Fig. 1B), compared with 5 mM with Mg treatment alone in Fig. 1A, which was further investigated in the subsequent experiments. The concentration of 3 mM was the optimum Mg dose to stimulate the combined effect of Mg and LIPUS. Therefore, the following experiments were performed using a Mg concentration of 3 mM to investigate the combinative effect of Mg and LIPUS treatment.

Additionally, further detailed validation via a CCK-8 assay was performed after 1, 3, 5 and 7 days of treatment. As presented in Fig. 1C, the proliferation of hFOB 1.19 cells was significantly increased in the Mg alone group after 3 days, compared with the control. The proliferation of hFOB 1.19 cells gradually increased in the LIPUS alone group past day 3 of culture. Furthermore, to confirm whether the effect of combinative treatment was synergistic, the assay was performed following the combinative treatment. The results revealed that the combinative treatment of Mg and LIPUS significantly increased proliferation compared with each individual treatment, even at day 1 (P<0.01; Fig. 1C). This indicated that synergy took effect at the earliest time point and had a sustained effect on enhancing osteoblast proliferation.

Global alterations in gene expression

To further examine the mechanism and interaction of signaling pathways underlying the synergic effect of Mg and LIPUS, microarray analysis was performed, in which data fluctuations above 2-fold were considered to represent significant differential expression. As presented in Fig. 2, a Venn diagram was constructed for pairwise comparisons of the four groups, which depicted the 7,314 DEGs identified in total and the 826 shared DEGs in hFOB1.19 cells cultured following Mg and/or LIPUS treatment. Compared with the control group, data from the LIPUS only and Mg only groups indicated 1,687 and 3,967 DEGs, respectively. Notably, Mg and LIPUS combinative treatment resulted in a total of 5,661 DEGs, including 2,701 upregulated and 2,960 downregulated genes.

GO classification of DEGs in the Mg and LIPUS combination group

GO analysis of the microarray data was performed to obtain an overview of the cellular physiological events represented by the upregulated DEGs in cells of the combined treatment group. The thresholds of the GO terms were set as P<0.05 and an absolute value of fold enrichment ≥2. Enrichment analysis was performed with respect to the three GO categories: ‘Biological process’, ‘molecular function’ and ‘cellular component’. As presented in Table II, ‘wound healing’ (GO: 0042060), ‘transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathway’ (GO: 0007179) and ‘transcription, DNA-templated’ (GO: 0006351) were the most significantly enriched ‘biological process’ terms. ‘Receptor complex’ (GO: 0043235), ‘nucleus’ (GO: 0005634) and ‘SMAD protein complex’ (GO: 0071141) were the most enriched ‘cellular component terms’ (Table II). Furthermore, ‘DNA binding’ (GO: 0003677), ‘metal ion binding’ (GO: 0046872) and ‘GTPase activator activity’ (GO: 0005096) were the most enriched molecular function terms (Table II).

Table II.

GO classification of the identified differentially expressed genes in the combined magnesium and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment group.

Table II.

GO classification of the identified differentially expressed genes in the combined magnesium and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment group.

A, Enriched biological process terms

GO itemsGO termsGenesP-value
GO:0042060Wound healing20 1.59×10−5
GO:0007179Transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathway28 1.89×10−5
GO:0006351Transcription, DNA-templated191 9.78×10−5
GO:0060394Negative regulation of pathway-restricted SMAD protein phosphorylation7 1.93×10−4
GO:0045944Positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter105 5.42×10−4
GO:0051056Regulation of small GTPase mediated signal transduction24 6.54×10−4
GO:0035556Intracellular signal transduction50 9.36×10−4
GO:0043547Positive regulation of GTPase activity58 1.27×10−3
GO:0000165MAPK cascade17 1.37×10−3
GO:0030336Negative regulation of cell migration17 1.37×10−3

B, Enriched cellular component terms

GO itemsGO termsGenesP-value

GO:0043235Receptor complex23 5.11×10−3
GO:0005634Nucleus444 3.71×10−3
GO:0071141SMAD protein complex4 6.34×10−3
GO:0005737Cytoplasm424 1.04×10−2
GO:0015629Actin cytoskeleton27 1.57×10−2
GO:0016604Nuclear body7 1.94×10−2
GO:0005813Centrosome45 2.39×10−2
GO:0005604Basement membrane12 2.53×10−2
GO:0002116Semaphorin receptor complex3 3.22×10−2
GO:0001518Voltage-gated sodium channel complex4 3.89×10−2

C, Enriched molecular function terms

GO itemsGO termsGenesP-value

GO:0003677DNA binding175 2.42×10−6
GO:0046872Metal ion binding208 3.93×10−6
GO:0005096GTPase activator activity39 3.32×10−4
GO:0008270Zinc ion binding129 1.11×10−3
GO:0005515Protein binding746 2.15×10−3
GO:0003700Transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding92 3.96×10−3
GO:0070412R-SMAD binding7 3.98×10−3
GO:0070411I-SMAD binding5 5.25×10−3
GO:0046332SMAD binding10 5.68×10−3
GO:0019902Phosphatase binding10 6.53×10−3

[i] GO, gene ontology.

