A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography
- Authors:
- Luyang Cheng
- Shenhong Jing
- Yina Zhang
View Affiliations
Affiliations: Department of Geriatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150086, P.R. China, Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150086, P.R. China
- Published online on: January 17, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.905
-
Pages:
969-971
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of 64-multislice spiral computed tomography (64-MSCT) for coronary stenosis compared with selective X-ray coronary angiography (SCA). Patients with chest pain, chest tightness or coronary stenosis received SCA and they acted as the controls. The sensitivity and accuracy of 64-MSCT were analyzed as compared with SCA. Images from 64-MSCT were obtained for 95 patients. For the diagnosis of myocardial bridge, 64-MSCT coronary CT angiography (CTA) is superior to SCA. In cases of mild coronary stenosis, combined with clinical symptoms, patients may choose to receive conservative treatment instead of SCA. However, cases of moderate coronary stenosis should receive SCA to determine the diagnosis. In conclusion, no difference was observed between 64-MSCT coronary CTA and SCA in their ability to exclude true negative diagnoses and diagnosing true positives of coronary disease. The 64-MSCT coronary CTA method produces improved image quality for diagnosis of coronary stenosis and is a non-invasive, reliable and effective method for the diagnosis of the severity of coronary stenosis.
View Figures |
Figure 1
|
|
Figure 2
|
|
Figure 3
|
|
Figure 4
|
|
Figure 5
|
|
Figure 6
|
View References
1.
|
Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A, et al:
Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atheroscleotic coronary
plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol.
37:1430–1435. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2.
|
Li P, Xu K, Li S, et al: Impact of heart
rate on image quality of 16-slice spiral CT coronary angiography
and optimization of image reconstruction window. Chin J Interv
Imaging Ther. 3:18–22. 2006.(In Chinese).
|
3.
|
Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al:
Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter
multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 106:2051–2054.
2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4.
|
Wang ZQ, Yang ZQ, Zhu H, et al: Detection
of coronary artery stenoses using 16-slice spiral CT: comparison
with quantitative coronary angiography. J Comput Tomogr. 3:7–11.
2003.
|
5.
|
Xue H, Zhang Z, Jin Z, Lin S, Zhao W,
Zhang L and Zhang S: Recommended orientations of the MSCT coronary
angiography. Chinese J Med Imaging. 12:324–327. 2004.(In
Chinese).
|
6.
|
Konen E, Goitein O, Sternik L, et al: The
prevalence and anatomical patterns of intramuscular coronary
arteries: a coronary computed tomography angiographic study. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 49:587–593. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7.
|
Zhang G, Qian J, Fan B, et al: The impact
of myocardial bridge on coronary flow reverse. Chin J Cardiol.
30:279–281. 2002.(In Chinese).
|
8.
|
Zhang G and Ge J: Status of clinical
research ofmyocardial bridge. Chin J Intervent Cardiol. 10:52–54.
2002.(In Chinese).
|
9.
|
Heuschmid M, Kuettner A, Schroeder S, et
al: ECG-gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries: assessment of image
quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
184:1413–1419. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
10.
|
Xu Y and Lv J: Analysis of 106 cases with
CTA 64-MSCT. Chinese Med J Metallurg Ind. 23:1012006.(In
Chinese).
|
11.
|
Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Owens PE
and Marshall AJ: Highly accurate coronary angiography with
submillimetre, 16 slice computed tomography. Heart. 91:308–313.
2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|