SKLB1002, a potent inhibitor of VEGF receptor 2 signaling, inhibits endothelial angiogenic function in vitro and ocular angiogenesis in vivo
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 6, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11056
- Pages: 2571-2579
-
Copyright: © Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Pathological angiogenesis occurs in several parts of the eye, including retina, choroid and cornea. It is a major cause of vision loss in numerous ocular diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration and keratitis. Corneal neovascularization (CoNV) usually occurs in the inflammatory or infectious ocular surface diseases (1,2). It is characterized by the invasion of the capillaries from the pericorneal limbal vascular plexus into avascular cornea tissue. CoNV can lead to corneal scarring, edema and inflammation, which eventually affects visual acuity and worsens the prognosis of subsequent penetrating keratoplasty (3,4). A balance exists between the angiogenic factors and anti-angiogenic factors in the cornea (5,6). CoNV will occur when the balance is disturbed (7,8). CoNV is associated with increased expression of angiogenic factors and decreased expression of anti-angiogenic factors (9).
Numerous growth factors and cytokines have been reported to be involved in the angiogenic process. Among them, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a critical angiogenic factor. VEGF is upregulated in the inflamed and vascularized corneas (10). VEGF is a secreted growth factor induced by hypoxia or inflammatory stimulation and plays an important role in endothelial angiogenic functions, including cell proliferation, migration and new tube formation (11,12). VEGF usually exerts its biological effects by binding to and activating its major receptor, VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) (13–15). Thus, inhibition of VEGFR-2 signaling is a promising strategy for treating CoNV.
SKLB1002, derived from quinazoline, is a small molecule that displays potent and specific inhibition of VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase activity. It can inhibit VEGF-induced phosphorylation of VEGFR2 kinase and the downstream protein kinases (16,17). A previous study has demonstrated that SKLB1002 inhibits angiogenesis and may be a potential drug candidate for anti-cancer therapy (18). The present study investigated the role of SKLB1002 endothelial angiogenic function in vitro and ocular angiogenesis in vivo. The results revealed that SKLB1002 can significantly inhibit CoNV induced by alkali-burn in vivo and inhibit endothelial angiogenic functions in vitro.
Materials and methods
Corneal alkali-burn mouse model
In total, 40 male ICR mice (age, 12 weeks; weight 30±2 g) were chosen to build CoNV model, and were purchased from Nanjing Qinglongshan Experimental Animal Center. The mice were raised under standard conditions (temperature, 22±2°C; humidity, 50±5%) with a controlled 12-h light/dark cycle and had free access to water and standard laboratory chow. The mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of chloral hydrate at a dose of 350 mg/kg. No signs of peritonitis were observed during the experiment. Corneal alkali-burn was performed by applying a 2.5 mm diameter filter paper soaked with 1 mol/l NaOH on the corneal center for 25 sec. After the filter paper was removed, the eye was rinsed with the sterilized saline for 1 min. An eyedrop of SKLB1002 (0.05 mg/ml) or sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-Na; 0.5%) was used on the surface of cornea 3 times each day. Corneal neovascularization was observed using a slit lamp. The animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation.
Histopathological analysis
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed to detect the histopathological change of cornea. The mice were treated with SKLB1002, CMC-Na (0.5%), or PBS 3 times per day. The eyeballs were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) at 4°C for 24 h. Then, the eyeballs were dehydrated by immersion in a series of increased concentrations of alcohol, embedded in paraffin wax and sectioned at 5-µm thickness. The paraffin sections were deparaffinized by xylene for 30 min and rehydrated by an alcohol gradient. After washing with ddH2O, the sections were stained with hematoxylin at room temperature for 10 min. Then, the sections were washed with ddH2O and stained with eosin at room temperature for 1 min. After washing with ddH2O, the sections were dehydrated using alcohol and mounted using resinene. The images were captured using a light microscope at magnification, ×10.
Cell culture
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were obtained from Lonza Group, Ltd. (cc-2159) and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.
Cell viability assay
MTT assay was performed to detect cell viability. HUVECs were seeded onto 96-well plate (3,000-4,000/well) and treated with different concentrations of SKLB1002 for 48 h. HUVECs were also treated with p38 inhibitor SB203580 (10 µM; cat. no. S1863; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), ERK inhibitor U0126 (10 µM; cat. no. S1901; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) or JNK inhibitor SP600125 (10 µM; cat. no. S1876; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 1 h, and incubated with VEGF (10 ng/ml), VEGF + SKLB1002 or left untreated at 37°C for 48 h. Then, MTT (5 mg/ml, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was added at 37°C for 4 h. After removing the medium, the crystals were dissolved with isopropanol and determined at 570 nm wavelength using a microplate reader.
Cell proliferation assay
Ki67 staining was performed to determine cell proliferation. In brief, HUVECs were seeded onto 24-well plate. Following the required treatment, they were washed with PBS buffer, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) at room temperature for 15 min and blocked in 5% BSA (Biofroxx GmbH) at 37°C for 0.5 h. Ki67 antibody (1:200; Abcam; cat. no. ab16667) was added to each well overnight at 4°C. The plate was placed at room temperature to rewarm for 1 h and incubated with the secondary antibody for 3 h. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (1:1,000; Biosharp) at room temperature for 10 min. The plate was imaged using a fluorescence microscope.
EdU incorporation assay
After the required treatment, the cells were cultured with EdU medium (50 µM, 300 µl/well; Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.) at 37°C for 4 h. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) at room temperature for 30 min and incubated with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min. After washing with PBS for three times, cells were incubated with Apollo Dye solution (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.; cat. no. C10310) at 37°C for 1 h in the dark. Then, the cells were incubated with 0.5% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 15 min. Cell nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. The images were captured using a fluorescent microscope at magnification, ×40.
Flow cytometry
HUVECs (5×105 cells/well in 6-well plates) were incubated with or without SKLB1002 at 37°C for 24 h. They were harvested using a 0.05% trypsin solution, washed twice with PBS and centrifuged at 1,200 × g at 4°C for 5 min. Then, cell suspension was stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled Annexin V (BD Pharmingen; Becton, Dickinson and Company) and counterstained with propidium iodide (PI; BD Pharmingen; Becton, Dickinson and Company) at room temperature for 10 min in the dark. Finally, the percentage of apoptotic HUVECs were determined using a flow cytometer (cytoFLEX; Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and analyzed using CytExpert 2.3 (Beckman Coulter, Inc.).
Scratch wound healing assay
HUVECs were seeded onto a 6-well plate. After they reached >90% confluence, a 10 µl pipette tip was used to make a straight line in the middle of confluent monolayer. The floating cell debris was washed with PBS buffer and the injured cell monolayers were cultured in serum-free medium. The injured area was observed and the images captured at different time points (0, 24 and 48 h).
Transwell migration assay
HUVECs were seeded onto the upper Transwell inserts (Corning, Inc.) at 2×104/well and allowed for migrating through the hole for 10 h. Meanwhile, serum-free media was added into the upper insert and the complete media (10% FBS in DMEM) was put into the lower chamber as the chemoattractant. These non-migrated cells were removed by cotton swabs. The migrated cells were fixed with methyl alcohol at room temperature for 15 min and stained with 0.5% crystal violet solution at room temperature for 30 min. Finally, the stained cells were counted under a light microscope and images were captured at magnification, ×20.
Tube formation assay
The tube formation assay was performed to detect the angiogenic ability of HUVECs. The 24-well plate was frozen in advance, thawed Matrigel (BD Biosciences; Becton, Dickinson and Company) was added onto the bottom of wells and incubated at 37°C for 1 h to solidify. After the required treatment, HUVECs were cultured onto these wells at 1×105/well. The tube formation was observed by a light microscope and the tube length was calculated using ImageJ 1.52p software (National Institutes of Health).
Protein extraction and western blot analysis
After the required treatment, HUVECs were collected and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Following centrifugation at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 15 min, the supernatant was collected and the concentration of protein was determined using a BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The extracted protein (30 µg/lane) was separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto the PVDF membranes (EMD Millipore). After blocking with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 0.5 h, the membranes were incubated with ERK1/2 (1:1,000, 9102), p-ERK1/2 (1:1,000; 4370), JNK (1:1,000; 9252), p-JNK (1:1,000; 9251), p38 (1:1,000; 9212), p-p38 (1:1,000; 9215), or GAPDH (1:1,000; 2118; all from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) overnight at 4°C. After washing with TBST (containing 0.05% Tween) for 3 times, the PVDF membranes were incubated with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1,000; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) at room temperature for 3 h. The results of blots were visualized using an ECL detection system (Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd.) and the densitometry was measured using ImageJ 1.52p software (National Institutes of Health).
Statistical analysis
All experiments were repeated at least 3 times. All quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired or paired Student's t test or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
SKLB1002 administration has no obvious cytotoxicity in vitro and tissue toxicity in vivo
Corneal tissues were administered SKLB1002 (0.05 mg/ml), CMC-Na solution (0.5%), or PBS (Control) for 7 days. The histological change of the cornea was observed using H&E staining. Compared with the control group, no obvious morphologic change was observed after the administration of SKLB1002 or CMC-Na (Fig. 1A). MTT assay was performed to determine whether SKLB1002 had cytotoxicity in vitro. The result demonstrated that SKLB1002 had no obvious cytotoxicity on HUVECs ranging from 1 to 100 nm (Fig. 1B). Flow cytometry assays through Annexin V-FITC/PI double labeling revealed that compared with the control group, SKLB1002 administration did not lead to an increased percentage of apoptotic HUVECs (Fig. 1C). Collectively, these results show that SKLB1002 administration has no obvious cytotoxicity in vitro and tissue toxicity in vivo.
Topical application of SKLB1002 eyedrop inhibits CoNV
To determine whether SKLB1002 administration plays an inhibitory role in CoNV, a CoNV model was first constructed through alkali-burn injury and then the injured corneas were treated with SKLB1002 eyedrops (0.05 mg/ml) or CMC-Na solution (0.5%) 3 times per day. The results demonstrated that new corneal blood vessels appeared at 1 day and peaked at 7 days after alkali-burn injury. The image of the anterior segment was taken using a slit lamp at 7 days after alkali-burn injury. There was no neovascularization in normal cornea (Ctrl group). Furthermore, alkali-burn injury induced an increased number and length of pathological corneal blood vessels (Alkali group). Compared with Alkali group, the number and the length of new corneal blood vessels was significantly reduced after the administration of SKLB1002 (Alkali + SKLB1002 group), but not CMC-Na (Alkali + CMC-Na group; Fig. 2). Collectively, the above-mentioned results suggest that SKLB1002 administration can suppress CoNV in vivo.
SKLB1002 administration suppresses endothelial angiogenic function in vitro
To determine the effect of SKLB1002 administration on HUVEC viability, HUVECs were pre-treated with SKLB1002 and then treated with or without VEGF (10 ng/ml). VEGF treatment significantly increased the viability of HUVECs. However, pre-treatment with SKLB1002 (10 or 50 nM) significantly reduced VEGF-induced increase in HUVEC viability (Fig. 3A). EdU incorporation assay and Ki67 immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that pre-treatment with SKLB1002 significantly decreased the proliferation ability of HUVECs (Fig. 3B and C). Transwell migration assay and scratch wound healing assay demonstrated that pre-treatment of SKLB1002 significantly reduced the migration ability of HUVECs (Fig. 3D and E). Matrigel tube formation assay demonstrated that VEGF-mediated tube formation ability was interrupted after the administration of SKLB1002 (Fig. 3F).
SKLB1002 serves its anti-angiogenic function via the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway
VEGF and VEGFR-2 usually serve their roles through activation of MAPK signaling. Western blotting was performed to investigate whether SKLB1002 administration could affect the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway. VEGF treatment led to increased expression levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2, JNK and p38. The increased expression of these proteins was markedly interrupted after SKLB1002 administration (Fig. 4A). It was thus concluded that SKLB1002 played its anti-angiogenic role in endothelial cells through inactivation of MAPK signaling as demonstrated in Fig. 4B. To further verify whether SKLB1002 performed its anti-angiogenic role in endothelial cells through MAPK signaling, HUVECs were treated with p38 inhibitor (SB203580), ERK inhibitor (U0126), JNK inhibitor (SP600125), or SKLB1002 and then incubated with or without VEGF. The results demonstrated that SKLB1002 administration decreased the viability of HUVECs (Fig. 4C) and reduced the migration and tube formation ability of HUVECs (Fig. 4D and E), showing similar effects as the combined effects of SB203580, U0126 and SP600125 administration on endothelial angiogenic functions. These results provided additional evidence that SKLB1002 plays its anti-angiogenic role in endothelial cells through the inactivation of MAPK signaling.
Discussion
CoNV is characterized by the invasion of the new blood vessels into the cornea and is a major cause of blindness worldwide (19–21). However, the current therapeutic options have demonstrated limited or transitory results (22). The present study investigated the effects of SKLB1002 administration on the progression of CoNV. SKLB1002 administration can inhibit the progression of CoNV in vivo and regulate endothelial angiogenic functions in vitro.
Under normal condition, the transparency of the cornea is a prerequisite for vision (23). Pathological factors, such as infection, chemical burns, hypoxia and inflammatory molecules, can interrupt the balance between angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors in the cornea. VEGF has been reported as a major angiogenic factor during CoNV (24). The VEGF level in the vascularized cornea is significantly higher compared with the normal cornea (1,10,25). Anti-VEGF agents such as bevacizumab have been used for treating ocular angiogenesis, including CoNV. However, they require intravitreal injection and a relatively frequent dosing regimen (4-6 weeks) (26,27). In experimental models of neovascularization, anti-VEGF treatment became less effective at blocking vessel growth and regressing vessels as the neovascularization develops over time (8,28,29). In addition, subconjunctival injection of an anti-VEGF drug may lead to hemorrhage and damage patient compliance. Thus, there remains a requirement to search for novel therapies for CoNV.
SKLB1002 is a novel potent inhibitor of VEGF receptor 2 signaling. It has no significant toxicity on mouse corneal structure in vivo and endothelial cell viability in vitro. An alkali-burn corneal angiogenesis model was used to investigate the role of SKLB1002 in anti-angiogenic effects. Eyedrops were used to deliver SKLB1002 onto the ocular surface, which have great advantage over the traditional subconjunctival injection because it is noninvasive and easily accepted by the patients. However, tear screening and nasolacrimal duct drainage may affect the bioavailability of SKLB1002 (30,31). To overcome this flaw, CMC-Na was used as the solvent of the eyedrops to increase the retention time of SKLB1002. CMC-Na is a hydrosoluble biopolymer derived from cellulose (18,32). CMC-Na has been widely used due to its high viscosity, non-toxicity and non-allergenicity (16). In addition, a previous study reported that CMC-Na can be used as a drug solvent to treat dry eye (17). Mouse eyes were injured through incubation with 1 mol/l NaOH to induce CoNV. After 7 days of alkali burn, the images of the anterior segment showed that the number and length of CoNV was attenuated in SKLB1002-administrated group.
Angiogenesis is a complicated process comprising the participation of multifarious cells and factors. Endothelial cells are the key regulators in the angiogenic cascade (33,34). Once the balance between angiogenic factors and anti-angiogenic factors is disturbed, endothelial cells are activated to proliferate, migrate and form the tubes (35–37). The present study demonstrated that SKLB1002 administration can inhibit the VEGF-induced proliferation, migration and tube formation ability of HUVECs, suggesting a critical role of SKLB1002 in inhibiting endothelial angiogenic functions.
The molecular mechanism of SKLB1002 in anti-angiogenic effects was also investigated. VEGF-VEGFR-2 signaling has been reported to serve their roles in angiogenesis through the activation of MAPK signaling (38,39). MAPKs comprise the ERK1/2, JNK1/2/3 and p38 isoforms (40,41). ERK1/2 is involved in the regulation of HUVEC proliferation (42). VEGF-induced p38 change can affect cell migration (43,44). JNK plays important roles in the cell proliferation and apoptotic responses to cellular stresses (45). The present study demonstrated that SKLB1002 decreased the phosphorylation level of ERK1/2, JNK and p38. Given that ERK1/2, JNK and p38 have been demonstrated to be the critical regulators of cell proliferation, migration and tube formation (46), it is not surprising that SKLB1002-regulated MAPK signaling pathway is involved in the regulation of the angiogenic cascade.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that SKLB1002, a small-molecule inhibitor of VEGFR-2, exhibited anti-angiogenic effects on CoNV by blocking the MAPK signaling pathway. SKLB1002 administration can inhibit endothelial cell proliferation, migration and tube formation in vitro. Thus, selective inhibition of VEGFR-2 through SKLB1002 administration is a promising therapy for ocular angiogenesis. Angiogenesis can also contribute to the pathogenesis of other diseases, such as malignant, inflammatory, infectious and immune disorders. Anti-angiogenesis by SKLB1002 administration may offer new therapeutic opportunities for these disorders.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr Yao Jin and Dr Xiu-Miao Li (Nanjing Medical University, China) for the helpful statistical discussion and technical assistance for western blotting.
Funding
The present study was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81470594, 81570859, 81870679 and 81800858), grants from the Medical Science and Technology Development Project Fund of Nanjing (grant no. ZKX1705), innovation team Project Fund of Jiangsu Province (grant no. CXTDB2017010) and the Science and Technology Development Plan Project Fund of Nanjing (grant no. 201716007).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
BY and QJ were the major contributors to the experimental design. QZ and ST established the animal models. CL, JL, XL and JY performed the western blot analysis. QZ and ST performed the cell culture. BY was involved in writing the manuscript and the analysis and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experimental procedures adhered to the principles stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (updated 2011; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) and were approved by the Animal Care and the Use Committee of Nanjing Medical University.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Ellenberg D, Azar DT, Hallak JA, Tobaigy F, Han KY, Jain S, Zhou Z and Chang JH: Novel aspects of corneal angiogenic and lymphangiogenic privilege. Prog Retin Eye Res. 29:208–248. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang SX and Ma JX: Ocular neovascularization: Implication of endogenous angiogenic inhibitors and potential therapy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 26:1–37. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Qazi Y, Wong G, Monson B, Stringham J and Ambati BK: Corneal transparency: Genesis, maintenance and dysfunction. Brain Res Bull. 81:198–210. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fu YC and Xin ZM: Inhibited corneal neovascularization in rabbits following corneal alkali burn by double-target interference for VEGF and HIF-1α. Biosci Rep. 39(pii): BSR201805522019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Qazi Y, Maddula S and Ambati BK: Mediators of ocular angiogenesis. J Genet. 88:495–515. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maddula S, Davis DK, Maddula S, Burrow MK and Ambati BK: Horizons in therapy for corneal angiogenesis. Ophthalmology. 118:591–599. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sene A, Chin-Yee D and Apte RS: Seeing through VEGF: Innate and adaptive immunity in pathological angiogenesis in the eye. Trends Mol Med. 21:43–51. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Roshandel D, Eslani M, Baradaran-Rafii A, Cheung AY, Kurji K, Jabbehdari S, Maiz A, Jalali S, Djalilian AR and Holland EJ: Current and emerging therapies for corneal neovascularization. Ocul Surf. 16:398–414. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bock F, Maruyama K, Regenfuss B, Hos D, Steven P, Heindl LM and Cursiefen C: Novel anti(lymph)angiogenic treatment strategies for corneal and ocular surface diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res. 34:89–124. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Poulaki V, Mitsiades N, Kruse FE, Radetzky S, Iliaki E, Kirchhof B and Joussen AM: Activin a in the regulation of corneal neovascularization and vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Am J Pathol. 164:1293–1302. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Apte RS, Chen DS and Ferrara N: VEGF in signaling and disease: Beyond discovery and development. Cell. 176:1248–1264. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eilken HM and Adams RH: Dynamics of endothelial cell behavior in sprouting angiogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 22:617–625. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoeben A, Landuyt B, Highley MS, Wildiers H, Van Oosterom AT and De Bruijn EA: Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis. Pharmacol Rev. 56:549–580. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferrara N, Gerber HP and LeCouter J: The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med. 9:669–676. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Varricchi G, Loffredo S, Galdiero MR and Marone G, Cristinziano L, Granata F and Marone G: Innate effector cells in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Curr Opin Immunol. 53:152–160. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shen G, Li Y, Du T, Shi G, Dai L, Chen X, Zheng R, Li W, Su X, Zhang S, et al: SKLB1002, a novel inhibitor of VEGF receptor 2 signaling, induces vascular normalization to improve systemically administered chemotherapy efficacy. Neoplasma. 59:486–493. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li WW, Chen JJ, Zheng RL, Zhang WQ, Cao ZX, Yang LL, Qing XY, Zhou LX, Yang L, Yu LD, et al: Taking quinazoline as a general support-Nog to design potent and selective kinase inhibitors: application to FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3. Chem Med Chem. 5:513–516. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang S, Cao Z, Tian H, Shen G, Ma Y, Xie H, Liu Y, Zhao C, Deng S, Yang Y, et al: SKLB1002, a novel potent inhibitor of VEGF receptor 2 signaling, inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 17:4439–4450. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bignami F, Lorusso A, Rama P and Ferrari G: Growth inhibition of formed corneal neovascularization following Fosaprepitant treatment. Acta Ophthalmol. 95:e641–e648. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Skobe M and Dana R: Blocking the path of lymphatic vessels. Nat Med. 15:993–994. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tolentino MJ: Current molecular understanding and future treatment strategies for pathologic ocular neovascularization. Curr Mol Med. 9:973–981. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu S, Romano V, Steger B, Kaye SB, Hamill KJ and Willoughby CE: Gene-based antiangiogenic applications for corneal neovascularization. Surv Ophthalmol. 63:193–213. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhong W, Montana M, Santosa SM, Isjwara ID, Huang YH, Han KY, O'Neil C, Wang A, Cortina MS, de la Cruz J, et al: Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in corneal transplantation-A review. Surv Ophthalmol. 63:453–479. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nominato LF, Dias AC, Dias LC, Fantucci MZ, Mendes da Silva LEC, Murashima AA and Rocha EM: Prevention of corneal neovascularization by adenovirus encoding human vascular endothelial growth factor soluble receptor (s-VEGFR1) in lacrimal gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 59:6036–6044. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee JE, Kim KL, Kim D, Yeo Y, Han H, Kim MG, Kim SH, Kim H, Jeong JH and Suh W: Apatinib-loaded nanoparticles suppress vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis and experimental corneal neovascularization. Int J Nanomedicine. 12:4813–4822. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chang JH, Garg NK, Lunde E, Han KY, Jain S and Azar DT: Corneal neovascularization: An anti-VEGF therapy review. Surv Ophthalmol. 57:415–429. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Friedman M, Azrad-Lebovitz T, Morzaev D, Zahavi A, Marianayagam NJ, Nicholson JD, Brookman M, Michowiz S, Hochhauser E and Goldenberg-Cohen N: Protective effect of TLR4 ablation against corneal neovascularization following chemical burn in a mouse model. Curr Eye Res. 44:505–513. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
van Wijngaarden P, Coster DJ and Williams KA: Inhibitors of ocular neovascularization: Promises and potential problems. JAMA. 293:1509–1513. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Menzel-Severing J: Emerging techniques to treat corneal neovascularisation. Eye (Lond). 26:2–12. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chang CY, Wang MC, Miyagawa T, Chen ZY, Lin FH, Chen KH, Liu GS and Tseng CL: Preparation of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-modified biopolymeric nanoparticles containing epigalloccatechin-3-gallate for targeting vascular endothelial cells to inhibit corneal neovascularization. Int J Nanomedicine. 12:279–294. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Urtti A: Challenges and obstacles of ocular pharmacokinetics and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 58:1131–1135. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kisielewska J, Ligeza J and Klein A: The effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, tyrphostins: AG1024 and SU1498, on autocrine growth of prostate cancer cells (DU145). Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 46:185–191. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De Bock K, Georgiadou M and Carmeliet P: Role of endothelial cell metabolism in vessel sprouting. Cell Metab. 18:634–647. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Siemerink MJ, Augustin AJ and Schlingemann RO: Mechanisms of ocular angiogenesis and its molecular mediators. Dev Ophthalmol. 46:4–20. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eelen G, de Zeeuw P, Simons M and Carmeliet P: Endothelial cell metabolism in normal and diseased vasculature. Circ Res. 116:1231–1244. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shi W, Liu J, Li M, Gao H and Wang T: Expression of MMP, HPSE, and FAP in stroma promoted corneal neovascularization induced by different etiological factors. Curr Eye Res. 35:967–977. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Adams RH and Alitalo K: Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 8:464–478. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Olsson AK, Dimberg A, Kreuger J and Claesson-Welsh L: VEGF receptor signalling-in control of vascular function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 7:359–371. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cross MJ and Claesson-Welsh L: FGF and VEGF function in angiogenesis: Signalling pathways, biological responses and therapeutic inhibition. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 22:201–207. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cargnello M and Roux PP: Activation and function of the MAPKs and their substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 75:50–83. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arthur JS and Ley SC: Mitogen-activated protein kinases in innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 13:679–692. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Simons M, Gordon E and Claesson-Welsh L: Mechanisms and regulation of endothelial VEGF receptor signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 17:611–625. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
del Barco Barrantes I and Nebreda AR: Roles of p38 MAPKs in invasion and metastasis. Biochem Soc Trans. 40:79–84. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Penn JS, Madan A, Caldwell RB, Bartoli M, Caldwell RW and Hartnett ME: Vascular endothelial growth factor in eye disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. 27:331–371. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sehgal V and Ram PT: Network Motifs in JNK Signaling. Genes Cancer. 4:409–413. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim EK and Choi EJ: Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1802:396–405. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |