Open Access

Successful treatment of lung cancer coexisting with B‑cell lymphoma with pembrolizumab following rituximab‑included chemotherapy: A case report

  • Authors:
    • Daisuke Natori
    • Hiroaki Ozasa
    • Yusuke Shima
    • Chisaki Mizumoto
    • Keiichiro Suminaga
    • Takashi Nomizo
    • Hitomi Ajimizu
    • Hironori Yoshida
    • Toyohiro Hirai
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 23, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2024.2731
  • Article Number: 33
  • Copyright: © Natori et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The combined occurrence of lung cancer and B‑cell lymphoma, such as mucosa‑associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, is rare. The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unknown in this population of patients, and the occurrence of ICI‑induced exacerbation of lymphoma is concerning. The present study describes a case of successful treatment with pembrolizumab following rituximab‑containing chemotherapy for lung cancer complicated by MALT lymphoma. The patient was a 69‑year‑old woman diagnosed with MALT lymphoma based on a biopsy of stomach ulcerative lesions, and advanced lung cancer based on a biopsy of a lymph node in the left pulmonary hilum. Complete remission was achieved after one cycle of rituximab and bendamustine therapy for MALT lymphoma. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was subsequently initiated, resulting in a good response for lung cancer without recurrence or exacerbation of the lymphoma. In conclusion, the present study suggested that pembrolizumab, following rituximab‑containing therapy, could be a treatment option for patients with lung cancer coexisting with MALT lymphoma.

Introduction

Cases of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) complicated by B-cell lymphoma are relatively rare. The majority of previous reports regarding such cases included accidental diagnoses or successful treatments through surgical resection (1). However, cases of advanced lung carcinoma and B-cell lymphoma being treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have rarely been reported, except for two cases with conflicting results involving treatment with sintilimab and pembrolizumab (2,3).

The efficacy of ICIs has been demonstrated in various types of malignant tumors, including NSCLC. Some clinical trials have revealed that pembrolizumab improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC, particularly those with a high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) (4,5). However, the efficacy of ICIs for malignant lymphomas is unknown, with the exception of Hodgkin's lymphoma and some types of B-cell lymphoma, such as mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. In particular, in the case of indolent lymphomas, such as follicular lymphoma (FL) or MALT lymphoma, the efficacy of ICIs is controversial (6,7).

Moreover, the safety of ICIs in B-cell lymphoma has yet not been clarified. Some studies have reported the development of malignant lymphomas, such as FL, during or after treatment with ICIs (3,8,9); one study suspected that the development of lymphoma might be caused by ICIs (3). Thus, consensus on the commencement of ICI treatment for patients with advanced lung cancer in conjunction with B-cell lymphomas is not unanimous because of fear of lymphoma progression.

Herein, we present the case of successful treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy following bendamustine and rituximab (BR) therapy for a patient simultaneously diagnosed with advanced NSCLC and MALT lymphoma, which could help determine the efficacy and safety of ICI treatment for this demographic.

Case report

A 69-year-old female patient visited Kyoto University Hospital (Kyoto, Japan) in March 2022 with an upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. She had no history of smoking and a specific medical history, including Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed ulcerative lesions in the stomach without active bleeding (Fig. 1A), and a biopsy of the lesions revealed MALT lymphoma (positive for cluster of differentiate 20 (CD20) and negative for CD3). Serological evaluation for immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody against HP was negative, and MALT1 translocation was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Bone marrow biopsy did not indicate malignancy. Computed tomography (CT) revealed stomach wall thickening, swollen lymph nodes around the stomach and left pulmonary hilum, and atelectasis in the middle lobe of the right lung, whereas the positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) image (Fig. 1C) showed right adrenal gland enlargement with 18F-fluorodeoxyglycose (18F-FDG) uptake. Magnetic resonance imaging showed no brain metastases. Although the stomach lesions were diagnosed as MALT lymphoma, the lesions in the lung and adrenal glands were suspected to be complicated by other diseases, such as lung cancer. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of lymph nodes in the left pulmonary hilum indicated NSCLC with suspected multiple distant metastases to the adrenal gland and the opposite side of the lung [cTxN1M1c, cStageⅣB, no oncogenic driver mutations, PD-L1 TPS ≥75% (22C3)]. However, brush cytology detected atypical lymphoid cells, indicating that the atelectasis was caused by MALT lymphoma. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with advanced NSCLC complicated with MALT lymphoma. Although NSCLS should be treated promptly, treatment for MALT lymphoma was prioritized, considering stomach bleeding. We initiated one course of bendamustine (90 mg/m2) plus rituximab (375 mg/m2) therapy. PET-CT showed reduced 18F-FDG uptake in the stomach wall and atelectasis in the right lung, except in other lesions (Fig. 1D). We initiated pembrolizumab (200 mg/kg body weight) therapy as a prognostic factor for NSCLC. Four months after pembrolizumab initiation, PET-CT showed no 18F-FDG uptake in any of the lesions (Fig. 1E). An erosive lesion was found in the stomach wall through gastrointestinal endoscopy and a re-biopsy of the stomach wall showed no residual lesions of MALT lymphoma, indicating pathological remission of the MALT lymphoma (Fig. 1B). The patient's best response was a good partial response (PR) for NSCLC and complete remission (CR) for MALT lymphoma. The treatment effect was maintained for more than 1 year without recurrence under continuous pembrolizumab monotherapy (cut-off date: April 25, 2023).

Discussion

Cases of lung cancers being complicated by B-cell lymphoma are relatively rare. To date, only a few cases of advanced lung cancer with B-cell lymphoma have been reported. Two of these cases were successfully treated with alectinib or osimertinib (10,11) whereas the other cases reported partial efficacy of sintilimab treatment and exacerbation after pembrolizumab treatment in patients with advanced lung cancer and B-cell lymphoma (2) To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of pembrolizumab treatment following one course of BR therapy for advanced NSCLC accompanied by MALT lymphoma, which resulted in good disease control.

The antitumor efficacy of ICIs has been demonstrated in many clinical trials. Pembrolizumab is a humanized IgG4 antibody against the PD-1 receptor, and its efficacy in lung cancer has previously been demonstrated. In particular, the Keynote-024 clinical trial revealed that pembrolizumab monotherapy for patients with NSCLC expressing PD-L1 ≥50% significantly improved the OS and PFS (4) The efficacy of ICIs for malignant lymphomas has not been determined, with the exception of Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of nivolumab for relapse or recurrent (r/r) lymphoma showed an overall response rate (ORR) of approximately 40% in r/r FL (6); however, phase 2 trials with nivolumab treatment for r/r FL showed an ORR of only 4% (7) In contrast, pembrolizumab plus rituximab therapy for FL showed relatively good ORR (67%) and CR (50%), with long-term remission (12).

The efficacy of ICIs in treating MALT lymphoma remains unknown, although a clinical study evaluating their efficacy is ongoing (NCT04268277). Three reports have investigated the treatment of B-cell lymphoma complicated with other solid cancers with ICIs (Table I). Two studies reported that MALT lymphoma with solid tumors was controlled by ICI treatment followed by rituximab monotherapy or rituximab-included chemotherapy (2,9) and one of which achieved CR for MALT lymphoma and PR for lung cancer by treatment with five courses of rituximab-included regimen, followed by sintilimab monotherapy (2). Another study reported CR for MALT lymphoma that developed during pembrolizumab treatment for urothelial cell carcinoma and was treated with four courses of rituximab (9) These cases suggest that ICIs with rituximab-containing regimens may be effective in these populations. However, the remaining patient reported the development and exacerbation of FL after pembrolizumab monotherapy, suggesting that lymphoma progression may be induced by ICI therapy (3).

Table I

B-cell lymphoma and other cancers treated with ICIs.

Table I

B-cell lymphoma and other cancers treated with ICIs.

First author, yearAge/sexLymphomaCoexisting cancerICIsOnset of lymphomaClinical courseSafety of ICIs for lymphoma(Refs.)
Yuan, 202067/MMALT lymphomaLC (Ad)SintilimabBefore ICI inductionDuring chemotherapy with CBDCA, PTX, and bevacizumab, the MALT lymphoma was diagnosed and treated with rituximab and lenalidomide, resulting in CR. Sintilimab therapy for the progression of LC was initiated and stable condition was maintainedMaintained CR after the start of ICI treatment(2)
Marumo, 202174/FFLLC (SQ)PembrolizumabDuring ICI treatmentFollowing the commencement of pembrolizumab for LC, FL was developed and treated with rituximab. After achieving CMR and resuming pembrolizumab for LC, FL was exacerbated and R-CVP therapy was required to achieve CMRDevelopment and exacerbation of lymphoma might be induced by ICIs(3)
Osumo, 202284/FMALT lymphomaUrothelial cell carcinomaPembrolizumabDuring ICI treatmentTwo years after the start of pembrolizumab, the MALT lymphoma was diagnosed in the right parotid gland. After the completion of rituximab therapy, pembrolizumab monotherapy was resumedGood response was achieved after resuming ICI treatment(9)

[i] ICIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors; MALT, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; LC, lung cancer; Ad, adenocarcinoma; CBDCA, carboplatin; PTX, paclitaxel; CR, complete remission; FL, follicular lymphoma; SQ, squamous cell carcinoma; CMR, complete metabolic response; R-CVP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone.

However, the mechanisms underlying the development and exacerbation of B-cell lymphoma by ICI remain unclear. Two studies have reported the development of lymphoma after the cessation of ICI therapy (8,13) and one suggested that nivolumab treatment might inhibit the development of lymphoma (8) Moreover, the development of B-cell lymphoma after ICI treatment requires a long time. Previous studies have reported 80 cycles of treatment, 27 cycles of nivolumab, and approximately 2 years from pembrolizumab commencement (8,9,14) for the development of B-cell lymphoma, indicating that ICIs were not a direct cause of lymphoma development. However, the development and exacerbation of lymphoma during one case of pembrolizumab treatment suggested that the mechanism of exacerbation might be the depression of follicular helper T-cells and follicular regulatory T-cells induced by anti-PD-1(3). Although the population at risk of lymphoma development and exacerbation is unknown, it is important to focus on this phenomenon during or after ICI treatment.

In our case, we observed CR for MALT lymphoma and good PR for lung cancer treated with one course of BR therapy, followed by pembrolizumab monotherapy. The efficacy of three courses of BR therapy for MALT lymphoma has been reported to be high, with an ORR of 100% and long-term response (15) One cycle of BR therapy may be effective enough to prevent relapse or recurrence after pembrolizumab initiation. Considering cases of MALT lymphoma with no relapse or exacerbation after ICI treatment (2,9) the initiation of ICI treatment may be safe after CR is achieved with a rituximab-containing treatment.

Pembrolizumab treatment following a rituximab-including regimen may be safely initiated in patients with MALT lymphoma and solid cancers, such as lung cancer.

In conclusion, cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) simultaneously diagnosed with MALT lymphoma are rare. Pembrolizumab treatment following a rituximab-containing regimen could be a treatment option in such cases.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study are included in the figures and/or tables of this article.

Authors' contributions

DN wrote the original draft, and contributed to conception, design, data acquisition and data analysis. YS and HO contributed to supervision, writing, conception, design, data analysis, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. CM contributed to supervision, data acquisition, data analysis, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. KS, TN, HA, HY and TH contributed to data acquisition, conception, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. YS and HO confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Written and oral informed consent to publish this report was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Yamasaki M, Takenaka T, Matsumoto N, Asaoku H, Taniwaki M and Hattori N: Primary pulmonary collision tumor comprising squamous cell carcinoma and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Lung Cancer. 129:107–109. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Yuan S, Hu X, Zhao Y and Wang Z: Case report: PD-1 inhibitor is active in lung Adenocarcinoma with B cell deficiency. Front Immunol. 11(563622)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Marumo Y, Kusumoto S, Masaki A, Nakashima T, Kikuchi T, Mori F, Komatsu H, Inagaki H, Iida S and Inagaki A: Newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma during pembrolizumab treatment for lung cancer. Int J Hematol. 114:280–285. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, Gottfried M, Peled N, Tafreshi A, Cuffe S, et al: Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive non-small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 375:1823–1833. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, Kowalski DM, Cho BC, Turna HZ, Castro G Jr, Srimuninnimit V, Laktionov KK, Bondarenko I, et al: Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): A randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 393:1819–1830. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Lesokhin AM, Ansell SM, Armand P, Scott EC, Halwani A, Gutierrez M, Millenson MM, Cohen AD, Schuster SJ, Lebovic D, et al: Nivolumab in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancy: Preliminary results of a phase Ib study. J Clin Oncol. 34:2698–2704. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Armand P, Janssens A, Gritti G, Radford J, Timmerman J, Pinto A, Mercadal Vilchez S, Johnson P, Cunningham D, Leonard JP, et al: Efficacy and safety results from CheckMate 140, a phase 2 study of nivolumab for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Blood. 137:637–645. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Sengul Samanci N, Yılmaz U, Bedir S, Ozgur Yurttas N, Oruc K, Durak Sahin Z, Celik E, Toplutas KN, Akı H, Eskazan AE and Demirelli FH: Follicular lymphoma generating in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer following nivolumab discontinuation. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 26:2042–2046. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Osumo B, Radzevich J, Nashed N, Ustwani O and Slotman G: Primary parotid non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma in an elderly woman on pembrolizumab for metastatic invasive papillary urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. Am Surg. 88:799–801. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Okawa S, Rai K, Fujii N, Gion Y, Ninomiya K, Kato Y, Taniguchi A, Kubo T, Ichihara E, Ohashi K, et al: Marginal zone lymphoma and lung adenocarcinoma with an EGFR Exon 19 E746-S752del mutation in a patient with IgG4-related disease. Intern Med. 60:2831–2837. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Ashish S, Rodriguez RR, Sethi P, Yu F and Raj M: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation-targeting treatment with alectinib in lung adenocarcinoma and primary cutaneous marginal zone B-cell lymphoma. Cureus. 14(e29922)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Nastoupil LJ, Chin CK, Westin JR, Fowler NH, Samaniego F, Cheng X, Ma MCJ, Wang Z, Chu F, Dsouza L, et al: Safety and activity of pembrolizumab in combination with rituximab in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Blood Adv. 6:1143–1151. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Castel M, Cotton C, Deschamps-Huvier A, Commin MH, Marguet F, Jardin F, Duval-Modeste AB and Joly P: Primary central nervous system lymphoma following immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 146:634–639. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In French).

14 

Boudou-Rouquette P, Grignano E, Arrondeau J, Burroni B and Chouchana L: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after nivolumab treatment for lung cancer: A case report and a World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database review. Eur J Cancer. 130:20–22. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Salar A, Domingo-Domenech E, Panizo C, Nicolás C, Bargay J, Muntañola A, Canales M, Bello JL, Sancho JM, Tomás JF, et al: Long-term results of a phase 2 study of rituximab and Bendamustine for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Blood. 130:1772–1774. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2024
Volume 20 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Natori D, Ozasa H, Shima Y, Mizumoto C, Suminaga K, Nomizo T, Ajimizu H, Yoshida H and Hirai T: Successful treatment of lung cancer coexisting with B‑cell lymphoma with pembrolizumab following rituximab‑included chemotherapy: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 20: 33, 2024.
APA
Natori, D., Ozasa, H., Shima, Y., Mizumoto, C., Suminaga, K., Nomizo, T. ... Hirai, T. (2024). Successful treatment of lung cancer coexisting with B‑cell lymphoma with pembrolizumab following rituximab‑included chemotherapy: A case report. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 20, 33. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2024.2731
MLA
Natori, D., Ozasa, H., Shima, Y., Mizumoto, C., Suminaga, K., Nomizo, T., Ajimizu, H., Yoshida, H., Hirai, T."Successful treatment of lung cancer coexisting with B‑cell lymphoma with pembrolizumab following rituximab‑included chemotherapy: A case report". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 20.4 (2024): 33.
Chicago
Natori, D., Ozasa, H., Shima, Y., Mizumoto, C., Suminaga, K., Nomizo, T., Ajimizu, H., Yoshida, H., Hirai, T."Successful treatment of lung cancer coexisting with B‑cell lymphoma with pembrolizumab following rituximab‑included chemotherapy: A case report". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 20, no. 4 (2024): 33. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2024.2731