Open Access

Advances in antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Yuqing Hao
    • Yadong Wang
    • Li Zhang
    • Fang Liu
    • Yuefei Jin
    • Jinzhao Long
    • Shuaiyin Chen
    • Guangcai Duan
    • Haiyan Yang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 30, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1849
  • Article Number: 161
  • Copyright: © Hao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) are one of the promising strategies to deal with bacterial infections. As the main subset of NPs, metal and metal oxide NPs show destructive power against bacteria by releasing metal ions, direct contact of cell membranes and antibiotic delivery. Recently, a number of researchers have focused on the antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Currently, there is a lack of a comprehensive review on ZnO NPs against S. aureus. Therefore, in this review, the antibacterial activity against S. aureus of ZnO NPs made by various synthetic methods was summarized, particularly the green synthetic ZnO NPs. The synergistic antibacterial effect against S. aureus of ZnO NPs with antibiotics was also summarized. Furthermore, the present review also emphasized the enhanced activities against S. aureus of ZnO nanocomposites, nano‑hybrids and functional ZnO NPs.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a gram-positive pathogen that can lead to numerous infectious diseases, such as pneumonia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, skin and soft tissue infections, bacteremia and sepsis (1). At the same time, the threat caused by S. aureus infections has increased significantly in humans as well as in animals (2,3). In clinical practices, antibiotics are effective way to treat S. aureus infections. With the use of antibiotics (especially overuse or misuse of antibiotics), antibiotic resistant S. aureus strains, such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), have spread both in hospitals and communities and also persist in the home environment, which poses a great threat to human health (4,5). It is estimated that 700,000 persons succumb to antibiotic-resistance bacteria including MRSA and this number is predicted to grow to 10 million by 2050(3). In order to deal with this, increasing efforts have been made to discover new therapeutic strategies to fight against S. aureus infections, such as bacteriophage (6,7), vaccines (8-10), monoclonal antibodies (11,12), recombinant endolysins (13), anti-persistent bacteria therapies (14), antibacterial peptide (15,16), natural plant components (17-19) and nanoparticles (NPs) (20,21).

NPs, being <100 nm, are one of the novel promising methods to deal with bacterial infections, including S. aureus infections (22,23). The antibacterial activity of NPs is mostly attributed to their special characteristics, such as well-distributed size, perfect spherical shape, positive surface charge and hydrophobicity (24,25). NPs begin their antibacterial effects by the direct interplay with cell surface, involving the destruction of cell wall peptidoglycan and membrane protein and interference in energy metabolism (ATPase inhibition and electron transport disruption). Then, NPs can penetrate into cytoplasm and cause great damage to intracellular components, including nucleic acids, proteins, lysosomes and ribosomes (26). Additionally, oxidative stress induced by excess releasing of reactive oxygen species (ROS) also plays a substantial role in inducing lipid peroxidation on the bacterial cell membrane (27). As well as the aforementioned mechanism, metal NPs have specific ways to resist pathogenic microorganisms by releasing metal ions and producing different ROS (28). Several metal (gold, silver, copper and zinc) NPs and their metal oxide NPs have been reported to have distinctive antimicrobial properties against S. aureus (29,30) and they were also shown to be the carriers that can deliver antibiotics to target sites (22,31). Fig. 1 shows the properties, antibacterial mechanism against S. aureus and antibiotics delivery ability of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs).

There are a number of studies reporting the antibacterial property of ZnO NPs against S. aureus (32-34). ZnO NPs reduce the biofilm of S. aureus by inhibiting biofilm genes expression, such as ica A, ica D and fnb A (35). In Kahandal et al (36), the biofilm formation of S. aureus was inhibited markedly by 95.39 % when treated with 125 µg/ml of ZnO NPs for 5 h. Abdelraheem et al (37) observed that ZnO NPs presented antibacterial activity against multidrug resistant S. aureus, such as methicillin, vancomycin and linezolid resistant S. aureus. Irfan et al (38) confirmed the antibacterial activity of ZnO NPs against S. aureus and MRSA with the zone of inhibition (ZOI) of 21±2 and 17±2 mm, respectively. El-Masry et al (39) also reported that ZnO NPs (20 nm and concentration of 20 mM) inhibited 105 and 107 CFU/ml S. aureus with ZOI of 26 and 22 mm, respectively. Currently, there is a lack of a comprehensive review on ZnO NPs against S. aureus. Therefore, the present study reviewed the antibacterial activity against S. aureus of ZnO NPs fabricated by various synthetic ways, especially the green synthetic ZnO NPs. It also summarized the synergistic antibacterial effects against S. aureus of ZnO NPs in combination with antibiotics. Furthermore, it highlighted the enhanced activities against S. aureus of ZnO nanocomposites, nano-hybrids and functional ZnO NPs.

2. Chemically and physically synthesized ZnO NPs against S. aureus

Commonly, ZnO NPs can be synthesized by using top-down and bottom-up methods that include diverse physical and chemical ways (40) (Fig. 2). Top-down approaches cut massive materials into NPs physically, including ball milling, ion sputtering, laser ablation, metal etching and pyrolysis. According to Massoudi et al (41) research, ZnO NPs made by high-speed ball milling inhibit S. aureus with the largest ZOI of ~13.5±0.5 mm. It was also found that ZnO NPs synthesized by microwave heating displayed the ZOI of ~16 mm against S. aureus (42). Bottom-up ways fabricated atoms and molecules into nano-sized particles, which included chemical reduction, sol-gel method, chemical vapor deposition, molecular condensation and even green synthesis (43). Different synthesis processes bring about various physicochemical properties of metal NPs such as size, shape, dispersity and stabilization diversity, which determine the antibacterial efficiency (44,45). Table I shows the characteristics and anti-S. aureus capacity of ZnO NPs made by several methods. In Bai et al (46), small molecule ligand solvothermal synthesized ZnO NPs showed size-related antibacterial effect and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4 nm ZnO NPs against S. aureus was 6.25 µg/ml, which is lower than the MIC of 10 nm ZnO NPs at ~25 µg/ml. In an antimicrobial test of solution-polymerization-method synthesized ZnO NPs, it was discovered that S. aureus was more susceptible to nanoparticle size than E. coli (47). The co-precipitation method is also frequently used to synthesize ZnO NPs that show the lowest MIC against S. aureus compared with other bacteria (48). Moreover, by using an easy chemical method, diethylene-glycol-mediated ZnO NPs were made and they had antibacterial activity against S. aureus with the ZOI of 14 mm and showed the excellent S. aureus biofilm control (49). It was also reported that S. aureus cell leakage was observed after exposure to mechano-chemical synthesized ZnO NPs (50). Although a great number of physicochemical synthetic methods have been found to make ZnO NPs for S. aureus treatment, some demerits such as high cost, toxicity and instability still place restrictions on their large-scale antibacterial applications (43).

Table I

The characteristics and anti-S. aureus activity of top-down and bottom-up synthesized ZnO NPs.

Table I

The characteristics and anti-S. aureus activity of top-down and bottom-up synthesized ZnO NPs.

First author/s, yearMethod typeMethodSizeShapeBacterial strainMICZOI(Refs.)
Massoudi et al, 2022Top-down synthesisBall milling148±68 nmHexagonalS. aureus 13.5±0.5 mm(41)
Yusof et al, 2019 Microwave heating50-130 nm~SphericalS. aureus 16 mm(42)
Bai et al, 2015b Solvothermal synthesis4 nm, 10 nmWurtzite structureS. aureus (ATCC 6538)6.25 and 25 µg/ml (46)
Manzoor et al, 2016 Mechano-chemical milling<20 nmSphericalMRSA0.625 mg/ml (50)
El-Gendy et al, 2022 Laser-ablation9.8 nmSphericalS. aureus (ATCC 43300)  (126)
Navarro-López et al, 2021Bottom-up synthesis Solution-polymerization method<20 nmHexagonal wurtzite structureS. aureus (ATCC 33594)1 mg/ml (47)
Manyasree et al, 2018  Co-precipitation35 nmSphericalS. aureus (MCC-2408)4 mg/ml24±0.35 mm(48)
Sajjad et al, 2021  Co-precipitation17.11-22.56 nmSpherical to hexagonal disks and rodlikeMRSA 23 mm(139)
Al-Mosawi et al, 2023 Wet chemical precipitation method18.47-25.19 nmSphericalMRSA25-50 µg/ml17.62±2.65 mm(140)
Kim et al, 2020 Solvothermal synthesis50 nmSphericalS. aureus 4 mm(141)
Hozyen et al, 2019 Sonochemical method41 nmHexagonalS. aureus20 mg/ml (142)
Mahamuni et al, 2018 Polyol synthesis15-100 nmOval to rodS. aureus (NCIM 2654)10-20 µg/ml14 mm(49)
Khan et al, 2014 Sol-gel method23.7-88.8 nmFlower-shapedS. aureus0.5 mg/ml23 mm(143)
Dadi et al, 2019b Sol-gel method3 nmSphericalS. aureus (ATCC 6538) 32 mm(32)
Gharpure et al, 2021  Co-precipitation60-250 nmRod, pear and almond-shapedS. aureus (PTCC1112) and S. aureus (ATCC6538p)2.5 µg/ml (144)
Wahab et al, 2010 Non-hydrolytic solution process20-30 nmSphericalS. aureus15 µg/ml (145)

[i] ZnO NPs, zinc oxide nanoparticles; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; ZOI, zone of inhibition.

3. Green-synthesized ZnO NPs against S. aureus

Recently, green biological materials drew much attention to researchers for their environment-friendly, cost-effective, low-toxicity and useful properties to make ZnO NPs (26). There are a number of types of biological materials such as bacteria, fungi, algae and plant extracts (51,52) (Fig. 3), which serve as reducing agents, capping agents, stabilizers and ligands during the synthesis of ZnO NPs (26) and their effects are ion reduction, size and shape control, NPs surface stabilization, metal passivation and coating, respectively, which are important to the antimicrobial properties of ZnO NPs (26,53). The antibacterial properties of green-synthesized ZnO NPs against S. aureus are in Table II.

Table II

The antibacterial properties against S. aureus of green-synthesized ZnO NPs.

Table II

The antibacterial properties against S. aureus of green-synthesized ZnO NPs.

First author/s, yearMaterial typeMaterialZnO NPs sizeZnO NPs shapeBacterial strainMICZOI(Refs.)
Mohammed et al, 2023PlantCymbopogon citratus20-24 nmHexagonal rod-likeS. aureus (MTCC 9760)88.13±0.35 µg/ml19.60±0.66 mm(56)
Mushtaq et al, 2023 Viscum album13.5 nmQuasi- sphericalS. aureus (ATCC 29213) 40±0.3 mm(57)
Al-Askar et al, 2023 Pluchea indica21.9 nmSphericalS. aureus250 µg/ml17.0±1.0 mm(146)
Hasan et al, 2022 Withania coagulans25 nmFlower-shapedS. aureus1.25 µg/ml21 mm(58)
Ting et al, 2022 Andrographis paniculata<98.61 nmFlower-shapeS. aureus (ATCC 29737) 25 mm(53)
Irfan et al, 2022 Acacia modesta70±03 nmRodMRSA 16±0.02 mm(59)
Malhotra et al, 2023 Eupatorium odoratum50 nmSpherical and hexagonalS. aureus (MTCC87)250 µg/ml (61)
Alallam et al, 2023 Curcumin27.61±5.18 nmGrain-shaped and sphericalS. aureus500 µg/ml10.60±0.10 mm(60)
Kahandal et al, 2023 Locust Bean Gum20-40 nmSphericalS. aureus (ATCC 6538)125 µg/ml (36)
Sachin et al, 2023 Lychee<10 nmSphericalS. aureus500 µg/ml15.0 mm(55)
Doğaroğlu et al, 2023 Mentha spicata24.5 nmTriangularS. aureus (ATCC 25923) 17.83 mm(54)
Doğaroğlu et al, 2023 Ocimum basilicum26.7 nmTriangularS. aureus (ATCC 25923) 16.14 mm 
Manojkumar et al, 2023 Brassica oleracea52 nmFlower-likeS. aureus 13 mm(147)
Irfan et al, 2021 Psidium guajava Linn41.34 nmHexagonalS. aureus 12±0.23 mm(148)
Jamil et al, 2020AlgaeMicroalgae strain ZAA1 (MF140241)1-100 nmSphericalS. aureus 14.5 mm(63)
  ZAA2 (MF114592)    20 mm 
  ZAA3 (MF114594)    14 mm 
Lopez-Miranda et al, 2023  Sargassum20-200 nmIrregularS. aureus (ATCC 6538)800 µg/ml (66)
Morowvat et al, 2023 Chlorella vulgaris33.4 nmRodMRSA400 µg/ml (64)
Ebadi et al, 2019 cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. EA0350-80 nmStar-shapedS. aureus (ATCC 25923)64 µg/ml (68)
Ebadi et al, 2022 cyanobacterial strain Desertifilum sp. EAZ0388 nmRodS. aureus (ATCC 59223)32 µg/ml (67)
Alsaggaf et al, 2021 Ulva fasciata Delile77.81 nmFlower and sphere shapesS. aureus (ATCC 25923)22.5 µg/ml19.7±1.1 mm(65)
Mohd Yusof et al, 2020Bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum TA4291.1 nmFlower-like (ZnO NPs-CFS)S. aureus1250 µg/ml16.5 mm(71)
   191.8 nmIrregular (ZnO NPs-CB) 312.5 µg/ml16 mm 
Shaaban and El Mahdy et al, 2018 Streptomyces isolate S1220-50 nmSphericalS. aureus (ATCC 29213)200 µg/ml (73)
     MRSA clinical isolates3.25-50 µg/ml  
Rehman et al, 2019 Bacillus haynesii (GeneBank: MG822851)50±5 nmSpherical and a few rod-shapedS. aureus (ATCC 29213)4 mg/ml (72)
Taran et al, 2018 Halomonas elongata IBRC-M 1021418.11±8.93 nmSphericalS. aureus (ATCC 43300)13.6 µg/ml (74)
Kang, 2022 Leuconostoc sp. Strain C2173.77± 14.53 nmRodS. aureus512 µg/ml (76)
Abdo et al, 2021 Pseudomonas aeruginosa14.95±3.5 nmSphericalS. aureus (ATCC 6538)200 µg/ml12.33±0.9 mm(149)
Sharma et al, 2021Fungi Phanerochaete chrysosporium50 nmHexagonalS. aureus (MTCC-96)0.1 µg/ml23 mm(77)
Mohamed et al, 2021 Penicillium chrysogenum9-35 nmHexagonalS. aureus (ATCC 23235)2 mg/ml16.33±0.88 mm(78)
Sumanth, 2020 Xylaria acuta34-55 nmHexagonalS. aureus (NCIM No. 2079)15.6 µg/ml (79)
Abdelkader et al, 2022 Aspergillus niger31.75±4.38 nmSpherical morphology with some hexagonal architectureS. aureus (ATCC 29231)8-128 µg/ml (80)
Motazedi et al, 2020  Saccharomyces cerevisiae<30 nmSphericalS. aureus (ATCC 25923) 25 mm(81)

[i] ZnO NPs, zinc oxide nanoparticles; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; CFS, the cell-supernatant; CB, the cell-biomass; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; ZOI, zone of inhibition.

Plant extracts synthesis

Due to different synthetic raw materials, plant-derived ZnO NPs are provided with multifarious characteristics. Triangle-like M-ZnO-NPs and B-ZnO-NPs were made by Mentha spicata and Ocimum basilicum acting as capping, stabilizing and reducing agents with size of 24.5 and 26.7 nm, respectively. These types of ZnO NPs had antibacterial properties against S. aureus (ATCC 25923) with a 14.73 mm ZOI with 0.01 g/ml M-ZnO-NPs (54). In Sachin et al (55), ZnO NPs synthesized by using lychee peel extract were spherical and small (<10 nm) and were also proved to combat S. aureus (ATCC25923) with 15 mm ZOI of 100 µg/ml ZnO NPs. In Mohammed et al (56), zinc nitrate hexahydrate and Cymbopogon citratus extracts were used to synthesize ZnO NPs, which killed S. aureus cells with a MIC of 88.13±0.35 µg/ml. In Mushtaq et al (57), methanol and water leaf extracts of Viscum album were applied to fabricate ZnO NPs that were quasi-spherical with size of 13.5 nm and which showed considerable inhibitory effects against S. aureus with a ZOI of 39±0.3 and 40±0.3 mm, respectively. Due to having a higher content of DNA gyrase-B inhibitor, the water extracts of ZnO NPs were proved to be more effective in limiting bacterial growth. ZnO NPs with flower-shaped structures were created by a green nanotechnology facility in Hasan et al (58) and showed 90.9% inhibition against S. aureus. It is noteworthy that the ZnO NPs showed more durable antimicrobial activity than Ag NPs in in vivo tests, which may be attributed to their distinctive morphology and massive active surface sites. In Irfan et al (59), green-synthesized ZnO NPs by Gum Acacia modesta expressed antimicrobial ability against MRSA with a ZOI of 16±2 mm. Alallam et al (60) also observed that ZnO NPs made by pure curcumin had a great ability to combat MRSA. Notably, these green-synthesized ZnO NPs showed a minimal cytotoxicity compared with chemically synthesized ZnO NPs (61). Furthermore, in Ting et al (53), ZnO NPs biosynthesized by using the aqueous extract of Andrographis paniculata leaves demonstrated a high inhibition on S. aureus and then controlled periimplantitis. ZnO NPs synthesized by using ethanolic extracts of Eupatorium odoratum are reported to show more than 97% biofilm inhibition of S. aureus that could be applied to reduce central venous catheter associated infections (61).

Algae synthesis

Algae are known as ‘bio-nano-factories’ due to their various properties, such as low risk of environmental toxicity, simple processing methods and the ability to redox metals (62). In addition, algal extracts are full of bioactive molecules that can be used as reducing and stabilizing agents. The biosynthesis of ZnO NPs using microalgae was authenticated to be a cost-effective method and the ZAA2 strain microalgae-synthesized ZnO NPs showed outstanding antibacterial activity with the largest ZOI of ~20 mm against S. aureus (63). In addition, by using Chlorella vulgaris as green resource, biogenic ZnO NPs were produced having significant antibacterial activity against MRSA, attributed to their excellent size distribution and surface energy (64). Researchers have also investigated the phyco-synthesis of UFD-ZnO NPs using extract of Ulva fasciata Delile. The destructive power of UFD-ZnO NPs against S. aureus (ATCC 25923) was time-dependent, while the MIC and ZOI were recorded at ~17.5 µg/ml and 24.9±1.5 mm, respectively (65). In a recent study, Sargassum extracts have been used to synthesize ZnO NPs and the ultrasound-assisted green synthesized ZnO NPs showed the highest inhibition against S. aureus by 99% compared with ZnO NPs alone (66). As one of the phototrophic bacteria, cyanobacteria are the source of bioactive compounds as well as the raw material of ZnO NPs synthesis. By using cell extract of a new cyanobacterial strain Desertifilum sp. EAZ03, ZnO NPs have been made that possess considerable antibiofilm and antimicrobial effects against S. aureus (ATCC 59223) with an MIC value of 32 µg/ml and the minimum bactericidal concentration value of 64 µg/ml (67). Similarly, Ebadi et al (68) synthesized ZnO NPs using the cell extract of the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. EA03, which were also discovered to destroy S. aureus biofilms and had low cytotoxicity on lung fibroblast cells.

Bacterial synthesis

With their lower purification cost and higher productivity compared with other microorganisms, bacteria are also considered as the raw materials to create ZnO NPs (69,70). According to a biosynthesis test of Yusof et al (71), Lactobacillus plantarum TA4, a microorganism isolated from fermented food, was proved to synthesize ZnO NPs with concentration- and shape-dependent antibacterial capacity. In addition, cell-free supernatant (CFS) and cell-biomass (CB) taken from L. plantarum TA4 were used as reducing agents to synthesize ZnO NPs, respectively. Although the MIC value to inhibit S. aureus of ZnO NPs-CB was lower compared with ZnO NPs-CFS, ZnO NPs were more conveniently purified by CFS (71). From this, it is indispensable to weigh up the pros and cons of different synthetic materials in order to choose the optimal raw material under different demands and experimental environments. In Rehman et al (72), Bacillus haynesii isolated from date palm plant was employed as the reducing agent to establish an eco-friendly nanobiofactory. ZnO NPs mediated by Bacillus cereus showed a spherical shape with median size of 50±5 nm, which damaged S. aureus cell surface by direct contact (72). Streptomyces purified from waste soil can be used to biosynthesize ZnO NPs and the antibacterial effects were identified to combat multiple isolates of S. aureus (73). Taran et al (74) explored the optimum condition to biosynthesize ZnO NPs by using Halomonas elongata IBRC-M 10214 through the Taguchi method (75). Results showed that these ZnO NPs were stable, pure and nontoxic, able to fight against multi-drug resistant bacteria such as S. aureus ATCC 43300. Strain C2 isolated from the genus Leuconostoc of lactic acid bacteria has been employed to biosynthesize metal NPs, including ZnO NPs and Au NPs. According to Kang et al (76), the C2-ZnO NPs expressed a lower MIC value of 512 µg/ml compared with C2-Au NPs (MIC: 1024 µg/ml) against S. aureus.

Fungal synthesis

A number of studies have reported that fungi can be used for synthesizing ZnO NPs. Sharma et al (77) used Phanerochaete chrysosporium to make ZnO NPs with advantages in terms of stability, simple processing, antimicrobial activity and non-cytotoxicity. Mohamed et al (78) produced fungal-synthesized ZnO NPs of 9-35 nm by using Penicillium chrysogenum and found that the ZnO NPs had antibacterial and antibiofilm activities against S. aureus. ZnO NPs synthesized by a simple, non-toxic method using fungal filtrate of Xylaria acuta were promising antimicrobial agents that exhibited an MIC value of 15.6 µg/ml against S. aureus (79). Abdelkader et al (80) synthesized ZnO NPs using Aspergillus niger Endophytic fungal extract with characteristics of stability and antibiofilm activity. It was demonstrated that ZnO NPs reduced the number of biofilm-forming S. aureus from 50-20.83% and the MIC of ZnO NPs against multiple S. aureus strains ranged from 8-128 µg/ml (80). In Motazedi et al (81), the extracellular extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used to create spherical ZnO NPs with dose-dependent antibacterial ability against S. aureus.

4. ZnO NPs cooperating with antibiotics for S. aureus treatment

At present, one of the most serious issues of global health must be antibiotics resistance. The synergy between antibiotics and ZnO NPs attracts much attention and would be a practicable treatment against multi-drug resistant bacteria (82,83). It has been found that ciprofloxacin in conjunction with ZnO@Glu-TSC (thiosemicarbazide-conjugated and glutamic acid-functionalized ZnO NPs) could significantly inhibit the expression of efflux pump genes, which is a vital factor towards antibiotics resistance (84). In addition, ZnO NPs can be excellent drug carriers to target antibacterial agents to the action sites and still achieve desired therapeutic effects for a decreased drug dosage, thus enhancing the antimicrobial efficacy (22). In Habib et al (85), using ZnO NPs combined with ciprofloxacin and imipenem, the ZOI of S. aureus was 17 mm higher than that of E. coli (12 mm). By using ZnO NPs in conjunction with antibiotics to defeat S. aureus, the MICs of six clinical common antibiotics were reduced, which reflected an effective antibacterial cooperation. Furthermore, the anti-biofilm efficacy was also investigated and was enhanced from 34-37% (antibiotics alone) to 65-85% (antibiotics and ZnO NPs combination) (86).

Hemmati et al (87) synthesized and characterized the chitosan-ZnO nanocomposites loading with gentamicin, which caused MIC reduction by four-fold and biofilm reduction by 77% in S. aureus by contrast with the gentamicin alone. Notably, drug-loaded ZnO NPs were shown to exhibit negligible toxicity to human cells (82). Thus, the synergy of ZnO NPs and antibiotics can be applied to a variety of antibacterial circumstances. In an infection model of rats, azithromycin-loaded ZnO NPs displayed enhanced ability to clear MRSA (88). Phytomolecules-coated ZnO NPs combined with tobramycin and gallic acid were synthesized and shown to be an excellent material for contact lenses, expressing a maximum log10 reduction of 5.7±0.02 CFU/ml in the growth of S. aureus and contributed to disruption of bacterial cell wall and membrane, leading to the leakage of cytoplasm and bacterial death (89). These drug-hybrid NPs such as cefazolin-hybrid ZnO NPs are also used to post-operative antimicrobial therapy due to their inhibitory actions against S. aureus both in vitro and in vivo (90).

5. ZnO nanocomposites/hybrids against S. aureus

Non-metal ZnO nano-composites/hybrids against S. aureus

In order to improve the antibacterial activity of ZnO NPs, various non-metal substances have been used to prepare ZnO nanocomposites. In Oves et al (91), the combination of graphene, curcumin and ZnO NPs showed enhanced inhibition against S. aureus more than five-fold compared with graphene-ZnO NPs and the ZnO nanocomposites also suppressed MRSA (ATCC 43300) effectively. Zhai et al (92) designed ZnO-graphene nanocomposites that could enhance rapid antibiosis due to the separation of ZnO electron-hole pairs and increased active sites by transforming the shape of ZnO. Silica nanorattles (SNs) combined with ZnO NPs were reported to exhibit an improved antibacterial activity against MRSA with a lower MIC of 6.25 µg/ml compared with free ZnO NPs in vitro and in vivo. Since the SNs surface protected and amassed the ZnO NPs, the free radicals offered by ZnO NPs had an enhanced efficacy in combating MRSA (93). Vinotha et al (94) developed the Btp-Ac-ZnO nanocomposites by using Acorus calamus extract and bacterial toxic protein (Cry) and they demonstrated the concentration-dependent biofilm inhibition of the synthesized nanocomposites against S. aureus (MTCC 9542). ZnO NPs can also be supported by 4A zeolite, controlling the release of ZnO NPs and enhancing the antibacterial properties (95). It has been shown that pancreatin-doped ZnO nanocomposites have improved performances, such as low-toxicity to human cells and anti-biofilm and anti-motility abilities against MRSA and increased sensitivity for vancomycin against MRSA (96). Canales et al (97) demonstrated that the electrospun scaffolds based on poly (lactic acid), bioglass and ZnO NPs showed biocidal properties against S. aureus with bacteria decreasing by 30%, which may be useful for tissue engineering. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose film combined with ZnO NPs and carboxymethyl starch have been shown to have excellent antibacterial ability against S. aureus and no toxicity to human HaCat cells and so can be used for wound dressing (98). Majeed et al (99) found that ZnO NPs doped with selenium showed strong inhibition to MRSA, however, teratogenicity was also revealed, which means that it is important to use them cautiously.

Nano-hybrids are also recommended as a good replacement for conventional antibacterial ZnO NPs and have enhanced antibacterial efficacy and low-toxicity on normal cells (100). According to Karthikeyan et al (101), in order to develop nanomaterials with high antibacterial ability compared with antibiotics, the alginate-ZnO hybrid nanomaterials have been synthesized with good inhibition effects on MRSA and low cytotoxicity to human cells. Kang et al (102) reported that the dispersibility of ZnO could be improved by the hybridization of ZnO NPs with nanocellulose and increasing bacterial inhibition rates were shown in S. aureus. Furthermore, in the research of AbouAitah et al (103), a hybrid nano-formulation was developed from ZnO NPs and protocatechuic acid and offered a sustained-release antibacterial effect toward S. aureus (Fig. 4).

Metal-doped ZnO nanocomposites against S. aureus

The activities of metal ions can be improved by the amalgamation of metal NPs. For instance, the release of more zinc and copper ions has been confirmed by ICP-OES analysis in Cu-doped ZnO nanocomposites, which caused enhanced antibacterial activity against S. aureus (104). In Rao et al (105), Na-doped ZnO NPs expressed enhanced inhibition activity against S. aureus with Na-concentration dependence. By using a scaled-up green strategy, cellulose-based Ag-ZnO nanocomposites (AZC) were prepared, which demonstrated good stability. It was also reported that the AZC films showed greater inhibition against S. aureus than E. coli (106). Hu et al (107) revealed that ZnO/Ag bimetallic nanocomposites showed significant inhibition against S. aureus compared with single metal nanomaterials and the cytotoxicity to fibroblasts was reduced by a ZnO and Ag complex. Mohammadi-Aloucheh et al (108) reported that ZnO/CuO nanocomposites synthesized using fruit extracts could lead to the disruption of bacterial membranes and enhanced anti-bacterial ability compared with ZnO NPs alone. Bahari et al (109) synthesized Fe3O4/ZnO nanocomposite by the sol-gel method and the molar ratio of 1:10 showed the best antimicrobial performance against S. aureus with a ZOI of 11.5±0.7 mm. AlSalhi et al (110) used the co-precipitation technique to make magnetic ZnO/ZnFe2O4 nanohybrids that were good photocatalytic material and it was discovered that the membrane of S. aureus collapsed after exposure to the nanohybrids. Lee et al (111) made a multi-metal oxide nanocomposite including ZrO, ZnO and TiO2. It was observed that these nanocomposites demonstrated a killing efficiency of 72.4% against S. aureus. Poly (vinyl alcohol)-based compositions were developed with addition of silver, copper and ZnO NPs, which had the feature of solidifying to be peeled off along with the impaired bacterial film, thereby decreasing the number of S. aureus (112).

6. Functional ZnO NPs for S. aureus treatment

In order to optimize the performance of ZnO NPs to combat pathogenic microorganisms, researchers have given attention to functionalized, modified or capped ZnO NPs (34,113). Choi et al (114) created novel ZnO NPs functionalized with caffeic acid, which expressed enhanced antibacterial efficiency against S. aureus and three MRSA strains. The amino-functionalized hydrophilic ZnO NPs induced the destruction of respiratory electron transformation, generation of intracellular ROS and depolarization of cell membrane in S. aureus (115). Charoensri et al (116) prepared polyaniline-functionalized ZnO NPs by a simple impregnation method; not only did the synthesized ZnO NPs films show enhanced water hydrophobicity, but also expressed increased antibacterial ability against S. aureus, which will make it possible to develop antibacterial biodegradable materials. Lee et al (117) prepared gallic acid functionalized ZnO NPs that had high bacterial cell membrane affinity and showed enhanced bactericidal activity against S. aureus and higher selective inhibition to MRSA strains compared with non-functionalized ZnO NPs. According to Chen et al (118), photosensitizers-functionalized ZnO NPs demonstrated marked S. aureus inhibition and showed low-toxicity on endothelial cells and erythrocyte. In Yuan et al (119), lysozyme-modified ZnO NPs expressed excellent antibacterial activity against S. aureus and MRSA due to their small size, membrane permeability and enzyme-mediated ROS generation and even had lower cytotoxicity than gentamycin at the same concentration.

7. Conclusion and perspectives

In the present study, ZnO NPs synthesized by different methods and their antibacterial activity against S. aureus have been summarized. Taken together, the anti-S. aureus efficacy of ZnO NPs mainly relies on their basic characteristics, especially size and shape. Spherical shape and small size are ideal features of ZnO NPs to combat bacteria that lead to high specific surface areas and more chances to contact with pathogens. In Babayevska et al (24), ZnO NPs with the highest specific surface area showed the size <10 nm. It is also reported that spherical ZnO NPs had the minimal size (31 nm) and higher anti-S. aureus activity (6-7 log CFU ml−1 reduction) compared with flower-shaped particles (3-4 log CFU ml−1 reduction for S. aureus) (44). The detail of ZnO NPs synthesized by various physical and chemical methods has been the subject of recent research (40). Some studies also revealed that these traditional synthesized methods had various shortcomings, such as being environment-contaminating, expensive and energy-intensive (43,120,121). Green synthesis has been emphasized due of its environment-friendly, easy-acquired and low-toxicity features. Some studies also noted that these green materials had antibacterial abilities already, such as mint (122), aloe (123) and curcumin (124), and they endow ZnO NPs with enhanced and steady antibacterial activity against S. aureus (125). Physical or chemical processes are the indispensable part in NPs synthesis. However, ZnO NPs made only by physicochemical ways are cannot compare with biogenic, functional or compound ZnO NPs when they are further applied to clinical antibacterial situations.

ZnO NPs can be used in a number of pre-clinical and clinical antimicrobial fields, including surgical operation (59), post-operative anti-bacterial therapy (90), anti-inflammatory (80) and ophthalmic treatment (126). For example, suture coated by green synthetic ZnO NPs demonstrated excellent tensile strength and wound healing ability in an incision wound rat model (59). An infection model in mice showed that ZnO NPs originating from fungi could significantly decrease hepatic inflammatory markers, restrain congestion and fibrosis in tissues and improve liver function (80). Sindelo et al (127) made the phthalocyanines link to the amino-functionalized ZnO NPs and these nanocomposites showed considerable activities of photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy and multi-microbial biofilms eradication. Considering that ZnO NPs had an excellent antibacterial activity against S. aureus and good biocompatibility, a chitosan-ZnO/selenium nanoparticles scaffold was developed to be used for infected wound healing and postoperative treatment of pediatric fractures (128). Ismail et al (129) also reported that ZnO NPs could be used as the hand sanitation in the future, which present improved anti-MRSA activity compared with the commonly used alcohol sanitation.

As one of the primary metal oxide NPs, ZnO NPs express excellent ability against S. aureus, but they still have drawbacks to be widely used as antibiotics replacements in clinical contexts. A few trials in vivo suggested that different metal oxide NPs damage cells to different degrees (45). Venkatraman et al (130) noted the toxicity of ZnO NPs to RAW264 macrophage cells, with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 494 µg/ml. Although electrospun scaffolds based on ZnO NPs showed increasing antibacterial activity, it is also reported that cytotoxicity was related to high ZnO content (97). According to Pereira et al (131), erythrocyte changes were also discovered in reptile exposure to ZnO NPs at the dose of 440 µg/kg. Yang et al (132) reported that ZnO NPs could induce apoptosis of mouse-derived spermatogonia cell line GC-1 spg cells. In Al-Zahaby et al (133), ZnO NPs (0.69 mg/l) mediated ROS that induced cell apoptosis and caused sensory toxicity effect on zebrafish olfactory organs. ZnO NPs synthesized by Calotropis procera leaf extract were reported to exhibit potent antimicrobial ability with concentration-dependent manner. However, with increasing exposure to ZnO NPs, deleterious changes (degeneration, swelling and atrophy) were found in the kidney by histology (85). Nazir et al (134) also discovered liver dysfunction in mice intraperitoneal injection groups at ZnO NPs doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg. ZnO NPs were also cytotoxic to the human immune system at doses of 25 and 12 mg/l (135). Despite ZnO NPs exhibiting outstanding capability in inhibiting MRSA, the resistance to NPs by microbes remained. If the dosage of NPs is below the sublethal concentrations, a series of resistance mechanisms would be initiated stealthily by bacteria, resembling their antibiotic resistance (136).

ZnO NPs still have potential toxicity when they are applied to clinical antibacterial treatment, though green-ZnO NPs have shown lower cytotoxicity than physicochemically synthesized ZnO NPs (60). Studies mostly pay close attention to the improving methods for preparation of ZnO NPs (42,48,54). They focus on the physical characteristics and antibacterial abilities, but neglect, to some degree, the cytotoxicity tests in vivo. Markedly, researchers have developed a predictive model to evaluate the security of ZnO NPs with different features and the authors point out that ZnO NPs with larger size, spherical shape, negative charge and a higher tendency for aggregation are safer, which is of great value to further toxicity studies (137). Notably, ZnO NPs <100 µg/ml were biocompatible and the cytotoxicity was parallel with their antibacterial activity, which meant that the anti-S. aureus mechanism (direct contact to cells, ROS and Zn2+ releasing) was also the potential killing process in normal cells (24). Although a number of reports explained the antibacterial mechanism against S. aureus of metal and metal oxide NPs, the studies for ZnO NPs were still limited compared with other metal NPs such as Ag NPs (26,138). The majority of ZnO NPs anti-S. aureus properties lack a comprehensive assessment and were only analyzed by well or disc diffusion test and bacterial growth curve and some studies only reported ZOI or MIC or even neither of them (42,50,126). A uniform standard of S. aureus strain is also necessary, which would play a crucial role in comparing antibacterial effects of ZnO NPs made by different methods.

In order to restrict the immoderate proliferation and mutation of pathogens, unremitting efforts should be made to optimize antibacterial strategies. As aforementioned, the synergism of ZnO NPs and other materials showed complemental effects, enhanced antibacterial activity and improved properties in clinical applications. Due to technology developments, there are more potentials for ZnO NPs preparation and biomedical application. For instance, apart from the green synthesis aforementioned, material-saving, safe and even granular NPs can be made by more novel methods, such as microfluidic (120). Except for using green and easily obtained raw materials, synthetic methods should be able to flexibly control the size, shape and dispersity of ZnO NPs, which means that the key material and procedure of ZnO NPs synthesis must be identified by modern techniques. Notably, genomic and proteomic techniques should be devoted to the exploration of the antibacterial mechanism, synthesis optimization and cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs. The antibacterial study of effects at the cellular level in the long term is an essential component to investigate the dosage and safety of ZnO NPs. It is necessary to focus on ZnO NPs studies in vivo, especially the biokinetics, bioavailability, tissue distribution and clearance rate, which are essential for their antibacterial applications and improved using as antibiotics replacements. In addition, composite and functional ZnO NPs could enhance the antibacterial advantages to some degree and decrease their toxicity and also reduce the excessive exposure of ZnO NPs that diminish the possibility of antimicrobial resistance, this is for future researchers.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82273696 and 81973105). The funders have no role in the preparation of manuscript and decision to submission.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

HY and GD conceived the present study. YH, YW, LZ, FL, YJ, JL and SC performed the literature search, drafted the manuscript and drew the figures. YH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' information

Optional

References

1 

Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL and Fowler VJ: Staphylococcus aureus infections: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 28:603–661. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Wang Y, Zhang P, Wu J, Chen S, Jin Y, Long J, Duan G and Yang H: Transmission of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus between animals, environment, and humans in the farm. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 30:86521–86539. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Willyard C: Drug-resistant bacteria ranked. Nature (London). 543(15)2017.

4 

Hou H, Li Y, Jin Y, Chen S, Long J, Duan G and Yang H: The crafty opponent: The defense systems of Staphylococcus aureus and response measures. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 67:233–243. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Lakhundi S and Zhang K: Methicillin-zesistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 31:e00020–18. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Gong C, Guan W, Liu X, Zheng Y, Li Z, Zhang Y, Zhu S, Jiang H, Cui Z and Wu S: Biomimetic bacteriophage-like particles formed from probiotic extracts and NO donors for eradicating multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Adv Mater. 34(e2206134)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Plumet L, Ahmad-Mansour N, Dunyach-Remy C, Kissa K, Sotto A, Lavigne JP, Costechareyre D and Molle V: Bacteriophage therapy for Staphylococcus aureus infections: A Review of animal models, treatments, and clinical trials. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 12(907314)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Chand U, Priyambada P and Kushawaha PK: Staphylococcus aureus vaccine strategy: Promise and challenges. Microbiol Res. 271(127362)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Miller LS, Fowler VG, Shukla SK, Rose WE and Proctor RA: Development of a vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus invasive infections: Evidence based on human immunity, genetics and bacterial evasion mechanisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 44:123–153. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Super M, Doherty EJ, Cartwright MJ, Seiler BT, Langellotto F, Dimitrakakis N, White DA, Stafford AG, Karkada M, Graveline AR, et al: Biomaterial vaccines capturing pathogen-associated molecular patterns protect against bacterial infections and septic shock. Nat Biomed Eng. 6:8–18. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

de Vor L, van Dijk B, van Kessel K, Kavanaugh JS, de Haas C, Aerts PC, Viveen MC, Boel EC, Fluit AC, Kwiecinski JM, et al: Human monoclonal antibodies against Staphylococcus aureus surface antigens recognize in vitro and in vivo biofilm. Elife. 11(e67301)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Raafat D, Otto M, Reppschlager K, Iqbal J and Holtfreter S: Fighting Staphylococcus aureus biofilms with monoclonal antibodies. Trends Microbiol. 27:303–322. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Haddad Kashani H, Schmelcher M, Sabzalipoor H, Seyed Hosseini E and Moniri R: Recombinant endolysins as potential therapeutics against antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Current status of research and novel delivery strategies. Clin Microbiol Rev. 31:e00071–17. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Defraine V, Fauvart M and Michiels J: Fighting bacterial persistence: Current and emerging anti-persister strategies and therapeutics. Drug Resist Updat. 38:12–26. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Ganesan N, Mishra B, Felix L and Mylonakis E: Antimicrobial peptides and small molecules targeting the cell membrane of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 87(e0003722)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Hou X, Li J, Tang H, Li Q, Shen G, Li S, Chen A, Peng Z, Zhang Y, Li C and Zhang Z: Antibacterial peptide NP-6 affects Staphylococcus aureus by multiple modes of action. Int J Mol Sci. 23(7812)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Li J, Liu D, Tian X, Koseki S, Chen S, Ye X and Ding T: Novel antibacterial modalities against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus derived from plants. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 59 (Suppl 1):S153–S161. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Pirzadeh M, Caporaso N, Rauf A, Shariati MA, Yessimbekov Z, Khan MU, Imran M and Mubarak MS: Pomegranate as a source of bioactive constituents: A review on their characterization, properties and applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 61:982–999. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Vestergaard M and Ingmer H: Antibacterial and antifungal properties of resveratrol. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 53:716–723. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Rai M, Ingle AP, Pandit R, Paralikar P, Gupta I, Chaud MV and Dos Santos CA: Broadening the spectrum of small-molecule antibacterials by metallic nanoparticles to overcome microbial resistance. Int J Pharm. 532:139–148. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Zahran M and Marei AH: Innovative natural polymer metal nanocomposites and their antimicrobial activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 136:586–596. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Makabenta JMV, Nabawy A, Li CH, Schmidt-Malan S, Patel R and Rotello VM: Nanomaterial-based therapeutics for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Nat Rev Microbiol. 19:23–36. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Yuan Z, Lin C, Dai L, He Y, Hu J, Xu K, Tao B, Liu P and Cai K: Near-infrared light-activatable dual-action nanoparticle combats the established biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its accompanying inflammation. Small. 17(e2007522)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Babayevska N, Przysiecka Ł, Iatsunskyi I, Nowaczyk G, Jarek M, Janiszewska E and Jurga S: ZnO size and shape effect on antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity profile. Sci Rep. 12(8148)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Wang Y, Yang Y, Shi Y, Song H and Yu C: Antibiotic-free antibacterial strategies enabled by nanomaterials: Progress and perspectives. Adv Mater. 32(e1904106)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Maťátková O, Michailidu J, Miškovská A, Kolouchová I, Masák J and Čejková A: Antimicrobial properties and applications of metal nanoparticles biosynthesized by green methods. Biotechnol Adv. 58(107905)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Wang L, Hu C and Shao L: The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: Present situation and prospects for the future. Int J Nanomedicine. 12:1227–1249. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Alzahrani KE, Niazy AA, Alswieleh AM, Wahab R, El-Toni AM and Alghamdi HS: Antibacterial activity of trimetal (CuZnFe) oxide nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 13:77–87. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Roszczenko P, Szewczyk OK, Czarnomysy R, Bielawski K and Bielawska A: Biosynthesized gold, silver, palladium, platinum, copper, and other transition metal nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics. 14(2286)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Slavin YN, Asnis J, Häfeli UO and Bach H: Metal nanoparticles: Understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity. J Nanobiotechnology. 15(65)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Huang X, Zheng X, Xu Z and Yi C: ZnO-based nanocarriers for drug delivery application: From passive to smart strategies. Int J Pharm. 534:190–194. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Dadi R, Azouani R, Traore M, Mielcarek C and Kanaev A: Antibacterial activity of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles against gram positive and gram negative strains. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 104(109968)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Kalpana VN and Devi Rajeswari V: A Review on green synthesis, biomedical applications, and toxicity studies of ZnO NPs. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2018(3569758)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Lallo da Silva B, Caetano BL, Chiari-Andréo BG, Pietro RCLR and Chiavacci LA: Increased antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles: Influence of size and surface modification. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 177:440–447. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Bianchini Fulindi R, Domingues Rodrigues J, Lemos Barbosa TW, Goncalves Garcia AD, de Almeida La Porta F, Pratavieira S, Chiavacci LA, Pessoa Araújo Junior J, da Costa PI and Martinez LR: Zinc-based nanoparticles reduce bacterial biofilm formation. Microbiol Spectr. 11(e0483122)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (Epub ahead of print).

36 

Kahandal A, Chaudhary S, Methe S, Nagwade P, Sivaram A and Tagad CK: Galactomannan polysaccharide as a biotemplate for the synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles with photocatalytic, antimicrobial and anticancer applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 253(126787)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Abdelraheem WM, Khairy RMM, Zaki AI and Zaki SH: Effect of ZnO nanoparticles on methicillin, vancomycin, linezolid resistance and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 20(54)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Irfan M, Munir H and Ismail H: Moringa oleifera gum based silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles: Green synthesis, characterization and their antibacterial potential against MRSA. Biomater Res. 25(17)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

El-Masry RM, Talat D, Hassoubah SA, Zabermawi NM, Eleiwa NZ, Sherif RM, Abourehab MSA, Abdel-Sattar RM, Gamal M, Ibrahim MS and Elbestawy A: Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoparticles against enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus. Life (Basel). 12(1662)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Bommakanti V, Banerjee M, Shah D, Manisha K, Sri K and Banerjee S: An overview of synthesis, characterization, applications and associated adverse effects of bioactive nanoparticles. Environ Res. 214(113919)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Massoudi I, Hamdi R, Ababutain I, Alhussain E and Kharma A: HSBM-produced zinc oxide nanoparticles: Physical properties and evaluation of their antimicrobial activity against human pathogens. Scientifica (Cairo). 2022(9989282)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Yusof NAA, Zain NM and Pauzi N: Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles with chitosan as stabilizing agent and their antibacterial properties against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Int J Biol Macromol. 124:1132–1136. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Asif N, Amir M and Fatma T: Recent advances in the synthesis, characterization and biomedical applications of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 46:1377–1398. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Mendes AR, Granadeiro CM, Leite A, Pereira E, Teixeira P and Poças F: optimizing antimicrobial efficacy: Investigating the impact of zinc oxide nanoparticle shape and size. Nanomaterials (Basel). 14(638)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Stankic S, Suman S, Haque F and Vidic J: Pure and multi metal oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, antibacterial and cytotoxic properties. J Nanobiotechnology. 14(73)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Bai X, Li L, Liu H, Tan L, Liu T and Meng X: Solvothermal synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and anti-infection application in vivo. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 7:1308–1317. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Navarro-López DE, Garcia-Varela R, Ceballos-Sanchez O, Sanchez-Martinez A, Sanchez-Ante G, Corona-Romero K, Buentello-Montoya DA, Elías-Zuñiga A and López-Mena ER: Effective antimicrobial activity of ZnO and Yb-doped ZnO nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 123(112004)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Manyasree D, Kiranmayi P and Kolli VR: Characterization and antibacterial activity of zno nanoparticles synthesized by co precipitation method. Int J Appl Pharm. 10(224)2018.

49 

Mahamuni PP, Patil PM, Dhanavade MJ, Badiger MV, Shadija PG, Lokhande AC and Bohara RA: Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles by using polyol chemistry for their antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity. Biochem Biophys Rep. 17:71–80. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Manzoor U, Siddique S, Ahmed R, Noreen Z, Bokhari H and Ahmad I: Antibacterial, structural and optical characterization of mechano-chemically prepared ZnO nanoparticles. PLoS One. 11(e0154704)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Paiva-Santos AC, Herdade AM, Guerra C, Peixoto D, Pereira-Silva M, Zeinali M, Mascarenhas-Melo F, Paranhos A and Veiga F: Plant-mediated green synthesis of metal-based nanoparticles for dermopharmaceutical and cosmetic applications. Int J Pharm. 597(120311)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Salem SS and Fouda A: Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles and their prospective biotechnological applications: An overview. Biol Trace Elem Res. 199:344–370. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Ting BYS, Fuloria NK, Subrimanyan V, Bajaj S, Chinni SV, Reddy LV, Sathasivam KV, Karupiah S, Malviya R, Meenakshi DU, et al: Biosynthesis and response of zinc oxide nanoparticles against periimplantitis triggering pathogens. Materials (Basel). 15(3170)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Doğaroğlu ZG, Uysal Y, çaylalı Z and Karakulak DS: Green nanotechnology advances: Green manufacturing of zinc nanoparticles, characterization, and foliar application on wheat and antibacterial characteristics using Mentha spicata (mint) and Ocimum basilicum (basil) leaf extracts. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 30:60820–60837. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Sachin Jaishree, Singh N, Singh R, Shah K and Pramanik BK: Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using lychee peel and its application in anti-bacterial properties and CR dye removal from wastewater. Chemosphere. 327(138497)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Mohammed YHI, Alghamdi S, Jabbar B, Marghani D, Beigh S, Abouzied AS, Khalifa NE, Khojali WMA, Huwaimel B, Alkhalifah DHM and Hozzein WN: Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Cymbopogon citratus extract and its antibacterial activity. ACS Omega. 8:32027–32042. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Mushtaq W, Ishtiaq M, Maqbool M, Mazhar MW, Casini R, Abd-Elgawad AM and Elansary HO: Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Viscum album extracts: Unveiling bioactive compounds, antibacterial potential, and antioxidant activities. Plants (Basel). 12(2130)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Hasan M, Zafar A, Imran M, Iqbal KJ, Tariq T, Iqbal J, Shaheen A, Hussain R, Anjum SI and Shu X: Crest to trough cellular drifting of green-synthesized zinc oxide and silver nanoparticles. ACS Omega. 7:34770–34778. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Irfan M, Munir H and Ismail H: Characterization and fabrication of zinc oxide nanoparticles by gum Acacia modesta through green chemistry and impregnation on surgical sutures to boost up the wound healing process. Int J Biol Macromol. 204:466–475. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Alallam B, Doolaanea AA, Alfatama M and Lim V: Phytofabrication and characterisation of zinc oxide nanoparticles using pure curcumin. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 16(269)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Malhotra A, Chauhan SR, Rahaman M, Tripathi R, Khanuja M and Chauhan A: Phyto-assisted synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles for developing antibiofilm surface coatings on central venous catheters. Front Chem. 11(1138333)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

62 

Khanna P, Kaur A and Goyal D: Algae-based metallic nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization and applications. J Microbiol Methods. 163(105656)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

63 

Jamil Z, Naqvi STQ, Rasul S, Hussain SB, Fatima N, Qadir MI and Muhammad SA: Antibacterial activity and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by microalgae. Pak J Pharm Sci. 33:2497–2504. 2020.PubMed/NCBI

64 

Morowvat MH, Kazemi K, Jaberi MA, Amini A and Gholami A: Biosynthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Chlorella vulgaris biomass against multidrug-resistant pathogens. Materials (Basel). 16(842)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

65 

Alsaggaf MS, Diab AM, Elsaied BEF, Tayel AA and Moussa SH: Application of ZnO nanoparticles phycosynthesized with Ulva fasciata extract for preserving peeled shrimp quality. Nanomaterials (Basel). 11(385)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

66 

Lopez-Miranda JL, Molina GA, González-Reyna MA, España-Sánchez BL, Esparza R, Silva R and Estévez M: Antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by a green method using Sargassum extracts. Int J Mol Sci. 24(1474)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

67 

Ebadi M, Zolfaghari MR, Aghaei SS, Zargar M and Noghabi KA: Desertifilum sp. EAZ03 cell extract as a novel natural source for the biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles and antibacterial, anticancer and antibiofilm characteristics of synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Appl Microbiol. 132:221–236. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

68 

Ebadi M, Zolfaghari MR, Aghaei SS, Zargar M, Shafiei M, Zahiri HS and Noghabi KA: A bio-inspired strategy for the synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) using the cell extract of cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. EA03: From biological function to toxicity evaluation. RSC Adv. 9:23508–23525. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

69 

Barani M, Masoudi M, Mashreghi M, Makhdoumi A and Eshghi H: Cell-free extract assisted synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using aquatic bacterial strains: Biological activities and toxicological evaluation. Int J Pharm. 606(120878)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

70 

Dikshit P, Kumar J, Das AK, Sadhu S, Sharma S, Singh S, Gupta PK and Kim BS: Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles: Applications and limitations. Catalysts. 11(902)2021.

71 

Mohd Yusof H, Abdul Rahman NA, Mohamad R, Zaidan UH and Samsudin AA: Biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles by cell-biomass and supernatant of Lactobacillus plantarum TA4 and its antibacterial and biocompatibility properties. Sci Rep. 10(19996)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Rehman S, Jermy BR, Akhtar S, Borgio JF, Abdul AS, Ravinayagam V, Al Jindan R, Alsalem ZH, Buhameid A and Gani A: Isolation and characterization of a novel thermophile; Bacillus haynesii, applied for the green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 47:2072–2082. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Shaaban M and El-Mahdy AM: Biosynthesis of Ag, Se, and ZnO nanoparticles with antimicrobial activities against resistant pathogens using waste isolate Streptomyces enissocaesilis. IET Nanobiotechnol. 12:741–747. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

74 

Taran M, Rad M and Alavi M: Biosynthesis of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles by Halomonas elongata IBRC-M 10214 in different conditions of medium. Bioimpacts. 8:81–89. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

75 

Taran M and Amirkhani H: Strategies of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) synthesis by Haloarcula sp. IRU1 utilizing glucose as carbon source: Optimization of culture conditions by Taguchi methodology. Int J Biol Macromol. 47:632–634. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

76 

Kang MG, Khan F, Jo DM, Oh D, Tabassum N and Kim YM: Antibiofilm and antivirulence activities of gold and zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized from kimchi-isolated Leuconostoc sp. Strain C2. Antibiotics (Basel). 11(1524)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

77 

Sharma JL, Dhayal V and Sharma RK: White-rot fungus mediated green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their impregnation on cellulose to develop environmental friendly antimicrobial fibers. 3 Biotech. 11(269)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

78 

Mohamed AA, Abu-Elghait M, Ahmed NE and Salem SS: Eco-friendly mycogenic synthesis of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles for in vitro antibacterial, antibiofilm, and antifungal applications. Biol Trace Elem Res. 199:2788–2799. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

79 

Sumanth B, Lakshmeesha TR, Ansari MA, Alzohairy MA, Udayashankar AC, Shobha B, Niranjana SR, Srinivas C and Almatroudi A: Mycogenic synthesis of extracellular zinc oxide nanoparticles from Xylaria acuta and its nanoantibiotic potential. Int J Nanomedicine. 15:8519–8536. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

80 

Abdelkader DH, Negm WA, Elekhnawy E, Eliwa D, Aldosari BN and Almurshedi AS: Zinc oxide nanoparticles as potential delivery carrier: Green synthesis by Aspergillus niger Endophytic fungus, characterization, and in vitro/in vivo antibacterial activity. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 15(1057)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

81 

Motazedi R, Rahaiee S and Zare M: Efficient biogenesis of ZnO nanoparticles using extracellular extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Evaluation of photocatalytic, cytotoxic and other biological activities. Bioorg Chem. 101(103998)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

82 

Akbar N, Aslam Z, Siddiqui R, Shah MR and Khan NA: Zinc oxide nanoparticles conjugated with clinically-approved medicines as potential antibacterial molecules. AMB Express. 11(104)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

83 

Ghaffar N, Javad S, Farrukh MA, Shah AA, Gatasheh MK, Al-Munqedhi BMA and Chaudhry O: Metal nanoparticles assisted revival of Streptomycin against MDRS Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One. 17(e0264588)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

84 

Nejabatdoust A, Zamani H and Salehzadeh A: Functionalization of ZnO nanoparticles by glutamic acid and conjugation with thiosemicarbazide alters expression of efflux pump genes in multiple drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Microb Drug Resist. 25:966–974. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

85 

Habib S, Rashid F, Tahir H, Liaqat I, Latif AA, Naseem S, Khalid A, Haider N, Hani U, Dawoud RA, et al: Antibacterial and cytotoxic effects of biosynthesized zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Microorganisms. 11(1363)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

86 

Abdelghafar A, Yousef N and Askoura M: Zinc oxide nanoparticles reduce biofilm formation, synergize antibiotics action and attenuate Staphylococcus aureus virulence in host; an important message to clinicians. BMC Microbiol. 22(244)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

87 

Hemmati F, Salehi R, Ghotaslou R, Kafil HS, Hasani A, Gholizadeh P and Rezaee MA: The assessment of antibiofilm activity of chitosan-zinc oxide-gentamicin nanocomposite on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Biol Macromol. 163:2248–2258. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

88 

Saddik MS, Elsayed MMA, El-Mokhtar MA, Sedky H, Abdel-Aleem JA, Abu-Dief AM, Al-Hakkani MF, Hussein HL, Al-Shelkamy SA, Meligy FY, et al: Tailoring of novel azithromycin-loaded zinc oxide nanoparticles for wound healing. Pharmaceutics. 14(111)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

89 

Khan SA, Shahid S, Mahmood T and Lee CS: Contact lenses coated with hybrid multifunctional ternary nanocoatings (phytomolecule-coated ZnO nanoparticles:Gallic acid:Tobramycin) for the treatment of bacterial and fungal keratitis. Acta Biomater. 128:262–276. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

90 

Rath G, Hussain T, Chauhan G, Garg T and Goyal AK: Development and characterization of cefazolin loaded zinc oxide nanoparticles composite gelatin nanofiber mats for postoperative surgical wounds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 58:242–253. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

91 

Oves M, Rauf MA, Ansari MO, Aslam Parwaz Khan A, A Qari H, Alajmi MF, Sau S and Iyer AK: Graphene decorated zinc oxide and curcumin to disinfect the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nanomaterials (Basel). 10(1004)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

92 

Zhai F, Luo Y, Zhang Y, Liao S, Cheng J, Meng X, Zeng Y, Wang X, Yang J, Yin J and Li L: Viscosity simulation of glass microfiber and an unusual air filter with high-efficiency antibacterial functionality enabled by ZnO/graphene-modified glass microfiber. ACS Omega. 7:14211–14221. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

93 

Chai Q, Wu Q, Liu T, Tan L, Fu C, Ren X, Yang Y and Meng X: Enhanced antibacterial activity of silica nanorattles with ZnO combination nanoparticles against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Bull (Beijing). 62:1207–1215. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

94 

Vinotha V, Yazhiniprabha M, Jeyavani J and Vaseeharan B: Synthesis and characterization of cry protein coated zinc oxide nanocomposites and its assessment against bacterial biofilm and mosquito vectors. Int J Biol Macromol. 208:935–947. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

95 

Azizi-Lalabadi M, Ehsani A, Divband B and Alizadeh-Sani M: Antimicrobial activity of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles supported in 4A zeolite and evaluation the morphological characteristic. Sci Rep. 9(17439)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

96 

Banerjee S, Vishakha K, Das S, Dutta M, Mukherjee D, Mondal J, Mondal S and Ganguli A: Antibacterial, anti-biofilm activity and mechanism of action of pancreatin doped zinc oxide nanoparticles against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 190(110921)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

97 

Canales DA, Piñones N, Saavedra M, Loyo C, Palza H, Peponi L, Leonés A, Baier RV, Boccaccini AR, Grünelwald A and Zapata PA: Fabrication and assessment of bifunctional electrospun poly(l-lactic acid) scaffolds with bioglass and zinc oxide nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 228:78–88. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

98 

Pitpisutkul V and Prachayawarakorn J: Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/carboxymethyl starch/zinc oxide porous nanocomposite films for wound dressing application. Carbohydr Polym. 298(120082)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

99 

Majeed A, Javed F, Akhtar S, Saleem U, Anwar F, Ahmad B, Nadhman A, Shahnaz G, Hussain I, Hussain SZ and Sohail MF: Green synthesized selenium doped zinc oxide nano-antibiotic: Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of antimicrobial, nanotoxicity and teratogenicity potential. J Mater Chem B. 8:8444–8458. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

100 

Zabihi E, Arab-Bafrani Z, Hoseini SM, Mousavi E, Babaei A, Khalili M, Hashemi MM and Javid N: Fabrication of nano-decorated ZnO-fibrillar chitosan exhibiting a superior performance as a promising replacement for conventional ZnO. Carbohydr Polym. 274(118639)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

101 

Karthikeyan C, Tharmalingam N, Varaprasad K, Mylonakis E and Yallapu MM: Biocidal and biocompatible hybrid nanomaterials from biomolecule chitosan, alginate and ZnO. Carbohydr Polym. 274(118646)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

102 

Kang J, Hu C, Dichiara A, Guan L, Yun H and Gu J: Facile preparation of cellulose nanocrystals/ZnO hybrids using acidified ZnCl2 as cellulose hydrolytic media and ZnO precursor. Int J Biol Macromol. 227:863–871. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

103 

AbouAitah K, Piotrowska U, Wojnarowicz J, Swiderska-Sroda A, El-Desoky AHH and Lojkowski W: Enhanced activity and sustained release of protocatechuic acid, a natural antibacterial agent, from hybrid nanoformulations with zinc oxide nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci. 22(5287)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

104 

Naserian F and Mesgar AS: Development of antibacterial and superabsorbent wound composite sponges containing carboxymethyl cellulose/gelatin/Cu-doped ZnO nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 218(112729)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

105 

Nageswara Rao B, Tirupathi Rao P, Vasudha K, Esub Basha S, Prasanna DSL, Bhushana Rao T, Samatha K and Ramachandra RK: Physiochemical characterization of sodium doped zinc oxide nano powder for antimicrobial applications. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 291(122297)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

106 

Fu F, Gu J, Zhang R, Xu X, Yu X, Liu L, Liu X, Zhou J and Yao J: Three-dimensional cellulose based silver-functionalized ZnO nanocomposite with controlled geometry: Synthesis, characterization and properties. J Colloid Interface Sci. 530:433–443. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

107 

Hu M, Li C, Li X, Zhou M, Sun J, Sheng F, Shi S and Lu L: Zinc oxide/silver bimetallic nanoencapsulated in PVP/PCL nanofibres for improved antibacterial activity. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 46:1248–1257. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

108 

Mohammadi-Aloucheh R, Habibi-Yangjeh A, Bayrami A, Latifi-Navid S and Asadi A: Enhanced anti-bacterial activities of ZnO nanoparticles and ZnO/CuO nanocomposites synthesized using Vaccinium arctostaphylos L. fruit extract. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 46 (Suppl 1):S1200–S1209. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

109 

Bahari A, Roeinfard M, Ramzannezhad A, Khodabakhshi M and Mohseni M: Nanostructured Features and Antimicrobial Properties of Fe3O4/ZnO Nanocomposites. Natl Acad Sci Lett. 42:9–12. 2019.

110 

AlSalhi MS, Devanesan S, Asemi N and Ahamed A: Concurrent fabrication of ZnO-ZnFe2O4 hybrid nanocomposite for enhancing photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants and its bacterial inactivation. Chemosphere. 318(137928)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

111 

Lee M, Han SI, Kim C, Velumani S, Han A, Kassiba AH and Castaneda H: ZrO2/ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposite coatings on stainless steel for improved corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, and antimicrobial activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 14:13801–13811. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

112 

Pulit-Prociak J, Staroń A, Staroń P, Chmielowiec-Korzeniowska A, Drabik A, Tymczyna L and Banach M: Preparation and of PVA-based compositions with embedded silver, copper and zinc oxide nanoparticles and assessment of their antibacterial properties. J Nanobiotechnology. 18(148)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

113 

Akhil K, Jayakumar J, Gayathri G and Khan SS: Effect of various capping agents on photocatalytic, antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of ZnO nanoparticles. J Photochem Photobiol B. 160:32–42. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

114 

Choi KH, Nam KC, Lee SY, Cho G, Jung JS, Kim HJ and Park BJ: Antioxidant potential and antibacterial efficiency of caffeic acid-functionalized ZnO nanoparticles. Nanomaterials (Basel). 7(148)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

115 

Du M, Zhao W, Ma R, Xu H, Zhu Y, Shan C, Liu K, Zhuang J and Jiao Z: Visible-light-driven photocatalytic inactivation of S. aureus in aqueous environment by hydrophilic zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles based on the interfacial electron transfer in S. aureus/ZnO composites. J Hazard Mater. 418(126013)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

116 

Charoensri K, Rodwihok C, Wongratanaphisan D, Ko JA, Chung JS and Park HJ: Investigation of functionalized surface charges of thermoplastic starch/zinc oxide nanocomposite films using polyaniline: The potential of improved antibacterial properties. Polymers (Basel). 13(425)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

117 

Lee J, Choi KH, Min J, Kim HJ, Jee JP and Park BJ: Functionalized ZnO nanoparticles with gallic acid for antioxidant and antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Nanomaterials (Basel). 7(365)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

118 

Chen J, Jing Q, Xu Y, Lin Y, Mai Y, Chen L, Wang G, Chen Z, Deng L, Chen J, et al: Functionalized zinc oxide microparticles for improving the antimicrobial effects of skin-care products and wound-care medicines. Biomater Adv. 135(212728)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

119 

Yuan K, Liu X, Shi J, Liu W, Liu K, Lu H, Wu D, Chen Z and Lu C: Antibacterial properties and mechanism of lysozyme-modified ZnO nanoparticles. Front Chem. 9(762255)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

120 

Popa ML, Preda MD, Neacșu IA, Grumezescu AM and Ginghină O: Traditional vs microfluidic synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci. 24(1875)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

121 

Ahmed S, Annu Chaudhry SA and Ikram S: A review on biogenic synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using plant extracts and microbes: A prospect towards green chemistry. J Photochem Photobiol B. 166:272–284. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

122 

Kapp K, Orav A, Roasto M, Raal A, Püssa T, Vuorela H, Tammela P and Vuorela P: Composition and antibacterial effect of mint flavorings in candies and food supplements. Planta Med. 86:1089–1096. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

123 

Deng Z, Bheemanaboina RRY, Luo Y and Zhou CH: Aloe emodin-conjugated sulfonyl hydrazones as novel type of antibacterial modulators against S. aureus 25923 through multifaceted synergistic effects. Bioorg Chem. 127(106035)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

124 

Hussain Y, Alam W, Ullah H, Dacrema M, Daglia M, Khan H and Arciola CR: Antimicrobial potential of curcumin: Therapeutic potential and challenges to clinical applications. Antibiotics (Basel). 11(322)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

125 

Singh P, Garg A, Pandit S, Mokkapati VRSS and Mijakovic I: Antimicrobial effects of biogenic nanoparticles. Nanomaterials (Basel). 8(1009)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

126 

El-Gendy AO, Nawaf KT, Ahmed E, Samir A, Hamblin MR, Hassan M and Mohamed T: Preparation of zinc oxide nanoparticles using laser-ablation technique: Retinal epithelial cell (ARPE-19) biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity when activated with femtosecond laser. J Photochem Photobiol B. 234(112540)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

127 

Sindelo A, Nene L and Nyokong T: Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy with asymmetrical cationic or neutral metallophthalocyanines conjugated to amino-functionalized zinc oxide nanoparticles (spherical or pyramidal) against planktonic and biofilm microbial cultures. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 40(103160)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

128 

Ruan Q, Yuan L, Gao S, Ji X, Shao W, Ma J and Jiang D: Development of ZnO/selenium nanoparticles embedded chitosan-based anti-bacterial wound dressing for potential healing ability and nursing care after paediatric fracture surgery. Int Wound J. 20:1819–1831. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

129 

Ismail A, Raya NR, Orabi A, Ali AM and Abo-Zeid Y: Investigating the antibacterial activity and safety of zinc oxide nanoparticles versus a commercial alcohol-based hand-sanitizer: Can zinc oxide nanoparticles be useful for hand sanitation? Antibiotics (Basel). 11(1606)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

130 

Venkatraman G, Mohan PS, Abdul-Rahman PS, Sonsudin F, Muttiah B, Hirad AH, Alarfaj AA and Wang S: Morinda citrifolia leaf assisted synthesis of ZnO decorated Ag bio-nanocomposites for in-vitro cytotoxicity, antimicrobial and anticancer applications. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 47:1213–1226. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

131 

Pereira da Costa Araújo A, Lima VS, Emmanuela de Andrade Vieira J, Mesak C and Malafaia G: First report on the mutagenicity and cytotoxicity of Zno nanoparticles in reptiles. Chemosphere. 235:556–564. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

132 

Yang D, Zhang M, Gan Y, Yang S, Wang J, Yu M, Wei J and Chen J: Involvement of oxidative stress in ZnO NPs-induced apoptosis and autophagy of mouse GC-1 spg cells. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 202(110960)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

133 

Al-Zahaby SA, Farag MR, Alagawany M, Taha HSA, Varoni MV, Crescenzo G and Mawed SA: Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) induce cytotoxicity in the zebrafish olfactory organs via activating oxidative stress and apoptosis at the ultrastructure and genetic levels. Animals (Basel). 13(2867)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

134 

Nazir S, Rabbani A, Mehmood K, Maqbool F, Shah GM, Khan MF and Sajid M: Antileishmanial activity and cytotoxicity of ZnO-based nano-formulations. Int J Nanomedicine. 14:7809–7822. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

135 

Czyzowska A and Barbasz A: Cytotoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to innate and adaptive human immune cells. J Appl Toxicol. 41:1425–1437. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

136 

Niño-Martínez N, Salas Orozco MF, Martínez-Castañón GA, Torres Méndez F and Ruiz F: Molecular mechanisms of bacterial resistance to metal and metal oxide nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci. 20(2808)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

137 

Alsmadi MM, Al-Nemrawi NK, Obaidat R, Abu Alkahsi AE, Korshed KM and Lahlouh IK: Insights into the mapping of green synthesis conditions for ZnO nanoparticles and their toxicokinetics. Nanomedicine (Lond). 17:1281–1303. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

138 

Marinescu L, Ficai D, Oprea O, Marin A, Ficai A, Andronescu E and Holban AM: Optimized Synthesis approaches of metal nanoparticles with antimicrobial applications. J Nanomater. 2020:1–14. 2020.

139 

Sajjad A, Bhatti SH, Ali Z, Jaffari GH, Khan NA, Rizvi ZF and Zia M: Photoinduced fabrication of zinc oxide nanoparticles: Transformation of morphological and biological response on light irradiance. ACS Omega. 6:11783–11793. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

140 

Al-Mosawi RM, Jasim HA and Haddad A: Study of the antibacterial effects of the starch-based zinc oxide nanoparticles on methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different clinical specimens of patients from Basrah, Iraq. AIMS Microbiol. 9:90–107. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

141 

Kim I, Viswanathan K, Kasi G, Sadeghi K, Thanakkasaranee S and Seo J: Preparation and characterization of positively surface charged zinc oxide nanoparticles against bacterial pathogens. Microb Pathog. 149(104290)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

142 

Hozyen HF, Ibrahim ES, Khairy EA and El-Dek SI: Enhanced antibacterial activity of capped zinc oxide nanoparticles: A step towards the control of clinical bovine mastitis. Vet World. 12:1225–1232. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

143 

Khan MF, Hameedullah M, Ansari AH, Ahmad E, Lohani MB, Khan RH, Alam MM, Khan W, Husain FM and Ahmad I: Flower-shaped ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by a novel approach at near-room temperatures with antibacterial and antifungal properties. Int J Nanomedicine. 9:853–864. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

144 

Gharpure S, Jadhav T, Ghotekar C, Jagtap A, Vare Y and Ankamwar B: Non-antibacterial and antibacterial ZnO nanoparticles composed of different surfactants. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 21:5945–5959. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

145 

Wahab R, Mishra A, Yun SI, Kim YS and Shin HS: Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles prepared via non-hydrolytic solution route. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 87:1917–1925. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

146 

Al-Askar AA, Hashem AH, Elhussieny NI and Saied E: Green biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Pluchea indica leaf extract: Antimicrobial and photocatalytic activities. Molecules. 28(4679)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

147 

Manojkumar U, Kaliannan D, Srinivasan V, Balasubramanian B, Kamyab H, Mussa ZH, Palaniyappan J, Mesbah M, Chelliapan S and Palaninaicker S: Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Brassica oleracea var. botrytis leaf extract: Photocatalytic, antimicrobial and larvicidal activity. Chemosphere. 323(138263)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

148 

Irfan M, Naz MY, Saleem M, Tanawush M, Głowacz A, Glowacz W, Rahman S, Mahnashi MH, Alqahtani YS, Alyami BA, et al: Statistical study of nonthermal plasma-assisted ZnO coating of cotton fabric through ultrasonic-assisted green synthesis for improved self-cleaning and antimicrobial properties. Materials (Basel). 14(6998)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

149 

Abdo AM, Fouda A, Eid AM, Fahmy NM, Elsayed AM, Khalil AMA, Alzahrani OM, Ahmed AF and Soliman AM: Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and their activity against pathogenic microbes and common house mosquito, culex pipiens. Materials (Basel). 14(6983)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2024
Volume 21 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hao Y, Wang Y, Zhang L, Liu F, Jin Y, Long J, Chen S, Duan G and Yang H: Advances in antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus (Review). Biomed Rep 21: 161, 2024.
APA
Hao, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Liu, F., Jin, Y., Long, J. ... Yang, H. (2024). Advances in antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus (Review). Biomedical Reports, 21, 161. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1849
MLA
Hao, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Liu, F., Jin, Y., Long, J., Chen, S., Duan, G., Yang, H."Advances in antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus (Review)". Biomedical Reports 21.5 (2024): 161.
Chicago
Hao, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Liu, F., Jin, Y., Long, J., Chen, S., Duan, G., Yang, H."Advances in antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus (Review)". Biomedical Reports 21, no. 5 (2024): 161. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1849