![Open Access](/resources/images/iconopenaccess.png)
Relationship between adverse events associated with lenvatinib treatment for thyroid cancer and patient prognosis
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 16, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2190
- Article Number: 28
-
Copyright: © Iwasaki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
The age-adjusted incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer was 15.03 and 0.51 per 100,000 individuals, respectively, in 2015 (https://seer.cnacer.gov/csr/1975_2115/). The increasing incidence of thyroid cancer is mostly because of increasing surveillance and overdiagnosis (1,2).
In Japan, the age-adjusted incidence of thyroid cancer was 8.7 per 100,000 person-years in 2017, whereas the age-adjusted mortality rate was 0.3 per 100,000 person-years in 2018 (https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/index.html). Since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for cancer treatment, their efficacy and adverse events (AEs) have been reported for various carcinomas (3,4). TKI treatment has also been introduced as a guideline for treating patients with radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) (5). Patients with recurrent distant metastases of advanced thyroid cancer are refractory to RAI; another option for TKI treatment is external irradiation, but there are limited sites and frequency of this alternative treatment. The therapeutic effect of TKIs depends on the target lesion (6). For instance, the treatment results for pulmonary metastases are excellent, whereas those for bone metastases and unresectable local lesions are poor. The efficacy of TKIs represented a breakthrough for cancer treatment, and these drugs have attracted the attention of several clinicians. However, their clinical utility is limited by frequent AEs (7,8). High blood pressure, cutaneous symptoms, and digestive tract symptoms can be treated with appropriate management. Conversely, tumor necrosis-induced cavitation resulting in macrovascular rupture (9) and rapid tumor regrowth after treatment discontinuation (10) are considered as life-threatening AEs. However, the prognosis of TKIs is favorable despite the appearance of AEs. In particular, the appearance of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is reportedly correlated with prognosis for several TKIs (11-13). This retrospective study aimed to verify the AEs of lenvatinib in the real-world setting and clarify whether life-threatening AEs and HFS are markers of good prognosis as previously reported.
Materials and methods
Patients' selection
Between June 2015 and May 2020, 111 patients were treated at Kanagawa Cancer Center, Japan with lenvatinib, including 79 patients with radioactive iodine-refractory DTC and 32 patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kanagawa Cancer Center (IRB approval number 27-61 for DTC and 28-49 for ATC). All patients provided a comprehensive consent stating that their samples collected for medical examination could be utilized for investigation and clinical research.
Treatment dose and AE evaluation
The initial dose of lenvatinib was 24 mg/day, and the dose could be reduced for the following reasons: Body weight <40 kg, age ≥80 years, performance status ≥2, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Interruption or reduction of dose (to 20, 14, 10 or 8 mg/day) was permitted in cases of toxic effects. The dose reduction criteria for proteinuria were as reported previously (14). We classified the radiologic response to TKI therapy on the basis of the RECIST 1.1 criteria (15) as follows: Complete remission of the disease (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). To evaluate safety, the occurrence of any AE and the time for treatment discontinuation were recorded. AEs were graded from 1 to 5 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (http://www.jcog.jp/doctor/tool/ctcaev5.html), and the maximum value was totaled for each patient. Table I shows the frequency of all grades and that of ≥grade 3. The frequency of ≥grade 3 was low. Grade 4 indicated a life-threatening AE, which included skin fistula, cavitation, embolism, GI perforation, and regrowth, requiring drug discontinuation.
Statistical analysis
The median values between the two groups were compared using the Fisher's test for nominal variables and the Student's t-test for continuous variables. The statistically significant difference was set at P<0.05. All statistical data were analyzed using EZR software version 2.4. (16) Furthermore, survival analysis for DTCs was performed using the Cox hazard model for the AEs listed in Table I. Overall survival (OS) after lenvatinib treatment and 12-month survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with SPSS software (version 24; IBM Corp.), and the log-rank and Bonferroni tests were applied. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Patient characteristics
Table II presents the patient characteristics of the ATC and DTC groups. Patients with ATC were significantly older, and they had a worse treatment outcome. In addition, patients with ATC had shorter treatment periods and survival.
