Open Access

Module-based functional pathway enrichment analysis of a protein‑protein interaction network to study the effects of intestinal microbiota depletion in mice

  • Authors:
    • Zhen‑Yi Jia
    • Yang Xia
    • Danian Tong
    • Jing Yao
    • Hong‑Qi Chen
    • Jun Yang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 9, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2137
  • Pages: 2205-2212
  • Copyright: © Jia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY_NC 3.0].

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Complex communities of microorganisms play important roles in human health, and alterations in the intestinal microbiota may induce intestinal inflammation and numerous diseases. The purpose of this study was to identify the key genes and processes affected by depletion of the intestinal microbiota in a murine model. The Affymetrix microarray dataset GSE22648 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using the limma package in R. A protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed for the DEGs using the Cytoscape software, and the network was divided into several modules using the MCODE plugin. Furthermore, the modules were functionally annotated using the PiNGO plugin, and DEG‑related pathways were retrieved and analyzed using the GenMAPP software. A total of 53 DEGs were identified, of which 26 were upregulated and 27 were downregulated. The PPI network of these DEGs comprised 3 modules. The most significant module‑related DEGs were the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 4B1 isozyme gene (CYP4B1) in module 1, CYP4F14 in module 2 and the tachykinin precursor 1 gene (TAC1) in module 3. The majority of enriched pathways of module 1 and 2 were oxidation reduction pathways (metabolism of xenobiotics by CYPs) and lipid metabolism‑related pathways, including linoleic acid and arachidonic acid metabolism. The neuropeptide signaling pathway was the most significantly enriched functional pathway of module 3. In conclusion, our findings strongly suggest that intestinal microbiota depletion affects cellular metabolism and oxidation reduction pathways. In addition, this is the first time, to the best of our knowledge, that the neuropeptide signaling pathway is reported to be affected by intestinal microbiota depletion in mice. The present study provides a list of candidate genes and processes related to the interaction of microbiota with the intestinal tract.

Introduction

There are >1,000 species of bacteria in the intestinal tract, known as intestinal microbiota. The genomes of these species encode >100-fold unique genes compared to the human genome (1). The intestinal microbiota is dominated by five bacterial phyla (Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia) and one Archaea (Euryarchaeota) (2). These complex communities of microorganisms play an important role in metabolic, nutritional, physiological and immunological processes in the human body (3). Molecular characterization of the intestinal microbiota by phylogenetic approaches has received considerable attention in recent years and revealed a remarkable compositional stability and resilience in adult life, even after pervasive treatments with antibiotics (4). Species of the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are particularly present in the colon of healthy individuals, and they are generally regarded as desirable, owing to the reduction of the neutral pH to a more acidic pH that they cause (5). Changes in microbial community composition are closely associated with various diseases, such as allergic disease (6), colorectal cancer (7) and intestinal inflammatory disease (8).

Our understanding of intestinal microbiota and their importance for the human physiology has increased, owing to international research initiatives such as the MetaHIT project (1) and the Human Microbiome Project (9). However, the development of simple protocols for the manipulation of intestinal microbiota in experimental animal models is still needed. Recently, a study focusing on the effects of intestinal microbiota depletion on the gut mucosa and epithelial gene expression was performed; depletion of the intestinal microbiota was achieved in mice by administering broad-spectrum antibiotics in drinking water (10). The study reported that antibiotic treatment significantly reduced the expression of antimicrobial factors to a level similar to that of germ-free mice, and altered the expression of a total of 517 genes in the colonic epithelium. The expression of genes involved in the cell cycle was significantly altered, concomitant with reduced epithelial proliferative activity in situ, as assessed by Ki-67 expression, which suggested that commensal microbiota drives cellular proliferation in the colonic epithelium (10). Metabolites produced by the gut microbiota community from processes such as oxidation reduction and lipid metabolism have been reported to considerably affect intestinal functions (1).

The present study used a previously released microarray dataset (10) to assess the effects of intestinal microbiota depletion in mice, by focusing on the gene expression profiles of colonic intestinal epithelial cells in the presence and absence of intestinal microbiota. These profiles were analyzed using a series of bioinformatic methods, including protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction, module functional annotation and pathway enrichment analyses. Further research on the mechanisms identified here as affected by the intestinal microbiota depletion is planned for a future study.

Materials and methods

Affymetrix microarray analysis

The raw data and the probe annotation files from the gene expression profiling dataset GSE22648 (10; accession no. GDS3921) were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (the National Center of Biotechnology Information; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE22648). These data were obtained on a GPL6887 platform using MouseWG-6 v2.0 expression beadchips (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Data from a total of 11 chips were analyzed, corresponding to colonic intestinal epithelial cell gene expression profiles of 5 replicates from mice with depleted intestinal microbiota and 6 replicates from control mice that were not treated with antibiotics (germ-free).

Identification and clustering analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

The raw data were preprocessed using the Affy package in R (11). Differential expression analysis between the 5 intestinal microbiota-depleted and the 6 control samples was performed using limma, a linear regression model software package available in R (12), and multiple testing correction was performed using a Bayesian method (13). The DEGs between intestinal microbiota-depleted and control samples were defined as these genes showing a |log fold change (FC)| >1 and a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05. To visualize the expression profiles of DEGs and all genes, unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis was performed (14).

PPI network construction

The search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes (STRING) (15) database was used to retrieve the predicted interactions for the identified DEGs; the version 9.0 of STRING covers >1,100 completely sequenced species. All associations available in STRING are provided with a probabilistic confidence score, which was derived by separately benchmarking groups of associations against the a manually curated functional classification scheme (15). Each score represents a rough estimate of how likely a given association describes a functional linkage between two gene products. The DEGs with a confidence score >0.8 were selected to construct the PPI network, using the open-source Cytoscape software (16). Cytoscape (http://cytoscape.org/) allows visualizing complex networks and integrating these networks to any type of attribute data.

Functional analysis of modules from the PPI network

The MCODE (17) plugin in Cytoscape was used to further divide the PPI into modules, using a cutoff value for the connectivity degree of nodes (proteins in the network) >2. Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation and enrichment analysis of genes in the resulting modules was performed using the PiNGO plugin in Cytoscape (18) with a threshold P<0.05 based on a hypergeometric test.

Pathway analysis

Information on the biological pathways in which the module-related DEGs are involved was retrieved from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html) (19,20). Visualization of these pathways and enrichment analysis was performed using the GenMAPP software (19). GenMAPP is a powerful tool for graphically viewing microarray data in the context of pathway analysis in an intuitive manner for biologists, and it was previously used in the analysis of microarray data related to allergic disease (21). P<0.05 was set as the threshold used for enrichment analysis of KEGG pathways.

Results

Identification of DEGs

The normalized expression values following preprocessing of the raw data are shown in Fig. 1. Differential expression analysis on these values using FDR<0.05 and |log FC|>1 as cutoff criteria identified a total of 53 genes differentially expressed between depleted intestinal microbiota and control mice. Among these DEGs, 26 were upregulated and 27 were downregulated upon microbiota depletion.

Clustering analysis of DEGs

Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed on the expression values of all genes and of the 53 DEGs. Clearly distinct expression patterns were observed between the microbiota-depleted and the control mice in both the total gene and DEG clustering analysis (Fig. 2).

PPI analysis and module functional annotation

The PPI network was constructed (Fig. 3A) based on the predicted interactions of 14 DEGs showing a confidence score >0.8. Using the MCODE plugin in Cytoscape, the PPI network was divided into three modules (Fig. 3B–D). Modules 1, 2 and 3 were found to be significantly enriched (P<0.05) for 12, 14 and 14 Gene Ontology (GO) terms, respectively (Table I). The two most significant GO terms in module 1 were oxidation reduction (P=1.9321E-21) and metabolic process (P=1.1226E-12). The DEGs in module 1 (Fig. 3B), i.e., the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 4B1 isozyme gene (CYP4B1), CYP2D10 and CYP2D26, which were upregulated (Table II), and CYP2C55, which was downregulated, were all involved in these two processes (Table I). In addition, CYP4B1 was found to be involved in all enriched GO term functions of module 1. The terms unsaturated fatty acid, lipid, cellular lipid and fatty acid metabolic process were the most significantly enriched functions in module 2, and the upregulated gene CYP4F14 (Fig. 3C, Table II) was predicted to be involved in all these functions (Table I). Notably, the neuropeptide signaling pathway was the most significantly enriched function (P=2.5213E-11) in module 3, and the upregulated gene tachykinin precursor 1 (TAC1) (Fig. 3D, Table II) was predicted to be involved in this function (Table I). The top 5 DEGs in terms of significance (Table II) were all upregulated upon microbiota depletion.

Table I

Functional annotation of the genes in the three modules using Gene Ontology (GO) terms.

Table I

Functional annotation of the genes in the three modules using Gene Ontology (GO) terms.

A, Significantly enriched GO terms (n=12) and associated DEGs in module 1

GO idCorr. PGenes in test setFunctional description
551141.9321E-21CYP2J5, CYP2C70, CYP2D9, CYP2D10, CYP2C37, CYP2C55, CYP3A25, CYP2C54, CYP3A13, CYP2C44, CYP3A11, CYP2C29, CYP2C40, CYP2E1, CYP1A2, CYP4B1, CYP2D26Oxidation reduction
81521.1226E-12CYP2J5, CYP2C70, CYP2D9, CYP2D10, CYP2C37, CYP2C55, CYP3A25, CYP2C54, CYP3A13, CYP2C44, CYP3A11, CYP2C29, UGT2B1, CYP2C40, CYP2E1, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, UGT3A2, CYP4B1, CYP2A12, UGT2B35, UGT2B5, CYP2D26Metabolic process
425379.6276E-10UGT2B1, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, CYP4B1Benzene and derivative metabolic process
68052.6493E-08UGT2B1, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, CYP4B1Xenobiotic metabolic process
714662.6493E-08UGT2B1, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, CYP4B1Cellular response to xenobiotic stimulus
67252.6493E-08CYP2A12, UGT2B35, UGT2B1, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, CYP4B1Cellular aromatic compound metabolic process
94103.7437E-08UGT2B1, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, CYP4B1Response to xenobiotic stimulus
708874.26E-04UGT2B1, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, CYP4B1Cellular response to chemical stimulus
442481.01E-03UGT2B35, UGT2B1, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, CYP4B1Cellular catabolic process
90563.27E-03UGT2B35, UGT2B1, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, CYP4B1Catabolic process
422217.25E-03UGT2B1, CYP2D26, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, CYP4B1Response to chemical stimulus
517169.66E-03UGT2B1, CYP1A2, UGT1A1, CYP4B1Cellular response to stimulus

B, Significantly enriched GO terms (n=14) and associated genes in module 2

GO idCorr. PGenes in test setFunctional description

335592.0285E-08PTGS2, PTGS1, CYP4F14, ALOX5Unsaturated fatty acid metabolic process
66291.1496E-07PTGS2, PLB1, PTGS1, PLA2G2A, CYP4F14, ALOX5Lipid metabolic process
442551.2555E-06PTGS2, PTGS1, PLA2G2A, CYP4F14, ALOX5Cellular lipid metabolic process
66312.1203E-06PTGS2, PTGS1, CYP4F14, ALOX5Fatty acid metabolic process
327879.1722E-06PTGS2, PTGS1, CYP4F14, ALOX5Monocarboxylic acid metabolic process
434365.05E-05PTGS2, PTGS1, CYP4F14, ALOX5Oxoacid metabolic process
197525.05E-05PTGS2, PTGS1, CYP4F14, ALOX5Carboxylic acid metabolic process
60825.05E-05PTGS2, PTGS1, CYP4F14, ALOX5Organic acid metabolic process
421805.26E-05PTGS2, PTGS1, CYP4F14, ALOX5Cellular ketone metabolic process
551148.20E-05PTGS2, PTGS1, CYP4F14, ALOX5Oxidation reduction
442811.02E-03PTGS2, PTGS1, CYP4F14, ALOX5Small molecule metabolic process
442381.89E-03PTGS2, PLB1, PTGS1, PLA2G2A, CYP4F14, ALOX5Primary metabolic process
81523.03E-03PTGS2, PLB1, PTGS1, PLA2G2A, CYP4F14, ALOX5Metabolic process
442379.30E-03PTGS2, PTGS1, PLA2G2A, CYP4F14, ALOX5Cellular metabolic process

C, Significantly enriched GO terms (n=14) and associated genes in module 3

GO idCorr. PGenes in test setFunctional description

72182.5213E-11GRP, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, TAC1, TAC2Neuropeptide signaling pathway
80151.8064E-10NTS, TACR3, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, TAC2Blood circulation
30131.8064E-10NTS, TACR3, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, TAC2Circulatory system process
71861.1712E-07GRP, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, GAST, TAC2G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway
71668.8661E-07GRP, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, GAST, TAC2Cell surface receptor linked signaling pathway
230334.6021E-06GRP, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, GAST, TAC2Signaling pathway
512394.8121E-06GRP, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, AGT, TAC1Regulation of multicellular organismal process
30084.9678E-06NTS, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, TAC2System process
650081.24E-05NTS, TACR3, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, TAC2Regulation of biological quality
230521.33E-05GRP, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, GAST, TAC2Signaling
650074.55E-05GRP, NTS, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, GAST, TAC2Biological regulation
325014.32E-04NTS, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, TAC2Multicellular organismal process
507942.08E-03GRP, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, GASTRegulation of cellular process
507892.69E-03GRP, TACR3, TACR2, TACR1, AGT, TAC1, GASTRegulation of biological process

[i] Corr. P, corrected p-value; CYP, cytochrome P450 gene; TAC1, tachykinin precursor 1 gene.

Table II

Characteristics of the most significant differentially expressed genes in the 3 modules.

Table II

Characteristics of the most significant differentially expressed genes in the 3 modules.

IdGene symbolFDR|log FC|GO termsaRegulation
ILMN_2790496CYP4B10.00235802.64All in Table IAUp
ILMN_1229535CYP2D100.02340231.4255114, 8152Up
ILMN_2704777CYP2D260.01902321.9255114, 8152, 42221Up
ILMN_1231625CYP4F140.00557201.31All in Table IBUp
ILMN_1251000TAC10.02570951.09All in Table ICUp

a The numbers denote Gene Ontology (GO) ids shown in Table I.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-mmr-09-06-2205'] } FC, fold change; CYP, cytochrome P450; TAC1, tachykinin precursor 1; FDR, false discovery rate.

Pathway analysis

Pathway enrichment analysis using the GenMAPP software was performed on the list of DEGs the products of which are parts of the three PPI modules. Module 1 was found to be significantly enriched for a total of 12 pathways, module 2 for 5 and module 3 for 2 (Table III). The most significant pathways in module 1 included metabolism of xenobiotics by P450s (P=2.20E-26), linoleic acid metabolism (P=6.54E-24) and arachidonic acid metabolism (P=1.49E-10). Significant pathways in module 2 also included arachidonic acid metabolism (P=5.61E-10) and linoleic acid metabolism (P=3.95E-02). Two pathways were significantly enriched in module 3, the calcium signaling pathway (P=3.23E-03) and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction (P=5.95E-03).

Table III

Pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in the three modules based on information from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways database for Mus musculus (mmu).

Table III

Pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in the three modules based on information from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways database for Mus musculus (mmu).

ModuleKEGG idP
1mmu00980: Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P4502.20E-26
mmu00830: Retinol metabolism3.63E-26
mmu00591: Linoleic acid metabolism6.54E-24
mmu00983: Drug metabolism1.30E-10
mmu00590: Arachidonic acid metabolism1.49E-10
mmu00140: Steroid hormone biosynthesis5.88E-09
mmu00053: Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism1.18E-03
mmu00040: Pentose and glucuronate interconversions1.52E-03
mmu00860: Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism4.74E-03
mmu00150: Androgen and estrogen metabolism4.74E-03
mmu00500: Starch and sucrose metabolism6.77E-03
mmu00232: Caffeine metabolism3.10E-02
2mmu00590: Arachidonic acid metabolism5.61E-10
mmu04370: Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway1.69E-03
mmu00592: α-linolenic acid metabolism1.56E-02
mmu00565: Ether lipid metabolism3.01E-02
mmu00591: Linoleic acid metabolism3.95E-02
3mmu04020: Calcium signaling pathway3.23E-03
mmu04080: Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction5.95E-03

Discussion

The collective genome of the human intestinal microbiota was estimated to contain 3.3 million microbial genes, which is ~150 times more genes than the human genome. Intestinal microbiota mostly use fermentation to generate energy, converting sugars, in part, to short-chain fatty acids, which are used by the host as an energy source (1). To understand the impact of intestinal microbiota on human health, it is crucial to assess their potential function. The present study identified a total of 53 DEGs, comprising 26 upregulated and 27 downregulated genes upon depletion of the intestinal microbiota in mice. Important differences in gene expression were observed between intestinal microbiota-depleted and control mice in hierarchical clustering analysis. The PPI network of DEGs was constructed and divided into 3 modules, with the most significant module-related DEGs being CYP4B1 in module 1, CYP4F14 in module 2 and TAC1 in module 3. The majority of enriched pathways of module 1 and 2 were oxidation reduction (metabolism of xenobiotics by CYPs) and lipid (e.g., linoleic and arachidonic acid) metabolism pathways. In addition, the neuropeptide signaling pathway was the most significantly enriched pathway in module 3.

Two types of functions of intestinal microbiota have been identified in a previous study, those required in all bacteria and those potentially specific to the gut (1). Functions of the first category relate to central metabolic pathways (for example, carbon metabolism and amino acid synthesis) and to important protein complexes (RNA and DNA polymerase, ATP synthase, general secretory apparatus) (1). The putative gut-specific functions include those involved in adhesion to host proteins (collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin), or in harvesting sugars of the globo-series glycolipids, which are carried on blood and epithelial cells (1). In the present study, most of module 1-related DEGs were involved in oxidation reduction and metabolic processes such as metabolism of xenobiotics by CYPs, and the majority of module 2-related DEGs were involved in lipid metabolic processes, such as lipid metabolic process and arachidonic acid metabolism. These results suggest that the intestinal microbiota is involved in numerous metabolic and biosynthetic processes, but has particularly important roles in the regulation of lipid biosynthesis and in oxidation-reduction processes, as also indicated by previous studies (2224).

Further analysis of the most significant DEGs CYP4B1, CYP2D10, CYP2D26 (module 1) and CYP4F14 (module 2) revealed that CYP4B1 and CYP4F14 are involved in almost all of the functions of each PPI module. In rats and rabbits, the CYP4B1 protein was shown to play an important role in mutagenic activation of procarcinogens in the organs (25). Most of organic xenobiotics require metabolic activation to electrophilic intermediates to produce adverse carcinogenic effects. Specific enzymes of the CYP superfamily are involved in the formation of reactive metabolites from certain substrates that are predicted or known occupational and environmental carcinogens (26). A new prodrug-activating enzyme system for pharmacogenic therapy of experimental brain tumors based on the rabbit CYP4B1 protein was previously described (27). CYP4Fs are a subfamily of enzymes involved in arachidonic acid metabolism and showing the highest catalytic activity towards leukotriene (LT)B4, a potent chemoattractant involved in inflammation. CYP4F-mediated metabolism of LTB4 leads to inactive ω-hydroxy products, incapable of initiating chemotaxis and the inflammatory stimuli that result in the influx of inflammatory cells (28). The CYP4B1 and CYP4F14 genes were identified as significantly upregulated in the present study, which, in combination with previous reports, suggests that intestinal microbiota depletion may lead to inflammation and cancer in the body.

It is notable that modules 1 and 2 were both enriched for the processes of arachidonic and linoleic acid metabolism. Arachidonic acid is a polyunsaturated ω-6 fatty acid that is released in response to tissue injury. Arachidonic acid is a pivotal signaling molecule, involved in the initiation and propagation of diverse signaling cascades regulating inflammation, pain and homeostatic functions (29). It is metabolized by three enzymatic pathways: the cyclooxygenase pathway produces prostanoid, the lipoxygenase pathway yields monohydroxy compounds and LTs, while the CYP epoxygenase pathway generates hydroxy and epoxyeicosanoids. There is increasing evidence that some of these metabolic products play critical roles in cardiovascular disease (29). Linoleic acid is predominant in dairy products and plant oils such as flax seed, and animal studies have reported a reduction in intra-abdominal fat and an enhanced gain in fat-free mass upon linoleic acid supplementation; another study reported linoleic acid-mediated whole-body fat loss in overweight men and women; there have also been some concerns that linoleic acid can promote oxidative stress and induce hepatic lipid accumulation (3032). Based on these studies and the present findings on arachidonic and linoleic acid metabolism, the two processes appear to play a key role in human health and to be closely linked to the balance of intestinal microbiota.

In contrast to the reported effects of intestinal microbiota on oxidation reduction and lipid metabolism (3032), an association between intestinal microbiota and the neuropeptide signaling pathway has not been previously reported. In our study, it is notable that the neuropeptide signaling pathway was the most significantly enriched pathway in module 3. Among the here-identified DEGs, TAC1 is predicted to be involved in this pathway. This gene encodes a neurotransmitter of the central and peripheral nervous system (33), and the protein has additionally been associated with immunologic and inflammatory processes (34). The gut and the brain are closely connected organs, and their interaction plays an important role not only in gastrointestinal function, but also in certain feeling states and in intuitive decision making (35); alterations in this interaction have been associated with a wide range of disorders, including functional, inflammatory gastrointestinal, and eating disorders. It has been reported that healthy humans and rats produce autoantibodies directed against appetite-regulating peptide hormones and neuropeptides, suggesting that these autoantibodies may play physiological roles in hunger- and satiety-related pathways (36). Gut-related antigens including those produced by the intestinal microflora, may affect the production of these autoantibodies, which might represent a new link between the gut and the regulation of appetite. We thus argue that the depletion of the intestinal microflora in mice may lead to impaired neuropeptide signaling.

In conclusion, our findings strongly suggest that intestinal microbiota depletion affects metabolism, oxidation reduction and neuropeptide signaling pathways in mice, involving a number of genes and interactions. Numerous diseases, as well as aging, can be induced by depletion of the intestinal microflora, and therefore, the dynamic equilibrium of the intestinal microflora plays a key role in human health. The neuropeptide signaling pathway was first reported in the present study to be affected by the depletion of the intestinal microflora, a result which reveals a potential link between the intestinal bacteria and the nervous system. However, further experimentation and additional studies are needed to confirm this link; such studies are expected to enhance our understanding of the interactions between the bacteria of the intestinal microflora and their host environment.

References

1 

Qin J, Li R, Raes J, et al: A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 464:59–65. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Tremaroli V and Backhed F: Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 489:242–249. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Gerritsen J, Smidt H, Rijkers GT and de Vos WM: Intestinal microbiota in human health and disease: the impact of probiotics. Genes Nutr. 6:209–240. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Jernberg C, Lofmark S, Edlund C and Jansson JK: Long-term impacts of antibiotic exposure on the human intestinal microbiota. Microbiology. 156:3216–3223. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Arroyo G, Penas E, Pedrazuela A and Prestamo G: Intestinal microbiota in rats fed with tofu (soy curd) treated under high pressure. Eur Food Res Technol. 220:395–400. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Bjorksten B, Sepp E, Julge K, Voor T and Mikelsaar M: Allergy development and the intestinal microflora during the first year of life. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 108:516–520. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Ohigashi S, Sudo K, Kobayashi D, et al: Changes of the intestinal microbiota, short chain fatty acids, and fecal pH in patients with colorectal cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 58:1717–1726. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Rawls JF: Enteric infection and inflammation alter gut microbial ecology. Cell Host Microbe. 16:73–74. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Human Microbiome Jumpstart Reference Strains Consortium. Nelson KE, Weinstock GM, Highlander SK, et al: A catalog of reference genomes from the human microbiome. Science. 328:994–999. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Reikvam DH, Erofeev A, Sandvik A, et al: Depletion of murine intestinal microbiota: effects on gut mucosa and epithelial gene expression. PLoS One. 6:e179962011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Irizarry R, Gautier L and Cope L: An R package for analyses of Affymetrix oligonucleotide arrays. The Analysis of Gene Expression Data: Methods and Software. Parmigiani G, Garrett ES, Irizarry RA and Zeger SL: Springer-Verlag; Berlin: pp. 102–119. 2003, View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Smyth GK: limma: linear models for microarray data. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor. Gentleman R, Carey VJ, Huber W, Irizarry RA and Dudoit S: Springer; New York, NY: pp. 397–420. 2005, View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Shao X, Huang B, Lee JM, Xu F and Espejo A: Bayesian method for multirate data synthesis and model calibration. AIChE J. 57:1514–1525. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Hur AB, Elisseeff A and Guyon I: Identification of co-regulation patterns by unsupervised cluster analysis of gene expression data. US Patent 8,489,531. Filed February 2, 2011; issued July 16, 2013.

15 

Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, et al: The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D561–D568. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, et al: Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13:2498–2504. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Bader GD and Hogue CW: An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 4:22003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Smoot M, Ono K, Ideker T and Maere S: PiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to find candidate genes in biological networks. Bioinformatics. 27:1030–1031. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kanehisa M and Goto S: KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:27–30. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Xue J, Zhao C and Liang A: Pathway analysis of the differential expression genes of oligonucleotide microarray of airway allergic diseases using GenMAPP. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 25:371–373. 2011.(In Chinese).

21 

Dahlquist KD, Salomonis N, Vranizan K, Lawlor SC and Conklin BR: GenMAPP, a new tool for viewing and analyzing microarray data on biological pathways. Nat Genet. 31:19–20. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Velagapudi VR, Hezaveh R, Reigstad CS, et al: The gut microbiota modulates host energy and lipid metabolism in mice. J Lipid Res. 51:1101–1112. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Bäckhed F: Programming of host metabolism by the gut microbiota. Ann Nutr Metab. 58:44–52. 2011.

24 

Espey MG: Role of oxygen gradients in shaping redox relationships between the human intestine and its microbiota. Free Radic Biol Med. 55:130–140. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Tamaki Y, Arai T, Sugimura H, et al: Association between cancer risk and drug-metabolizing enzyme gene (CYP2A6, CYP2A13, CYP4B1, SULT1A1, GSTM1, and GSTT1) polymorphisms in cases of lung cancer in Japan. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 26:516–522. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Roos PH, Belik R, Follmann W, et al: Expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP1A1, CYP1B1, CYP2E1 and CYP4B1 in cultured transitional cells from specimens of the human urinary tract and from urinary sediments. Arch Toxicol. 80:45–52. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Jang SJ, Kang JH, Lee TS, et al: Prodrug-activating gene therapy with rabbit cytochrome P450 4B1/4-ipomeanol or 2-aminoanthracene system in glioma cells. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 44:193–198. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Antonovic L: A physiological role of cytochromes P450 4Fs: mouse model (unpublished dissertation). The University of Texas. AAI3218710. 2006

29 

Li N, Liu JY, Qiu H, et al: Use of metabolomic profiling in the study of arachidonic acid metabolism in cardiovascular disease. Congest Heart Fail. 17:42–46. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Gaullier JM, Halse J, Hoye K, et al: Supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid for 24 months is well tolerated by and reduces body fat mass in healthy, overweight humans. J Nutr. 135:778–784. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Gaullier JM, Halse J, Hoye K, et al: Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation for 1 y reduces body fat mass in healthy overweight humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 79:1118–1125. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Kreider RB, Ferreira MP, Greenwood M, Wilson M and Almada AL: Effects of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation during resistance training on body composition, bone density, strength, and selected hematological markers. J Strength Cond Res. 16:325–334. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

33 

Graham GJ, Stevens JM, Page NM, et al: Tachykinins regulate the function of platelets. Blood. 104:1058–1065. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Brain SD: Sensory neuropeptides: their role in inflammation and wound healing. Immunopharmacology. 37:133–152. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Mayer EA: Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut-brain communication. Nat Rev Neurosci. 12:453–466. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Vijay-Kumar M, Aitken JD, Carvalho FA, et al: Metabolic syndrome and altered gut microbiota in mice lacking Toll-like receptor 5. Science. 328:228–231. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2014
Volume 9 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Jia ZY, Xia Y, Tong D, Yao J, Chen HQ and Yang J: Module-based functional pathway enrichment analysis of a protein‑protein interaction network to study the effects of intestinal microbiota depletion in mice. Mol Med Rep 9: 2205-2212, 2014
APA
Jia, Z., Xia, Y., Tong, D., Yao, J., Chen, H., & Yang, J. (2014). Module-based functional pathway enrichment analysis of a protein‑protein interaction network to study the effects of intestinal microbiota depletion in mice. Molecular Medicine Reports, 9, 2205-2212. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2137
MLA
Jia, Z., Xia, Y., Tong, D., Yao, J., Chen, H., Yang, J."Module-based functional pathway enrichment analysis of a protein‑protein interaction network to study the effects of intestinal microbiota depletion in mice". Molecular Medicine Reports 9.6 (2014): 2205-2212.
Chicago
Jia, Z., Xia, Y., Tong, D., Yao, J., Chen, H., Yang, J."Module-based functional pathway enrichment analysis of a protein‑protein interaction network to study the effects of intestinal microbiota depletion in mice". Molecular Medicine Reports 9, no. 6 (2014): 2205-2212. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2137