A clinical and basic study of optimal endometrial preparation protocols for patients with infertility undergoing frozen‑thawed embryo transfer

An,Junxia; Li,Lifei; Zhang,Xiang; Liu,Lin; Wang,Liyan; Zhang,Xuehong

doi:10.3892/etm.2020.8914

A clinical and basic study of optimal endometrial preparation protocols for patients with infertility undergoing frozen‑thawed embryo transfer

Authors:
- Junxia An
- Lifei Li
- Xiang Zhang
- Lin Liu
- Liyan Wang
- Xuehong Zhang
View Affiliations

Affiliations: The Reproductive Medicine Special Hospital of The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China
Published online on: June 19, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8914
Pages: 2191-2199
Copyright: © An et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The optimal protocol for endometrial preparation in patients with infertility remains unclear. Due to this, the current study retrospectively analyzed 1,589 patients with infertility and regular menstrual cycles to assess reproductive outcomes per embryo transferred and per embryo transfer (ET) cycle following the transfer of frozen‑thawed embryos (FET) in a modified natural cycle (mNC) or hormone therapy cycle (HT) with or without gonadotropin‑releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)‑induced pituitary suppression. The molecular mechanisms involved were also studied using tissues from endometrial biopsies. Patients who underwent FET were assigned to 5 groups as follows: Group A underwent a mNC (n=276); group B (n=338) received estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4); group C received 1 cycle of GnRHa, E2 and P4 (n=323); group D received 2 cycles of GnRHa, E2 and P4 (n=329); and group E received 3 cycles of GnRHa, E2 and P4 (n=323). Tissues from endometrial biopsies of 91 patients performed on the day of ET were tested for endometrial receptivity marker mRNA expression and microRNA (miR)‑223‑3p mRNA. Furthermore, endometrial stromal cells (ESCs) were used for an in‑depth study of the molecular mechanisms involved. Among the 5 groups of patients, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates were not significantly different. However, endometrial receptivity was enhanced in group E when compared with groups A‑D, which was associated with endometrial leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), osteopontin, vascular endothelial growth factor, integrin β3 and homeobox gene 10 and 11 mRNA upregulation, and miR‑223‑3p miRNA downregulation. Transfection of ESCs with an miR‑223‑3p mimic significantly reduced levels of LIF mRNA and protein. In addition, pre‑treating ESCs with GnRHa upregulated mRNA and protein expression of the decidualization markers prolactin and insulin‑like growth factor binding protein‑1 in a time‑dependent manner. In conclusion, these results indicated that HT with GnRHa may be a potential endometrial preparation protocol for FET.

View Figures

View References

1	Trounson A and Mohr L: Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 305:707–709. 1983.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
2	Maheshwari A and Bhattacharya S: Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: Ready for prime time? Hum Reprod. 28:6–9. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
3	McLernon D, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies MJ, de Neubourg D, Dumoulin JC, Gerris J, Kremer JA, Martikainen H, Mol BW and Norman RJ: Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: Meta-Analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ. 213(341)2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
4	Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomas C, Tapanainen JS and Martikainen H: Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod. 24:1632–1639. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
5	Schild RL, Knobloch C, Dorn C, Fimmers R, Van Der Ven H and Hansmann M: Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow. Fertil Steril. 75:361–366. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
6	Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AE, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS and Cohlen BJ: What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 23:255–261. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
7	Dal Prato L, Borini A, Cattoli M, Bonu MA and Sciajno R: Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer with or without pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril. 77:956–960. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
8	El-Toukhy T, Taylor A, Khalaf Y, Al-Darazi K, Rowell P, Seed P and Braude P: Pituitary suppression in ultrasound-monitored frozen embryo replacement cycles, A randomized study. Hum Reprod. 19:874–879. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
9	Horne G, Critchlow JD, Newman MC, Edozien L, Matson PL and Lieberman BA: A prospective evaluation of cryopreservation strategies in a two-embryo transfer program. Hum Reprod. 12:542–547. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
10	Queenan JT Jr, Ramey JW, Seltman HJ, Eure L, Veeck LL and Muasher SJ: Transfer of cryopreserved-thawed pre-embryos in a cycle using exogenous steroids without prior gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression yields favourable pregnancy results. Hum Reprod. 12:1176–1180. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
11	Simon A, Hurwitz A, Zetner BS, Bdolah Y and Laufer N: Transfer of frozenthawed embryos in artificially prepared cycles with and without prior gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression: A prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 13:2712–2717. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
12	Mandelbaum J: Embryo and oocyte cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 15:43–47. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
13	Hill MJ, Miller KA and Frattarelli JL: A GnRH agonist and exogenous hormone stimulation protocol has a higher live-birth rate than a natural endogenous hormone protocol for frozen-thawed blastocyst-stage embryo transfer cycles: An analysis of 1391 cycles. Fertil Steril. 93:416–422. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
14	Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Hunter HR, Fitzgerald CT, Horne G, Pease EE, Brison DR and Lieberman BA: Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: A retrospective study. Fertil Steril. 85:603–609. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
15	Wang J, Zhou F, Dong Y, Wu R and Qian L: Prolonged gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy reduced expression of nitric oxide synthase in the endometrium of women with endometriosis and infertility. Fertil Steril. 85:1037–1044. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
16	Liang J, Wang S and Wang Z: Role of microRNAs in embryo implantation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 15:90–101. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
17	Kang J, Park J, Chung D, Lee SH, Park EY, Han KH, Choi SJ, Chung IB, Han HD and Jung YS: Comparison of the clinical outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer with and without pretreatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 61:489–496. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
18	Achache H and Revel A: Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 12:731–746. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
19	Auernhammer CJ and Melmed S: Leukemia-inhibitory factor-neuroimmune modulator of endocrine function. Endocr Rev. 21:313–345. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
20	Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 116:281–297. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
21	Taylor HS: The role of HOX genes in human implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 6:75–79. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
22	Van Mourik MS, Macklon NS and Heijnen CJ: Embryonic implantation: Cytokines, adhesion molecules, and immune cells in establishing an implantation environment. J Leukoc Biol. 85:4–19. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
23	Vuorela P, Carpén O, Tulppala M and Halmesmäki E: VEGF, its receptors and the tie receptors in recurrent miscarriage. Mol Hum Reprod. 6:276–282. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
24	Surrey ES, Minjarez DA and Schoolcraft WB: The incidence of aberrant endometrial alphavbeta(3) vitronectin expression in a high risk infertility population: Could prolonged GnRH agonist therapy play a role? J Assist Reprod Genet. 24:553–556. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
25	Dong X, Sui C, Huang K, Wang L, Hu D, Xiong T, Wang R and Zhang H: MicroRNA-223-3p suppresses leukemia inhibitory factor expression and pinopodes formation during embryo implantation in mice. Am J Transl Res. 8:1155–1163. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
26	Chu B, Zhong L, Dou S, Wang J, Li J, Wang M, Shi Q, Mei Y and Wu M: MiRNA-181 regulates embryo implantation in mice through targeting leukemia inhibitory factor. J Mol Cell Biol. 7:12–22. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
27	Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 136:215–233. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
28	Brosens JJ, Pijnenborg R and Brosens IA: The myometrialjunctional zone spiral arteries in normal and abnormal pregnancies: A review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 187:1416–1423. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
29	Gellersen B and Brosens J: Cyclic AMP and progesterone receptor cross-talk in human endometrium: A decidualizing affair. J Endocrinol. 178:357–372. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
30	Paternot G, Debrock S, D'Hooghe T and Spiessens C: Computer-assisted embryo selection: A benefit in the evaluation of embryo quality? Reprod Biomed Online. 23:347–354. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
31	Evilsizor MN, Ray-Jones HF, Lifshitz J and Ziebell J: Primer for immunohistochemistry on cryosectioned rat brain tissue: Example staining for microglia and neurons. J Vis Exp. 12(e52293)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
32	Itoh H, Mogami H, Bou Nemer L, Word L, Rogers D, Miller R and Word RA: Endometrial stromal cell attachment and matrix homeostasis in abdominal wall endometriomas. Hum Reprod. 33:280–291. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
33	Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
34	Klemmt PA, Carver JG, Kennedy SH, Koninckx PR and Mardon HJ: Stromal cells from endometriotic lesions and endometrium from womenwith endometriosis have reduced decidualization capacity. Fertil Steril. 85:564–572. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
35	Laird SM, Tuckerman EM and Li TC: Cytokine expression in theendometrium of women with implantation failure and recurrentmis carriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 13:13–23. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
36	Karpovich N, Klemmt P, Hwang JH, McVeigh JE, Heath JK, Barlow DH and Mardon HJ: The production of interleukin-11 and decidualization are compromisedin endometrial stromal cells derived from patients with infertility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 90:1607–1612. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
37	Ryan IP and Taylor RN: Endometriosis and infertility: New concepts. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 52:365–371. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
38	Croze F, Kennedy TG, Schroedter IC, Friesen HG and Murphy LJ: Expression of insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 in the rat uterus during decidualization. Endocrinology. 127:1995–2000. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
39	Klemmt PA, Liu F, Carver JG, Brosi D, Adamson J, Mardon HJ and McVeigh E: Effects of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues on human endometrial stromal cells and embryo invasion in vitro. Hum Reprod. 24:2187–2192. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar