1
|
Lorch H, Zwaan M, Kagel C and Weiss HD:
Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists:
experience with 125 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol. 24:180–184. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar
|
2
|
Caers J, Fontaine C, Vinh-Hung V, et al:
Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated
with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports. Support Care Cancer.
13:325–331. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
3
|
Plumhans C, Mahnken AH, Ocklenburg C, et
al: Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports:
catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain
perception. Eur J Radiol. 79:338–342. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar
|
4
|
Cil BE, Canyiğit M, Peynircioğlu B, et al:
Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: a single
center experience. Diagn Interv Radiol. 12:93–98. 2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Lewis CA, Allen TE, Burke DR, et al:
Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice
Committee: Quality improvement guidelines for central venous
access. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 14:S231–S235. 2003.
|
6
|
Yip D and Funaki B: Subcutaneous chest
ports via the internal jugular vein. A retrospective study of 117
oncology patients. Acta Radiol. 43:371–375. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7
|
Biffi R, Corrado F, de Braud F, et al:
Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports
connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours:
experience from 178 cases using a single type of device. Eur J
Cancer. 33:1190–1194. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar
|
8
|
Funaki B, Szymski GX, Hackworth CA, et al:
Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for
long-term central venous access. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
169:1431–1434. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
McGee DC and Gould MK: Preventing
complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med.
348:1123–1133. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
10
|
Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, et al:
Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation:
meta-analysis. BMJ. 327:3612003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11
|
Biffi R, Orsi F, Pozzi S, et al: Best
choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of
catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer
therapy: a randomized trial. Ann Oncol. 20:935–940. 2009.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
12
|
Di Carlo I, Pulvirenti E, Mannino M and
Toro A: Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally
implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year
comprehensive review on early complications. Ann Surg Oncol.
17:1649–1656. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
|
13
|
Karakitsos D, Labropoulos N, De Groot E,
et al: Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal
jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique
in critical care patients. Crit Care. 10:R1622006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
14
|
Akahane A, Sone M, Ehara S, Kato K, Tanaka
R and Nakasato T: Subclavian vein versus arm vein for totally
implantable central venous port for patients with head and neck
cancer: a retrospective comparative analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol. 34:1222–1229. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
15
|
Sakamoto N, Arai Y, Takeuchi Y, Takahashi
M, Tsurusaki M and Sugimura K: Ultrasound-guided radiological
placement of central venous port via the subclavian vein: a
retrospective analysis of 500 cases at a single institute.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 33:989–994. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
16
|
Teichgräber UK, Kausche S, Nagel SN and
Gebauer B: Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of
radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central
venous port systems. Eur Radiol. 21:1224–1232. 2011.
|
17
|
Shetty PC, Mody MK, Kastan DJ, Sharma RP,
Burke MW and Venugopal C: Outcome of 350 implanted chest ports
placed by interventional radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol.
8:991–995. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
18
|
Brooks AJ, Alfredson M, Pettigrew B and
Morris DL: Ultrasound-guided insertion of subclavian venous access
ports. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 87:25–27. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
19
|
McNulty NJ, Perrich KD, Silas AM, Linville
RM and Forauer AR: Implantable subcutaneous venous access devices:
is port fixation necessary? A review of 534 cases. Cardiovasc
Intervent Radiol. 33:751–755. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
20
|
de Costa BR, Dickey K and Greenwood L: A
practical approach for repositioning flipped venous access ports. J
Vasc Interv Radiol. 11:213–214. 2000.PubMed/NCBI
|
21
|
Ozdemir NY, Abali H, Oksuzoğlu B,
Budakoglu B, Akmangit I and Zengin N: It appears to be safe to
start chemotherapy on the day of implantation through subcutaneous
venous port catheters in inpatient setting. Support Care Cancer.
17:399–403. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
22
|
Trerotola SO, Kuhn-Fulton J, Johnson MS,
Shah H, Ambrosius WT and Kneebone PH: Tunneled infusion catheters:
increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after
subclavian versus internal jugular venous access. Radiology.
217:89–93. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar
|
23
|
Silberzweig JE, Sacks D, Khorsandi AS and
Bakal CW; Society of Interventional Radiology Technology Assessment
Committee: Reporting standards for central venous access. J Vasc
Interv Radiol. 14:S443–S452. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|