Frequency and characteristics of AEs
Meanwhile, the frequency of AEs is presented in Table I. The most common AE was hypertension (HT) in both groups, and approximately half of such patients had HT as a pre-existing disease before treatment that was exacerbated by lenvatinib therapy. The second most common AE was proteinuria, followed by anorexia and HFS, while diarrhea occurred less frequently because antidiarrheal drugs were often prescribed at the beginning of treatment. HT and HFS were observed as an early-phase AE in all patients within 1 month following lenvatinib treatments. The frequencies of HFS and proteinuria were higher in patients with DTC who had long treatment periods, whereas alopecia was only observed as a late-phase AE in patients with DTC who used lenvatinib for >1 year. Concerning serious AEs, skin fistula appeared in 11 patients with DTC (34.4%) and 7 patients with ATC (8.9%). In both groups, fistulae were caused by tumor necrosis in the lesion adjacent to the trachea or skin. One typical case is presented in Fig. 1. The fatality rate associated with this AE was 38.9% (7/18), including three deaths because of major bleeding and four deaths attributable to successive pneumonia and mediastinitis. Three patients (two patients with ATC and one patient with DTC) displayed cavity formation in the lungs that prevented further treatment with lenvatinib. One particular case is shown in Fig. 2. Embolism was observed in four patients with DTC (pulmonary embolism, cerebral infarction, thrombotic cholecystitis, and deep vein thrombosis) and two patients with ATC (cerebral infarction and thrombotic cholecystitis). Gastrointestinal tract perforation was recognized in two patients with DTC. During treatment, irreversible regrowth occurred in seven patients with DTC who discontinued treatment because of this AE, and all these patients died. The AE characteristics are summarized in Table III.
![]() | Table IIICharacteristics of adverse events of lenvatinib treatment for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. |
OS curves
As shown in Fig. 3, 19 patients (including two overlapping cases) with serious AEs had poor outcomes, including a significantly lower 24-month OS rate (P<0.001). Meanwhile, the 24-month OS rate was 73.2% in patients with HFS compared with 52.1% in patients without HFS (P=0.0421, Fig. 4).
Discussion
We previously reported the results of lenvatinib for the treatment of ATC (16,17). In this prior study, 19/32 lesions were diagnosed by biopsy only, and total thyroidectomy was not performed. Skin fistula was recognized in 11/19 patients (57.8%). The oral treatment period was too short to consider other AEs. In many cases, even if AEs occurred, the disease progressed quickly, and the lenvatinib dose could not be reduced. With DTC, the administration period was long, and hence it was possible to evaluate AEs other than skin fistula. HT of 91.1%, which was most common, did not correlate with prognosis because of its high frequency. Proteinuria and anorexia also appeared during the entire administration period, and no correlation with prognosis was observed. HT was the most common AE; nonetheless, HT of all patients was well controlled by administering 1-3 types of antihypertensive drugs and adjusting the dose. Regarding proteinuria, renal failure could be prevented by reducing the dose of lenvatinib and withdrawing this drug adequately (14). Meanwhile, anorexia and weight loss due to lenvatinib improved with drug suspension and resumption of dose reduction.
HT and HFS appeared within 1 month of administration in all cases, and a correlation with prognosis was observed in HFS. No correlation between HFS and prognosis was observed in prior studies.
In the real world, the lenvatinib therapy outcome for DTC was worse than that in the Select trial because of disease progression in the patients (18), in line with other reports (19). Of course, the management of non-serious AEs, such as hypertension, proteinuria, and HFS, is also necessary; however, as observed in the present study, prognosis will be poor if serious AEs are present. Therefore, careful management to avoid these AEs is essential to improve patient outcomes.
TKIs inhibit angiogenesis, and as such, careful administration is required because lesions adjacent to large blood vessels are at risk of bleeding (9). In particular, there is a risk of blood vessel wall rupture in lesions with a history of external irradiation (20) or for fistulae that develop in the digestive tract or skin (21). Although TKIs are not curative, they can be administered continuously. If a fistula develops, it is necessary to halt treatment or reduce the dose, whereas dose reduction may be preferable to treatment discontinuation to prevent irreversible tumor regrowth.
Anticoagulant therapy should be administered to patients at risk of embolism. For gastrointestinal perforation and cavity formation in the lungs, early detection, dose reduction, and drug interruption may be necessary for symptoms, such as abdominal pain and chest pain.
Avoiding serious AEs is paramount for improving the treatment outcomes. If a skin fistula develops, especially if it is close to a large blood vessel, the drug needs to be discontinued. Dose reduction is necessary to avoid fistula development in the digestive tract or trachea. Moreover, although embolism is difficult to prevent because of its sudden onset, d-dimer should be monitored in the high-risk groups, and anticoagulants should be administered as per requirement. Lenvatinib treatment has also been initiated for hepatic cancer; with an average dosing period of 6 months, the overall response and disease control rates were 57.1 and 71.4%, respectively (22).
The frequency of HFS is high in Japan, as has been reported for several TKIs (13). Although the precise mechanisms by which multikinase inhibitors cause HFS remain unknown, the antiangiogenic activity of these drugs may inhibit vascular repair mechanisms in high-pressure areas, such as the palms and soles, which are repeatedly exposed to subclinical trauma (23).
This study was retrospective. Because the subjects were patients with ATC or DTC, which have different biological prognoses, the frequencies of AEs were also different. To examine whether the prognosis of DTC can be predicted by the presence or absence of HFS, a median treatment period of 18.2 months is not sufficient. Moreover, prognosis was significantly worse for patients with serious AEs.
This study, reported from real-world experience, showed that lenvatinib therapy could result in severe AEs requiring dose reduction or treatment discontinuation. It also indicated that the appearance of HFS portended a good prognosis in patients treated with lenvatinib, which may be characteristic of the Japanese population. We expect additional reports from other facilities regarding these two points.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr Hiroyuki Hayashi (Department of Pathology, Yokohama City Hospital, Yokohama, Japan) for assistance in pathological diagnosis.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
HI and ST designed the study. HI, ST, SK and DM designed the study and investigation. SK and AM analyzed the data and contributed to data curation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Cancer Board of Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital (Japan) approved lenvatinib treatment, including surgery, for patients with ATC or DTC. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital (Japan). All patients provided a comprehensive consent stating that their samples that were collected for medical examination could be utilized for investigation and clinical research.
Patient consent for publication
All patients signed a consent form stating that their personal data and samples could be used for academic presentation or paper presentation while ensuring complete anonymity before receiving the treatment.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' information
HI is an endocrine surgeon working at Kanagawa Cancer Center and has extensive experience of several surgeries for ATC, as well as ATC treatment.
References
Seib CD and Sosa JA: Evolving understanding of the epidemiology of thyroid cancer. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 48:23–35. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Olson E, Wintheiser G, Wolfe KM, Droessler J and Silberstein PT: Epidemiology of thyroid cancer: A review of the National Cancer Database, 2000-2013. Cureus. 11(e4127)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Melosky B, Leighl NB, Rothenstein J, Sangha R, Stewart D and Papp K: Management of EGFR TKI-induced dermatologic adverse events. Curr Oncol. 22:123–132. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Eskazan AE and Ozmen D: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for newly-diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: Focusing on TKI discontinuation due to adverse events-is better always good? Expert Rev Hematol. 10:583–586. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Haugen BR: 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: What is new and what has changed? Cancer. 123:372–381. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Iwasaki H, Yamazaki H, Takasaki H, Suganuma N, Sakai R, Nakayama H, Hatori S, Toda S and Masudo K: Treatment outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer with distant metastasis improve by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncol Lett. 17:5292–5300. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kamba T and McDonald DM: Mechanisms of adverse effects of anti-VEGF therapy for cancer. Br J Cancer. 96:1788–1795. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sonpavde G, Bellmunt J, Schutz F and Choueiri TK: The double edged sword of bleeding and clotting from VEGF inhibition in renal cancer patients. Curr Oncol Rep. 14:295–306. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Machiels JP, Henry S, Zanetta S, Kaminsky MC, Michoux N, Rommel D, Schmitz S, Bompas E, Dillies AF, Faivre S, et al: Phase II study of sunitinib in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: GORTEC 2006-01. J Clin Oncol. 28:21–28. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mancuso MR, Davis R, Norberg SM, O'Brien S, Sennino B, Nakahara T, Yao VJ, Inai T, Brooks P, Freimark B, et al: Rapid vascular regrowth in tumors after reversal of VEGF inhibition. J Clin Invest. 116:2610–2621. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu L, Wang E, Li L, Chen D, Peng K, Wang M and Han G: As clinical markers, hand-foot-skin reaction and diarrhea can predict better outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019(2576349)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Falcone G, Arrigoni C, Dellafiore F, Gallucci F, Milani V, Boveri S, Ausili D and Caruso R: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between hand-foot syndrome (HFS) and cancer chemotherapy efficacy. Clin Ter. 170:e388–e395. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kobayashi K, Kawakami K, Yokokawa T, Aoyama T, Suzuki K, Wakatsuki T, Suenaga M, Sato H, Sugiyama E, Yamaguchi K and Hama T: Association of hand-foot skin reaction with regorafenib efficacy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncology. 96:200–206. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Iwasaki H, Yamazaki H, Takasaki H, Suganuma N, Sakai R, Nakayama H, Toda S and Masudo K: Renal dysfunction in patients with radioactive iodine-refractory thyroid cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 98(e17588)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, et al: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 45:228–247. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Iwasaki H, Yamazaki H, Takasaki H, Suganuma N, Nakayama H, Toda S and Masudo K: Lenvatinib as a novel treatment for anaplastic thyroid cancer: A retrospective study. Oncol Lett. 16:7271–7277. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Iwasaki H, Toda S, Suganuma N, Murayama D, Nakayama H and Masudo K: Lenvatinib vs. palliative therapy for stage IVC anaplastic thyroid cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 12:138–143. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Schlumberger M, Tahara M, Wirth LJ, Robinson B, Brose MS, Elisei R, Habra MA, Newbold K, Shah MH, Hoff AO, et al: Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. 372:621–630. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Locati LD, Piovesan A, Durante C, Bregni M, Castagna MG, Zovato S, Giusti M, Ibrahim T, Puxeddu E, Fedele G, et al: Real-world efficacy and safety of lenvatinib: Data from a compassionate use in the treatment of radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer patients in Italy. Eur J Cancer. 118:35–40. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hui EP, Ma BBY, King AD, Mo F, Chan SL, Kam MKM, Loong HH, Ahuja AT, Zee BCY and Chan ATC: Hemorrhagic complications in a phase II study of sunitinib in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma who has previously received high-dose radiation. Ann Oncol. 22:1280–1287. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Blevins DP, Dadu R, Hu M, Baik C, Balachandran D, Ross W, Gunn B and Cabanillas ME: Aerodigestive fistula formation as a rare side effect of antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 24:918–922. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Katsura Y, Takeda Y, Ohmura Y, Sakamoto T, Kawai K, Inatome J, Murakami K, Naito A, Kagawa Y, Masuzawa T, et al: Experience of treatment with lenvatinib in patients with advanced HCC-A in a single institution. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 46:2101–2103. 2019.PubMed/NCBI(In Japanese). | |
Yada M, Masumoto A, Motomura K, Tajiri H, Morita Y, Suzuki H, Senju T and Koyanagi T: Indicators of sorafenib efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 20:12581–12587. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |