1
|
Oliva MS, Schottman T and Gulati M:
Turning the tide of corneal blindness. Indian J Ophthalmol.
60:423–427. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2
|
Pascolini D and Mariotti SP: Global
estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 96:614–618.
2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
3
|
Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D,
Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP and Mariotti SP: Global
data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health
Organ. 82:844–851. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
|
4
|
Beckingsale P, Mavrikakis I, Al-Yousuf N,
Mavrikakis E and Daya SM: Penetrating keratoplasty: Outcomes from a
corneal unit compared to national data. Br J Ophthalmol.
90:728–731. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Bersudsky V, Blum-Hareuveni T, Rehany U
and Rumelt S: The profile of repeated corneal transplantation.
Ophthalmology. 108:461–469. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6
|
Ma JJ, Graney JM and Dohlman CH: Repeat
penetrating keratoplasty versus the Boston keratoprosthesis in
graft failure. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 45:49–59. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7
|
Muraine M, Sanchez C, Watt L, Retout A and
Brasseur G: Long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty. A
10-year-plus retrospective study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
241:571–576. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
8
|
Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, Hodge DO and
Bourne WM: Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating
keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 105:1855–1865. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
Kremer I, Rajpal RK, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ
and Laibson PR: Results of penetrating keratoplasty in aniridia. Am
J Ophthalmol. 115:317–320. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
10
|
Tugal-Tutkun I, Akova YA and Foster CS:
Penetrating keratoplasty in cicatrizing conjunctival diseases.
Ophthalmology. 102:576–585. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11
|
Yaghouti F, Nouri M, Abad JC, Power WJ,
Doane MG and Dohlman CH: Keratoprosthesis: Preoperative prognostic
categories. Cornea. 20:19–23. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
12
|
Barber JC: Keratoprosthesis: Past and
present. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 28:103–109. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
13
|
Aldave AJ, Sangwan VS, Basu S, Basak SK,
Hovakimyan A, Gevorgyan O, Kharashi SA, Jindan MA, Tandon R,
Mascarenhas J, et al: International results with the Boston type I
keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 119:1530–1538. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
14
|
Chew HF, Ayres BD, Hammersmith KM, Rapuano
CJ, Laibson PR, Myers JS, Jin YP and Cohen EJ: Boston
keratoprosthesis outcomes and complications. Cornea. 28:989–996.
2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
15
|
Ciolino JB, Belin MW, Todani A, Al-Arfaj K
and Rudnisky CJ; Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 Study Group, :
Retention of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: Multicenter study
results. Ophthalmology. 120:1195–1200. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
16
|
Dunlap K, Chak G, Aquavella JV, Myrowitz
E, Utine CA and Akpek E: Short-term visual outcomes of Boston type
1 keratoprosthesis implantation. Ophthalmology. 117:687–692. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
17
|
Greiner MA, Li JY and Mannis MJ:
Longer-term vision outcomes and complications with the Boston type
1 keratoprosthesis at the University of California, Davis.
Ophthalmology. 118:1543–1550. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
18
|
Kamyar R, Weizer JS, de Paula FH, Stein
JD, Moroi SE, John D, Musch DC and Mian SI: Glaucoma associated
with Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 31:134–139. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
19
|
Patel AP, Wu EI, Ritterband DC and Seedor
JA: Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: The New York Eye and Ear
experience. Eye (Lond). 26:418–425. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
20
|
Robert MC and Harissi-Dagher M: Boston
type 1 keratoprosthesis: The CHUM experience. Can J Ophthalmol.
46:164–168. 2011. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
21
|
Zerbe BL, Belin MW and Ciolino JB; Boston
Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study Group, : Results from the multicenter
Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. Ophthalmology. 113(1779):
e1–7. 2006.
|
22
|
Gu J, Zhai J, Zhou S and Chen J: Boston
keratoprosthesis outcomes in severe ocular chemical burns in
Southern China: A retrospective study. Adv Ther. 33:760–773. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
23
|
Dohlman CH, et al: Introduction to the use
of the Boston keratoprosthesis. Expert Rev Ophthalmology. 1:41–48.
2006. View Article : Google Scholar
|
24
|
Aquavella JV, Qian Y, McCormick GJ and
Palakuru JR: Keratoprosthesis: The Dohlman-Doane device. Am J
Ophthalmol. 140:1032–1038. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
25
|
Sellami D, Abid S, Bouaouaja G, Ben Amor
S, Kammoun B, Masmoudi M, Dabbeche K, Boumoud H, Ben Zina Z and
Feki J: Epidemiology and risk factors for corneal graft rejection.
Transplant Proc. 39:2609–2611. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
26
|
Price FW and Price MO: Adult keratoplasty:
Has the prognosis improved in the last 25 years? Int Ophthalmol.
28:141–146. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
27
|
De La Paz MF, De Toledo JÁ, Charoenrook V,
Sel S, Temprano J, Barraquer RI and Michael R: Impact of clinical
factors on the long-term functional and anatomic outcomes of
osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis and tibial bone keratoprosthesis. Am
J Ophthalmol. 151(829–839): e12011.
|
28
|
Muñoz-Gutierrez G, de Toledo Alvarez J,
Barraquer RI, Vera L, Valeria Couto R, Nadal J and de la Paz MF:
Post-surgical visual outcome and complications in Boston type 1
keratoprosthesis. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 88:56–63. 2013.(In
English, Spanish). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
29
|
Williamson SL and Cortina MS: Boston type
1 keratoprosthesis from patient selection through postoperative
management: A review for the keratoprosthetic surgeon. Clin
Ophthalmol. 10:437–443. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
|
30
|
Farias CC, Ozturk HE, Albini TA, Berrocal
AM, Amescua G, Betancurt C, Parel JM, Oliveros MC, Gibbons A,
Vargas JM and Perez VL: Use of intraocular video endoscopic
examination in the preoperative evaluation of keratoprosthesis
surgery to assess visual potential. Am J Ophthalmol. 158(80–86):
e22014.
|
31
|
Stacy RC, Jakobiec FA, Michaud NA, Dohlman
CH and Colby KA: Characterization of retrokeratoprosthetic
membranes in the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol.
129:310–316. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
32
|
Robert MC, Moussally K and Harissi-Dagher
M: Review of endophthalmitis following Boston keratoprosthesis type
1. Br J Ophthalmol. 96:776–780. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
33
|
Jardeleza MS, Rheaume MA, Chodosh J, Lane
AM and Dohlman CH: Retinal detachments after Boston
Keratoprosthesis: Incidence, predisposing factors, and visual
outcomes. Digit J Ophthalmol. 21:1–15. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
34
|
Cade F, Grosskreutz CL, Tauber A and
Dohlman CH: Glaucoma in eyes with severe chemical burn, before and
after keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 30:1322–1327. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
35
|
Kammerdiener LL, Speiser JL, Aquavella JV,
Harissi-Dagher M, Dohlman CH, Chodosh J and Ciolino JB: Protective
effect of soft contact lenses after boston keratoprosthesis. Br J
Ophthalmol. 100:549–552. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|