1.
|
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D,
Mathers C and Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in
2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 127:2893–2917. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2.
|
Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al:
Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted
colectomy vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.
JAMA. 287:321–328. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
3.
|
Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, et al:
Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of
esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition.
J Am Coll Surg. 198:536–542. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4.
|
No authors listed. Suturing or stapling in
gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective randomized study. West of
Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group Br J Surg.
78:337–341. 1991.PubMed/NCBI
|
5.
|
Laterza E, de’ Manzoni G, Veraldi GF,
Guglielmi A, Tedesco P and Cordiano C: Manual compared with
mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised
trial. Eur J Surg. 165:1051–1054. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6.
|
Law S, Fok M, Chu KM and Wong J:
Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis
after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized
controlled trial. Ann Surg. 226:169–173. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar
|
7.
|
Okuyama M, Motoyama S, Suzuki H, Saito R,
Maruyama K and Ogawa J: Hand-sewn cervical anastomosis versus
stapled intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for middle or
lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized
controlled study. Surg Today. 37:947–952. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
|
8.
|
Walther B, Johansson J, Johnsson F, Von
Holstein CS and Zilling T: Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after
esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective
randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled
intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann Surg. 238:803–814. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar
|
9.
|
Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Ueno M, Fujimoto Y,
Yamaguchi T and Muto T: Standardized technique of laparoscopic
intracorporeal rectal transaction and anastomosis for low anterior
resection. Surg Endosc. 22:557–561. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
10.
|
Barlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S and
Schicke B: Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in
194 patinents and review of the literature. Surg Endosc.
19:757–766. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11.
|
Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Konradt J, et
al: Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection
with curative intent for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc.
16:7–13. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
12.
|
Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ and
Heald RJ: Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to
defunction the low anastomosis. Br J Surg. 78:196–198. 1991.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
13.
|
Ziv Y, Fazio VW, Church JM, Lavery IC,
King TM and Ambrosetti P: Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses are
safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative
colitis. Am J Surg. 171:320–323. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
14.
|
Orringer MB, Marshall B and Iannettoni MD:
Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a
side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
119:277–288. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
15.
|
Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray
GD and Galloway DJ: Comparison of manually constructed and stapled
anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland
Anastomosis Study Group. Ann Surg. 221:176–184. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar
|
16.
|
Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Vyas S,
Hashemi M and Winslet M: Hand-sewn versus stapled oesophago-gastric
anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest
Surg. 15:876–884. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
17.
|
Orsay CP, Bass EM, Firfer B, Ramakrishnan
V and Abcarian H: Blood flow in colon anastomotic stricture
formation. Dis Colon Rectum. 38:202–206. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
18.
|
Chung RS: Blood flow in colonic
anastomoses. Effect of stapling and suturing. Ann Surg.
206:335–339. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
19.
|
Wong J, Cheung H, Lui R, Fan YW, Smith A
and Siu KF: Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler:
the occurrence of leakage and stricture. Surgery. 101:408–415.
1987.PubMed/NCBI
|
20.
|
Berrisford RG, Page RD and Donnelly RJ:
Stapler design and strictures at the esophagogastric anastomosis. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 111:142–146. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
21.
|
Valdivieso A, Sarabia S, Pocino R, et al:
Is it worth using mechanical sutures in gastric surgery? Acta Chir
Belg. 95(Suppl 4): 179–181. 1995.PubMed/NCBI
|
22.
|
Dziki AJ, Duncan MD, Harmon JW, et al:
Advantages of handsewn over stapled bowel anastomosis. Dis Colon
Rectum. 34:442–448. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
23.
|
Fok M, Ah-Chong AK, Cheng SW and Wong J:
Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and
circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses. Br J Surg.
78:342–345. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
24.
|
Valverde A, Hay JM, Fingerhut A and
Elhadad A: Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis
after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French
Associations for Surgical Research Surgery. 120:476–483.
1996.PubMed/NCBI
|
25.
|
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al:
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer
QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international
clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 85:365–376. 1993.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
26.
|
Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Eckel
R, Sauer H and Holzel D: Quality of life in rectal cancer patients:
a four-year prospective study. Ann Surg. 238:203–213.
2003.PubMed/NCBI
|
27.
|
Shoji Y, Nihei Z, Hirayama R and Mishima
Y: Experiences with the linear cutter technique for performing
Roux-en-Y anastomosis following total gastrectomy. Surg Today.
25:27–31. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
28.
|
Valenzuela P, Saiz Puente MS, Valero JL,
Azorin R, Ortega R and Guijarro R: Continuous versus interrupted
sutures for repair of episiotomy or second-degree perineal tears: a
randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 116:436–441. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
29.
|
Hirahara N, Monma H, Shimojo Y, et al:
Reconstruction of the esophagojejunostomy by double stapling method
using EEA™ OrVil™ in laparoscopic total gastrectomy and proximal
gastrectomy. World J Surg Oncol. 9:552011.
|
30.
|
Park KJ, Woo JS, Jeong SS and Yi JH:
Continuous ‘over and over’ suture for tricuspid ring annuloplasty.
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 45:19–23. 2012.
|