Open Access

A comparative study of the single-site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy using needle instruments and double‑site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in the minimally invasive treatment of inguinal hernias in children

  • Authors:
    • Fan Wang
    • Sujun Liu
    • Yingmo Shen
    • Jie Chen
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 16, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.5756
  • Pages: 2896-2900
  • Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The clinical effect of the single-site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (SSLH) using needle instruments and double-site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (DSLH) in the treatment of inguinal hernias in children were compared. A total of 1,010 children with inguinal hernias who were treated in Chao-Yang Hospital from March 2011 to December 2014 were selected. According to the operation method, these children were divided into the single-site group using needle instruments (n=508) and the traditional double-site group (n=502). The clinical indexes of the two groups were compared. All the clinical indexes (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time of off-bed and discharge time) in the single-site group using needle instruments were significantly lower than those in the traditional double-site group (P<0.001, <0.001, <0.001 and <0.003, respectively), but the incidence rates of postoperative complications and contralateral occult hernia were at the similar level (P=0.249 and 0.221, respectively), so the difference was statistically insignificant. Patients in the two groups were followed up for 2 years and there was no recurrece in children in the single-site group while there was 2 in the double-site group. The SSLH using needle instruments is more effective with fewer traumas in the treatment of inguinal hernias in children than the DSLH. It is easier for children to recover from the herniorrhaphy with no scars, so it conforms more closely to the concept of minimally invasive herniorrhaphy, which can be promoted and applied for the treatment of inguinal hernias in children.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2018
Volume 15 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang F, Liu S, Shen Y and Chen J: A comparative study of the single-site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy using needle instruments and double‑site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in the minimally invasive treatment of inguinal hernias in children. Exp Ther Med 15: 2896-2900, 2018
APA
Wang, F., Liu, S., Shen, Y., & Chen, J. (2018). A comparative study of the single-site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy using needle instruments and double‑site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in the minimally invasive treatment of inguinal hernias in children. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 15, 2896-2900. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.5756
MLA
Wang, F., Liu, S., Shen, Y., Chen, J."A comparative study of the single-site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy using needle instruments and double‑site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in the minimally invasive treatment of inguinal hernias in children". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 15.3 (2018): 2896-2900.
Chicago
Wang, F., Liu, S., Shen, Y., Chen, J."A comparative study of the single-site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy using needle instruments and double‑site laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in the minimally invasive treatment of inguinal hernias in children". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 15, no. 3 (2018): 2896-2900. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.5756