Determination of signaling pathways that are influenced by Mg and LIPUS combinative treatment

KEGG analysis was used to determine the signaling pathway enrichment of DEGs induced by combinative treatment. The significance threshold was a P<0.05. As presented in Table III, the significantly enriched upregulated pathways included ‘MAPK signaling pathway’ (path: hsa04010), ‘TNF signaling pathway’ (path: hsa04668) and ‘TGF-beta signaling pathway’ (path: hsa04350). Additionally, the significantly enriched downregulated pathways included ‘systemic lupus erythematosus’ (path: hsa05322), ‘alcoholism’ (path: hsa05034) and ‘viral carcinogenesis’ (path: hsa05203), which had no clear connection with the focus of the present study.

Table III.

Prediction of signaling pathways associated with magnesium and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound combinative treatment.

Table III.

Prediction of signaling pathways associated with magnesium and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound combinative treatment.

A, Upregulated pathways

KEGG IDKEGG termsGenesP-value
path:hsa04010MAPK signaling pathway38 4.33×10−5
path:hsa04668TNF signaling pathway22 4.54×10−5
path:hsa04350TGF-beta signaling pathway17 1.76×10−4
path:hsa04621NOD-like receptor signaling pathway14 1.81×10−4
path:hsa04722Neurotrophin signaling pathway21 3.44×10−4

B, Downregulated pathways

KEGG IDKEGG termsGenesP-value

path:hsa05322Systemic lupus erythematosus35 2.10×10−9
path:hsa05034Alcoholism34 2.56×10−6
path:hsa05203Viral carcinogenesis28 2.58×10−3
path:hsa04010MAPK signaling pathway32 4.28×10−3
path:hsa04066HIF-1 signaling pathway16 6.94×10−3

[i] KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

The co-expression pattern of DEGs in hFOB1.19 osteoblasts may be a valuable tool for identifying important pathways associated with osteogenesis. To elucidate these pathways in greater detail, co-expressed genes that may be associated with signaling pathways in osteogenesis were specifically searched for. KEGG enrichment analysis was conducted and 73 pathways that were significantly enriched among the DEGs were identified. Among the co-upregulated DEGs, KEGG analysis identified the top three signaling pathways to be the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK; P=4.33×10−5), tumor necrosis factor (TNF; P=4.54×10−5) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β; P=1.76×10−4) signaling pathways, which were the most significantly enriched pathways in the combinative treatment group compared with the other treatment groups (Fig. 3). Closer examination of the pathway heat maps confirmed the enrichment of these three signaling pathways, as the majority of the DEGs associated with the pathways were upregulated following combined treatment (Fig. 4).

Expression profiles of representative DEGs associated with mineralization in the Mg and LIPUS combination group

The expression of bone morphogenetic protein BMP6, noggin (NOG), BMP receptor (BMPR)1A, BMPR2, SMAD5, SMAD8and TGF-β was detected by microarray analysis as these genes are associated with bone mineralization. Compared with the control group, the expression of BMP6, NOG, BMPR2 and SMAD8 was decreased, in the LIPUS only treatment group. In the Mg only group, NOG, BMPR1A and BMPR2 were increased, while SMAD5 expression was decreased, compared with the control group. Notably, in the combination treatment group, the expression of BMP6, NOG, BMPR1A, BMPR2, SMAD5 and TGF-β was significantly increased compared with control, while the expression of NOG, BMPR2 and TGF-β was significantly increased compared with Mg only and LIPUS only groups, indicating that the combination of Mg and LIPUS had a synergistic effect on mineralization (Fig. 5).

