Resveratrol improves cognition and decreases amyloid plaque formation in Tg6799 mice
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 6, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.10010
- Pages: 3783-3790
Abstract
Introduction
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive and memory impairments (1). There are >35 million individuals with AD worldwide, thus resulting in marked emotional and financial burdens on patients and society (2). The accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide in the brain is strongly implicated as a main hallmark of sporadic and familial forms of AD (3,4). Amyloid precursor protein (APP) -derived toxic peptides are found at autopsy in the brains of individuals with AD (5). Aβ is cleaved from APP by β-secretase 1 (BACE1) and subsequently by γ-secretase. BACE1 is considered the rate-limiting enzyme in the production of Aβ (6,7). In addition, accumulation of BACE1 is observed in normal and dystrophic presynaptic terminals surrounding the amyloid plaques in brains of AD mouse models and patients (8,9).
The effects of medications that are currently approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of AD manifestations are modest, transient and provide only symptomatic treatment (10). Recently, researchers have been paying more attention to herbal extracts for their potential therapeutic effects on AD. Resveratrol (Res) is a natural polyphenol with strong effects, including anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, cardiovascular protective, neuroprotective and cancer chemopreventive activities (11–13). It has been suggested that Res can act as a potent antioxidant in neurodegenerative disorders. Previous studies have reported that Res has the ability to regulate Aβ toxicity or significantly increase the Aβ clearance rate in a mouse model of AD (14,15). Res can also increase resistance against nerve inflammation and exerts anti-oxidant effects that contribute to its neuroprotective effects on the nervous system (16,17).
Tg6799 mice are APP/presenelin 1 (PS1) double transgenic mice that coexpress five familial AD (FAD) mutations, which are also known as 5XFAD mice. This mouse strain is a useful model of AD that recapitulates the relevant pathogenic features of AD amyloid pathology. Intraneuronal Aβ42 accumulates in the brain starting at 1.5 months, and the levels of brain Aβ42 and Aβ40 increase with age, whereas, the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio decrease. Amyloid deposition starts at 2 months. Tg6799 mice develop memory deficits by 4 months of age, as assessed using a Y-maze test compared with nontransgenic control mice (18). The present study aimed to determine the protective effects and underlying mechanisms of Res in AD treatment.
Materials and methods
Animals and Res treatment
This study was approved by The Animal Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (application no. NFYY-2015-43; Guangzhou, China). The experiments were performed using male Tg6799 mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA), which express the human APP and PS1 genes and five FAD mutations on a C57/B6XSJL background (18). These mice were group-housed under standard environmental conditions (12-h light/dark cycle, 23±1°C and 55±5% relative humidity), with free access to food and water. The procedures were performed in strict accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (19). At 2.5 months of age, 40 male Tg6799 mice (weight, 18–22 g) were randomly divided into the control and Res groups (n=20/group). According to a previous study (20), the Res group was treated daily with 0.5% Res (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; 60 mg/kg/day) by oral gavage for 60 consecutive days, whereas the control group was treated with volume-matched normal saline by gavage.
Behavioral testing
Open field test
The open field apparatus consisted of a rectangular chamber (40×40×30 cm) made of gray polyvinyl chloride. A video camera, a loudspeaker that provided masking noise and a 25 W red light bulb (illumination density at the center of the maze was 0.3 lx) were placed 180 cm above the center of the apparatus. The mice were gently placed at the center and were allowed to explore the area for 5 min. The digitized image of the path taken by each mouse was recorded and locomotor activity was subsequently analyzed using EthoVision 7.0 software (Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, The Netherlands).
Y-maze test
A black Y-maze was used with an arm length of 40 cm, width of 3 cm and wall height of 12.5 cm. Each mouse was placed in the center of the symmetrical Y-maze and allowed to explore freely through the maze until they entered the arms 22 times; the sequence of 22 entries was recorded. Each mouse was placed at the end of one arm facing the center and its movements were recorded for 8 min. Data were analyzed to determine the number of arm entries without repetition. Successful alternations were defined as sequential entries into a new arm. A mouse was excluded from the analysis if no entries into new arms were recorded for 2 consecutive min. Mean alternation percentage (%) was calculated as the number of successful alternations /20 ×100.
Morris water maze
The basic protocol and apparatus for the hidden platform version of the water maze have previously been described (21). Each mouse underwent four trials a day for 6 consecutive days. All mice underwent a probe test for 90 sec, where the platform was removed from the pool on day 7. The number of crosses over the platform location (crosses), the time spent in the target quadrant and the speed were recorded using a video tracking system.
Thioflavin S staining
Four mice from each group were sacrificed with 0.75% pentobarbitone sodium (50 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal injection. The deeply anesthetized mice exhibiting loss of reflexes and muscle relaxation were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Subsequently, the hippocampus was extracted and frozen sections, measuring 35 µm in thickness, were prepared at −25°C. For thioflavin S immunostaining, brain sections were allowed to defrost at room temperature and were then washed with PBS for 5 min. The sections were then stained with freshly prepared 0.4% thioflavin S solution (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for 5 min in the dark at room temperature, washed twice for 3 min with 70% alcohol, washed twice for 5 min with PBS and mounted. Image acquisition was performed under a fluorescence microscope. Plaque counts were quantified by counting thioflavin S-positive plaques in the hippocampus. The region of interest was manually selected under ×4 magnification and all parameters were kept constant during the analysis.
Aβ40 and Aβ42 ELISA
Another four mice from each group were used to conduct Aβ ELISA analyses. Following Res treatment for 60 days, animals were anesthetized by pentobarbitone sodium (50 mg/kg) and were decapitated. The required amount of homogenization buffer was prepared prior to use. The hemisphere tissues (50 mg) were isolated and homogenized using a Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer (DWK Life Sciences, Millville, NJ, USA). Brain homogenates were treated with PBS/protease inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and were supplemented with guanidine HCl to a final concentration of 5 mol/l. The brain tissue samples were then added to an Eppendorf tube containing the brain extraction buffer provided in the ELISA kits (cat. nos. KHB3481, KHB3441 and KHB3442; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The sample was ground thoroughly with a tissue homogenizer, and then centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was carefully transferred to a new tube and diluted with the buffer provided in the BioRad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Final guanidine HCl concentrations were <0.1 mol/l. The protein content was measured using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit. Duplicate samples were subsequently analyzed using Aβ40- and Aβ42-specific sandwich colorimetric ELISA kits (cat. nos. KHB3481, KHB3441 and KHB3442; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm, and curve-fitting software (TableCurve 2D; version 6; Jandel Scientific Software, San Rafael, CA) was used to generate the standard curve.
Western blotting
For western blot analysis, hippocampal tissues were dissected from four mice in each group and disrupted by sonication (three pulses at 1 Hz for 20 sec with 30 sec intervals between pulses) for 2 min in ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer with a complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The lysates were centrifuged at 16,900 × g for 40 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was boiled in loading buffer for 10 min. The protein content was measured using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). A total of 50 µg protein was loaded into each lane and separated by SDS-PAGE with 10% polyacrylamide gels. Following transfer onto Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, nonspecific binding was blocked with 5% nonfat milk in TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 for 1.5 h at room temperature. After the membranes were washed, they were incubated with the following primary antibodies: Anti-APP (1:1,000; cat. no. SIG-39300; BioLegend, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), anti-BACE1 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab108394; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-secreted (s)APPα (1:500; cat. no. 2B3; IBL, Japan), anti-sAPPβ (1:500, cat. no. 6A1; Immuno-Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd., Fujioka, Japan) and anti-sirtuin 1 (SIRT1; 1:1,000; cat. no. 8469s; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) at 4°C overnight. The membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:2,000; cat. nos. TA130003 and TA130023; OriGene Technologies, Inc., Beijing, China) for 1 h at room temperature. Bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence western blot detection reagents (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). ImageJ software (version 1.50; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to semi-quantify the relative expression levels of target proteins, which were normalized to the internal control GAPDH (1:1,000; cat. no. 5174; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.).
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the means ± standard error of the mean, and all experiments were repeated at least three times. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 18.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparisons between two groups were performed using two independent samples Student's t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Res treatment rescues cognitive impairment but does not affect the motor function of Tg6799 mice
Open field tests were used to measure locomotor activity, which served as a control to reflect motor function. In the open field test, the total distances of the two groups over 5 min were not significantly different (Fig. 1A). In addition, the spontaneous alternation performance of mice was determined using the Y-maze test, which is used to assess their spatial working memory. The results revealed that the Res group had an elevated mean alternation percentage compared with the control group (Fig. 1B). These findings indicated that the administration of Res improved spatial working memory.
The effects of Res on learning and memory were also determined in AD mice using the Morris water maze. The Morris water maze test is most widely used to test spatial memory in AD mouse models. Over the 6-day training phase, the escape latencies of all mice gradually decreased; however, the Res group mice exhibited significantly lower escape latencies compared with the controls (Fig. 2A). The average swimming speed during training and the probe test did not differ between the two groups (Fig. 2B). In addition, the administration of Res significantly increased the number of crosses and time spent in the target quadrant (Fig. 2C and D). The swimming path during the training phase and the probe test reflected the improved learning and memory of the mice in the Res group (Fig. 2E and F).
Administration of Res reduces amyloid plaques and Aβ42 levels in Tg6799 mice
Thioflavin S staining was performed to examine amyloid plaque pathology. Amyloid deposition was positive after staining with thioflavin S. The results revealed that the plaque loads in the Res group were quantitatively lower compared with in the control group. Amyloid plaques were significantly reduced in the hippocampus of the Res group compared with in the control group (Fig. 3A and B). Cerebral levels of Aβ42 and Aβ40 were also detected in hippocampal homogenates using ELISA kits. The Res group had lower levels of Aβ42 and Aβ40 compared with the control group. For Aβ42 levels, this alteration was statistically significant (Fig. 3C and D), which was consistent with the thioflavin S staining results.
Administration of Res alters the levels of BACE1, APP, sAPPα and sAPPβ in Tg6799 mice
Western blotting was used to determine APP, cleaved APP products and BACE1 expression, in order to investigate the mechanism underlying the reduction of amyloid plaques in the Res group. The results of western blot analysis revealed that the expression levels of APP, sAPPα, sAPPβ and BACE1 were significantly reduced in the Res group compared with in the control group (Fig. 4).
Res treatment did not affect SIRT1 levels in Tg6799 mice
A previous study (22) suggested that activation of the sirtuin family member SIRT1 is an important pharmacological effect of Res. Therefore, SIRT1 levels were determined by western blotting; however, the administration of Res did not affect the protein expression levels of SIRT1 (Fig. 5).
Discussion
The pathogenesis of AD continues to be debated, and there are numerous hypotheses, including the amyloid cascade hypothesis, neurotrophic factor hypothesis and oxidative stress hypothesis (23). The pathological hallmarks of AD include intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles, extracellular amyloid plaques, neuronal loss and gliosis. The aggregation of Aβ forms amyloid plaques. Numerous clinical, cytobiological and experimental animal studies (24,25) support the causative role of Aβ in the pathogenesis of AD. Notably, Aβ can induce loss of synaptic terminals and calcium imbalance, and can drive tau aggregation, thus inducing neurofibrillary tangles (26,27). Aβ is cleaved from APP, genetic mutations of which cause a familial form of AD. BACE1 cuts APP at the N-terminus of the Aβ domain to produce C99 and sAPPβ, after which, C99 is further cleaved by γ-secretase to generate Aβ (28). Notably, previous studies have demonstrated that Res is able to cross the blood-brain barrier, thus making oral gavage an efficient route of administration (29,30).
The present study demonstrated that the administration of Res significantly diminished the number and intensity of amyloid plaques, as measured by thioflavin S staining. Senile plaques are formed by the accumulation of APP-derived toxic peptides (predominantly Aβ42). Previous data support the hypothesis that AD neurodegeneration is initiated by an imbalance between Aβ42 production and clearance in selected brain regions (4). Tg6799 mice accumulate large amounts of cerebral Aβ42 at a young age, and generate much more Aβ42 than Aβ40. The ELISA results in this study demonstrated that the cerebral levels of Aβ42 and Aβ40 were decreased in hippocampal homogenates in response to Res, particularly Aβ42 levels, which were significantly reduced.
In vitro, Res promotes Aβ clearance potentially by increasing intracellular proteasomal activity (31). In a previous study, the Tg2576 mouse transgenic model of AD was fed red wine (containing Res), after which cognitive improvement or attenuation of amyloid brain pathology was assessed based on nonamyloidogenic processing of βAPP or the oligomerization of Aβ molecules (15,32). To investigate the mechanism underlying the reduction of plaque pathology by Res, the present study detected the expression levels of APP-associated enzymes by western blotting. A significant decrease in BACE1 levels may alter the APP processing pathway, leading to a reduction in amyloid burden. BACE1 is considered the rate-limiting enzyme in the production of Aβ. High-molecular weight APP and sAPPα levels were also decreased in response to Res. A number of previous studies (33,34) have suggested that Res can promote Aβ clearance without affecting Aβ-producing enzyme activities (γ-secretase and BACE1). This mechanism could be synergistic with a reduction in BACE1.
A previous study (35) suggested that Res is able to induce activation of the sirtuin family member SIRT1, which is beneficial for preventing neurodegeneration and improving memory. In addition, Res can counteract Aβ toxicity in cellular models due to its natural antioxidant properties and SIRT1 activation (36–38). Other findings have suggested that Res is able to reduce the harmful process that occurs in the APP/PS1 mouse hippocampus, which is mainly mediated by increased activation of SIRT1 and 5′ AMP-activated protein kinase pathways (39). However, in the present study, Res did not induce activation of SIRT1.
The present study assessed hippocampus-dependent spatial working memory in mice using the Y-maze test. This learning task does not involve any training, reward or punishment, and allows for the assessment of hippocampus-dependent spatial working memory. The hippocampus is the hub for learning and memory. The results demonstrated that treatment with Res resulted in a significant increase in the mean alternation percentage. It may be hypothesized that reduced amyloid plaques are responsible for the improved working memory in the Res group. Furthermore, the effects of Res treatment on learning and memory in Tg6799 mice were evaluated using the Morris water maze test. In the hidden platform version of the water maze test, animals learn to locate a submerged platform in a pool filled with opaque water. This spatial navigation performance is also known to be hippocampus dependent. This study confirmed that learning and memory were significantly improved by the administration of Res.
Numerous previous studies (40,41) have described the neuroprotective properties of Res; however, Res treatment as a therapy for AD still has many limitations, including poor bioavailability. The complex interaction and mechanisms of Res remain to be explored. In future studies, we aim to investigate the expression of α and γ secretases (ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9, 10 and 17, and PS1), and to investigate whether a modified treatment with Res may induce alterations in SIRT1 activity. In the present study, mice were treated with 60 mg/kg/day Res by oral gavage; this dosage per day is much higher than that ingested by humans via diet and wine, this is also an important issue to be considered in future work.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the administration of Res for 60 consecutive days protected against Aβ plaque formation and cognitive loss in Tg6799 mice. The exact underlying mechanism has yet to be elucidated; however, the animal behavioral data suggested that Res may serve a neuroprotective role in a mouse model of AD.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81471388 and 81771484), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (grant nos. 2015A030313235 and 2014A030313351), the Guangdong Science & Technology Planning Project, China (grant no. 2014A020211016), the Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Southern Medical University (grant no. C1051222), and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (grant no. IRT_16R37).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
XMZ, FW and YC conceived and designed the experiments, and revised the final version of the paper. YC, ZML and GWS performed the experiments. YC and YSS analyzed the data and wrote the paper. LP, SYS and YPW prepared reagents and materials, and performed part of the experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the animal ethics committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (application no. NFYY-2015-43).
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D and Stadlan EM: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of department of health and human services task force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 34:939–944. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Alzheimer's Association: 2011 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 7:208–244. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Selkoe DJ and Schenk D: Schenk, Alzheimer's disease: Molecular understanding predicts amyloid-based therapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 43:545–584. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hardy J and Selkoe DJ: The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: Progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 297:353–356. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K, Tung YC, Quinlan M, Wisniewski HM and Binder LI: Abnormal phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein tau (tau) in Alzheimer cytoskeletal pathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 83:4913–4917. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cole SL and Vassar R: BACE1 structure and function in health and Alzheimer's disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 5:100–120. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin X, Koelsch G, Wu S, Downs D, Dashti A and Tang J: Human aspartic protease memapsin 2 cleaves the beta-secretase site of beta-amyloid precursor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:1456–1460. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao J, Fu Y, Yasvoina M, Shao P, Hitt B, O'Connor T, Logan S, Maus E, Citron M, Berry R, et al: Beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 levels become elevated in neurons around amyloid plaques: Implications for Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. J Neurosci. 27:3639–3649. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kandalepas PC, Sadleir KR, Eimer WA, Zhao J, Nicholson DA and Vassar R: The Alzheimer's β-secretase BACE1 localizes to normal presynaptic terminals and to dystrophic presynaptic terminals surrounding amyloid plaques. Acta Neuropathol. 126:329–352. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De Strooper B: Proteases and proteolysis in Alzheimer disease: A multifactorial view on the disease process. Physiol Rev. 90:465–494. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Robb EL, Page MM, Wiens BE and Stuart JA: Molecular mechanisms of oxidative stress resistance induced by resveratrol: Specific and progressive induction of MnSOD. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 367:406–412. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baltaci AK, Arslangil D, Mogulkoc R and Patlar S: Effect of resveratrol administration on the element metabolism in the blood and brain tissues of rats subjected to acute swimming exercise. Biol Trace Elem Res. 175:421–427. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baltaci SB, Mogulkoc R and Baltaci AK: Resveratrol and Exercise. Biomed Rep. 5:525–530. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ladiwala AR, Lin JC, Bale SS, Marcelino-Cruz AM, Bhattacharya M, Dordick JS and Tessier PM: Resveratrol selectively remodels soluble oligomers and fibrils of amyloid Abeta into off-pathway conformers. J Biol Chem. 285:24228–24237. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang J, Ho L, Zhao Z, Seror I, Humala N, Dickstein DL, Thiyagarajan M, Percival SS, Talcott ST and Pasinetti GM: Moderate consumption of Cabernet Sauvignon attenuates Abeta neuropathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J. 20:2313–2320. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Capiralla H, Vingtdeux V, Zhao H, Sankowski R, Al-Abed Y, Davies P and Marambaud P: Resveratrol mitigates lipopolysaccharide- and Aβ-mediated microglial inflammation by inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB/STAT signaling cascade. J Neurochem. 120:461–472. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Crandall JP and Barzilai N: Exploring the promise of resveratrol: Where do we go from here? Diabetes. 62:1022–1023. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oakley H, Cole SL, Logan S, Maus E, Shao P, Craft J, Guillozet-Bongaarts A, Ohno M, Disterhoft J, Van Eldik L, et al: Intraneuronal beta-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer's disease mutations: Potential factors in amyloid plaque formation. J Neurosci. 26:10129–10140. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
The NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals, . NIH Publication. 85–23, 1985. 1985. | |
Menet MC, Baron S, Taghi M, Diestra R, Dargère D, Laprévote O, Nivet-Antoine V, Beaudeux JL, Bédarida T and Cottart CH: Distribution of trans-resveratrol and its metabolites after acute or sustained administration in mouse heart, brain, and liver. Mol Nutr Food Res. 61:2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohno M, Tseng W, Silva AJ and Disterhoft JF: Trace eyeblink conditioning requires the hippocampus but not autophosphorylation of alphaCaMKII in mice. Learn Mem. 12:211–215. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hong YA, Bae SY, Ahn SY, Kim J, Kwon YJ, Jung WY and Ko GJ: Resveratrol ameliorates contrast induced nephropathy through the activation of SIRT1-PGC-1α-Foxo1 signaling in mice. Kidney Blood Press Res. 42:641–653. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Area-Gomez E and Schon EA: Alzheimer disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 997:149–156. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Barage SH and Sonawane KD: Amyloid cascade hypothesis: Pathogenesis andtherapeutic strategies in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropeptides. 52:1–18. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Andreeva TV, Lukiw WJ and Rogaev EI: Biological basis for amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer's disease. Biochemistry (Mosc). 82:122–139. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Billings LM, Oddo S, Green KN, McGaugh JL and LaFerla FM: Intraneuronal Abeta causes the onset of early Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive deficits in transgenic mice. Neuron. 45:675–688. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Selkoe DJ and Schenk D: Alzheimer's disease: Molecular understanding predicts amyloid-based therapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 43:545–584. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fukumoto H, Takahashi H, Tarui N, Matsui J, Tomita T, Hirode M, Sagayama M, Maeda R, Kawamoto M, Hirai K, et al: A noncompetitive BACE1 inhibitor TAK-070 ameliorates Abeta pathology and behavioral deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 30:11157–11166. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Han YS, Bastianetto S, Dumont Y and Quirion R: Specific plasma membrane binding sites for polyphenols, including resveratrol, in the rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 318:238–245. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gilgun-Sherki Y, Melamed E and Offen D: Oxidative stress induced-neurodegenerative diseases: The need for antioxidants that penetrate the blood brain barrier. Neuropharmcology. 40:959–975. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Marambaud P, Zhao H and Davies P: Resveratrol promotes clearance of Alzheimer's disease amyloid-beta peptides. J Biol Chem. 280:37377–37382. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ho L, Chen LH, Wang J, Zhao W, Talcott ST, Ono K, Teplow D, Humala N, Cheng A, Percival SS, et al: Heterogeneity in red wine polyphenolic contents differentially influences Alzheimer's disease-type neuropathology and cognitive deterioration. J Alzheimers Dis. 16:59–72. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jia Y, Wang N and Liu X: Resveratrol and amyloid-beta: Mechanistic insights. Nutrients. 9(pii): E11222017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deng H and Mi MT: Resveratrol attenuates Aβ25–35 caused neurotoxicity by inducing autophagy through the TyrRS-PARP1-SIRT1 signaling pathway. Neurochem Res. 41:2367–2379. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen CJ, Yu W, Fu YC, Wang X, Li JL and Wang W: Resveratrol protects cardiomyocytes from hypoxia-induced apoptosis through the SIRT1-FoxO1 pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 378:389–393. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jang JH and Surh YJ: Protective effect of resveratrol on beta-amyloid-induced oxidative PC12 cell death. Free RadicBiol Med. 34:1100–1110. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kim D, Nguyen MD, Dobbin MM, Fischer A, Sananbenesi F, Rodgers JT, Delalle I, Baur JA, Sui G, Armour SM, et al: SIRT1 deacetylase protects against neurodegeneration in models for Alzheimer's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. EMBO J. 26:3169–3179. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lagouge M, Argmann C, Gerhart-Hines Z, Meziane H, Lerin C, Daussin F, Messadeq N, Milne J, Lambert P, Elliott P, et al: Resveratrol improves mitochondrial function and protects against metabolic disease by activating SIRT1 and PGC-1alpha. Cell. 127:1109–1122. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Porquet D, Griñán-Ferré C, Ferrer I, Camins A, Sanfeliu C, Del Valle J and Pallàs M: Neuroprotective role of trans-resveratrol in a murine model of familial Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 42:1209–1220. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bastianetto S, Ménard C and Quirion R: Neuroprotective action of resveratrol. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1852:1195–1201. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hou Y, Wang K, Wan W, Cheng Y, Pu X and Ye X: Resveratrol provides neuroprotection by regulating the JAK2/STAT3/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway after stroke in rats. Genes Dis. 5:245–255. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |