Nab‑paclitaxel is effective against intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma via disruption of desmoplastic stroma
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 10, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8690
- Pages: 566-572
Abstract
Introduction
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IH-CCA) is a malignant epithelial tumor arising from hepatic parenchyma in the biliary tracts. It is the second most prevalent primary hepatic tumor worldwide with a progressive increase in incidence and mortality rates in recent years (1–3). At present, complete surgical resection is the only possible curative therapy for patients with IH-CCA. For unresectable IH-CCA, palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine is the standard first-line treatment. However, the response to such therapy remains limited (4). Since no effective drug is available for the treatment of refractory CCA (5,6), novel therapeutic drugs require urgent development.
A possible explanation for the multi-drug resistance observed in patients with IH-CCA is the ‘desmoid-like’ pattern of IH-CCA in the liver parenchyma. IH-CCA is well known for its desmoplastic and hypoplastic stroma, which are both predictive factors for poor drug penetration and response (7). Recently, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), was revealed to have a major role in altering the tumor microenvironment by increasing the production of extracellular matrix proteins, cytokines and growth factors that interact with CCA, thereby enhancing the aggressive behavior and therapeutic resistance of the tumor (8).
Several CAF-associated liver parenchyma diseases have been linked to the risk of developing CCA. For example, primary sclerosing cholangitis, a chronic inflammatory disease of the bile duct characterized by fibrosis in the biliary tract, has been identified as a predisposing factor for IH-CCA. Immunohistochemical staining has revealed the enhanced expression of α-SMA in the biliary stroma of these patients (7). The presence of desmoplasia is also indicative of the existence of a close association between mammographic density and breast cancer (9).
Nab-paclitaxel, also known as nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, is designed to deliver the paclitaxel compound without the complications induced by chemical solvents. A follow-up study reported stroma disrupting effects of nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer (10), which were confirmed later in a phase III MPACT study that suggested that nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine is more effective than gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer (11). However, the role of nab-paclitaxel in treating IH-CCA has not been investigated despite the fact that IH-CCA is also a desmoplastic tumor.
The present study we initially investigated the inhibitory effects of paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel in different CCA cell lines. Subsequently, a toxin-induced IH-CCA rat model established in our laboratory was used to evaluate the in vivo antitumor activity of the standard gemcitabine/oxaliplatin, paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel treatments. Compared with paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel demonstrated increased effectiveness in reducing in vivo tumor formation by disrupting the desmoplastic stroma.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The CCA KKU-M213 and KKU-100 cell lines were obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank (JCRB; Osaka, Japan). KKU-213 and KKU-100 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK), 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 100 µg/ml penicillin and 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.
Cell viability measurements
Cell viability was determined using an MTT cell viability assay kit (Trevigen, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA), according to manufacturer's protocols. The cells were seeded at a density of 2,000 cells/100 µl culture medium/well in 96-well microplates. At 24 h after seeding, the cells were treated with 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160 or 320 nM paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or DMEM medium containing DMSO and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; GE Healthcare Life Sciences), 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 100 µg/ml penicillin and 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 72 h in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C. Subsequently, the cells were incubated in the medium containing MTT for 4 h and were lysed with DMSO, prior to the optical density of the resulting supernatant being measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Spectral Max 250; Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Apoptotic cell death
Apoptosis was measured using a FITC Annexin V apoptosis detection kit (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), according to manufacturer's instructions. After a 24-h incubation, cells were treated with DMSO or nab-paclitaxel at 0, 5, 10 or 20 nM for 48 h in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C. Cells were collected and stained with an Annexin V kit (cat no. 51-65874X; BD Biosciences) and a propidium iodide kit (cat no. 51-66211E; BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's protocol for 15 min at 25°C in the dark and then analyzed using a FACSCalibur machine. The data were analyzed using CellQuest software (version 2.0; BD Biosciences). Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Rat orthotopic tumor graft
A total of 20 adult 8-week old male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (310±14 g; BioLASCO Taiwan Co, Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan) were used for the experiments. Animals were divided equally (n=5) into the following four groups: Control (Group 1), gemcitabine/oxaliplatin treatment (Group 2), paclitaxel treatment (Group 3) and nab-paclitaxel treatment (Group 4). The rats were housed in an animal facility room maintained in a 12/12 h light:dark cycle and at an ambient temperature of 22°C. The animals had ad libitum access to food and water. The rats were administered with 300 mg/l thioacetamide (TAA) daily via drinking water for up to 20 weeks. All drug treatments administered to these animals were initiated in the 21st week. The gemcitabine/oxaliplatin group received intraperitoneal injections of gemcitabine (50 mg/kg) and oxaliplatin (2 mg/kg) once every 2 weeks over a 4-week period. Simultaneously, the paclitaxel group received an intravenous infusion of paclitaxel (20 mg/kg) for 5 consecutive days. Additionally, the nab-paclitaxel group received an intravenous slow infusion of nab-paclitaxel (7.5 mg/kg) for 5 consecutive days. The control group received intraperitoneal injections of phosphate buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) (Fig. 1).
Evaluation of treatment efficacy in rats by positron emission tomography
In order to evaluate the changes in glycolysis in live animals with liver tumors, 2-deoxy-2-[F-18] fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) studies were performed at the Molecular Imaging Center of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Taoyuan, Taiwan). In brief, 20 rats were treated with TAA, prior to being subjected to serial PET scanning at 21, 23 and 25 weeks using the Inveon™ system (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). Animals were assigned equally to the control and treatment groups based on their baseline PET results, to ensure similar PET-positive rates in the two groups. The details of radioligand preparation, scanning protocols and determination of optimal scanning time have been previously described by our group (12,13). In brief, animals were fasted overnight prior to scanning and, 90 min after 18F-FDG intravenous injection, 30-min static scans were obtained for all the animals. All imaging studies on animals were performed at 37°C under anesthesia (2% isoflurane vaporized in 100% oxygen)-controlled imaging bed (Minerve System, Esternay, France). PET images were reconstructed using the 2-dimensional ordered subset expectation-maximization method (4 iterations and 16 subsets) without attenuation and scatter corrections. All imaging data were processed by the PMOD image analysis workstation (PMOD Technologies Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland). The largest liver tumor for each animal was identified by careful investigation of the three tumor image sets obtained for each rat. The uptake of 18F-FDG by the normal and tumor liver tissues was quantified by calculating the standardized uptake value (SUV). The SUVs were calculated according to the recommendations of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (14). Regions of interest (ROIs) in the tumors were determined by obtaining transverse images of the selected tumors and measuring the largest diameter. The normal liver ROIs were also determined similarly by measuring the diameter of transverse images obtained from the normal liver tissues. The mean SUV (SUVmean) of the normal and tumor liver tissues was calculated, and the respective tumor:liver (T/L) radioactivity ratio were compared for the two tissue types.
Immunofluorescence analysis for effects of drug treatment on rat tumor stroma
The study samples were obtained from rats treated with paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel for 4 weeks. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slides (4-µm thickness) were prepared using a standard protocol. The slides were deparaffinized in 4 5-min incubations in 100% xylene, then dehydrated in a graded alcohol serious of 100% for 5 min ×2, 95% for 5 min, 90% for 5 min, 70% for 5 min and distilled H2O for 5 min ×3 at 25°C. Antigen retrieval took place using pH 6.0 citric buffer at 121°C for 3 min, washed 3 times in distilled water for 5 min, then twice in Tris-buffered saline for 5 min. Specimens were mounted using H33258 mounting solution and kept at 4°C until use. The slides were incubated with a primary antibody against α-SMA (dilution, 1:200; cat. no. ab5694; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), a marker for activated fibroblasts, at 4°C overnight. The slides were washed with PBS with tween 20 following incubation with the primary antibody and were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with a goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 (IgG H+L) secondary antibody (dilution, 1:200; cat. no. A11036; Molecular Probes; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33258 [mounted cover slide with 0.1 µg/ml H33258 mounting solution consisting of 0.1 µg/ml H33258 (cat. no. H21491; Molecular Probes; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in glycerol (cat no. G7757; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at 25°C and slides were then kept at 4°C until images were captured following three days]. Images were captured using the Leica TCS SP8X confocal system equipped with a LEICA DM6000 CS Microscope (objective lens 63×, subjective lens 10×, digital zoom 1×; final magnification, ×630) (Leica Microsystems, Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, USA).
Statistical analysis
The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. SPSS software for Windows (Version 21.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The SUV ratio between experimental and control animals was calculated using nonlinear regression analysis. Differences between the data from experimental and control animals were calculated and verified using the Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel induced similar in vitro anti-proliferative effects
Human CCA KKU-100 and KKU-213 cell lines were treated with varying doses of paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel. The MTT test indicated that the two compounds induced similar cytotoxicity in the different cell lines (paclitaxel IC50 values, 17.09 nM for KKU-100 and 3.17 nM for KKU-213; nab-paclitaxel IC50 values, 25.32 nM for KKU-100 and 4.15 nM for KKU-213; Fig. 2A). In order to confirm the apoptotic effect of nab-paclitaxel in CCA cells, the presence of apoptosis and the percentage of apoptotic cells were determined using a FITC Annexin V apoptosis detection kit. Nab-paclitaxel treatment increased the percentage of apoptotic cells within 48 h in a concentration-dependent manner; 54.32 and 60.78% of apoptotic KKU-100 and KKU-213 cells were observed following treatment with 20 nM nab-paclitaxel (Fig. 2B).
Nab-paclitaxel induced enhanced antitumor effects compared with paclitaxel in a rat model of TAA-induced IH-CCA
Transverse, sagittal and coronal views of TAA-induced CCA tumors in control and drug-treated animals were evaluated by 18F-FDG-PET. Each group exhibited >1 FDG-avid tumor in the liver after 20 weeks of TAA treatment, as demonstrated in the coronal view of the animal PET-CT (Fig. 3A). In the present study, nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel or gemcitabine/oxaliplatin were administered to rats undergoing TAA treatment. The change in the T/L ratio of the SUV for each group is presented in Fig. 3B. The T/L ratio of the SUV exhibited steady elevation from the initial to the final scans in the control group (7.8–20.6% elevation from 2 to 4 weeks post-experiment). The T/L ratio of the SUV in the paclitaxel treatment group exhibited a mild increase until the final scans (5.6 and 5.1% at 2 and 4 weeks post-experiment, respectively). By contrast, in the nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine/oxaliplatin treatment groups, the T/L ratio of the SUV exhibited a decrease until the final scans (nab-paclitaxel, −28.5 and −19.1%, respectively; gemcitabine/oxaliplatin, −11.3 and −5.4%, respectively, at 2 and 4 weeks post-experiment). The results of the present study indicated that treatment with nab-paclitaxel induced a significant decrease in the T/L ratio of the SUV, compared with the values reported for the control group (P<0.05, control vs. group 3). Furthermore, nab-paclitaxel treatment resulted in significant suppression of in vivo tumor viability in the rat CCA model.
Nab-paclitaxel disrupts cancer-associated fibroblasts in rat IH-CCA
The immunofluorescence results for the resected IH-CCA of the rats are presented in Fig. 4. The red staining for α-SMA was stronger and observed over the entire paclitaxel-treated tumor, compared with the weak, dispersed staining of the nab-paclitaxel-treated tumor (Fig. 4A). The confocal images in Fig. 4B indicated the anatomical association among the CAFs (with α-SMA staining), vessels and IH-CCA, demonstrating that nab-paclitaxel broke the CAFs surrounding the IH-CCA.
Discussion
The results of the present study demonstrated that nab-paclitaxel may inhibit IH-CCA by disrupting the stromal CAFs. In an attempt to study this further, the TAA-induced IH-CCA rat model was selected for in vivo study. Multifocal bile ductal proliferation with marked atypia (15) was observed in the liver of the rats after 9 weeks of TAA administration, contrary to the observations made in a mouse xenograft model (15). Furthermore, 50% of the rats developed IH-CCA with intense stromal desmoplasia from the 16th week (15). From the 16–22th weeks, the incidence of invasive CCAs increased progressively in 100% of the rats (Fig. 1) (15). Therefore, this model served as a useful pre-clinical platform for developing therapeutic strategies for human CCA, including nab-paclitaxel (12,13).
In the present study, paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel induced similar anti-proliferative effects via induction of apoptosis in two human CCA cell lines (Fig. 2). However, only nab-paclitaxel induces in vivo antitumor effects in the TAA-induced rat model, demonstrated by a significant decrease in the T/L ratio of the SUV (Fig. 3). Paclitaxel did not induce any in vivo antitumor effects in the TAA-induced rat model. Furthermore, in the present study, the treatment effects induced by CAF on desmoplastic stroma were compared between the paclitaxel and the nab-paclitaxel groups. The disrupting effects on the stroma were found to be limited to the nab-paclitaxel group (Fig. 4). Therefore, the stromal disrupting effect may partially explain the effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel against IH-CCA. The current clinical observations support the aforementioned result, thereby providing an explanation for the ineffective use of paclitaxel in the treatment of biliary tract cancer since 1996 (16). However, Muc1 and survivin have been suggested to be associated with the poor prognosis of IH-CCA (17). Furthermore, whether or not these two proteins changed following nab-paclitaxel treatment was examined. The immunohistochemistry stains of Muc1 and survivin exhibited no change prior to and following all treatments (data not shown), suggesting that nab-paclitaxel did not target these two proteins.
There are certain limitations to the present study. To begin with, although the present study investigates an orthotopic CCA with desmoplastic stroma originating from the rat liver, such induced CCA may not completely simulate the conditions observed in human CCA. However, this model overcomes the drawbacks of a xenograft CCA model that lacks surrounding CAFs. Secondly, the small number of rats used in the four different treatment groups may lower the statistical power of the present study. For example, the animal PET revealed the significant inhibitory effect of nab-paclitaxel compared with that of paclitaxel, but the immunofluorescence study was unable to statistically confirm these observations.
In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that nab-paclitaxel is effective against IH-CCA via disruption of the surrounding CAFs. Since there are few treatment options available for IH-CCA, this result may provide useful information in designing clinical trials, as well as for the identification of biomarker in the future.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Miss Meng-Lun Lu (Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Tapei, Taiwan) for her technology support.
Funding
The work was supported by Taiwan Cancer Clinic Foundation and the Szu-Yuan Research Foundation of International Medicine. Additional support was provided by the Taipei Veterans General Hospital (grant nos. V105C-057 and V104E16-003-MY3-2 to Ming-Huang Chen), the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (grant nos. NMRPG5D6032, CMRPG3E1611, CMRPG3E1612, CRRPG3F0031 and NMRPG3F6021 to Chun-Nan Yeh), and the Ministry of Science and Technology (grant nos. MOST104-2314-B-075-064-MY2 to Ming-Huang Chen, MOST103-2314-B-182A-081-MY2 and MOST105-2314-B-182A-041-MY2 to Chun-Nan Yeh).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
PMC analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. CTC, RCW, KCC, CYL and MHaC contributed to study design and data collection. YHC, TSY helped with the animal experiments. MHuC helped cell experiments. CNY guided the animal model and associated tissue IHC staining analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Taoyuan, Taiwan).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Reference
Ustundag Y and Bayraktar Y: Cholangiocarcinoma: A compact review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 14:6458–6466. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR and Taylor-Robinson SD: Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 366:1303–1314. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Patel T: Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology. 33:1353–1357. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, et al: Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 362:1273–1281. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hezel AF, Deshpande V and Zhu AX: Genetics of biliary tract cancers and emerging targeted therapies. J Clin Oncol. 28:3531–3540. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhu AX and Hezel AF: Development of molecularly targeted therapies in biliary tract cancers: Reassessing the challenges and opportunities. Hepatology. 53:695–704. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sirica AE and Gores GJ: Desmoplastic stroma and cholangiocarcinoma: Clinical implications and therapeutic targeting. Hepatology. 59:2397–2402. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sirica AE: The role of cancer-associated myofibroblasts in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 9:44–54. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
DeClerck YA: Desmoplasia: A response or a niche? Cancer Discov. 2:772–724. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Alvarez R, Musteanu M, Garcia-Garcia E, Lopez-Casas PP, Megias D, Guerra C, Muñoz M, Quijano Y, Cubillo A, Rodriguez-Pascual J, et al: Stromal disrupting effects of nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 109:926–933. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, Seay T, Tjulandin SA, Ma WW, Saleh MN, et al: Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 369:1691–1703. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen MH, Lin KJ, Yang WL, Kao YW, Chen TW, Chao SC, Chang PM, Liu CY, Tzeng CH, Chao Y, et al: Gene expression-based chemical genomics identifies heat-shock protein 90 inhibitors as potential therapeutic drugs in cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer. 119:293–303. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen MH, Chiang KC, Cheng CT, Huang SC, Chen YY, Chen TW, Yeh TS, Jan YY, Wang HM, Weng JJ, et al: Antitumor activity of the combination of an HSP90 inhibitor and a PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor against cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 5:2372–2389. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, Pruim J and Price P: Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: Review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) PET study group. Eur J Cancer. 35:1773–1782. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yeh CN, Maitra A, Lee KF, Jan YY and Chen MF: Thioacetamide-induced intestinal-type cholangiocarcinoma in rat: An animal model recapitulating the multi-stage progression of human cholangiocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 25:631–636. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jones DV Jr, Lozano R, Hoque A, Markowitz A and Patt YZ: Phase II study of paclitaxel therapy for unresectable biliary tree carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 14:2306–2310. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sirica AE, Dumur CI, Campbell DJ, Almenara JA, Ogunwobi OO and Dewitt JL: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression: Prognostic factors and basic mechanisms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 7 11 Suppl:S68–S78. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |