![Open Access](/resources/images/iconopenaccess.png)
Isolation and characterization of ex vivo expanded mesenchymal stem cells obtained from a surgical patient
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 6, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2892
- Pages: 1777-1783
-
Copyright: © Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY_NC 3.0].
Abstract
Introduction
Tissue-specific stem cells are present in numerous human tissues and have the potential to differentiate into one or multiple mature cell types. Tissue-specific stem cells represent an intermediate between pluripotent cells and fully committed mature cells, and are excellent models for studying cellular differentiation and tissue regeneration. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMMSCs) are derived from bone marrow pluripotent stem cells and exhibit the homologous properties of stem cells, including self-renewal and the capacity to develop into multiple lineages (1–3). The isolation of hBMMSCs is simple due to their plastic adherence and ability to expand in culture (4–7). It has been reported that hBMMSCs have considerable therapeutic potential in several malignancies, including cardiovascular disease, cellular replacement therapy and tissue engineering (8–11).
hBMMSCs express numerous surface markers, including SH2, SH3, CD90, CD105 and CD106, but do not express hematopoietic stem cell markers, such as CD14, CD34 and CD45. hBMMSCs are stable and preserve their differentiation potential following long-term ex vivo culture and cryopreservation. hBMMSCs have been demonstrated to differentiate into myocytes, hepatocytes, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, fibroblasts and adipocytes (12), but also differentiate into hematopoietic cells and matrix cells, and under specific conditions, form myotubes and tendon (13–15). Furthermore, hBMMSC transplantation does not elicit immune rejection. Therefore, they may become a new source for tissue repair and regeneration. hBMMSCs are readily obtained from human bone marrow and expanded ex vivo, and are then transplanted back into patients following in vitro induction (16,17). Therefore, hBMMSCs have potential clinical utility for the use of stem cells for personalized medicine.
Even though hBMMSCs are efficiently recovered from bone marrow aspirates of healthy individuals and from those of patients suffering from severe diseases and injuries, they are an uncommon cell type in the bone marrow, accounting for <0.1% of nucleated cells in bone marrow aspirates. Therefore, expansion of hBMMSCs to obtain a stable source of hBMMSCs without losing the pluripotential of hBMMSCs is important. In the present study, hBMMSCs were obtained from a human subject, grown to passage (P)65 and the morphological characteristics as well as pluripotent differentiation potential of these hBMMSCs were investigated in vitro and in vivo.
Materials and methods
Isolation and expansion of bone marrow cells
The study was approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai Chest Hospital, (Shanghai, China). Bone marrow cells were isolated from the rib fragment from an adult surgical patient at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University (Shanghai, China). Cells (1.5×108 ) were plated in gelatin-coated T175 culture flasks and the mesenchymal cell population was isolated based on plastic adherence. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagles’s medium (DMEM; high glucose; Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 50 μg/ml thymidine phosphorylase (ECGF), 50 μg/ml heparin, penicillin 100 U/ml and streptomycin 100 mg/ml (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 for 24 h. For expansion of the mesenchymal cell population, the cells were incubated under standard culture conditions. On day three, non-adherent cells were removed by changing the medium. Thereafter, the medium was replaced twice a week. Following reaching confluence, the cells were trypsinized (0.25% v/v trypsin EDTA; Invitrogen Life Technologies), re-suspended in culture media and seeded at 1×103 cells/cm2 [passage (P)1]. P10 to P57 cells were used in the present study. Prior to administration, the cells were resuspended in 250 μl serum-free DMEM. For the cellular proliferation assays, hBMMSCs were grown in 24-well plates at a density of 0.5×104 cells/ml and were counted at different time intervals for plotting the growth curve and calculating the proliferation index.
Transmission electron microscopy
For transmission electron microscopy, hBMMSCs (2×105) were harvested and fixed with 2.5% electron microscopy-grade glutaraldehyde, post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide with 0.1% potassium ferricyanide, dehydrated in gradient ethanol (30–90%) and embedded in Epon. Ultrathin sections (65 nm) were cut, stained with 2% uranyl acetate and examined under a Hitachi H-600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
Flow cytometric analysis
To verify the presentation of hBMSC markers, phenotyping was routinely performed by flow cytometry on culture-expanded hBMMSCs. Cells of P2 were collected from confluent layers following incubation with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA for 5 min. The single-cell suspensions were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)/0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) prior to the staining. For direct staining, the cells were centrifuged (250 × g, 5 min) and re-suspended in cold PBS/0.5% BSA. A total of 1×106 cells were incubated for 15 min on ice in the dark in cold PBS/0.5% BSA with titrated concentrations of R-phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated monoclonal mouse anti-human CD29, -CD31, -CD38, -CD44, -CD59, -CD80, -CD86, -CD90, -CD105 and -CD106 antibodies or monoclonal fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated mouse anti-human CD9, -CD14 and -CD34 antibodies. The cells were then washed twice by centrifugation (250 × g, 5 min) and re-suspended with cold PBS/0.5% BSA prior to proceeding to flow cytometry. Dead cells and debris were stained with propidium iodide (100 μg/ml) and excluded from the measurements. Acquisitions were performed on a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Data analysis was conducted with FCS Express V2 software (version 2, De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA, USA) following gating for the designated population.
In vitro multipotent differentiation assays
The multi-lineage differentiation potential of human MSCs (n=3, P3) was analyzed by applying the standard procedures used by Pittenger et al (12). For adipogenesis, 2×105 cells/cm2 were seeded. Five days after reaching confluence, the hBMMSCs were treated for three days with induction media consisting of α-MEM (Gibco Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1.0×10−7 M dexamethasone (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1.0×10−9 M insulin, 0.5 mM 1.0×10−7 M ascorbic acid and 7×10−3 M sodium β-glycerophosphate for 18 days at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and then for two days with maintenance media consisting of α-MEM, FBS and 1.0×10−9 M insulin. Sudan black B staining of the lipid droplets was performed as previously described (12). Sudan black B concentrations were calculated by comparison with a Sudan black B dye standard curve and expressed as nmol/ml following normalization against the total cellular protein, and is expressed as nmol/mg protein. The above experiments were performed at least three times independently and each experiment was conducted in quadruplicate.
For osteogenesis, hBMMSCs were seeded at a density of 2×105 cells/cm2 and grown under osteogenic induction conditions in DMEM (Gibco Laboratories) supplemented with 1.0×10−7 M dexamethasone, 1.0×10−7 M ascorbic acid and 7×10−3 M β-glycerophosphate sodium for seven days at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The cells were collected following incubation with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA for 5 min. Following centrifugation, the cells were suspended in 100 ml normal saline and frozen and thawed three times at −200°C. The suspension was centrifuged at 250 × g for 10 min and osteocalcin contents were determined using the enzyme dynamics method.
In vivo multipotent differentiation assays
For osteogenesis, five nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with P15 hBMMSCs (2.5×107) mixed with an equal volume of Matrigel®, and osteogenesis was observed as described previously (16). Myogenesis was studied as described by Caterson et al (16). For the controls, six nude mice were injected in the hind leg with absolute alcohol (n=3) or Dil-labeled hBMMSCs (2×106) (n=3). For the treatment group, six nude mice were injected with absolute alcohol followed 2 h later by Dil-labeled hBMMSCs (2×106). The tissue sections of leg muscles were prepared and incubated with the monoclonal antibody against myoglobin at day three and with the monoclonal antibody against MyoD1 at day 12 and were examined under a fluorescent microscope (CK40/BK51, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Hematopoietic reconstitution
The nude mice (6 to 8-week old males), were obtained from Shanghai Super-B&K laboratory animal Corp., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The mice were handled and housed according to protocols approved by the Shanghai Medical Experimental Animal Care Commission. A total of 4 h after the nude mice were sublethally (650 cGy) irradiated, each mouse was infused via the tail vein with 2×106 hBMMSCs. In addition, 0.5 μg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered daily for three days. The control nude mice were infused with normal saline. The mice were sacrificed at different time-points for analysis. Peripheral blood samples were collected 48–144 h following infusion of hBMMSCs for leukocyte count and smear. The cells were also removed from bilateral femurs by flushing with PBS. The firmly adhered cells of the endosteal region were recovered by digesting the crushed bone with collagenase type IV (0.03%) and dispase (2 U/ml). The bone marrow cells were pooled in a tube and the erythrocytes were lysed by treatment with Grey’s solution. Mononuclear cells were collected and prepared for smears. The smears were then fixed in acetone and stained with PE-conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody and FITC-conjugated anti-human CD34 antibody, examined under a fluorescent microscope (Olympus Corporation) and the images were captured accordingly.
RNA extraction and gene expression profiling
Total cellular RNA was extracted from hBMMSCs of P7 and P65 using the TRIzol reagent as instructed by the manufacturer (Invitrogen Life Technologies). RNA (1 μg; RIN value >6) was used for generation of second-strand cDNA, and cRNA was amplified with the Oligo dT primer, then biotinylated and fragmented with One-Cycle Target Labeling and control reagents (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), followed by hybridization to U133 Plus 2.0 array overnight (17 h) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, the hybridized DNA microarray was fluorescence stained with GeneChipFluidics Station 450 (Affymetrics) and scanned with a GeneChip Scanner 3000 (Affymetrics). GCOS1.2 Affymetrix GeneChip Command Console (TGCC) was employed to extract the data in the microarray followed by analysis with the Robust Multi-Array Average (RMA) method. The relative gene expression was calculated. A difference of >2 or <0.5-fold and reliability (P<0.05) was considered to indicate significant differences in gene expression.
Results
Morphological characteristics of cultured hBMMSCs
The majority of hBMMSCs were elliptical following one week of culture with abundant cytoplasms and prominent nuclei. Light microscopy demonstrated that the cells resembled fibroblasts in shape and were arranged in parallel or whorls (Fig. 1A–D). Electron microscopy of cultured hBMMSCs revealed that the nuclei were large and irregular in shape with 2–3 nucleoli and scant nuceloplasm (Fig. 2A). The cytoplasms were rich in mitochondria and rough endoplasmic reticula (Fig. 2B) with gap junctions (Fig. 2C). Transmission electron microscopy further demonstrated that the cultured hBMMSCs were elongated or polygonal (Fig. 3A) with short microvilli (Fig. 3B) and projections (Fig. 3C). No apparent changes in cell morphology were observed for cells up to P10. The doubling time for P10, P20 and P40 hBMMSCs was 32, 36 and 32 h, respectively.
Flow cytometric studies revealed that the positive rate of CD31 was 31.1% in P4 hBMMSCs and 18.6% in P10 hBMMSCs. CD105 and CD106 were expressed in 99 and 95% of P25 hBMMSCs, respectively (Fig. 3D–F).
An in vivo osteogenesis test demonstrated subcutaneous bony tissue formation on the back of the nude mice 35 days post-hBMMSCs inoculation (Fig. 4A). Histology analysis showed a predominant endochondral bone formation process (Fig. 4B) in in vivo bone tissue formation (Fig. 4C). In adipogenesis, lipid droplets appeared at day 18 post induction of adipogenesis, which increased in size and occupied the entire cell (Fig. 4D). In osteogenesis, it was identified that the induced hBMMSCs were elongated, contained numerous particles and were positive for osteocalcin (Fig. 4B). The osteocalcin content was 12±0.5 mg/ml for induced P10 hBMMSCs and 12±0.5 mg/ml for induced P25 hBMMSCs, which was ~3× higher than that of the unstimulated cells. Furthermore, no expression of osteocalcin was observed in the induced P38 and P57 hBMMSCs.
For osteogenesis, palpable masses were detected from day 35 post inoculation of hBMMSCs, and bone tissue formation was observed (Fig. 5A). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining further revealed chondrocytes and the formation of bone tissues (Fig. 5B). For myogenesis, at day six after subcutaneous inoculation, hBMMSCs differentiated to myocytes and were positive for myoglobin (Fig. 5C and D). At day 12, H&E staining demonstrated striations in the cytoplasm of differentiated hBMMSCs at day 12 post inoculation (Fig. 5E) and the cells were positive for MyoD1 (Fig. 5F). The control nude mice revealed no formation of muscle cells and were negative for myoglobin and MyoD1.
White blood cell counts in the peripheral blood of control mice irradiated at sublethal doses gradually decreased and did not recover to normal up to 144 h following irradiation (Fig. 6A). In irradiated nude mice reconstituted by hBMMSCs, the white blood cell count briefly dropped following irradiation but gradually recovered. CD45- and CD34-positive cells were not detected in the peripheral blood and bone marrow of the control nude mice. In irradiated nude mice reconstituted by hBMMSCs, CD45- and CD34-positive cells were detected 72 h and 144 h post induction (Fig. 6C–D).
The gene microarray analysis of P7 and P57 hBMMSCs demonstrated that 20 genes were upregulated >2-fold and 40 genes were downregulated >2-fold in the P57 hBMMSCs. The 10 most upregulated and 10 most downregulated genes are summarized in Table I.
![]() | Table ITen most upregulated and downregulated genes in cultured late human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. |
Discussion
In the present study, hBMMSCs were isolated from a surgical patient and stably expanded ex vivo until P65. Flow cytometric analysis of P25 hBMMSCs demonstrated that the cells expressed CD105 and CD106 but not CD14, CD34 and CD45, and exhibited apparent contact inhibition. Furthermore, these cells were able to form cartilage and osteoid tissues in nude mice. In addition, bone marrow cells were observed in the osteoid tissue and formation of erythrocytes was also noted, suggesting there was ongoing erythropoiesis in the osteoid tissue. Myogenesis in nude mice was also observed following inoculation of hBMMSCs. H&E staining revealed typical striations in the newly formed skeletal muscles. These findings indicated that hBMMSCs are able to differentiate into blood and muscle cells. Early infusion of hBMMSCs allows hematopoiesis in the early stage of bone marrow failure, which provides time for recovery of the bone marrow from the infusion of autologous hematopoietic stem cells. This is consistent with the microenvironment induction theory, stating that stem cells form tissue-specific cells depending on the microenvironment (18).
The gene expression profiles of P7 and P57 hBMMSCs were investigated and it was identified that 20 genes were upregulated >2 fold and 40 genes were downregulated >2 fold. These genes are involved in angiogenesis, cell cycle control and the regulation of proliferation and apoptosis. Furthermore, the late passages of hBMMSCs were associated with ploidy compared with the early passages of hBMMSCs (data not presented). These findings indicated that the passage of hBMMSCs may be associated with gene mutations and gene expression changes. Therefore, early passages of hBMMSCs should be used for stem cell therapy. These findings are consistent with those by Maitra et al (17).
Mesenchymal stem cells possess pluripotent potential and are induced to differentiate into cells of various types for organ regeneration, including osteoblasts, chondrocytes, cardiomyocytes, myocytes, adipocytes and hematopoietic cells. As a result, they hold significant potential for broad clinical applications in the treatment of numerous malignancies. The present study found that it is feasible to isolate and long-term culture hBMMSCs from patients, and that it is safe to use hBMMSCs within 30 passages. An hBMMSCs cell line was established which may be used for further studying the biological properties of hBMMSCs for tissue engineering.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology Sino-Swiss International Collaboration project (grant no. 2012DFG31320) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China project (grant no. 81371702).
References
Herzog EL, Chai L and Krause DS: Plasticity of marrow-derived stem cells. Blood. 102:3483–3493. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sato Y, Araki H, Kato J, et al: Human mesenchymal stem cells xenografted directly to rat liver are differentiated into human hepatocytes without fusion. Blood. 106:756–763. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, et al: Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 8:315–317. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakamura K, Ito Y, Kawano Y, et al: Antitumor effect of genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells in a rat glioma model. Gene Ther. 11:1155–1164. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tropel P, Noël D, Platet N, Legrand P, Benabid AL and Berger F: Isolation and characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells from adult mouse bone marrow. Exp Cell Res. 295:395–406. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tocci A and Forte L: Mesenchymal stem cell: use and perspectives. Hematol J. 4:92–96. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
da Meirelles LS and Nardi NB: Murine marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell: isolation, in vitro expansion, and characterization. Br J Haematol. 123:702–711. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Parr A, Tator C and Keating A: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for the repair of central nervous system injury. Bone Marrow Transplant. 40:609–619. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bai L, Caplan A, Lennon D and Miller RH: Human mesenchymal stem cells signals regulate neural stem cell fate. Neurochem Res. 32:353–362. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mangi AA, Noiseux N, Kong D, He H, Rezvani M, Ingwall JS and Dzau VJ: Mesenchymal stem cells modified with Akt prevent remodeling and restore performance of infarcted hearts. Nat Med. 9:1195–1201. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Duan HF, Wu CT, Wu DL, et al: Treatment of myocardial ischemia with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing hepatocyte growth factor. Mol Ther. 8:467–474. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al: Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 284:143–147. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mezey É and Chandross KJ: Bone marrow: a possible alternative source of cells in the adult nervous system. Eur J Pharmacol. 405:297–302. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Muraglia A, Cancedda R and Quarto R: Clonal mesenchymal progenitors from human bone marrow differentiate in vitro according to a hierarchical model. J Cell Sci. 113:1161–1166. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Liechty KW, MacKenzie TC, Shaaban AF, et al: Human mesenchymal stem cells engraft and demonstrate site-specific differentiation after in utero transplantation in sheep. Nat Med. 6:1282–1286. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Caterson EJ, Nesti LJ, Albert T, Danielson K and Tuan R: Application of mesenchymal stem cells in the regeneration of musculoskeletal tissues. MedGenMed. 5:E12001. | |
Maitra A, Arking DE, Shivapurkar N, et al: Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet. 37:1099–1103. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Koç ON, Gerson SL, Cooper BW, Dyhouse SM, Haynesworth SE, Caplan AI and Lazarus HM: Rapid hematopoietic recovery after coinfusion of autologous-blood stem cells and culture-expanded marrow mesenchymal stem cells in advanced breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 18:307–316. 2000.PubMed/NCBI |