1
|
Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer
statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:7–30. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
2
|
Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer
statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 63:11–30. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
3
|
Rob L, Halaska M and Robova H:
Nerve-sparing and individually tailored surgery for cervical
cancer. Lancet Oncol. 11:292–301. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
4
|
Long Y, Yao DS, Pan XW and Ou TY: Clinical
efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for
cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One.
9(e94116)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
5
|
Ditto A, Martinelli F, Borreani C,
Kusamura S, Hanozet F, Brunelli C, Rossi G, Solima E, Fontanelli R,
Zanaboni F, et al: Quality of life and sexual, bladder, and
intestinal dysfunctions after class III nerve-sparing and class II
radical hysterectomies: A questionnaire-based study. Int J Gynecol
Cancer. 19:953–957. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
6
|
Kim HS, Choi CH, Lim MC, Chang SJ, Kim YB,
Kim MA, Kim TJ, Park SY, Kim BG, Song YS, et al: Safe criteria for
less radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical
cancer: A multicenter clinicopathologic study. Ann Surg Oncol.
19:1973–1979. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
7
|
Maas CP, Trimbos JB, DeRuiter MC, Van De
Velde CJ and Kenter G: Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: Latest
developments and historical perspective. Crit Rev Oncol.
48:271–279. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
8
|
Querleu D and Morrow CP: Classification of
radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 9:297–303. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
9
|
Höckel M, Konerding MA and Heussel CP:
Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy:
Oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 178:971–976. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
10
|
van Gent MD, Romijn LM, van Santen KE,
Trimbos JB and de Kroon CD: Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
versus conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical
cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and
quality of life. Maturitas. 94:30–38. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
11
|
Wu J, Liu X, Hua K, Hu C, Chen X and Lu X:
Effect of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy on bladder function
recovery and quality of life in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 20:905–909. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
12
|
Chen C, Li W, Li F, Liu P, Zhou J, Lu L,
Su G, Li X, Guo Y and Huang L: Classical and nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy: An evaluation of the nerve trauma in cardinal
ligament. Gynecol Oncol. 125:245–251. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
13
|
Kim HS, Kim K, Ryoo SB, Seo JH, Kim SY,
Park JW, Kim MA, Hong KS, Jeong CW, Song YS, et al: Conventional
versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: A
meta-analysis. J Gynecol Oncol. 26:100–110. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
14
|
Bogani G, Rossetti DO, Ditto A, Signorelli
M, Martinelli F, Mosca L, Scaffa C, Leone Roberti Maggiore U,
Chiappa V, Sabatucci I, et al: Nerve sparing approach improves
outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive radical
hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol. 25:402–410. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
15
|
Xue Z, Zhu X and Teng Y: Comparison of
nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Cell Physiol Biochem.
38:1841–1850. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
16
|
Li B, Zhang R, Wu LY, Zhang GY, Li X and
Yu GZ: A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in
patients with cervical cancer. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi.
43:606–610. 2008.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
17
|
Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer
program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Then Nordic Cochrane Centre, The
Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
|
18
|
Gagnier J: The Cochrane risk of bias tool.
2011; Available at: http://bmg.cochrane.org.
Accessed July 12, 2016.
|
19
|
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R,
Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ and GRADE Working
Group: GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence
and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 336:924–926. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
20
|
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D,
Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA and PRISMA-P Group:
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis
protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 4(1)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
21
|
Bogani G, Cromi A, Uccella S, Serati M,
Casarin J, Pinelli C, Nardelli F and Ghezzi F: Nerve-sparing versus
conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A minimum 12
months' follow-up study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 24:787–793.
2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
22
|
Ceccaroni M, Roviglione G, Spagnolo E,
Casadio P, Clarizia R, Peiretti M, Bruni F, Peters I and Aletti G:
Pelvic dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy: A multicenter comparative study. Anticancer Res.
32:581–588. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
23
|
Chen C, Li W, Li F, Liu P, Zhou J, Lu L,
Su G, Li X, Guo Y and Huang L: Classical and nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy: an evaluation of the nerve trauma in cardinal
ligament. Gynecol Oncol1. 25:245–251. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
24
|
Chen C, Huang L, Liu P, Su G, Li W, Lu L,
Wang L, Li X, Duan H, Zou C and Hatch K: Neurovascular quantitative
study of the uterosacral ligament related to nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 172:74–79.
2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
25
|
Ditto A, Martinelli F, Mattana F, Reato C,
Solima E, Carcangiu M, Haeusler E, Mariani L and Raspagliesi F:
Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class
III radical hysterectomy: An observational study. Ann Surg Oncol.
18:3469–3478. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
26
|
Ditto A, Bogani G, Leone Roberti Maggiore
U, Martinelli F, Chiappa V, Lopez C, Perotto S, Lorusso D and
Raspagliesi F: Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy in cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol.
29(e41)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
27
|
van Gent MDJM, Rademaker M, van der Veer
JCB, van Poelgeest MIE, Gaarenstroom KN, Putter H, Trimbos JBMZ and
de Kroon CD: Long-term oncological outcome after conventional
radical hysterectomy versus 2 nerve-sparing modalities for early
stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 27:1729–1736.
2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
28
|
Kuwabara Y, Suzuki M, Hashimoto M, Furugen
Y, Yoshida K and Mitsuhashi N: New method to prevent bladder
dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 26:1–8. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
29
|
Liang Z, Chen Y, Xu H, Li Y and Wang D:
Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space
dissection technique for cervical cancer: Description of technique
and outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 119:202–207. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
30
|
Liu Z, Li X, Tao Y, Li W, Yang Y, Yao Y
and Zhu T: Clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic
nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical
cancer. Int J Surg. 25:54–58. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
31
|
Makowski M, Nowak M, Szpakowski M,
Wladzinski J, Serwach-Nowinska A, Janas L and Wilczyński JR:
Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Prz Menopauzalny.
13:180–185. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
32
|
Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K and
Schneider A: Identification and preservation of the motoric
innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III.
Gynecol Oncol. 79:154–157. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
33
|
Querleu D, Narducci F, Poulard V, Lacaze
S, Occelli B, Leblanc E and Cosson M: Modified radical vaginal
hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic nerve-sparing dissection:
A comparative study. Gynecol Oncol. 85:154–158. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
34
|
Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R,
Zanaboni F, Solima E, Spatti G, Hanozet F, Vecchione F, Rossi G and
Kusamura S: Type II versus Type III nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy: Comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions.
Gynecol Oncol. 102:256–262. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
35
|
Raspagliesi F, Bogani G, Spinillo A, Ditto
A, Bogliolo S, Casarin J, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Martinelli F,
Signorelli M, Gardella B, et al: Introducing nerve-sparing approach
during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for locally-advanced
cervical cancer: A multi-institutional experience. Eur J Surg
Oncol. 43:2150–2156. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
36
|
Roh J, Lee DO, Suh DH, Lim MC, Seo SS,
Chung J, Lee S and Park SY: Efficacy and oncologic safety of
nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A
randomized controlled trial. J Gynecol Oncol. 26:90–99.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
37
|
Sakuragi N, Todo Y, Kudo M, Yamamoto R and
Sato T: A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique
in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder
function. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 15:389–397. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
38
|
Shi R, Wei W and Jiang P: Laparoscopic
nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma: Emphasis
on nerve content in removed cardinal ligaments. Int J Gynecol
Cancer. 26:192–198. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
39
|
Skret-Magierlo J, Narog M, Kruczek A,
Kluza R, Kluz T, Magon T, Skret A and Wicherek L: Radical
hysterectomy during the transition period from traditional to
nerve-sparing technique. Gynecol Oncol. 116:502–505.
2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
40
|
van den Tillaart SA, Kenter GG, Peters AA,
Dekker FW, Gaarenstroom KN, Fleuren GJ and Trimbos JB:
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Local recurrence rate,
feasibility, and safety in cervical cancer patients stage IA to
IIA. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 19:39–45. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
41
|
Tseng CJ, Shen HP, Lin YH, Lee CY and
Wei-Cheng Chiu W: A prospective study of nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy for uterine cervical carcinoma in Taiwan. Taiwan J
Obstet Gynecol. 51:55–59. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
42
|
Yang Y, Qin T, Zhang W, Wu Q, Yang A and
Xu F: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for bulky
cervical cancer (≥6 cm) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A
multicenter prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 34:35–40.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
43
|
Barnes W, Waggoner S, Delgado G, Maher K,
Potkul R, Barter J and Benjamin S: Manometric characterization of
rectal dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol.
42:116–119. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
44
|
Long Y, Yao D, Gao K and Xie X:
Preliminary study on clinical effect of nerve sparing radical
hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Chin Clin Oncol. 15:1083–1090.
2010.
|
45
|
Angioli R, Plotti F, Aloisi A, Scaletta G,
Capriglione S, Luvero D, Fiore L, Terranova C, Montera R and Panici
PB: A randomized controlled trial comparing four versus six courses
of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in locally advanced
cervical cancer patients previously treated with neo-adjuvant
chemotherapy plus radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 139:433–438.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
46
|
Li L, Wu Y, Hu L, Xu H, He H and Hu D:
Metastatic nerve root tumor: A case report and literature review.
Mol Clin Oncol. 4:1039–1040. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
47
|
Chen L, Zhang WN, Zhang SM, Yang ZH and
Zhang P: Effect of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
on bladder function, intestinal function recovery and quality of
sexual life in patients with cervical carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer
Prev. 15:10971–10975. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
48
|
Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett
S and Sydes MR: Practical methods for incorporating summary
time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 8(16)2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|