1
|
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J and
Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 59:225–249.
2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
2
|
Piver MS, Rutledge F and Smith JP: Five
classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer.
Obstet Gynecol. 44:265–272. 1974.PubMed/NCBI
|
3
|
Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Hanozet F,
Martinelli F, Solima E, Zanaboni F, et al: Nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy in cervical cancer: evolution of concepts. Gynecol
Oncol. 107:119–121. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4
|
Pluta M, Rob L, Charvat M, Chmel R,
Halaska M Jr, Skapa P, et al: Less radical surgery than radical
hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol
Oncol. 113:181–184. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
5
|
Likic IS, Kadija S, Ladjevic NG,
Stefanovic A, Jeremic K, Petkovic S, et al: Analysis of urologic
complications after radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
99:6442008.
|
6
|
Jackson KS and Naik R: Pelvic floor
dysfunction and radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer.
16:354–363. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7
|
Yabuki Y, Sasaki H, Hatakeyama N and
Murakami G: Discrepancies between classic anatomy and modern
gynecologic surgery on pelvic connective tissue structure:
harmonization of those concepts by collaborative cadaver
dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 193:7–15. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar
|
8
|
Fujii S: Anatomic identification of
nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure.
Gynecol Oncol. 111:33–41. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
van den Tillaart SAHM, Kenter GG, Peters
AA, Dekker FW, Gaarenstroom KN, Fleuren GJ, et al: Nerve-sparing
radical hysterectomy: local recurrence rate, feasibility, and
safety in cervical cancer patients stage IA to IIA. Int J Gynecol
Cancer. 19:39–45. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
10
|
Espino-Strebel EE, Luna JT and Domingo EJ:
Comparison of the feasibility and safety of nerve-sparing radical
hysterectomy with the conventional radical hysterectomy. Int J
Gynecol Cancer. 20:1274–1283. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11
|
Querleu D and Morrow CP: Classification of
radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 9:297–303. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
12
|
Frumovitz M, Sun CC, Schmeler KM, Deavers
MT, Dos Reis R, Levenback CF and Ramirez PT: Parametrial
involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with
early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 114:93–99. 2009.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
13
|
Schmeler K, Frumovitz M and Ramirez P:
Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: is there a
role for less radical surgery? Gynecol Oncol. 120:321–325. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
14
|
Mauroy B, Demondion X, Bizet B, Claret A,
Mestdagh P and Hurt C: The female inferior hypogastric (=pelvis)
plexus: anatomical and radiological description of the plexus and
its afferences - applications to pelvic surgery. Surg Radiol Anat.
29:55–66. 2007.
|
15
|
Kato T, Suzaka K and Osaki T: Unilateral
or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical
technique to preserve the pelvic autonomic nerves while increasing
radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 17:1172–1178. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
|
16
|
Hazewinkel MH, Sprangers MA, van der
Velden J, van der Vaart CH, Stalpers LJ, Burger MP and Roovers JP:
Long-term cervical cancer survivors suffer from pelvic floor
symptoms: a cross-sectional matched cohort study. Gynecol Oncol.
117:281–286. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
17
|
Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LD, A'Hern RP,
Polak JM and Barton DP: Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical and
simple hysterectomy: a quantitative study of nerve types in the
uterine supporting ligaments. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 9:47–51.
2002. View Article : Google Scholar
|
18
|
Mantzaris G, Rodolakis A, Vlachos G,
Athanasiou S, Theocharis S, Sotiripoulou ChM and Antsaklis A:
Magnifying lenses assisted nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and
prevention of nerve plexus trauma. Int J Gynecol Cancer.
18:868–875. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
19
|
van Meurs H, Visser O, Buist MR, Ten Kate
FJ and van der Velden J: Frequency of pelvic lymph node metastases
and parametrial involvement in stage IA2 cervical cancer: a
population-based study and literature review. Int J Gynecol Cancer.
19:21–26. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
20
|
Sakuragi N: Up-to-date management of lymph
node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in
cervical cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 12:165–175. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
21
|
Tavares MB, Sousa RB, Oliveirae Silva T,
Moreira LA, Silva LT, Tavares CB and Vieira SC: Prevalence of
prognostic factors for cancer of the uterine cervix after radical
hysterectomy. Sao Paulo Med J. 127:145–149. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
22
|
Kasamatsu T, Onda T, Sawada M, Kato T and
Ikeda S: Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer:
clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic evaluation.
Gynecol Oncol. 114:69–74. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
23
|
Herr D, Konig J, Heilmann V, Koretz K,
Kreienberg R and Kurzeder C: Prognostic impact of
satellite-lymphovascular space involvement in early-stage cervical
cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 16:128–132. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
24
|
Lim CS, Alexander-Sefre F, Allam M, Singh
N, Aleong JC, Al-Rawi H and Jacobs IJ: Clinical value of
immunohistochemically detected lymphovascular space invasion in
early stage cervical carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 15:2581–2588. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
25
|
Strnad P, Robova H, Skapa P, Pluta M,
Hrehorcak M, Halaska M and Rob L: A prospective study of sentinel
lymph node status and parametrial involvement in patients with
small tumour volume cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 109:280–284.
2008.PubMed/NCBI
|
26
|
Wright JD, Grigsby PW, Brooks R, Powell
MA, Gibb RK, Gao F, et al: Utility of parametrectomy for early
stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer.
110:1281–1286. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
27
|
Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Scambia G,
Greggi S, Cutillo G, D'Andrea G, et al: Lymphatic spread of
cervical cancer: an anatomical and pathological study based on 225
radical hysterectomies with systematic pelvic and aortic
lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 62:19–24. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
28
|
Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, D'Andrea
G, Cutillo G, Rabitti C, Congiu M, et al: Early cervical carcinoma:
the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the
basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study. Cancer.
88:2267–2274. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar
|
29
|
Plentl AA and Friedman EA: Lymphatic
system of the female genitalia. The morphologic basis of oncologic
diagnosis and therapy. Major Probl Obstet Gynecol. 2:1–223.
1971.PubMed/NCBI
|
30
|
Vieira SC, Sousa RB, Tavares MB, Silva JB,
Abreu BA, Santos LG, et al: Preoperative pelvic lymphoscintigraphy
is of limited usefulness for sentinel lymph node detection in
cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 145:96–99. 2009.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
31
|
Du XL, Sheng XG, Jiang T, Li QS, Yu H, Pan
CX, et al: Sentinel lymph node biopsy as guidance for radical
trachelectomy in young patients with early stage cervical cancer.
BMC Cancer. 11:1572011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
32
|
Ercoli A, Delmas V, Iannone V, Fagotti A,
Fanfani F, Corrado G, et al: The lymphatic drainage of the uterine
cervix in adult fresh cadavers: anatomy and surgical implications.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 36:298–303. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
33
|
Plentl AA and Friedman EA: Clinical
significance of cervical lymphatics. Lymphatic System of the Female
Genitalia The Morphological Basis of Oncologic Diagnosis and
Therapy. 1st edition. W.B. Saunders; Philadelphia: pp. 75–115.
1971
|
34
|
Park NY, Chong GO, Hong DG, Cho YL, Park
IS and Lee YS: Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of
laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of
FIGO stage IB cervical cance. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 21:355–362.
2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|