Combined expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 and β-catenin is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor survival in breast cancer patients following cyclophosphamide treatment
- Authors:
- Published online on: September 15, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4273
- Pages: 3163-3173
Abstract
Introduction
Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in women. Breast cancer is a group of heterogeneous diseases with various responses to chemotherapy (1). Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are the tumor-initiating cells that are believed to be responsible for breast cancer recurrence, metastasis, and drug resistance (2,3). CSCs express specific biomarkers such as CD44, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1), and β-catenin (4–6). Expression of these CSC markers has prognostic values for the recurrence, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance in various tumors such as lung, hepatocellular, and breast cancer (7–9).
ALDH1, a member of a family of NAD(P)+-dependent enzymes that detoxify a wide variety of aldehydes, have been found to be associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer (10). ALDH1A1 has been extensively studied, and is found to be associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients (11,12). ALDH1A1 plays an important role in the proliferation of breast CSCs and resistance to chemotherapy, particularly cyclophosphamide (13,14). However, the signaling pathways that regulate the expression of ALDH1A1 in breast cancer remain unclear.
Recently, Condello et al have reported that β-catenin upregulates the expression of ALDH1A1, and β-catenin-regulated ALDH1A1 contributes to the maintenance of ovarian cancer spheroids (15). β-catenin is located in the intracellular side of the cytoplasmic membrane, and plays an important role in cell-to-cell adhesion by linking the cytoskeleton and cadherin (16). It is well known that β-catenin is involved in the Wnt signaling pathway that plays an active role in CSCs and carcinogenesis of various tumors such as breast cancer (17,18) and ovarian cancer (19). Activation of Wnt signaling leads to translocation of β-catenin from the membrane to the cytoplasm and nucleus, where it promotes transcription of many genes that are associated with cancer growth, invasion, progression, and invasion (20). However, it remains unclear whether β-catenin regulates the expression of ALDH1A1 in breast cancer patients.
In the present study, we investigated the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin in 276 breast cancer patients. We studied the association between the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin in breast cancer patients, and analyzed the correlation of their combined expression with clinicopathological features, chemotherapeutic responses, and prognosis of breast cancer patients.
Materials and methods
Patients and tissue samples
The Medical Ethics Committee of China Medical University approved this study. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the Medical Ethics Committee waived the need of written informed consents by the patients.
This study included human breast tissues from 276 female patients with breast cancer, who underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between 2004 and 2008. Breast cancer was diagnosed based on pathological staining. The patient age, menopausal status, tumor type, tumor size, and lymph node metastasis were retrospectively obtained from medical records. Of the 276 breast cancer patients, 220 had invasive ductal carcinoma, 30 had invasive lobular carcinoma, and 26 had other types of tumors including mucinous, medullary, and cribriform carcinoma. The histological grade of the cancer was determined according to the World Health Organization grading system. The stage of the cancer was evaluated according to the TNM staging system.
No patients underwent radiation therapy and chemotherapy before surgery. After surgery, 165 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and the remaining 11 patients did not receive chemotherapy. All chemotherapy regimens contained cyclophosphamide, including CMF (cyclophosphamide + methotrexate + fluorouracil, n=65), AC (adriamycin + cyclophosphamide, n=32), CEF (cyclophosphamide + epimbicin + fluorouracil, n=32), CE (cyclophosphamide + epimbicin, n=20), and CAF (cyclophosphamide + adriamycin + fluorouracil, n=18).
Tissue microarray (TMA)
Paraffinized donor blocks were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and representative breast cancer samples were selected by reviewing the hematoxylin and eosin-stained blocks. Tissue cores with a diameter of 1.5 mm were extracted from each donor block, and precisely arrayed into a new paraffin recipient block with a maximum of 200 cores, using the Organization Microarrayer (Pathology Devices, USA).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described (21). Briefly, sections (4-µm thick) were obtained from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded TMA recipient blocks, and mounted on poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides. Sections were deparaffinized with xylene, rehydrated in a graded alcohol series, and heated in a microwave oven to retrieve antigen. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies against ALDH1A1 (mouse anti-human monoclonal antibodies, 1:100 dilution; Abcam, UK) and β-catenin (mouse anti-human monoclonal antibodies, 1:200 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology, USA) overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with biotinylated secondary antibodies for 30 min at 37°C. Sections were then incubated with streptavidin horseradish peroxidase for additional 30 min (LSAB kit; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), and stained with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. Negative control sections were treated in the same conditions, except no primary antibodies.
Evaluation of immunohistochemistry
The immunostaining was examined under a light microscope, and was evaluated by two pathologists blinded to the experimental conditions. The immunoreactivity intensity was scored as follows: 0 for negative staining, 1 for weak positive staining, 2 for moderate positive staining, and 3 for strong positive staining. The percentage of stained cells was scored 0–100%. The final immunoreactive score was calculated by multiplying the intensity score with the score for the percentage of positively stained cells, ranging from 0 to 300%. The scores were assigned by using 5% increments (0, 5, 10, and 300%) as previously reported (22,23). The final immunoreactive scores were used to determine the cut-off value for discriminating tumors with the high expression of ALDH1A1 or β-catenin from those with low expression, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. To discriminate tumors with the cytoplasmic expression of β-catenin from tumor with the membrane expression of β-catenin, the percentage of β-catenin membrane expression for each sample was used to determine the cut-off value, using ROC curves. The percentage of β-catenin membrane expression was calculated as follows: β-catenin membrane expression % = The number of cells with membrane expression/(the number of cells with membrane expression + the number of cells with cytoplasmic expression) x 100%. The sensitivity and specificity for the survival status (alive or dead) of breast cancer patients was plotted to generate ROC curves.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For data with normal distribution, Student's t-test was used to compare the difference in the means. For data with unequal variance, Wilcoxon rank sum tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the difference. The association between the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin and clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients was evaluated using the Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test. The Pearson's rank correlation analysis was applied to assess the association between the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin. The Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to demonstrate the survival difference, and the survival probabilities were assessed by a log-rank test. To assess the association of potential confounding variables with the prognosis, overall survival (OS), or disease-free survival (DFS), univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used. The OS was defined as the time between the day of diagnosis and the disease-related death, or last known follow-up. The DFS was calculated as the time between the day of diagnosis and the occurrence of local recurrence or distant metastasis. Probability values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Clinicopathological characteristics
Table I summarizes clinicopathological characteristics of 276 breast cancer patients. The average age of breast cancer patients was 50.1±7.9 years (range, 31–82 years). Of the 276 patients, the age, menopausal status, tumor size, tumor type, histological grade, TNM stage, and lymph node metastasis were recorded in 276, 266, 229, 276, 267, 197, and 266 patients, respectively. The majority of these patients had a tumor with invasive ductal carcinoma (79.7%), and <2 cm in size (62.0%). Of the 267 patients with known histological grade, 136 (50.9%) patients had grade I breast cancer, and 131 (49.1%) patients had grade II–II breast cancer. The stage of the cancer was evaluated in 197 patients, including 46 patients with stage I breast cancer, 122 patients with stage II breast cancer, and 29 patients with stage III breast cancer. Lymph node metastasis occurred in 91 (34.2%) of 266 patients.
Follow-up information was available for 168 breast cancer patients. During the follow-up period of 9–118 months, relapses occurred in 62 cases and cancer-associated deaths were found in 48 cases. The 5-years survival rate was 84.5%. The mean OS and DFS were 98.5 and 91.5 months, respectively.
Expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin
We studied the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin in 276 samples from breast cancer patients and 80 control samples from patients with benign hyperplasia, using immunohistochemistry (Fig. 1). ALDH1A1-immunopositive staining was mainly observed in the cytoplasm in both breast cancer and control samples. ALDH1A1-immunopositive staining was observed in 149 (54%) of 276 breast cancer samples and 25 (31.3%) of 80 control samples. ALDH1A1 immunoreactivity occurred significantly more frequently in breast cancer samples than in control samples (P<0.001). In contrast, β-catenin immunoreactivity was observed in the membrane and cytoplasm in both breast cancer samples and control samples. β-catenin immunoreactivity was observed in 246 (89.1%) of 276 breast cancer samples and 72 (90.0%) of 80 control samples. There was no significant difference of β-catenin-immunopositive staining between breast cancer samples and control samples (P= 0.824).
Selection of the cut-off value for the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin
ROC curve analysis was performed to determine an optimal cut-off score for the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin in breast cancer samples. Based on the survival status, a cut-off score of 165 and 170% were selected for the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin, respectively (Fig. 2A and B). Tumors with immunohistological scores ≥165 and <165% were defined as tumors with 'high' [ALDH1A1(high)] and 'low' [ALDH1A1(low)] expression of ALDH1A1, respectively. Tumors with immunohistological scores ≥170 and <170% were defined as tumors with 'high' [β-catenin(high)] and 'low' [β-catenin(low)] expression of β-catenin, respectively. In total 149 tumors (54.0%) exhibited ALDH1A1(high) expression, and 127 (46.0%) tumors showed ALDH1A1(low) expression; 196 (71.0%) tumors exhibited β-catenin(high) expression, and 80 (29.0%) tumors showed β-catenin(low) expression.
We further performed ROC analysis to determine an optimal cut-off score for discriminating the membrane expression from the cytoplasmic expression of β-catenin in breast cancer with β-catenin(high) expression. Based on the survival status, a cut-off score of 70% was selected (Fig. 2C). Tumors with the membrane expression ≥70 and <70% were defined as tumors with β-catenin(m), and β-catenin (c) expression, respectively. Of the 196 β-catenin(high) breast cancers, 109 (55.6%) had β-catenin(m) expression, and 87 (44.4%) had β-catenin(c) expression.
Association between the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin
Pearson's rank correlation analysis was used to analyze the association between the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin in breast cancer. There was no significant correlation between the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin in the breast cancer patients (n=276). We then examined the subcellular expression levels of β-catenin in breast cancer with β-catenin(high) expression. In breast cancer with ALDH1A1(low) expression, β-catenin(m) expression was observed in 58 (65.2%) of 89 cases, and β-catenin(c) expression was found in 31 (34.8%) of 89 cases. In breast cancer with ALDH1A1(high) expression, β-catenin(m) expression was observed in 51 (47.7%) of 107 cases, and β-catenin(c) expression was found in 56 (52.3%) of 107 cases. β-catenin(c) expression occurred significantly more frequently in ALDH1A1(high) breast cancer than in ALDH1A1(low) breast cancer (Chi-square test, P= 0.014; Fig. 3A). Furthermore, the expression level of ALDH1A was significantly higher in β-catenin(c) breast cancer than in β-catenin(m) breast cancer (P=0.020, Fig. 3B).
Association of the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin with clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients
Table II summarizes the association between the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin and the clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients. The age, menopausal status, tumor type, tumor size, histological grade, and TNM stage were not significantly associated with the expression of ALDH1A1. ALDH1A1(high) expression was associated with lymph node metastasis (P=0.029). The age, menopausal status, tumor size, tumor type, and TNM stage were not significantly associated with the subcellular expression of β-catenin. β-catenin(c) expression was associated with grade II–III tumors (P=0.014) and lymph node metastasis (P=0.002).
Table IIAssociation of β-catenin localization and ALDH1A1 expression with clinicopathological features of breast cancer. |
Table III summarizes the association of combined expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin with lymph node metastasis. Compared with tumors with ALDH1A1(low) and β-catenin(m) expression and ALDH1A1(low) and β-catenin(c) expression, tumors with ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression was associated with lymph node metastasis (P<0.05, Table III). Compared with tumors with ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(m) expression, tumors with ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression exhibited a tendency toward more lymph node metastasis (P=0.076, Table III).
Table IIIAssociation of the combination of β-catenin location and ALDH1A1 with lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. |
We then examined the effect of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin expression on the number of metastatic lymph nodes in breast cancer. The number of metastatic lymph nodes was significantly higher in patients with ALDH1A1(high) expression compared with patients with ALDH1A1(low) expression (P=0.045, Fig. 4A). The number of metastatic lymph nodes was significantly higher in patients with β-catenin(c) expression compared with patients with β-catenin(m) expression (P=0.001, Fig. 4B). Patients with ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression had significantly more metastatic lymph nodes compares with tumors with other combined expression of ALDH1A and β-catenin (P<0.001, Fig. 4C).
Association of the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin with the survival of breast cancer patients
The Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to evaluate the association of the expression level of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin with the OS or DFS in breast cancer patients. ALDH1A1(high) expression was associated with significantly shorter OS (P=0.014, Fig. 5A). Although ALDH1A1(high) expression was associated with a tendency toward shorter DFS in breast cancer patients, no significant difference was found (P=0.074, Fig. 5B). In addition, β-catenin(c) expression was associated with significantly shorter OS (P=0.015, Fig. 5C) and DFS (P=0.023, Fig. 5D). We further examined the association of the combined expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin with the OS or DFS in breast cancer patients. Compared with ALDH1A1(low) and β-catenin(m) expression, ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression was associated with shorter OS and DFS in breast cancer patients (P<0.05, Fig. 5E and F).
We examined the association of the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin with the therapeutic response in breast cancer patients who received cyclophosphamide treatment. ALDH1A1 and β-catenin alone and their combined expression were not significantly associated with the OS and DFS in breast cancer patients with non-cyclophosphamide therapy (Fig. 6A, B, E, F, I and J). ALDH1A1(high) expression was associated with shorter OS (P=0.004) and DFS (P=0.002) in patients with cyclophosphamide treatment (Fig. 6C and D). β-catenin(c) expression was associated with shorter OS (P=0.021) and DFS (P=0.003) in patients with cyclophosphamide treatment (Fig. 6G and H). Combined ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression was associated with shorter OS (P=0.020) and DFS (P=0.012) in patients with cyclophosphamide treatment compared with other combined expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin (Fig. 6K and L).
The univariate analysis identified that the menopausal status, tumor size, histological stage, TNM stage, and lymph node metastasis were significantly associated with the OS and DFS in breast cancer patients (Table IV). In addition, ALDH1A1(high) expression was significantly associated with shorter OS of breast cancer patients. β-catenin(c) expression was significantly associated with shorter OS and DFS of breast cancer patients (Table IV). Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis found that histological grade was an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS in breast cancer patients (P<0.05, Table V). Lymph node metastasis and histological grade were independent prognostic factors for shorter DFS in breast cancer patients (P<0.05, Table V).
Table IVUnivariate Cox regression analysis of the association between clinicopathological data and OS and DFS in breast cancer patients. |
Table VMultivariate Cox regression analysis of the association between clinicopathological data and OS and DFS in breast cancer patients. |
Discussion
In this study, we performed tissue microarray-based immunohistochemistry to examine the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin in 276 breast cancer patients. We found that ALDH1A1 overexpression was associated with lymph node metastasis and shorter OS in breast cancer patients. In addition, we found that the β-catenin(c) expression was associated with lymph node metastasis and shorter OS and DFS in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, combined expression of ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) was associated with shorter OS and DFS in breast cancer patients, especially in patients with cyclophosphamide treatment. Our findings suggest that translocation of β-catenin from the membrane to the cytoplasm may subsequently promote the expression of ALDH1A1 in breast cancer, and β-catenin-regulated ALDH1A1 may contribute to poor outcome of breast cancer patients.
In the present study, we examined the association of ALDH1A1 expression with clinical characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer patients. We found that ALDH1A1(high) expression was associated with poor clinical outcome of breast cancer patients in agreement with previous studies showing that ALDH1A1 is associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients (11,12). In addition, we found that ALDH1A1(high) expression was associated with lymph node metastasis, and patients with ALDH1A1(high) expression had more metastatic lymph nodes than those with ALDH1A1(low) expression. Consistent with our results, Khoury et al found that ALDH1A1 expression correlated with lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients (24). Several studies have demonstrated that ALDH1 expression is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor survival in various tumors such as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, and rectal cancer (25–27). Our findings that ALDH1A1(high) was associated with lymph node metastasis and poor clinical outcome suggests that ALDH1A1 expression may define breast cancer with strong metastatic potential and be used for predicting disease outcome. Furthermore, ALDH1A1 is known to inactivate cyclophosphamide, and thus contribute to resistance to cyclophosphamide and poor clinical outcome of breast cancer patient (14,24). Moreover, we found that ALDH1A1(high) expression was associated with shorter OS and DFS in patients with cyclophosphamide treatment, but not in those with non-cyclophosphamide treatment. Therefore, ALDH1A1 may be used as a biomarker to predict poor clinical outcome after cyclophosphamide treatment.
The Wnt signaling pathway is known to be involved in the development of breast cancer (28). During Wnt signaling activation, β-catenin is translocated from the membrane to the cytoplasm and the nucleus, where it promotes transcription of multiple protumorigenic genes via interaction with LEF/TCF transcription factors (20). The cytoplasmic accumulation of β-catenin has been found to be associated with poor clinical outcome of breast cancer patients (20,29–32). In the present study, we found that the cytoplasmic expression of β-catenin was associated with grade II–II tumors, lymph node metastasis, and shorter OS and DFS in breast cancer patients. Our study supports that the cytoplasmic expression of β-catenin can be used as a prognostic marker for poor outcome of breast cancer patients. Although the mechanisms by which β-catenin is translocated from the membrane to the cytoplasm in breast cancer remain largely unclear, Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), a scaffolding protein that regulate the cellular level of β-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway (33), may be involved. It has been reported that the low expression of APC is associated with overexpression of β-catenin in the cytoplasm of breast cancer cells (34). In breast cancer cell lines, APC truncation leads to an increase in the cytoplasmic expression of β-catenin (35).
Although ALDH1A1 is known to be a CSC marker that is associated with poor prognosis of many tumors including breast cancer (10–12), little is known about the regulation of ALDH1A1 expression. Recently, it has been reported that ALDH1A1 is a direct target of β-catenin in ovarian cancer spheroids (15). In the present study, we found that β-catenin(c) expression occurred more frequently in ALDH1A1(high) breast cancer, and the expression level of ALDH1A was higher in β-catenin(c) breast cancer, suggesting that β-catenin may regulate the expression of ALDH1A1 in breast cancer. This idea is supported by the finding that the ALDH activity was reduced by the inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by a TCF4-dominant negative construct in human breast cancer cells (36). Thus, β-catenin may regulate the expression of ALDH1A1 via interaction with the TCF4 transcription factor in breast cancer. In addition, we found that tumors with ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression were associated with lymph node metastasis and poor clinical outcome in breast cancer patients. Consistent with our findings, Xu et al reported that in patients with colorectal carcinoma, β-catenin was preferentially expressed in tumors with high expression of ALDH1A1, and were associated with high potential of metastasis and poor outcome (37). Furthermore, we found that ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression was associated with shorter OS and DFS in patients with cyclophosphamide treatment, suggesting that tumors with ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression exhibited resistance to cyclophosphamide treatment. ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression may be used for predicting poor outcome of breast cancer patients.
In summary, we investigated the expression of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin in breast cancer patients, and analyzed the association of their expression alone and in combination with the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer patients. We found that ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression was associated with lymph node metastasis and worse clinical outcome in breast cancer patients, especially those receiving cyclophosphamide treatment. Combined expression of ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) was associated with lymph node metastasis, poor outcome, and resistance to cyclophosphamide treatment. Our study suggests that β-catenin may regulate ALDH1A1 expression in a subtype of breast cancer with ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression. ALDH1A1(high) and β-catenin(c) expression may be used as a biomarker for predicting poor prognosis in breast cancer following cyclophosphamide treatment.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of the People's Republic of China (no. 81373427), Program for Liaoning Innovative Research Team in University, LNIRT (LT2014016) and the Shenyang Science and Technology Plan Project (F14-232-6-05).
References
Stebbing J and Ellis P: An overview of drug development for metastatic breast cancer. Br J Nurs. 21(Suppl 4): S18–S22. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li X, Lewis MT, Huang J, Gutierrez C, Osborne CK, Wu MF, Hilsenbeck SG, Pavlick A, Zhang X, Chamness GC, et al: Intrinsic resistance of tumorigenic breast cancer cells to chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 100:672–679. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sampieri K and Fodde R: Cancer stem cells and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 22:187–193. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Neumeister V, Agarwal S, Bordeaux J, Camp RL and Rimm DL: In situ identification of putative cancer stem cells by multiplexing ALDH1, CD44, and cytokeratin identifies breast cancer patients with poor prognosis. Am J Pathol. 176:2131–2138. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jiang F, Qiu Q, Khanna A, Todd NW, Deepak J, Xing L, Wang H, Liu Z, Su Y, Stass SA, et al: Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 is a tumor stem cell-associated marker in lung cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 7:330–338. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Marhaba R, Klingbeil P, Nuebel T, Nazarenko I, Buechler MW and Zoeller M: CD44 and EpCAM: Cancer-initiating cell markers. Curr Mol Med. 8:784–804. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nomura M, Fukuda T, Fujii K, Kawamura T, Tojo H, Kihara M, Bando Y, Gazdar AF, Tsuboi M, Oshiro H, et al: Preferential expression of potential markers for cancer stem cells in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung. An FFPE proteomic study. J Clin Bioinforma. 1:232011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Feng D, Wang N, Hu J and Li W: Surface markers of hepatocellular cancer stem cells and their clinical potential. Neoplasma. 61:505–513. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Croker AK, Goodale D, Chu J, Postenka C, Hedley BD, Hess DA and Allan AL: High aldehyde dehydrogenase and expression of cancer stem cell markers selects for breast cancer cells with enhanced malignant and metastatic ability. J Cell Mol Med. 13:2236–2252. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, Jacquemier J, Viens P, Kleer CG, Liu S, et al: ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 1:555–567. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu Y, Lv DL, Duan JJ, Xu SL, Zhang JF, Yang XJ, Zhang X, Cui YH, Bian XW and Yu SC: ALDH1A1 expression correlates with clinicopathologic features and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 14:4442014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu S, Xue W, Huang X, Yu X, Luo M, Huang Y, Liu Y, Bi Z, Qiu X and Bai S: Distinct prognostic values of ALDH1 isoenzymes in breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 36:2421–2426. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pandrangi SL, Chikati R, Chauhan PS, Kumar CS, Banarji A and Saxena S: Effects of ellipticine on ALDH1A1-expressing breast cancer stem cells - an in vitro and in silico study. Tumour Biol. 35:723–737. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sládek NE, Kollander R, Sreerama L and Kiang DT: Cellular levels of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1) as predictors of therapeutic responses to cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy of breast cancer: A retrospective study. Rational individualization of oxazaphosphorine-based cancer chemotherapeutic regimens. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 49:309–321. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Condello S, Morgan CA, Nagdas S, Cao L, Turek J, Hurley TD and Matei D: β-catenin-regulated ALDH1A1 is a target in ovarian cancer spheroids. Oncogene. 34:2297–2308. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jiang W and Hiscox S: β-catenin - cell adhesion and beyond (Review). Int J Oncol. 11:635–641. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Madjd Z, Gheytanchi E, Erfani E and Asadi-Lari M: Application of stem cells in targeted therapy of breast cancer: A systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 14:2789–2800. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lindvall C, Bu W, Williams BO and Li Y: Wnt signaling, stem cells, and the cellular origin of breast cancer. Stem Cell Rev. 3:157–168. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arend RC, Londoño-Joshi AI, Straughn JM Jr and Buchsbaum DJ: The Wnt/β-catenin pathway in ovarian cancer: A review. Gynecol Oncol. 131:772–779. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin SY, Xia W, Wang JC, Kwong KY, Spohn B, Wen Y, Pestell RG and Hung MC: Beta-catenin, a novel prognostic marker for breast cancer: Its roles in cyclin D1 expression and cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:4262–4266. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu Z, Xiao Q, Zhao L, Ren J, Bai X, Sun M, Wu H, Liu X, Song Z, Yan Y, et al: DNA methyltransferase 1/3a overexpression in sporadic breast cancer is associated with reduced expression of estrogen receptor-alpha/breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 and poor prognosis. Mol Carcinog. Jan 25–2014.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fang Y, Wei J, Cao J, Zhao H, Liao B, Qiu S, Wang D, Luo J and Chen W: Protein expression of ZEB2 in renal cell carcinoma and its prognostic significance in patient survival. PLoS One. 8:e625582013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhu W, Cai MY, Tong ZT, Dong SS, Mai SJ, Liao YJ, Bian XW, Lin MC, Kung HF, Zeng YX, et al: Overexpression of EIF5A2 promotes colorectal carcinoma cell aggressiveness by upregulating MTA1 through C-myc to induce epithelial-mesen-chymaltransition. Gut. 61:562–575. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Khoury T, Ademuyiwa FO, Chandrasekhar R, Jabbour M, Deleo A, Ferrone S, Wang Y and Wang X: Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 expression in breast cancer is associated with stage, triple negativity, and outcome to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Mod Pathol. 25:388–397. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Teng HW, Yang SH, Lin JK, Chen WS, Lin TC, Jiang JK, Yen CC, Li AF, Chen PC, Lan YT, et al: CIP2A is a predictor of poor prognosis in colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 16:1037–1047. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wakamatsu Y, Sakamoto N, Oo HZ, Naito Y, Uraoka N, Anami K, Sentani K, Oue N and Yasui W: Expression of cancer stem cell markers ALDH1, CD44 and CD133 in primary tumor and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer. Pathol Int. 62:112–119. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Avoranta ST, Korkeila EA, Ristamäki RH, Syrjänen KJ, Carpén OM, Pyrhönen SO and Sundström JT: ALDH1 expression indicates chemotherapy resistance and poor outcome in node-negative rectal cancer. Hum Pathol. 44:966–974. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Howe LR and Brown AM: Wnt signaling and breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 3:36–41. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
López-Knowles E, Zardawi SJ, McNeil CM, Millar EK, Crea P, Musgrove EA, Sutherland RL and O'Toole SA: Cytoplasmic localization of beta-catenin is a marker of poor outcome in breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 19:301–309. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dolled-Filhart M, McCabe A, Giltnane J, Cregger M, Camp RL and Rimm DL: Quantitative in situ analysis of beta-catenin expression in breast cancer shows decreased expression is associated with poor outcome. Cancer Res. 66:5487–5494. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Geyer FC, Lacroix-Triki M, Savage K, Arnedos M, Lambros MB, MacKay A, Natrajan R and Reis-Filho JS: β-catenin pathway activation in breast cancer is associated with triple-negative phenotype but not with CTNNB1 mutation. Mod Pathol. 24:209–231. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang S, Li W, Lv S, Wang Y, Liu Z, Zhang J, Liu T and Niu Y: Abnormal expression of Nek2 and β-catenin in breast carcinoma: Clinicopathological correlations. Histopathology. 59:631–642. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Barker N: The canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway. Methods Mol Biol. 468:5–15. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ozaki S, Ikeda S, Ishizaki Y, Kurihara T, Tokumoto N, Iseki M, Arihiro K, Kataoka T, Okajima M and Asahara T: Alterations and correlations of the components in the Wnt signaling pathway and its target genes in breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 14:1437–1443. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
Schlosshauer PW, Brown SA, Eisinger K, Yan Q, Guglielminetti ER, Parsons R, Ellenson LH and Kitajewski J: APC truncation and increased beta-catenin levels in a human breast cancer cell line. Carcinogenesis. 21:1453–1456. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Debeb BG, Lacerda L, Xu W, Larson R, Solley T, Atkinson R, Sulman EP, Ueno NT, Krishnamurthy S, Reuben JM, et al: Histone deacetylase inhibitors stimulate dedifferentiation of human breast cancer cells through WNT/β-catenin signaling. Stem Cells. 30:2366–2377. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu SL, Zeng DZ, Dong WG, Ding YQ, Rao J, Duan JJ, Liu Q, Yang J, Zhan N, Liu Y, et al: Distinct patterns of ALDH1A1 expression predict metastasis and poor outcome of colorectal carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 7:2976–2986. 2014.PubMed/NCBI |