Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer
- Authors:
- Cui Lei
- Liming Huang
- Yanlin Wang
- Yiling Huang
- Yurong Huang
View Affiliations
Affiliations: Department of General Surgery, Yichang Central People's Hospital, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443000, P.R. China, Institute of Molecular Biology of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443000, P.R. China, Department of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China
- Published online on: April 12, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.103
-
Pages:
699-702
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
Gastric cancer is a common malignancy and cause of mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) detection in preoperative clinical T/N staging in gastric cancer. Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with gastric cancer by gastroscopy and pathological examination were included in the study. All 38 patients underwent MRI and EUS detection prior to surgery. The accuracy of MRI, EUS and MRI+EUS was evaluated according to postoperative pathological staging. Results identified the accuracy of EUS, MRI and EUS+MRI in T clinical staging to be 86.64, 73.68 and 89.47%, respectively (MRI vs. EUS+MRI, P=0.035), while the accuracy for N clinical staging was 65.78, 68.42 and 71.05%, respectively (P>0.05). The accuracy rate in EUS and EUS+MRI detection in N0 stage was markedly higher compared with that in MRI (100 vs. 86.67%, P=0.032), whereas the rate in EUS detection in N2 stage was lower compared with that in MRI and EUS+MRI (45.45 vs. 54.54%, P=0.021). Thus, both MRI and EUS had a higher accuracy in preoperative T/N staging. Additionally, the accuracy rate was improved significantly when the two procedures were combined.
View References
1.
|
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D,
Mathers C and Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in
2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 127:2893–2917. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2.
|
Bingya L, Zhenggang Z and Yanjian L: The
factors associated with prognosis in gastric cancer. Chin J
Gastrointest Surg. 7:432–433. 2004.
|
3.
|
Washington K: 7th edition of the AJCC
cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 17:3077–3079. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4.
|
Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo
P, Zini C, Cavallo Marincola B, Geiger D, Catalano C and
Passariello R: Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with
high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a
comparative analysis with histopathology. Radiol Med.
114:1065–1079. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5.
|
Dongzhen J and Feng L: The progress of
endoscopic ultra-sonography in gastrointestal disease. Chin J Med
Ultrasound. 1:284–286. 2004.
|
6.
|
Ganpathi IS, So JB and Ho KY: Endoscopic
ultrasonography for gastric cancer: does it influence treatment.
Surg Endosc. 20:559–562. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7.
|
Tsendsuren T, Jun SM and Mian XH:
Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative TNM
staging of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 12:43–47.
2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
8.
|
Li N, Wen Y and Guo H: Accuracy of
endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative TN staging for gastric
cancer: a meta-analysis. J Mod Oncol. 1:110–114. 2012.
|
9.
|
Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC, Kang WY, Hsieh JS,
Jaw TS, Wu MT and Liu GC: Gastric cancer: preoperative local
staging with 3D multi-detector row CT - correlation with surgical
and histopathologic results. Radiology. 242:472–482. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
10.
|
Kato M, Saji S, Kanematsu M, Fukada D,
Miya K, Umemoto T, Kunieda K, Sugiyama Y, Takao H, Kawaguchi Y,
Takagi Y, Kondo H and Hoshi H: Detection of lymph-node metastases
in patients with gastric carcinoma: comparison of three MR imaging
pulse sequences. Abdom Imaging. 25:25–29. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11.
|
Kim AY, Han JK, Kim TK, Park SJ and Choi
BI: MR imaging of advanced gastric cancer: comparison of various MR
pulse sequences using water and gadopentetate dimeglumine as oral
contrast agents. Abdom Imaging. 25:7–13. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|