HER4 isoform CYT2 and its ligand NRG1III are expressed at high levels in human colorectal cancer

  • Authors:
    • Yan Guo
    • Zhihui Duan
    • Yitao Jia
    • Chaoying Ren
    • Jian Lv
    • Peng Guo
    • Wujie Zhao
    • Bin Wang
    • Suqiao Zhang
    • Yaxing Li
    • Zhongxin Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 27, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8124
  • Pages: 6629-6635
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER4) isoforms and their ligand neuregulin 1 (NRG1) isoforms in human primary colorectal cancer (CRC). The mRNA expression of HER4 isoforms JM‑a, JM‑b, CYT1 and CYT2, and their ligand isoforms NRG1 I, II and III in CRC tissues and adjacent normal tissues were quantified by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to analyze the association between HER4 and NRG1 expression and lymph node metastasis in CRC. The expression levels of CYT1 (P=0.002), CYT2 (P=0.002) and NRG1 type III (P<0.001) were significantly higher in the CRC tissues than in the adjacent normal tissues. The expression of CYT2 was correlated with tumor stage (P=0.018), lymph node status (P=0.015) and tumor‑node‑metastasis (P=0.038) in CRC. The expression of NRG1III was correlated with lymph node metastasis, and the expression of CYT2 was associated with the expression of NRG1III (r=0.691, P<0.01). The logistic regression analysis indicated that expression of CYT2 >50 was a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in CRC. In conclusion the expression levels of CYT1, CYT2 and NRG1III were upregulated in CRC. An expression of CYT‑2 >50 was identified as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in CRC. Therefore, CY‑2 and NRG1III may be involved in the progression of CRC.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer in men and women, and the second leading cause of cancer-associated mortality in Western countries (1). At the time of diagnosis, synchronous metastases can be found in almost 20–25% of patients with CRC, and the majority of patients with stage III disease have a poor prognosis within 5 years of diagnosis. The mainstream drugs used for advanced CRC include 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody, which may be used as a single agent or in combination in the first or secondary line of therapy (2,3). However, these therapies are limited in application due to their toxic and adverse effects. Further understanding of the pathogenesis of CRC may provide support for investigating novel drugs and individualized treatments for CRC (4).

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 4 (HER4/ErbB4) belongs to the EGFR family, a group of transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). At least four HER4 variants (JM-a/CYT1, JM-a/CYT2, JM-b/CYT1 and JM-b/CYT2) can be generated by different HER4 mRNA splicing (5,6). Therefore, seven different human EGF RTKs have been found to be expressed in various normal and malignant cells: HER1 (EGFR/ErbB1), HER2 (ErbB2/Neu), HER3 (ErbB3), and four HER4 isoforms (JM-a/CYT-1, JM-a/CYT-2, JM-b/CYT-1 and JM-b/CYT-2) (7). Agents targeting EGFR and/or HER2 have been approved for clinical use. In addition, the overexpression or mutation of HER3 is associated with malignant cell growth, contributing to enhanced tumor progression and poor patient outcomes (8). There are potentially oncogenic ERBB4 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (9), and it has been reported that HER4 is overexpressed in human colon cancer and enhances cellular transformation (10). In addition, HER4 promotes breast cancer cell proliferation, mediates acquired resistance to ERBB2 inhibitors and may serve as a prognostic marker in patients with breast cancer (1114). However, the role of HER4 in CRC remains to be fully elucidated. The alternative splicing of HER4 yields four major isoforms, which differ in the extracelluar juxtamembrane domain (JM-a, vs. JM-b) and cytoplasmic domain (CYT-1, vs. CYT-2). Failure to account for isoform-specific roles in previous studies may have led to controversial reports on the role of HER4 in cancer. Therefore, it is important to definitively determine the expression of HER4 isoforms in CRC.

Neuregulins (NRGs) are HER4 ligands, and comprise a large family of EGF-like signaling molecules involved in cell-cell communication during development and disease. NRG1 is a high-affinity ligand of HER4, which is classified into at least three subgroups (types I–III) with 30 isoforms as a result of splicing variants (15). NRG1 type I and type II are processed at the membrane by metalloproteinases ADAM17 and ADAM19, whereas the NRG1 type III contains a cysteine-rich domain, which binds to and activates HER3 and HER4 (16).