These data were also consistent with the alizarin red S staining results, which measured the stimulatory effect of isolative or combinative treatment on the ability of hFOB 1.19 to differentiate into mature osteoblasts and form a mineralized extracellular matrix. Images of alizarin red S staining were captured at 0 and 14 days of culture (Fig. 6A). The results revealed that after day 14 of culture, the osteoblasts exhibited progressive stages of matrix mineralization. Stimulation with LIPUS alone induced the formation of a small number of mineralized nodules scattered under the field of vision; however, there was no significant difference in comparison with the control group (Fig. 6B). In the Mg only group, the proportion of the stained area in the culture plate increased to a marginally higher level than that of the counterpart LIPUS only group (Fig. 6B). The combination of LIPUS and Mg treatment resulted in prominent and maximum mineralized nodule formation, which exhibited cloud-shaped morphology, demonstrating that co-stimulation had a synergistic effect on increasing extracellular matrix calcium accumulation and anabolic activity during bone cell metabolism (Fig. 6B).

Expression profiles of representative DEGs associated with migration in the Mg and LIPUS combination group

The expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), p38 MAPK (P38), MAPK-activated protein kinase (MAPKAPK)2, MAPKAPK3, doublecortin (DCX), paxillin (PXN) and Jun proto-oncogene AP-1 transcription factor subunit (JUN) was determined by microarray, as these genes are strongly associated with cell migration. Compared with the control group, JNK, p38, MAPKAPK2, MAPKAPK3, DCX, PXN and JUN were all downregulated in the LIPUS only group. In the Mg alone group, JNK and JUN were upregulated, while the expression of PXN was decreased, compared with the control group. In the combination group, the expression of JNK, P38, DCX, PXN and JUN was significantly increased compared with control, while the expression of TNF-α, JNK, P38 and JUN was significantly increased compared with Mg only and LIPUS only groups, indicating that the combination of Mg and LIPUS treatment had a synergistic effect on migration (Fig. 7).

These data were also consistent with the results of a wound healing assay, which was used to capture representative images of migrated osteoblasts in response to an artificially induced scratch-wound. Initially, the current study determined whether LIPUS, as an established inducing stimulus for mechanosensitive cells, may accelerate osteoblast migration. However, the results of the present study indicated that compared with the control group, the wound healing ability of osteoblasts was not significantly altered following LIPUS treatment alone after 24 h (Fig. 8). It was also determined whether Mg, an essential element in various biological processes, was involved in osteoblast migration. In the Mg alone group, the total number of cells that had migrated into the scratch area was significantly increased compared with the control group, indicating that the Mg ions promoted osteoblast migration to repair the wound area (Fig. 8). Furthermore, it was observed that the number of migrated cells was significantly promoted compared with the single treatments in the combinative treatment group, indicating that combined Mg and LIPUS treatment had a tendency to accelerate the speed of wound repair by promoting cell migration (Fig. 8).

Expression pattern of metal transporter genes associated with Mg entry following Mg and LIPUS combinative treatment

To elucidate alterations in metal transporter gene expression associated with Mg entry in to hFOB1.19 osteoblasts, the expression of six candidate metal transport genes was examined across the four groups by microarray analysis: Cyclin and CBS domain divalent metal cation transport mediator 2(CNNM2), K+ voltage-gated channel subfamily J member 14 (KCNJ14), TRP subfamily M member 7 (TRPM7), TRPV2, ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit α1 (ATP1A1) and KCNJ2, as described in our previous study (29). Initially, the three treatments groups were compared with the control group. In the LIPUS alone group, CNNM2, KCNJ14 and TRPM7 were upregulated, while ATP1A1 was downregulated, compared with the control group. In the Mg alone group, ATP1A1 was downregulated, while the other metal transporter genes did not exhibit significantly altered expression. In the combination group, ATP1A1, CNNM2, KCNJ14, TRPM7 and TRPV2 were upregulated, whereas KCNJ2 expression was not altered, compared with the control group (Fig. 9). In comparison with the Mg alone group, CNNM2 and TRPM7 were upregulated in the LIPUS alone group, whereas in the combination group, ATP1A1, CNNM2, KCNJ14, TRPM7 and TRPV2 were upregulated compared with the Mg alone group, indicating that Mg ion alone treatment may not have induced the expression of Mg entry transporter genes, whereas LIPUS may have facilitated increased Mg entry by inducing Mg ion channel influx (Fig. 9).

RT-qPCR validation of the expression levels of upregulated genes in hFOB1.19 osteoblasts

RT-qPCR was conducted to validate the expression levels of upregulated genes in the control, Mg only, LIPUS only and combinative treatment groups. Six candidate DEGs were selected for validation: BMPR2, JNK, P38, TGF-β, TNF-α and TRPM7. Overall, consistent with the microarray results presented in Figs. 5 and 9, the expression alterations of the DEGs exhibited similar trends and reached significance (Fig. 7). Notably, cells treated with the combination of Mg and LIPUS were markedly responsive through the TGF-β, MAPK and TNF signaling pathways, as evidenced by significant increases in BMPR2, JNK, P38, TGF-β and TNF-α expression compared with control, Mg only and LIPUS only groups (Fig. 10). As presented in Fig. 8, JNK and P38 are expressed in the MAPK pathway, JNK, P38 and TNF-α are expressed in the TNF pathway, BMPR2 and TGF-β are expressed in the TGF-β pathway. Furthermore, the expression levels of TRPM7 in the LIPUS only and combinative treatment groups were significantly upregulated compared with the control group; however, no significant difference in expression was observed in the Mg alone group (Fig. 10). Therefore, the microarray results may be reliable for quantitatively estimating the transcription levels of the tested transcripts.

Discussion

The primary function of osteoblasts is to proliferate and migrate towards the site of active bone formation, subsequently transforming into osteocytes that embed in the mineralized bone matrix. Therefore, identifying strategies to promote the osteogenic activity of osteoblasts during bony trabeculae formation has been an important focus of scientific investigation (33). As the eighth most abundant element in the Earth's crust by mass, Mg possesses similar mechanical properties to natural bone. Thus, Mg alloys or Mg-coated surfaces of metallic substrates have recently achieved great progress in orthopedic applications (2). Nevertheless, the optimal range of Mg concentration to induce bone formation requires evaluation to improve biosafety and biocompatibility at the cellular level. Hallab et al (34) reported that MG-63 cell proliferation decreased by 50% as Mg concentration increased to 7 mM, whereas the proliferation typically remained stable at low Mg concentrations. However, limited observation points were set in the range from 1.0 to 5.0 mM. Similarly, Wang et al (35) demonstrated 35 mM as a critical concentration in terms of osteoblast safety, but gave few details regarding observations that cell proliferation exceeded 100% when Mg concentration reached 2–3 mM, which may indicate that Mg ions enhance osteoblast proliferation. The aforementioned studies predominantly investigated the toxicity of high Mg concentration on osteoblasts, rather than the promotional effect of relatively low Mg concentrations. He et al (36) concluded that 3 mM Mg promoted cell proliferation, alkaline phosphate activity and osteocalcin levels in hFOB1.19 osteoblasts. However, it is difficult to eliminate other environmental factors, including anion osmolality and pH alterations, which complicates the accurate determination of the optimum range of Mg concentration. In the present study, it was determined that the critical effective dose of Mg was 5 mM and with combined exposure to LIPUS, the concentration with maximum effect reduced to 3 mM, which is an acceptable dose in terms of human tolerance without health risk concerns (13). Notably, this concentration induced osteogenesis with combined exposure to LIPUS in the present study.

LIPUS has been applied to accelerate bone fracture healing in clinical practice for over two decades. Previous studies have confirmed that LIPUS influences all major processes involved in osteogenesis, including osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, and mineralized nodule formation (37,38). Furthermore, LIPUS and bioactive scaffold integration may overcome the limitations of bone grafting and other available surgical reconstructive techniques by delivering osteopregenitor cells to bone defects, thus providing novel medical applications for bone regeneration (29,30). Therefore, the combinative effect of LIPUS and Mg on osteoinduction was investigated in the present study. In the CCK-8 assay, it was observed that the combination of LIPUS and Mg treatment increased osteoblast proliferation. To determine whether LIPUS and Mg exhibited a synergistic effect on mineralization, calcified nodule formation was examined by alizarin red S staining. The results indicated that combinative treatment increased extracellular matrix calcium accumulation and anabolic activity during bone cell metabolism. A previous study by Man et al (39) revealed that pulsed MHz ultrasound may stimulate in vitro scratch wound healing through increased cell proliferation as well as migration. The migration assay in the present study indicated that LIPUS alone had no effect on osteoblast migration, whereas the combination of LIPUS and Mg significantly increased osteoblast migration compared with either LIPUS or Mg treatment alone.

In the current study, gene chip technology was used to analyze the molecular alterations in the different experimental groups, and the results revealed that combined Mg and LIPUS treatment significantly affected gene expression, as well as cytological properties, including ‘SMAD protein phosphorylation’, ‘DNA duplication’, ‘metal ion binding’, ‘actin cytoskeleton function’ and ‘wound healing’ GO terms, which were significantly upregulated. Notably, this synergistic stimulation predominantly occurred through the TGF-β, MAPK and TNF signaling pathways, which also facilitated Mg influx. This is schematically presented in Fig. 11, which depicts the proposed network of the combinative treatment influence on osteoblast proliferation, migration and mineralization.

The TGF-β/BMP superfamily are widely involved in the regulation of bone organogenesis via receptor or kinase activation (40). In SMAD-dependent BMP signaling, TGF-β binds to TGF-β receptor type I and II, which results in signal transduction to the corresponding SMAD. NOG regulates BMP receptor association and SMAD1/5/8 signaling. Activated SMADs regulate the expression of transcriptional factors and coactivators in osteoblast differentiation and mineralization (31). In the present study, TGF-β pathway proteins, including BMP6, NOG, BMPR1A, BMPR2, SMAD5 and SMAD8 were significantly upregulated in the combinative treatment group. Alterations in the expression of the key genes BMPR2 and TGF-β were also confirmed by RT-qPCR. Thus, it was concluded that the osteogenic effect of LIPUS and Mg in hFOB1.19 osteoblasts may be highly associated with TGF-β signaling.

MAPKs, including JNK and P38, have an important role in cell migration (41). JNK regulates cell migration by phosphorylating its substrates, which include JUN, DCX and PXN (4244). Furthermore, P38 has a regulatory role in migration by phosphorylating MAPKAPK2 and MAPKAPK3, which may be essential for the directionality of migration (45,46). It has previously been demonstrated that P38 activation may be associated with cytoskeletal reorganization and stimulation of cell motility in skeletal cells (47). A previous study reported that the inhibition of P38 prevented platelet-derived growth factor-induced migration of MC3T3 osteoblasts (48). The present study demonstrated the upregulation of P38 and JNK in the combined stimulation group, as well as a significant increase in the expression of downstream JUN components, DCX and PXN. The effect on JNK and P38 expression was confirmed by RT-qPCR. Taken together, these data indicated that combined LIPUS and Mg treatment induced JNK and P38 expression. Further gain and/or loss of function studies are required to confirm the role of the MAPK signaling pathway in combined Mg and LIPUS-induced osteoblast migration.

TNF-α is established as an inhibitor of osteoblast differentiation and an activator of osteoclastogenesis (49). However, it has been discovered that TNF-α may also promote osteogenic differentiation. These seemingly paradoxical effects were described as concentration-dependent in both in vitro and in vivo models (5052). For example, in a murine model, lower concentrations of TNF-α (optimum, 1 pg/ml) in the muscle distal to a fracture may promote migration of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Following cell migration to the fracture site, local addition of TNF-α to achieve concentrations of ~1 ng/ml at the fracture site subsequently inhibited further cell migration and promoted local osteogenesis (50). Notably, Mountziaris et al (51) demonstrated that the lowest dose of TNF-α (0.1 ng/ml) was only sufficient to attenuate the effects of dexamethasone, which halts MSC osteogenic differentiation, whereas higher doses (5 and 50 ng/ml) were able to exert a TNF-α-induced effect on the MSCs, leading to an increased depth of cell infiltration as well as calcium deposition in a biodegradable polymeric microfiber scaffold. The promotion of osteogenic differentiation by TNF-α maybe via nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), which initiates BMP synthesis and matrix mineralization (52). Taken together, this indicates that in the combinative treatment, increased TNF-α signaling may be crucial in increasing osteoblast mineralization.

A study by Kubanek et al (31) revealed that ultrasound may stretch or displace the cellular membrane to alter the state of mechanosensitive ion channels embedded within the membrane, which would thus mediate transmembrane currents. This supported the findings of the present study, which demonstrated that combined treatment significantly upregulated metal transporter genes associated with Mg entry, including ATP1A1, CNNM2, KCNJ14, TRPM7 and TRPV2, when compared with Mg treatment alone. Additionally, metal ion binding was identified as an enriched process in the GO analysis of microarray results.

There are two potential explanations for the enhanced bone formation observed in the combination treatment group. The first is that the synergistic effect of Mg and LIPUS may have directly influenced the aforementioned upregulated pathways, resulting in increased proliferation, migration and mineralization activity in human osteoblasts. A further explanation for these effects may be that LIPUS mediated Mg ion influx, leading to TGF-β, MAPK and TNF signaling pathway upregulation. More advanced technologies, including fluorescent imaging, should be utilized for more precise measurement of in vitro data, in order to evaluate the association between Mg influx rate and osteogenesis, and to elucidate the specific mechanism of improved bone formation by combinative treatment with Mg and LIPUS.

In healthy individuals, Mg serum concentration is closely maintained within a physiological range. The normal reference range for serum Mg concentration is 0.76–1.15 mM; levels above this range is diagnosed as hypermagnesemia (53), the symptoms of which include hyporeflexia, hypotension, respiratory depression and cardiac arrest. Saris et al (13) previously reported that 3.5 mM of Mg in the plasma was the critical level for human tolerance without concerns of health risks. Therefore, controlling local Mg release and promoting the transport efficiency of Mg ions into bone tissue are critical for biosafety in the application of biodegradable orthopedic Mg implants. The current study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to propose a novel application of combining Mg with LIPUS in order to simultaneously reduce Mg degradation rate and enhance osteogenesis or osteoinduction. At a relatively low Mg concentration of 3 mM, LIPUS may possibly accelerate Mg ion transport, improve local utilization and in turn promote regeneration in human osteoblasts in vivo; however, further investigation is required. These effects may sequester the release of Mg ions away from systemic circulation, thus relieving its excretory burden in the kidneys and maintaining Mg serum at a level sufficient for implant biosafety. Prospective randomized clinical trials are required to validate this theory.

In conclusion, in the present study, combined treatment consisting of Mg ions and LIPUS was demonstrated to produce a synergistic effect on human osteoblast bone formation through the TGF-β, MAPK and TNF signaling pathways, whilst simultaneously facilitating Mg influx. Therefore, the combinative Mg and LIPUS treatment may have potential as a novel regenerative application for improving osteoinduction, as well as the biocompatibility and biosafety of biodegradable Mg implants.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Ruiqin Ma of Shanghai Oebiotech Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China) for assistance of data analysis. We thank Dr Xi Zhan of the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Dalian, China) for technical advice. Additionally, we thank Dr Benjie Wang, Dr Baoyi Liu, Dr Xiaowei Wei and Dr Xiuzhi Zhang of Dalian University (Dalian, China) for their suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81672139).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

DZ conceived and designed the study. HZ analyzed and interpreted the data regarding microarray assay and RT-qPCR analysis. XY performed in vitro assays to detect osteoblast biological function. HZ and XY contributed equally in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Payr E: Beitrage zur technik der blutgefass- und nervennaht nebst mittheilungen über die verwendung eines resorbirbaren metalles in der chirurgie. Arch Klin Chir. 62:67–93. 1900.(In German).

2 

Zhao D, Witte F, Lu F, Wang J, Li J and Qin L: Current status on clinical applications of magnesium-based orthopaedic implants: A review from clinical translational perspective. Biomaterials. 112:287–302. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Zhao D, Huang S, Lu F, Wang B, Yang L, Qin L, Yang K, Li Y, Li W, Wang W, et al: Vascularized bone grafting fixed by biodegradable magnesium screw for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Biomaterials. 81:84–92. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Swaminathan R: Magnesium metabolism and its disorders. Clin Biochem Rev. 24:47–66. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Pasternak K, Kocot J and Horecka A: Biochemistry of magnesium. J Elementol. 15:601–616. 2010.

6 

Jahnen-Dechent W and Ketteler M: Magnesium basics. Clin Kidney J. 5 Suppl 1:i3–i14. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Abed E and Moreau R: Importance of melastatin-like transient receptor potential 7 and magnesium in the stimulation of osteoblast proliferation and migration by platelet-derived growth factor. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 297:C360–C368. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Ding S, Zhang J, Tian Y, Huang B, Yuan Y and Liu C: Magnesium modification up-regulates the bioactivity of bone morphogenetic protein-2 upon calcium phosphate cement via enhanced BMP receptor recognition and Smad signaling pathway. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 145:140–151. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Rude RK, Gruber HE, Wei LY and Frausto A: Immunolocalization of RANKL is increased and OPG decreased during dietary magnesium deficiency in the rat. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2:242005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Wang J, Ma XY, Feng YF, Ma ZS, Ma TC, Zhang Y, Li X, Wang L and Lei W: Magnesium ions promote the biological behaviour of rat calvarial osteoblasts by activating the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway. Biol Trace Elem Res. 179:284–293. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Gray J and Luan B: Protective coatings on magnesium and its alloys-a critical review. J Alloys Compd. 336:88–113. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Yamamoto A, Watanabe A, Sugahara K, Tsubakino H and Fukumoto S: Improvement of corrosion resistance of magnesium alloys by vapor deposition. Scr Mater. 44:1039–1042. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Saris NE, Mervaala E, Karppanen H, Khawaja JA and Lewenstam A: Magnesium. An update on physiological, clinical and analytical aspects. Clin Chim Acta. 294:1–26. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Zberg B, Uggowitzer PJ and Löffler JF: MgZnCa glasses without clinically observable hydrogen evolution for biodegradable implants. Nat Mater. 8:887–891. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Wang B, Zhao L, Zhu W, Fang L and Ren F: Mussel-inspired nano-multilayered coating on magnesium alloys for enhanced corrosion resistance and antibacterial property. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 157:432–439. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Jiang Y, Wang B, Jia Z, Lu X, Fang L, Wang K and Ren F: Polydopamine mediated assembly of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and bone morphogenetic protein-2 on magnesium alloys for enhanced corrosion resistance and bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 105:2750–2761. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Li Z, Shizhao S, Chen M, Fahlman BD, Debao Liu and Bi H: In vitro and in vivo corrosion, mechanical properties and biocompatibility evaluation of MgF2-coated Mg-Zn-Zr alloy as cancellous screws. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 75:1268–1280. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Padilla F, Puts R, Vico L, Guignandon A and Raum K: Stimulation of bone repair with ultrasound. Adv Exp Med Biol. 880:385–427. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Poolman RW, Agoritsas T, Siemieniuk RA, Harris IA, Schipper IB, Mollon B, Smith M, Albin A, Nador S, Sasges W, et al: Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) for bone healing: A clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 356:j5762017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Alvarenga EC, Rodrigues R, Caricati-Neto A, Silva-Filho FC, Paredes-Gamero EJ and Ferreira AT: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound-dependent osteoblast proliferation occurs by via activation of the P2Y receptor: Role of the P2Y1 receptor. Bone. 46:355–362. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Miyasaka M, Nakata H, Hao J, Kim YK, Kasugai S and Kuroda S: Low-Intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation enhances Heat-shock protein 90 and mineralized nodule formation in mouse calvaria-derived osteoblasts. Tissue Eng Part A. 21:2829–2839. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Saini V, Yadav S and McCormick S: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound modulates shear stress induced PGHS-2 expression and PGE2 synthesis in MLO-Y4 osteocyte-like cells. Ann Biomed Eng. 39:378–393. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Wang FS, Kuo YR, Wang CJ, Yang KD, Chang PR, Huang YT, Huang HC, Sun YC, Yang YJ and Chen YJ: Nitric oxide mediates ultrasound-induced hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha activation and vascular endothelial growth factor-A expression in human osteoblasts. Bone. 35:114–123. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Yang Z, Ren L, Deng F, Wang Z and Song J: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound induces osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament cells through activation of bone morphogenetic protein-smad signaling. J Ultrasound Med. 33:865–873. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Kinami Y, Noda T and Ozaki T: Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: Multi-center retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Sci. 18:410–418. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Nolte P, Anderson R, Strauss E, Wang Z, Hu L, Xu Z and Steen RG: Heal rate of metatarsal fractures: A propensity-matching study of patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) vs. surgical and other treatments. Injury. 47:2584–2590. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Salem KH and Schmelz A: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound shortens the treatment time in tibial distraction osteogenesis. Int Orthop. 38:1477–1482. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Seger EW, Jauregui JJ, Horton SA, Davalos G, Kuehn E and Stracher MA: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for nonoperative treatment of scaphoid nonunions: A meta-analysis. Hand (N Y). Apr 1–2017.(Epub ahead of print). PubMed/NCBI

29 

Zhou X, Castro NJ, Zhu W, Cui H, Aliabouzar M, Sarkar K and Zhang LG: Improved human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis in 3D bioprinted tissue scaffolds with low intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation. Sci Rep. 6:328762016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Nagasaki R, Mukudai Y, Yoshizawa Y, Nagasaki M, Shiogama S, Suzuki M, Kondo S, Shintani S and Shirota T: A combination of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and nanohydroxyapatite concordantly enhances osteogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells from buccal fat pad. Cell Med. 7:123–131. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Kubanek J, Shi J, Marsh J, Chen D, Deng C and Cui J: Ultrasound modulates ion channel currents. Sci Rep. 6:241702016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Franz-Odendaal TA, Hall BK and Witten PE: Buried alive: How osteoblasts become osteocytes. Dev Dyn. 235:176–190. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Hallab NJ, Vermes C, Messina C, Roebuck KA, Glant TT and Jacobs JJ: Concentration- and composition-dependent effects of metal ions on human MG-63 osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res. 60:420–433. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Wang J, Witte F, Xi T, Zheng Y, Yang K, Yang Y, Zhao D, Meng J, Li Y, Li W, et al: Recommendation for modifying current cytotoxicity testing standards for biodegradable magnesium-based materials. Acta Biomater. 21:237–249. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

He LY, Zhang XM, Liu B, Tian Y and Ma WH: Effect of magnesium ion on human osteoblast activity. Braz J Med Biol Res. 49:pii. 2016.doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20165257. View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Suzuki A, Takayama T, Suzuki N, Sato M, Fukuda T and Ito K: Daily low-intensity pulsed ultrasound-mediated osteogenic differentiation in rat osteoblasts. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 41:108–115. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Wu S, Kawahara Y, Manabe T, Ogawa K, Matsumoto M, Sasaki A and Yuge L: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates osteoblast differentiation and promotes bone formation in an osteoporosis rat model. Pathobiology. 76:99–107. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Man J, Shelton RM, Cooper PR, Landini G and Scheven BA: Low intensity ultrasound stimulates osteoblast migration at different frequencies. J Bone Miner Metab. 30:602–607. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Rahman MS, Akhtar N, Jamil HM, Banik RS and Asaduzzaman SM: TGF-β/BMP signaling and other molecular events: Regulation of osteoblastogenesis and bone formation. Bone Res. 3:150052015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Huang C, Jacobson K and Schaller MD: MAP kinases and cell migration. J Cell Sci. 117:4619–4628. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Gdalyahu A, Ghosh I, Levy T, Sapir T, Sapoznik S, Fishler Y, Azoulai D and Reiner O: DCX, a new mediator of the JNK pathway. EMBO J. 23:823–832. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Huang C, Rajfur Z, Borchers C, Schaller MD and Jacobson K: JNK phosphorylates paxillin and regulates cell migration. Nature. 424:219–223. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Javelaud D, Laboureau J, Gabison E, Verrecchia F and Mauviel A: Disruption of basal JNK activity differentially affects key fibroblast functions important for wound healing. J Biol Chem. 278:24624–24628. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Hannigan MO, Zhan L, Ai Y, Kotlyarov A, Gaestel M and Huang CK: Abnormal migration phenotype of mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2-/- neutrophils in Zigmond chambers containing formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine gradients. J Immunol. 167:3953–3961. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

McLaughlin MM, Kumar S, McDonnell PC, Van Horn S, Lee JC, Livi GP and Young PR: Identification of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase-activated protein kinase-3, a novel substrate of CSBP p38 MAP kinase. J Biol Chem. 271:8488–8492. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Rodriguez-Carballo E, Gámez B and Ventura F: p38 MAPK signaling in osteoblast differentiation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 4:402016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Mehrotra M, Krane SM, Walters K and Pilbeam C: Differential regulation of platelet-derived growth factor stimulated migration and proliferation in osteoblastic cells. J Cell Biochem. 93:741–752. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Osta B, Benedetti G and Miossec P: Classical and paradoxical effects of TNF-α on bone homeostasis. Front Immunol. 5:482014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Glass GE, Chan JK, Freidin A, Feldmann M, Horwood NJ and Nanchahal J: TNF-alpha promotes fracture repair by augmenting the recruitment and differentiation of muscle-derived stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:1585–1590. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Mountziaris PM, Lehman Dennis E, Mountziaris I, Sing DC, Kasper FK and Mikos AG: Effect of temporally patterned TNF-α delivery on in vitro osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells cultured on biodegradablepolymer scaffolds. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 24:1794–1813. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Hess K, Ushmorov A, Fiedler J, Brenner RE and Wirth T: TNF-alpha promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by triggering the NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Bone. 45:367–376. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Gröber U, Schmidt J and Kisters K: Magnesium in prevention and therapy. Nutrients. 7:8199–8226. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-2018
Volume 18 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zu H, Yi X and Zhao D: Transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals the effect of combinative treatment with low‑intensity pulsed ultrasound and magnesium ions on hFOB1.19 human osteoblast cells. Mol Med Rep 18: 749-762, 2018.
APA
Zu, H., Yi, X., & Zhao, D. (2018). Transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals the effect of combinative treatment with low‑intensity pulsed ultrasound and magnesium ions on hFOB1.19 human osteoblast cells. Molecular Medicine Reports, 18, 749-762. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.9006
MLA
Zu, H., Yi, X., Zhao, D."Transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals the effect of combinative treatment with low‑intensity pulsed ultrasound and magnesium ions on hFOB1.19 human osteoblast cells". Molecular Medicine Reports 18.1 (2018): 749-762.
Chicago
Zu, H., Yi, X., Zhao, D."Transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals the effect of combinative treatment with low‑intensity pulsed ultrasound and magnesium ions on hFOB1.19 human osteoblast cells". Molecular Medicine Reports 18, no. 1 (2018): 749-762. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.9006