Comparison between Solitaire™ AB and Enterprise stent‑assisted coiling for intracranial aneurysms

  • Authors:
    • Hua‑Wei Ye
    • Ya‑Qi Liu
    • Qiu‑Jing Wang
    • Tao Zheng
    • Xu‑Bo Cui
    • Yu‑Yuan Gao
    • Ling‑Feng Lai
    • Xin Zhang
    • Xi‑Feng Li
    • Shi‑Xing Su
    • Xu‑Ying He
    • Chuan‑Zhi Duan
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 8, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2481
  • Pages: 145-153
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyze the feasibility, rate of procedure‑related complications and midterm angiographic follow‑up outcomes using the Enterprise (EP) and Solitaire™ AB (ST) stents in the stent‑assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. In total, 81 patients with 90 aneurysms were included in the study, with the aim to treat 43 aneurysms with the EP stent (47.8%) and 47 aneurysms with the ST stent (52.2%). The 90 aneurysms were successfully stented and subsequently coiled; however, in four patients undergoing treatment with the EP stent, the stent was not navigable; thus, treatment with the ST stent was employed (EP, n=39, 43.3%; ST, n=51, 56.7%). Of the 90 aneurysms, 44 cases were ruptured aneurysms, with 74 located in the anterior circulation and 16 located in the posterior circulation. The stenting success rate of the ST stent was significantly higher compared with the EP stent. However, no statistically significant differences were observed with regard to the packing density, complete occlusion, progressive occlusion, recurrence rate, procedure‑related complications, in‑stent stenosis and stent migration rates between the two groups. In conclusion, the two common medical devices used for intracranial aneurysms are relatively safe and effective for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, due to the higher stenting success rate of the ST stent, this medical devise was demonstrated to be more flexible and feasible compared with the EP stent.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-2015
Volume 10 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Ye HW, Liu YQ, Wang QJ, Zheng T, Cui XB, Gao YY, Lai LF, Zhang X, Li XF, Su SX, Su SX, et al: Comparison between Solitaire™ AB and Enterprise stent‑assisted coiling for intracranial aneurysms. Exp Ther Med 10: 145-153, 2015.
APA
Ye, H., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Zheng, T., Cui, X., Gao, Y. ... Duan, C. (2015). Comparison between Solitaire™ AB and Enterprise stent‑assisted coiling for intracranial aneurysms. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 10, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2481
MLA
Ye, H., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Zheng, T., Cui, X., Gao, Y., Lai, L., Zhang, X., Li, X., Su, S., He, X., Duan, C."Comparison between Solitaire™ AB and Enterprise stent‑assisted coiling for intracranial aneurysms". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 10.1 (2015): 145-153.
Chicago
Ye, H., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Zheng, T., Cui, X., Gao, Y., Lai, L., Zhang, X., Li, X., Su, S., He, X., Duan, C."Comparison between Solitaire™ AB and Enterprise stent‑assisted coiling for intracranial aneurysms". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 10, no. 1 (2015): 145-153. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2481