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the expression of HER4 isoforms and the isoforms of the ligand NRG1 in human CRC tissues, and to analyze the correlation between their expression and the clinicopathological parameters of patients with CRC.

Materials and methods

Patient selection and biopsy collection

A total of 76 fresh-frozen samples (38 cancer tissues and 38 paired adjacent normal tissues) were obtained from patients with CRC who were treated at the Second Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Hebei, China) between November 2013 and August 2014. The surgery was performed on patients by the same surgeon, and the samples were collected during primary surgery prior to chemotherapy or radiation. The tissues were diagnosed as CRC preoperatively by endoscopic biopsy, and the normal tissues were 5 cm from the tumor edge. All patients had a pathological diagnosis and complete clinical data. The detailed clinical data, including gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, histological type, tumor differentiation, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, gene mutation, lymph node metastasis status, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage were collected from patient's medical records. Clinical staging was performed in accordance with the TNM staging system, formulated jointly by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control (1). All experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The endpoints were the assessments of the association between the expression of HER4 and NRG1 with the clinicopathological parameters of patients with CRC.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis

Total RNA was isolated from the cryopreserved tissues using TRIzol (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan). Total RNA (5 µg) was used for the synthesis of cDNA using a reverse transcription kit. The isoform-specific primers for HER4 and NRG1 are listed in Table I. RT-qPCR analysis was performed in triplicate with 1 µg cDNA and 2.5 µm primers in 25 µl buffer using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Bio, Inc.) on a Light Cycler 480 as follows: 94°C for 4 min; 94°C for 30 sec, 56°C for 30 sec (40 cycles), and 72°C for 30 sec. The mRNA expression level was normalized to β-actin and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (17).

Table I.

Primers used in the present study.

Table I.

Primers used in the present study.

GeneDirectionPrimer sequence
CYT1Forward 5′-GGATGAAGAGGATTTGGAAG-3′
Reverse 5′-TCCTGACATGGGGGTGTA-3′
CYT2Forward 5′-GAATAGGAACCAGTTTGTATACCG-3′
Reverse 5′-ACAGCAGGAGTCATCAAAAATC-3′
JMaForward 5′TAACGGTCCCACTAGTCA-3′
Reverse 5′-CATGTTGTGGTAAAGTGG-3′
JMbForward 5′-ATAGGCTCAAGTATTGAAG-3′
Reverse 5′-CCATCAGGCCGATGC-3′
NRG1 IForward 5′-AGGGCAAGAAGAAGGAGCG-3′
Reverse 5′-CCTTCAGTTGAGGCTGGCATA-3′
NRG1 IIForward 5′-CGCCTTCCGAGCCTCTTTC-3′
Reverse 5′-CCTTCTCCGCACATTTTACAAGA-3′
NRG1 IIIForward 5′-CCGGCCTCAAGTGGGTATT-3′
Reverse 5′-CCCAGTGGTGGATGTAGATGTAGA-3′
β-actinForward 5′-CGTGACATTAAGGAGAAGCTG-3′
Reverse 5′-CTAGAAGCATTTGCGGTGGAC-3′

[i] NRG, neuregulin 1.

Statistical analysis

The gene expression levels between the cancer and adjacent tissues were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Two groups of independent samples were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Spearman's correlation method was used to analyze the correlation between HER4 isoforms and the clinicopathological data. To identify variables, which were independent predictors of CRC, univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis with backward stepwise selection were employed. The data were processed using SPSS 22.0 software (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Expression of HER4 and NRG1 isoforms in CRC tissues and adjacent normal tissues

The mRNA levels of CYT1 (P=0.002), CYT2 (P=0.002, and NRG1 type III (P<0.001) were significantly higher in the CRC tissues, compared with those in adjacent normal tissues (P<0.05; Fig. 1A-C). No significant differences in the mRNA levels of JM-a, JM-b, NRG1 type I or NRG1 type II were found between the cancer tissues and the adjacent normal tissues.

Association between HER4 and NRG1 expression and clinicopathological parameters in CRC

Of the 38 patients with CRC, the expression of CYT1 was significantly associated with the depth of invasion (P=0.027) and TNM stage (P=0.033) in CRC (Fig. 2A and B). The median expression of CYT1 in T2-3 CRC was lower, compared with that of T4 (0.62, vs. 5.24, P=0.027). The median expression of CYT1 in stage II CRC was increased significantly compared with that of stage I (0.42, vs. 10.25). However, there was no significant difference in the expression of CYT1 between stage II and stage III CRC.

The expression of CYT2 was associated with T (P=0.018), N (P=0.015), and TNM stage (P=0.038) in CRC (Fig. 3A-C). The median expression of CYT2 was increased significantly between T2-3 and T4 (5.36, vs. 39.48, respectively), and the expression was significantly increased in lymph node-positive cases, compared with that in lymph node-negative cases (5.36, vs. 50.59, P=0.015). The expression of CYT2 did not differ significantly between stages I and II, however, it was significantly higher in stage III (median=50.59), compared with that in stage I (median=5.9) and stage II (median =3.34; P<0.05).

The expression of NRG1 III was correlated with lymph node metastasis. The median expression was higher in the lymph node-positive cases than in the lymph node-negative cases (0.96 vs. 2.00; P=0.015; Fig. 4). There was no correlation between the expression of CYT-1, CYT-2 or NRG1 III with age, gender, tumor size, tumor grade and CEA levels (P>0.05, Table II).

Table II.

Association between human epidermal growth factor receptor 4 and NRG1 expression with clinicopathological parameters of colorectal cancer.

Table II.

Association between human epidermal growth factor receptor 4 and NRG1 expression with clinicopathological parameters of colorectal cancer.

CYT1CYT2NRG1 III



VariablenMedianIQPP-valueMedianIQPP-valueMedianIQPP-value
Age (years)
  ≤62196.2516.630.1513.9576.930.711.180.820.77
  >62193.1812.73 10.3356.71 1.170.25
Gender
  Male233.6013.250.108.8347.790.391.170.760.56
  Female156.5631.34 50.59154.29 1.180.39
Tumor size
  <4 cm174.9214.120.698.8356.210.731.270.890.50
  >4 cm213.6015.10 13.95132.45 1.780.17
Differentiation
  High244.1610.040.3218.117.0400.801.110.290.73
  Poor146.416.012 5.26192.93 1.780.9
TNM stage
  I60.422.190.03a5.907.710.038a0.840.670.08
  II1610.2529.44 5.34102.96 1.220.28
  III164.068.90 50.59166.36 2.000.94
T stage
  T2/T3140.628.050.03a5.3611.860.018a0.960.060.20
  T4245.2420.76 39.48189.12 1.490.61
Lymph node
  Positive224.8319.900.875.3635.160.015a0.960.900.03a
  Negative164.068.90 50.5966.36 2.000.94
CEA
  Normal314.9313.490.717.3377.210.421.170.970.46
  High74.7314.72 22.7069.93 1.520.11

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn2-ol-0-0-8124'] } t-test or one-way analysis of variance was used.

a P<0.05. NRG1, neuregulin 1; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.

Correlation analysis between the expression of CYT1 and CYT2 HER4 isoforms and NRF1 III

As shown in Table III, the expression of CYT1 and CYT-2 were associated (r=0.481, P<0.05) and the expression of CYT2 and NRG1 were also associated (r=0.691, P<0.01).

Table III.

Correlation between the expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 4 isoforms CYT1, CYT2 and NRG1 III.

Table III.

Correlation between the expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 4 isoforms CYT1, CYT2 and NRG1 III.

CYT1CYT2NRG1III



IsoformrP-valuerP-valuerP-value
CYT10.481<0.050.373>0.05
CYT20.481<0.050.691<0.01
NRG1III0.373>0.050.691<0.01

[i] Spearman's-Rho method was used. P<0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference.

Analysis of variables associated with lymph node metastasis of CRC

As shown in Table IV, the univariate analysis showed that the expression of CYT2 was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis of CRC (P=0.047), whereas no significant associations were found between lymph node metastasis and age (P=0.372), gender (P=0.213), tumor differentiation (P=0.396), CEA level (P=0.641), KRAS mutation (P=0.333), tumor size (P=0.521), or the expression of CYT1 (P=0.654), NRG1I (P=0.671), NRG1II (P=0.490), NRG1III (P=0.192), JM-a (P=0.317) or JM-b (P=0.192).

Table IV.

Univariate analysis and multivariate regression of variables associated with lymph node metastasis.

Table IV.

Univariate analysis and multivariate regression of variables associated with lymph node metastasis.

Lymph node metastasis

YesNoUnivariate analysisMultivariate regression




Variablen%n%χ2P-valueOR95%CIP-value
Age (years)
  ≤62956.21045.50.4320.3720.1240.0091.7320.121
  >62743.81254.5
Gender
  Male8501568.21.2820.2134.2120.49535.8510.188
  Female850731.8
Differentiation
  Poor1168.81359.10.3710.3693.8260.41735.1090.235
  High531.2940.9
CEA
  Normal1381.21881.80.0020.6412.4280.06689.5150.630
  High318.8418.2
KRAS
  Wild637.51359.12.1970.3330.3880.0821.8250.231
  Mutation425522.7
  Indefinite637.5418.2
Tumor size
  <4 cm637.511500.5850.5219.1830.302279.6140.203
  >4 cm1062.51150
CYT1
  ≤501487.51986.40.100.6540.0010.0011.8210.071
  >50212.5313.6
CYT2
  ≤50743.81777.34.4740.047a23.2551.187455.4810.038a
  >50956.3522.7
NRG1I
  ≤51593.82195.50.0540.6710.4700.002105.4570.785
  >516.214.5
NRG1II
  ≤51062.51568.20.1330.4907.4780.087644.660.376
  >5637.5731.8
NRG1III
  ≤51381.32195.51.9840.1925,2920.2361,186,3410.093
  >5318.814.5
JMa
  ≤1012751986.40.7960.3170.2740.00152.0220.628
  >10425313.6
JMb
  ≤101381.22195.51.9840.1921.4550.017123.840.869
  >10318.814.5

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn5-ol-0-0-8124'] } χ2 test was used.

a P<0.05. NRG1, neuregulin 1; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.

Logistic regression revealed that the expression of CYT2 was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis of CRC. In terms of the odds ratios (ORs), the variable of the expression of CYT2 had the most marked effect on lymph node metastasis; the OR of lymph node metastasis in cancer with CYT2 expression >50 was 23.255 times higher than that with CYT2 expression ≤50 (P=0.038; Table IV).

Discussion

In the present study, it was demonstrated that HER4 isoforms CYT1 and CYT2, and their ligand NRG1 type III were upregulated in human CRC tissues. However, there was no significant difference in the expression of the other two HER4 isoforms (JM-a and JM-b) or the NRG1 type I and type II isoforms between CRC and normal tissues. The expression levels of CYT2 and CYT1 were closely associated with the TNM stage and tumor invasion depth of CRC, and the expression of CYT2 was associated with lymph node metastasis in CRC. However, only NRG1 type III was associated with lymph node metastasis in CRC.

In contrast to other members of the HER family, a single HER4 gene has four isoforms: JM-a, JM-b, CYT1 and CYT2, which are produced by alternative splicing. CYT1 and CYT2 differ by 16 amino acids present in the cytoplasmic tail of CYT1, which are not present in CYT2. This difference in the structure of CYT1 and CYT2 leads to their different cell location, resulting in different and even opposite roles in cell regulation. In the present study, it was found that the expression of CYT1 in CRC tissues was positively correlated with the depth of tumor invasion and TNM stage. Previous studies have indicated that CYT-1 is an independent prognostic factor of ovarian cancer, and that CYT-1 may promote the progression of ovarian cancer and malignant melanoma (18,19). In malignant melanoma, the expression of CYT1 suggested a short progression-free survival rate (19). Another study revealed that ERBB4 CYT1 has a novel oncogenic role in breast cancer (20). The mechanism by which CYT1 promotes tumor progression may be through activating the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt signaling pathway to induce tumor cells to evade apoptosis.

Compared with CYT1, the role of CYT2 in cancer, particularly in the colon, remains to be fully elucidated. In bladder cancer, the expression of JM-a/CYT2 and estrogen receptor may be indicative of improved prognosis of bladder cancer (21). A previous study found that the CYT2 variant, but not the CYT1 variant, protected EGFR from ligand-induced degradation by competing with EGFR for binding to a complex containing the E3 ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl and the adaptor Grb2 (22). In addition, another study showed that the ErbB4 CYT2 isoform promoted the transition from colon adenoma to carcinoma following adenomatous polyposis coli loss (23). However, another study demonstrated that the CYT2 isoform had an inhibitory effect on cancer cell growth (24). These inconsistent results may be due to the different cell types and the different expression levels of HER family members. The specific mechanism by which CYT2 promotes the occurrence and development of CRC requires further investigation.

NRG1 is important in the tumor microenvironment. Bone marrow stromal cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts and cancer cells can secrete NRG1 (25). NRG1 can be secreted by endothelial cells through autocrine or paracrine mechanisms of angiogenesis in ischemic tissues, in order to meet the needs of the rapid growth of tumor (26). NRG1 can be divided into at least three subsets, namely NRG1I, NRG1II and NRG1III. The expression of these isoforms shows tissue specificity and have different biological roles. Among the three subtypes of NRG1, the present study found that only the expression of NRG1III was increased in CRC. In addition, it was found that the expression of CYT2 was positively correlated with the expression of NRG1III, and the two were associated with lymph node metastasis in CRC. Therefore, the NRG1 III/CYT2 pathway may be important in the invasion and lymph node metastasis of CRC. However, in the present study, only the mRNA expression levels of the NRG1 and CYT2 isoforms were detected by RT-qPCR analysis, and additional experiments are required to detect protein expression levels of NRG1 and CYT2 isoforms via western blot or immunohistochemical analyses to confirm the conclusions. This is a major limitation of the present study.

In conclusion, the study is the first, to the best of our knowledge, to demonstrate upregulation in the expression levels of CYT1, CYT2 and NRG1 III in CRC. It was also found that CYT-2 expression >50 is a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in CRC. Therefore, CY-2 and NRG1III may be involved in the progression of CRC.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China (grant no. H2016307010).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:87–108. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Panoilia E, Schindler E, Samantas E, Aravantinos G, Kalofonos HP, Christodoulou C, Patrinos GP, Friberg LE and Sivolapenko G: A pharmacokinetic binding model for bevacizumab and VEGF165 in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 75:791–803. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Santoro V, Jia R, Thompson H, Nijhuis A, Jeffery R, Kiakos K, Silver AR, Hartley JA and Hochhauser D: Role of reactive oxygen species in the abrogation of oxaliplatin activity by cetuximab in colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 108:djv3942015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Dawson H and Lugli A: Molecular and pathogenetic aspects of tumor budding in colorectal cancer. Front Med (Lausanne). 2:112015.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Roskoski R Jr: The ErbB/HER family of protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Pharmacol Res. 79:34–74. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Veikkolainen V, Vaparanta K, Halkilahti K, Iljin K, Sundvall M and Elenius K: Function of ERBB4 is determined by alternative splicing. Cell Cycle. 10:2647–2657. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Muraoka-Cook RS, Sandahl MA, Strunk KE, Miraglia LC, Husted C, Hunter DM, Elenius K, Chodosh LA and Earp HS III: ErbB4 splice variants Cyt1 and Cyt2 differ by 16 amino acids and exert opposing effects on the mammary epithelium in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 29:4935–4948. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Lédel F, Stenstedt K, Hallström M, Ragnhammar P and Edler D: HER3 expression in primary colorectal cancer including corresponding metastases in lymph node and liver. Acta Oncol. 54:480–486. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Kurppa KJ, Denessiouk K, Johnson MS and Elenius K: Activating ERBB4 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 35:1283–1291. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Williams CS, Bernard JK, Demory Beckler M, Almohazey D, Washington MK, Smith JJ and Frey MR: ERBB4 is over-expressed in human colon cancer and enhances cellular transformation. Carcinogenesis. 36:710–718. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Mohd Nafi SN, Generali D, Kramer-Marek G, Gijsen M, Strina C, Cappelletti M, Andreis D, Haider S, Li JL, Bridges E, et al: Nuclear HER4 mediates acquired resistance to trastuzumab and is associated with poor outcome in HER2 positive breast cancer. Oncotarget. 5:5934–5949. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Machleidt A, Buchholz S, Diermeier-Daucher S, Zeman F, Ortmann O and Brockhoff G: The prognostic value of Her4 receptor isoform expression in triple-negative and Her2 positive breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 13:4372013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kim JY, Jung HH, Do IG, Bae S, Lee SK, Kim SW, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Ahn JS, Park YH and Im YH: Prognostic value of ERBB4 expression in patients with triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 16:1382016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Canfield K, Li J, Wilkins OM, Morrison MM, Ung M, Wells W, Williams CR, Liby KT, Vullhorst D, Buonanno A, et al: Receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB4 mediates acquired resistance to ERBB2 inhibitors in breast cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 14:648–655. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Zhao WJ: The expression and localization of neuregulin-1 (Nrg1) in the gastrointestinal system of the rhesus monkey. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 51:38–44. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Papaleo F, Yang F, Paterson C, Palumbo S, Carr GV, Wang Y, Floyd K, Huang W, Thomas CJ, Chen J, et al: Behavioral, neurophysiological, and synaptic impairment in a transgenic neuregulin1 (NRG1-IV) murine schizophrenia model. J Neurosci. 36:4859–4875. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Paatero I, Lassus H, Junttila TT, Kaskinen M, Bützow R and Elenius K: CYT-1 isoform of ErbB4 is an independent prognostic factor in serous ovarian cancer and selectively promotes ovarian cancer cell growth in vitro. Gynecol Oncol. 129:179–187. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Nielsen TO, Poulsen SS, Journe F, Ghanem G and Sorensen BS: HER4 and its cytoplasmic isoforms are associated with progression-free survival of malignant melanoma. Melanoma Res. 24:88–91. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Wali VB, Gilmore-Hebert M, Mamillapalli R, Haskins JW, Kurppa KJ, Elenius K, Booth CJ and Stern DF: Overexpression of ERBB4 JM-a CYT-1 and CYT-2 isoforms in transgenic mice reveals isoform-specific roles in mammary gland development and carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res. 16:5012014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Munk M, Memon A, Poulsen SS, Borre M, Nexo E and Sorensen BS: The HER4 isoform JM-a/CYT2 relates to improved survival in bladder cancer patients but only if the estrogen receptor α is not expressed. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 73:503–513. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Kiuchi T, Ortiz-Zapater E, Monypenny J, Matthews DR, Nguyen LK, Barbeau J, Coban O, Lawler K, Burford B, Rolfe DJ, et al: The ErbB4 CYT2 variant protects EGFR from ligand-induced degradation to enhance cancer cell motility. Sci Signal. 7:ra782014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Bae JA, Kho DH, Sun EG, Ko YS, Yoon S, Lee KH, Ahn KY, Lee JH, Joo YE, Chung IJ, et al: Elevated Coexpression of KITENIN and the ErbB4 CYT-2 isoform promotes the transition from colon adenoma to carcinoma following APC loss. Clin Cancer Res. 22:1284–1294. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Nielsen TO, Sorensen S, Dagnæs-Hansen F, Kjems J and Sorensen BS: Directing HER4 mRNA expression towards the CYT2 isoform by antisense oligonucleotide decreases growth of breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Br J Cancer. 108:2291–2298. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Han ME, Kim HJ, Shin DH, Hwang SH, Kang CD and Oh SO: Overexpression of NRG1 promotes progression of gastric cancer by regulating the self-renewal of cancer stem cells. J Gastroenterol. 50:645–656. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Park J, Sarode VR, Euhus D, Kittler R and Scherer PE: Neuregulin 1-HER axis as a key mediator of hyperglycemic memory effects in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109:pp. 21058–21063. 2012; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2018
Volume 15 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Guo Y, Duan Z, Jia Y, Ren C, Lv J, Guo P, Zhao W, Wang B, Zhang S, Li Y, Li Y, et al: HER4 isoform CYT2 and its ligand NRG1III are expressed at high levels in human colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett 15: 6629-6635, 2018
APA
Guo, Y., Duan, Z., Jia, Y., Ren, C., Lv, J., Guo, P. ... Li, Z. (2018). HER4 isoform CYT2 and its ligand NRG1III are expressed at high levels in human colorectal cancer. Oncology Letters, 15, 6629-6635. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8124
MLA
Guo, Y., Duan, Z., Jia, Y., Ren, C., Lv, J., Guo, P., Zhao, W., Wang, B., Zhang, S., Li, Y., Li, Z."HER4 isoform CYT2 and its ligand NRG1III are expressed at high levels in human colorectal cancer". Oncology Letters 15.5 (2018): 6629-6635.
Chicago
Guo, Y., Duan, Z., Jia, Y., Ren, C., Lv, J., Guo, P., Zhao, W., Wang, B., Zhang, S., Li, Y., Li, Z."HER4 isoform CYT2 and its ligand NRG1III are expressed at high levels in human colorectal cancer". Oncology Letters 15, no. 5 (2018): 6629-6635. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8124