Constitutive expression and anticancer potency of a novel immunotoxin onconase-DV3
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 18, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.4570
- Pages: 1987-1994
Abstract
Introduction
Onconase (P-30 protein), which is purified from embryos of the Northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens), is a member of the bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A (RNase A) superfamily (1,2). It has a molecular weight of 12.0 kDa and is composed of 104 amino acid (aa) residues (3). Although it is similar in molecular structure to RNase A, it has two unique features: the presence of a Cys87-Cys104 disulphide bond at the C-terminus; and presence of the N-terminal pyroglutamic acid residue, which results from cyclization of the glutamine residue (Gln) in the N-terminal and is an integral part of the active site. Recombinant onconase, which has an N-terminal methionine, has only l% activity compared to the native protein. In addition, it has three disulfide bonds that stabilize the protein structure and play a significant role in the resistance to hydrolysis by proteases and heat (4,5).
Onconase has cytotoxicity towards various malignant tumors such as breast, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancers, as well as malignant mesothelioma (6–9). Recombinant onconase was the first ribonuclease to be evaluated as a therapeutic drug in humans, and has progressed to phase III clinical trials in patients with unresectable mesothelioma. In vivo and in vitro experiments have shown that onconase has a synergistic effect with many other drugs including chemicals, synthetic drugs, and cytokines (10–13). Many cell surface receptors are overexpressed in multiple tumor types including the HER2 receptor, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor, and CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) (14,15). CXCR4 is overexpressed in more than 23 types of cancer, including melanoma, glioma, acute myelogenous leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and breast, prostate, renal, pancreatic, ovarian, cervical, colon, and small-cell lung cancers (16,17). DV3 is the binding sequence of the CXCR4 ligand, thus it has the potential to be used as a target to discern cancer cells in drug design.
Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) penetrate the cell membrane barrier and deliver various biological molecule cargoes into the cytoplasm without receptors, including proteins, DNA, RNA, and even nanoparticles (18–20). As a typical CPP with the amino acid sequence PFVYLI, PFV delivers fluorescent probes, RNA, and apoptotic peptides into a multiple of cancer cells (21–23).
The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris has developed into a highly successful expression system for the production of a variety of heterologous proteins using its strong and tightly regulated AOX1 promoter (24,25). This AOX1 promoter-controlled expression system depends on the generation of biomass in medium without the use of methanol (25). Despite the remarkable achievements made with this expression system, the use of methanol as the only carbon source can result in a series of issues, such as the consumption of large amounts of dissolved oxygen, the need for pure oxygen to maintain industrial production, and the proteolysis of recombinant proteins during high density fermentation. Furthermore, because methanol is an inflammable, explosive, and toxic substance, it can be dangerous to use (26).
The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAP) promoter can be used for the constitutive expression of recombinant heterologous proteins in P. pastoris cells using glucose, glycerol, and methanol as carbon sources. Since the GAP promoter-derived expression system allows for continuous production of the recombinant product while avoiding methanol fed-batch fermentation by P. pastoris, this system was proposed to be more suitable for large-scale fermentation and production of exogenous recombinant proteins (27,28). The most used and best studied secretion leader in yeast is the α-mating factor (α-MF) pre-pro-leader originating from S. cerevisiae, which has been used for production of secretory proteins with and without EAEA (Glu-Ala)2 overhang in various yeast species. Of the three types of leading sequences that can be used [pre sequence (19 aa), pre+pro sequence, pre+pro+EAEA], only the pre sequence resulted in high onconase bioactivity.
Materials and methods
Materials
All restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA, USA) and DNA polymerase was obtained from Takara (Dalian, Liaoning, China). Yeast extracts and peptone were purchased from Oxoid (Basingstoke, UK). Luria Bertani (LB) medium and yeast extract peptone glucose (YPD) components were purchased from Beijing Chemical Industry (Beijing, China). Escherichia coli TOP10 cells were used for plasmid maintenance. Zeocin, P. pastoris X33, and pGAPzαA were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA) and used for the expression process.
Growth media and conditions
YPD broth (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% glucose) containing Zeocin (100, 200, 300, and 400 µg/ml) was employed for selection of P. pastoris transformants at 30°C. Low salt LB (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 0.5% NaCl, pH 7.0) with Zeocin (25 µg/ml) were employed to culture E. coli TOP10 transformants at 37°C.
Plasmid and strains
A 560-base pair (bp) Pre-Onc-DV3 fusion gene fragment was synthesized by GenScript Corporation (Nanjing, China) after optimization. Both pGAPzαA and the Pre-Onc-DV3 gene were double digested by BstBI and EcoRI, and the digested gene was inserted into the open reading frame under control of the GAP promoter, resulting in the pGAPZαA-Pre-onconase-PFV-DV3 expression vector (Fig. 1). The recombinant plasmid was transferred into E. coli Top10 cells, and screened on low salt LB containing 25 µg/ml Zeocin. The extracted recombinant plasmid was identified by digesting with BglII and EcoRI, linearized with BlnI, and transformed into P. pastoris X33 cells by electroporation. The electrocompetent P. pastoris X33 cells were prepared according to standard methods, and using an electroporator (Scientz, Ningbo, China) following the manufacturer's instructions. The electroporation conditions were 1.5 kV, 25 µF, and 200 Ω.
Screening of clones
The transformed X33 clones were screened on YPD agar plates containing 100 µg/ml zeocin for 3 days. The chosen transformants were screened for Zeocin-level clones from the YPD agar plates containing a higher Zeocin concentration (200, 300, and 400 µg/ml). All of these high-level secretion clones were confirmed by PCR using X33 transformant DNA, and selected according to the Onc-DV3 recombinant protein concentration on SDS-PAGE. The promising X33 transformants were grown in 10 ml YPD medium in a 100-ml flask for 24 h. Then, the culture was transferred to 100 ml YPD medium for 24 h in a 1,000-ml flask. The inoculums were cultivated to OD600 of 0.5 as starting seed cells to investigate the effects of culture parameters: i) carbon source cells were cultured in 2% (w/v) of different carbon sources (glucose, glycerol, methanol, sucrose, sorbitol); ii) nitrogen source cells were cultured in 2% (w/v) of different nitrogen sources [tryptone, peptone, yeast extract, beef extract, (NH4)2SO4]; iii) the cells were cultured under different temperatures (21, 24, 27, 30, and 33°C); and (iv) the cells were cultured under a different pH (4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0).
The concentration of the Onc-DV3 recombinant protein was determined by SDS-PAGE and RNA hydrolytic activity. All of the data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of independent triplicate determinations.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed to determine the concentration of Onc-DV3. Briefly, samples were collected at various time-points (35, 45, 55, 65, and 75 h), and resolved by SDS-PAGE. Then, the proteins were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore Co., Ltd., Boston, MA, USA) using a DYCZ-40G transfer blotter (Beijing Liuyi Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The membranes were incubated in blocking buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5% skim milk, pH 7.5) at room temperature for 2 h, after which they were incubated with a polyclonal antibody of DV3 at room temperature for 4 h. Next, the membranes were washed three times with TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20, and incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG peroxidase conjugate (diluted 1:100; Boster Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei, China) at room temperature for 4 h. The membrane was incubated with a substrate solution containing 0.06% (w/v) chloronaphthol and 0.01% H2O2 (both from Beijing Chemicals) after washing.
Fed-batch fermentation
A 50-l fermentor was applied to evaluate the ability for larger scale constitutive expression of Onc-DV3 immunotoxin using the GAP promoter in P. pastoris, with the aforementioned method. The time-course for biomass and production of Onc-DV3 in the 50-l fermentor was determined. The production value of the recombinant immunotoxin increased with biomass until 72 h. The biomass (OD600) was elevated to ~300 during fed-batch fermentation in a 50-l fermentor. The production of Onc-DV3 in the 50-l fermentor reached about 2×106 U/l after 72 h of fermentation, compared to 6×105 U/l in a shake flask.
Biomass analysis, protein concentration determination, and cell viability assay
Biomass in the culture broth was determined by cell density expressed as optical absorbance (OD600). The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay kit (Sangon, Shanghai). Cell growth was monitored using a model UV-4802H spectrophotometer (Unico, Shanghai, China) at a wavelength of 490 nm, and converted to dry cell weight using a predetermined correlation factor.
Purification of onconase-DV3 fusion protein
The culture broth was collected after 72 h, and yeast cells were removed by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C. The centrifuged liquid was ultrafiltrated and concentrated by ultrafiltration using the Amfore ultrafiltration membrane 10000. The concentrated recombinant immunotoxin was loaded onto a SP Sepharose Fast Flow column (5.0×20 cm) that was pre-equilibrated with buffer A (20 mM PB, pH 7.0). The bound recombinant immunotoxin was eluted with buffer B (1 mol/l NaCl). The eluted protein was mixed with buffer C (20 mM PB, pH 7.0) and further loaded onto the Sephadex G-75 column (1.6×100 cm) that was pre-equilibrated with the same buffer. The purity of the recombinant immunotoxin from the final eluate was analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
Determination of the biological activity of the onconase
In order to determine the RNA degradation activity of onconase in vitro, 10 µg Pichia RNA was added in a 100-µl reaction buffer (100 mmol/l Tris-HCl, pH 8.0), and then purified onconase solutions at different concentrations (100, 10, 1, and 0.1 µg/ml) were added. The tubes were incubated in a water bath at 37°C for 30 min. The control group was incubated under the same conditions, but standard RNase A was added to replace the onconase. RNA degradation was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Determination of enzymatic parameters of the expression products using the double reciprocal
With 1 mg/ml solution of yeast transfer RNA (tRNA) as a substrate, various agents were successively added to assay the enzymatic activity of the purified Onc-DV3 by drawing a portrait of change values of OD260 along the RNase activity. The experiment was repeated at least three times.
Cell lines, culture, and the MTT assay
The paired highly metastatic and non-metastatic cell lines used were as follows: i) PC-3M-1E8, a human prostate cell line (highly metastatic), ii) PC-3M-2B4, a human prostate cell line, iii) MDA-MB-231, a human breast carcinoma cell line (highly metastatic), iv) MCF-7, a human breast carcinoma cell line, v) PG-BE1, a human lung cancer cell line (highly metastatic), vi) PG-LH7, a human lung cancer cell line, vii) L-02, a human normal liver cell, and viii) HEK293, a human embryonic kidney cell line.
All of the cell lines were kept in our laboratory in RPMI-1640 medium (Invitrogen) with 20% fetal bovine serum and 10% DMSO at −80°C. Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2. The cells (PC-3M-1E8, PC-3M-2B4, MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, PG-BE1, PG-LH7, L-02, HEK293) were seeded on 96-well flat-bottomed plates at 3,000 cells/well, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere for 24 h. Then, the cells were treated with Onc-DV3 after removing the medium at serial dilutions (0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60, and 3.20 µM). There were six individual wells for each dose. The blank control was the dilution medium without added sample. The cells were incubated in 96-well flat-bottomed plates at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere for 72 h, after which the supernatant was removed, and the cells were washed with PBS (pH 7.4). The cells were incubated in medium containing 20 µl MTT solution (5 mg/ml) at 37°C for 4 h. In order to dissolve the formed formazan crystals, 100 µl dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added after removing the supernatant. The OD was measured using the ELISA microplate reader at 490 nm. Cytotoxicity to the cancer cells was determined by survival rate (%). The experiment was repeated at least three times. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Results
Construction of an expression vector
A synthesized 560 bp Pre-Onc-DV3 gene was inserted into the pGAPzαA vector under control of the GAP promoter, by integrating the coding gene in frame with the S. cerevisiae α-factor pre-secretion signal sequence. The constitutive expression of pGAPzα-Pre-Onc-DV3 is shown (Fig. 1). The extracted recombinant plasmid was identified by digesting with BglII and EcoRI, producing a DNA fragment ~1,050 bp (Fig. 2). To confirm validity of the open reading frame, the full-length promoter and Pre-Onc-DV3 was sequenced (data not shown). Zeocin was used to screen the E. coli TOP10 transformants.
Screening of constitutive Pichia X33 clones of recombinant pGAP
The reconstructed vector was extracted and digested with BlnI to obtain a linear recombinant vector. Then, the linear vector of pGAPZαA-Pre-Onc-DV3 was employed to transform P. pastoris X33 by electroporation. The X33 transformants harboring the recombinant vector were screened depending on their resistance to Zeocin on YPD plates containing different concentrations of Zeocin. The 21 transformants were selected on YPD plates containing 400 µg/ml Zeocin, and were confirmed by genomic DNA PCR analysis. The expression ability of these transformants was determined by measuring the medium supernatant for RNA degradation efficiency.
Effects of carbon source, temperature, and pH on the production of onconase-DV3 immunotoxin
The effects of a few carbon sources on the production of Onc-DV3 immunotoxin during the fermentation process were evaluated. The X33 transformant with the highest expression level of recombinant immunotoxin was selected as an initial seed and cultured in modified YPD in which the glucose was 2% (w/v), but was replaced with different carbon sources (glucose, sorbitol, sucrose, methanol, or glycerol). The results demonstrated that glucose was the most favorable carbon source, with a maximum expression level of immunotoxin of ~310 U/l after 60 h of culture. The results are shown in Fig. 3A. Significantly, the biomass achieved the highest level when glycerol was used as a carbon source, and immunotoxin protein production was much lower than that of glucose as a carbon source. Compared to glucose and glycerol, both the biomass and production level of Onc-DV3 immunotoxin were much lower when using methanol, sucrose, or sorbitol as the carbon source. The main nitrogen sources were evaluated for their capacity to produce Onc-DV3 immunotoxin [tryptone, peptone, yeast extract, beef extract, (NH4)2SO4]. The results demonstrated that peptone was the most favorable nitrogen source. The maximum expression level of immunotoxin was ~310 U/l after 60 h of culture (Fig. 3B). The cells were grown in YPD medium (pH 7.0) at 21, 24, 27, 30, and 33°C to evaluate the effects of temperature on biomass and Onc-DV3 immunotoxin production (Fig. 3D). The biomass and production of Onc-DV3 did not show remarkable variance under different temperatures. The selected temperature for Onc-DV3 expression was at 30°C during fermentation, according to the empirical of higher enzyme activity at higher culture temperature (8). The effects of different medium initial pH (4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0) at 30°C on biomass and Onc-DV3 production were also checked during culture. The results showed (Fig. 3C) that the initial pH of the YPD medium had little effect on the biomass, but Onc-DV3 expression level was highest at pH 7.0.
The expression levels of recombinant immunotoxin at different times during the culture were analyzed by western blot analysis using anti-onconase polyclonal antibody. The results are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. The production of the recombinant immunotoxin was presented at 35 h and reached the highest production at 65 h in a flask culture.
Fed-batch fermentation
By using optimized conditions, a 50-l fermentor was applied to evaluate the ability for large-scale constitutive expression of Onc-DV3 immunotoxin using GAP promoter in P. pastoris, with the above selected method. The time-course for biomass and production of Onc-DV3 in the 50-l fermentor are shown in Fig. 6. The production value of the recombinant immunotoxin increased with the biomass until 72 h. The biomass (OD600) was elevated to ~300 during fed-batch fermentation in a 50-l fermentor. The production of Onc-DV3 in the 50 l fermentor reached about 2×103 U/l after 72 h of fermentation compared with that in the shake flask culture of 3.1×102 U/l. The results revealed that the constitutive expression of the Onc-DV3 recombinant immunotoxin was less hazardous to P. pastoris. It is viable to efficiently produce Onc-DV3 recombinant immunotoxin in the 50 l fermentor by adopting the constitutive fermentation strategy established in this study.
Purification and characterization of onconase-DV3 recombinant immunotoxin
The recombinant immunotoxin was isolated from the medium supernatant after ultrafiltration using membranes of 60 and 10 kDa and purified by SP Sepharose ion exchange chromatography and Sephadex G-75 gel chromatography. The purity of the recombinant immunotoxin reached 97.0% with the recovery level of 12.8% (Table I). The purified immunotoxin showed a single band on SDS-PAGE at ~20.0 kDa (Fig. 7), which was near the theoretical value for this recombinant protein.
Table IA summary of the purification process for the fusion protein onconase-DV3 produced by P. pastoris. |
The biological activity assay of Onc-DV3 was carried out by agrose electrophoresis and increment ultraviolet absorption (Fig. 8). RNA hydrolytic activity of the biological activity of Onc-DV3 was analyzed according to RNase assay from the onconase domain of Onc-DV3 (Table II). The results confirmed that the recombinant immunotoxin Onc-DV3 produced by the GAP promoter-derived expression system maintained high biological activity.
In conclusion, Onc-DV3 recombinant immunotoxin was expressed under the control of the GAP promoter in the P. pastoris expression system with high production and high biological activity.
MTT assay
Every strain of the tumor cells was cultured and treated with immunotoxin Onc-DV3 and incubated for 72 h. The survival rate of the cells as indicated by OD490 is shown in Table III. The trials of Onc-DV3 with tumor cells showed high efficient inhibition in highly metastatic tumor cells (PC-3M-1E8, PG-BE1, MDA-MB-231; the survival rate varied from 24.79±7.31 to 27.61±9.16), middle efficiency on poorly metastatic tumor cells (PC-3M-2B4, MCF-7, PG-LH7, the survival rate varied from 53.38±17.37 to 59.64±8.03), and no effect on normal cells (L-02, HEK293).
Discussion
The metastasis of tumor cells is the main cause of cancer-related death due to the rapid proliferation, the poor differentiation and the limited clinical efficacy of traditional treatments on tumor metastasis. Targeted cancer therapies based on immunological recognition of tumor cell-specific targets are expected to be more effective than traditional treatments and less harmful to normal cells.
The DV3 can selectively bind to metastatic tumors, but has no cytotoxicity to induce tumor cell apoptosis. Therefore, it needs to be linked with a molecule which is capable of causing tumor cell apoptosis.
Onconase has demonstrated its antitumor activity on several types of tumors and has been developed as a drug for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).
A bivalent targeted domain has been reported to be more effective than using a single targeted domain for targeting against the receptor. The dimer DV3 markedly improved the tumor cell killing activity than the single one. Since multi-copy seems to cause highly effective internalization (29–33), (DV3)2 with onconase may provide a more efficient approach for delivering RNase payloads into the cytosol of metastatic tumor cells.
The main systemic toxicity of onconase is the damage of proximal kidney tubular cells in which onconase exhibits highly non-specific uptake by tissues (34,35). The linkage of onconase and (DV3)2 is crucial so that it can specifically target metastatic tumor tissue.
In the present study, two copies of DV3 were selected to be linked to onconase to prepare an antitumor drug for metastatic tumors.
The best method of preparation was to construct the fusion gene of (DV3)2 and onconase, but formation of the cyclization of the glutamine residue (Gln) in the N-terminal contained by onconase may be difficult to be expressed in P. pastoris. Guided by the α-mating factor, high bioactivity and production were obtained.
Since it was not clear whether the carbon source, the nitrogen source, the temperature, or pH affect the expression level during the fermentation of Onc-(DV3)2, in order to ensure a high level of expression of Onc-DV3, these parameters were evaluated.
We demonstrated that the combination of onconase to a bivalent DV3 caused selective and specific cytotoxicity only towards metastatic tumor cells whereas onconase alone mediated cytotoxicity towards both metastatic and non-metastatic tumor cells.
The results of the cytotoxicity experiments of the DV3 + onconase mixture, onconase-single DV3, and onconase-double DV3 revealed a progressive antitumor effect, suggesting that double DV3 could deliver more target Onc to metastatic tumor cells and selectively enhance the cytotoxicity of onconase.
According to its specific and selective antitumor efficacy on metastatic tumor cells, we expect that further studies of Onc-DV3 could act in its development as a clinical drug.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Jilin Province Science and Technology Key Problem of China (20140203014YY).
References
Darzynkiewicz Z, Carter SP, Mikulski SM, Ardelt WJ and Shogen K: Cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of Pannon (P-30 protein), a novel anticancer agent. Cell Tissue Kinet. 21:169–182. 1988.PubMed/NCBI | |
Mosimann SC, Ardelt W and James MN: Refined 1.7 A X-ray crystallographic structure of P-30 protein, an amphibian ribonuclease with anti-tumor activity. J Mol Biol. 236:1141–1153. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ardelt W, Mikulski SM and Shogen K: Amino acid sequence of an anti-tumor protein from Rana pipiens oocytes and early embryos. Homology to pancreatic ribonucleases. J Biol Chem. 266:245–251. 1991.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gorbatyuk VY, Tsai CK, Chang CF and Huang TH: Effect of N-terminal and Met23 mutations on the structure and dynamics of onconase. J Biol Chem. 279:5772–5780. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bretscher LE, Abel RL and Raines RT: A ribonuclease A variant with low catalytic activity but high cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem. 275:9893–9896. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu Y, Mikulski SM, Ardelt W, Rybak SM and Youle RJ: A cytotoxic ribonuclease. Study of the mechanism of onconase cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem. 268:10686–10693. 1993.PubMed/NCBI | |
Saxena SK, Sirdeshmukh R, Ardelt W, Mikulski SM, Shogen K and Youle RJ: Entry into cells and selective degradation of tRNAs by a cytotoxic member of the RNase A family. J Biol Chem. 277:15142–15146. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Suhasini AN and Sirdeshmukh R: Transfer RNA cleavages by onconase reveal unusual cleavage sites. J Biol Chem. 281:12201–12209. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rodríguez M, Torrent G, Bosch M, Rayne F, Dubremetz JF, Ribó M, Benito A, Vilanova M and Beaumelle B: Intracellular pathway of onconase that enables its delivery to the cytosol. J Cell Sci. 120:1405–1411. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Newton DL, Hansen HJ, Mikulski SM, Goldenberg DM and Rybak SM: Potent and specific antitumor effects of an anti-CD22-targeted cytotoxic ribonuclease: Potential for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 97:528–535. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pavlakis N and Vogelzang NJ: Ranpirnase - an antitumour ribonuclease: Its potential role in malignant mesothelioma. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 6:391–399. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee I, Kalota A, Gewirtz AM and Shogen K: Antitumor efficacy of the cytotoxic RNase, ranpirnase, on A549 human lung cancer xenografts of nude mice. Anticancer Res. 27:299–307. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chang CH, Gupta P, Michel R, Loo M, Wang Y, Cardillo TM and Goldenberg DM: Ranpirnase (frog RNase) targeted with a humanized, internalizing, anti-Trop-2 antibody has potent cytotoxicity against diverse epithelial cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 9:2276–2286. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hu XF and Xing PX: Discovery and validation of new molecular targets for ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 5:625–630. 2003. | |
Ménard S, Pupa SM, Campiglio M and Tagliabue E: Biologic and therapeutic role of HER2 in cancer. Oncogene. 22:6570–6578. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Balkwill F: The significance of cancer cell expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Semin Cancer Biol. 14:171–179. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Snyder EL, Saenz CC, Denicourt C, Meade BR, Cui XS, Kaplan IM and Dowdy SF: Enhanced targeting and killing of tumor cells expressing the CXC chemokine receptor 4 by transducible anticancer peptides. Cancer Res. 65:10646–10650. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Saar K, Lindgren M, Hansen M, Eiríksdóttir E, Jiang Y, Rosenthal-Aizman K, Sassian M and Langel U: Cell-penetrating peptides: A comparative membrane toxicity study. Anal Biochem. 345:55–65. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lu S, Tager LA, Chitale S and Riley LW: A cell-penetrating peptide derived from mammalian cell uptake protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Anal Biochem. 353:7–14. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Snyder EL and Dowdy SF: Cell penetrating peptides in drug delivery. Pharm Res. 21:389–393. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rhee M and Davis P: Mechanism of uptake of C105Y, a novel cell-penetrating peptide. J Biol Chem. 281:1233–1240. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Watkins CL, Brennan P, Fegan C, Takayama K, Nakase I, Futaki S and Jones AT: Cellular uptake, distribution and cytotoxicity of the hydrophobic cell penetrating peptide sequence PFVYLI linked to the proapoptotic domain peptide PAD. J Control Release. 140:237–244. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park JW, Bang EK, Jeon EM and Kim BH: Complexation and conjugation approaches to evaluate siRNA delivery using cationic, hydrophobic and amphiphilic peptides. Org Biomol Chem. 10:96–102. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Macauley-Patrick S, Fazenda ML, McNeil B and Harvey LM: Heterologous protein production using the Pichia pastoris expression system. Yeast. 22:249–270. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Damasceno LM, Huang CJ and Batt CA: Protein secretion in Pichia pastoris and advances in protein production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 93:31–39. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sinha J, Plantz BA, Inan M and Meagher MM: Causes of proteolytic degradation of secreted recombinant proteins produced in methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris: Case study with recombinant ovine interferontau. Biotechnol Bioeng. 89:102–112. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Vassileva A, Chugh DA, Swaminathan S and Khanna N: Expression of hepatitis B surface antigen in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris using the GAP promoter. J Biotechnol. 88:21–35. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang X, Sun Y, Ke F, Zhao H, Liu T, Xu L, Liu Y and Yan Y: Constitutive expression of yarrowia lipolytica lipase LIP2 in Pichia pastoris using GAP as promoter. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 166:1355–1367. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pedersen MW, Jacobsen HJ, Koefoed K, Hey A, Pyke C, Haurum JS and Kragh M: Sym004: A novel synergistic anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody mixture with superior anticancer efficacy. Cancer Res. 70:588–597. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang Q, Villeneuve G and Wang Z: Control of epidermal growth factor receptor endocytosis by receptor dimerization, rather than receptor kinase activation. EMBO Rep. 6:942–948. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fan Z, Lu Y, Wu X and Mendelsohn J: Antibody-induced epidermal growth factor receptor dimerization mediates inhibition of autocrine proliferation of A431 squamous carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 269:27595–27602. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Perez-Torres M, Guix M, Gonzalez A and Arteaga CL: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody down-regulates mutant receptors and inhibits tumors expressing EGFR mutations. J Biol Chem. 281:40183–40192. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vasandani VM, Burris JA and Sung C: Reversible nephrotoxicity of onconase and effect of lysine pH on renal onconase uptake. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 44:164–169. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mikulski S, Grossman A, Carter P, Shogen K and Costanzi J: Phase-I human clinical-trial of onconase(r) (p-30 protein) administered intravenously on a weekly schedule in cancer-patients with solid tumors. Int J Oncol. 3:57–64. 1993.PubMed/NCBI | |
Vasandani VM, Wu YN, Mikulski SM, Youle RJ and Sung C: Molecular determinants in the plasma clearance and tissue distribution of ribonucleases of the ribonuclease A superfamily. Cancer Res. 56:4180–4186. 1996.PubMed/NCBI |