![Open Access](/resources/images/iconopenaccess.png)
HOXB7-S3 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 1, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4009
- Pages: 4901-4908
-
Copyright: © Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer mortality among females, accounting for 23% of total cancer cases and 14% of cancer mortalities (1). Breast cancer has the best prognosis when detected at early stages. However, patients diagnosed with advanced breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer have a poor prognosis. Therefore, in order to improve the overall survival rate of patients with breast cancer, it is of importance to investigate factors that could promote the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of human breast cancer cells.
A variety of genes are involved in the development of breast cancer, including BRCA1, BRCA2, p53 (2) and c-erbB-2 (3). Previously, it has also been reported that HOX genes are widely correlated with various types of cancer (4–6).
The homeobox (HOX) subgroup of the HOX supergene family encompasses 39 genes located in four contiguous clusters (HOXA, HOXB, HOXC and HOXD) (7). HOX genes containing a 183-bp DNA sequence coding for a 61-amino-acid domain defined as the homeodomain (HD) (8), which is responsible for the recognition and binding of sequence-specific DNA motifs (9), are transcription factors that are important in anterior-posterior body axis patterning during normal embryonic development (7). However, aberrant expression of HOX genes has been demonstrated in different tumor types, including leukemia (10), ovarian carcinoma (11) and pancreatic cancer (12), suggesting that HOX genes are important in various types of tumor.
HOXB7 is a newly identified member of the HOX gene family. It is highly expressed in embryonic tissues and is limited to specific tissues of the embryo during the late trimester of pregnancy but is not detected in the majority of terminally differentiated adult tissues under normal conditions. As a transcription factor, HOXB7 is also important in embryogenesis and tissue differentiation. However, deregulation of HOXB7 has been observed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, oral cancer, ovarian carcinoma and breast cancer (13–16). In addition, it has been reported that increased expression of HOXB7 was closely associated with tumor cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis (7,14,17).
However, the role of HOXB7 in breast cancer has yet to be characterized. In the current study, the mRNA and protein expression levels of HOXB7 in breast cancer cells were investigated and the effect of HOXB7-siRNA on the proliferation, apoptosis and invasion capacity of breast cancer was determined using a CCK-8 assay, flow cytometry (FCM) and transwell chambers. It was hypothesized that HOXB7 siRNA inhibits the proliferation and invasion of breast cancer cells and that HOXB7 may have therapeutic potential in breast cancer.
Materials and methods
Main reagents and instruments
Fetal bovine serum (FBS), RPMI-1640 medium, penicillin, streptomycin, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; used as a solvent) and pancreatic enzymes were purchased from HyClone Laboratories, Inc. (Logan, UT, USA). The primers for HOXB7 and GAPDH, rabbit monoclonal anti-human HOXB7 antibody, Lipofectamine 2000 and Lipofectamine™ RNAi MAX transfection reagents were obtained from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit was purchased from Fermentas (Vilnius, Lithuania). The mouse polyclonal anti-human GAPDH antibody was obtained from Tianjin Sungene Biotech Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China), siRNA was obtained from Shanghai Genepharma Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China), the Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8) was purchased from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (Wuhan, China), Transwell plates were obtained from Corning Inc. (Corning, NY, USA), Matrigel was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA) and the Annexin-V-EGFP/propidium iodide (PI) Apoptosis Detection kit was obtained from EnoGene Biotech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China).
Cell culture and treatments
MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 human breast cancer cell lines were purchased from the China Center for Type Culture Collection (Wuhan, China). The cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/ml penicillin-G and 100 μg/ml streptomycin) at 37°C in a humidified incubator that was supplemented with 5% CO2. The cells were then passaged at 80–90% confluence and digested with 0.25% trypsin.
RNA extraction and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was isolated from MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Total RNA (1.0 μg) was transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using the RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RT reaction was performed at 25°C for 10 min, 42°C for 60 min and 70°C for 10 min. The mRNA levels were analyzed by RT-qPCR using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq System (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). The following primers were used: GAPDH, forward 5′-AATCCCATCACCATCTTCCAG-3′ and reverse 5′-GAGCCCCAGCCTTCTCCAT-3′ (118 bp); HOXB7, forward 5′-TACCCCTGGATGCGAAGCTC-3′ and reverse 5′-AATCTTGATCTGTCTTTCCGTGA-3′ (171 bp). The reaction mixture, including 10.0 μl of 2X All-in-One™ qPCR Master mix (GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD, USA; AOPR-1200), 0.4 μl of forward primer, 0.4 μl of reverse primer, 5 μl of cDNA (10X dilution) and 4.2 μl of ddH2O, was incubated at 95°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 20 sec and 72°C for 20 sec for 40 cycles. The mRNA level of each sample was measured by the 2−ΔΔCT method (18). In addition, qPCR (Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was performed three times independently.
Western blotting
Cells were extracted using radioimmunoprecipitation assay protein lysis buffer and the level of protein expression was measured using the bicinchoninic acid assay protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Wuhan, China). Total protein (40 μg) was loaded and run on a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gel and 4% SDS-polyacrylamide stacking gel. Subsequently, protein was transferred onto nitrocellulose filter membranes for 1.5 h and then incubated with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 2 h to block nonspecific binding. This was then washed three times with Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST; 5 min each time) and then treated with rabbit monoclonal anti-human HOXB7 antibody (1:400; Invitrogen Life Technologies; cat. no. 40–2000) and mouse polyclonal anti-human GAPDH antibody (1:10,000; Tianjin Sungene Biotech Co., Ltd.; cat. no. KM9002) overnight at 4°C with continuous agitation. Subsequently, membranes were combined with corresponding secondary antibody, goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG)/horseradish peroxidase (HRP; 1:10,000 dilution; MR Biotech, Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and goat anti-mouse IgG/HRP; (1:10,000 dilution; MR Biotech, Co., Ltd.) at 37°C for 1 h after washing three times in TBST (15 min each time). Finally, the protein levels were analyzed using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Biossci Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Gray scale images were determined by Quantity One 4.62 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The optical density for target protein was shown as a proportion of GAPDH optical density. The experiments were replicated three times.
Synthesis of HOXB7-siRNA
Three sequences of siRNA oligonucleotides targeting HOXB7 synthesized by Shanghai Genepharma Co., Ltd. were identified and matched with the following HOXB7 cDNA sequences obtained from GenBank through a BLAST search (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi): Sequence 1 (S1), sense (HOXB7-homo-462) 5′-GAGAGUAACUUCCGGAUCUTT-3′; sequence 2 (S2), sense (HOXB7-homo-633): 5′-CGGAAA GACAGAUCAAGAUTT-3′; sequence of siRNA3, (S3), s en s e (HOX B7-homo -10 83): 5′-G C UAU UGUA AGGUCUUUGUTT-3′. The siRNA sequence that exhibited the highest interfering efficiency was selected to continue the study. By contrast, one sequence of negative control siRNA (Sn) was synthesized as: 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′ (sense).
siRNA transfection
The MCF-7 breast cancer cells cultured as described were divided into the following five groups: Con-B group, blank control group; Sn group, negative control siRNA; S1 group, S1 transfection group; S2 group, S2 transfection group and S3 group, S3 transfection group. Cells were seeded on 6-well plates at a density of 1×106 cells/well 24 h prior to transfection. When 80–90% confluence was reached, HOXB7-siRNA or negative control siRNA were transfected into MCF-7 cells at three different concentrations (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 μM, respectively) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies) in RPMI-1640 medium. Fluorescence, which was detected under a fluorescence microscope (VHB100F; Olympus Corporation, Shanghai, China) after transfection for 4–6 h, was used to optimize the condition of transfection.
Detection of interference efficiency by RT-qPCR and western blotting
Following transfection with HOXB7-siRNA for 48 and 72 h, five groups of MCF-7 cells were harvested to detect the mRNA and protein expression levels of HOXB7 by RT-qPCR and western blotting as described above, respectively. Interference efficiencies were calculated as follows: Interference efficiency = (mRNA expression of HOXB7 in the control group - mRNA expression of HOXB7 in the treatment group) / mRNA expression of HOXB7 in the control group × 100%. Each experiment was repeated three times. Cells transfected with siRNA3 had the lowest expression levels of HOXB7 mRNA and protein and, therefore, S3 was used in the following experiments.
CCK-8 cell proliferation assay
According to the manufacturer's instructions for the CCK-8 assay, the three groups of MCF-7 cells, including the Con-B group (blank control group), Sn group (negative control siRNA) and S3 group (siRNA3 transfection group) were collected at the exponential phase and inoculated onto a 96-well plate at a density of 5×103 cells/well. Following inoculation for 24, 48, 72 or 96 h, each well was replaced with 100 μl RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 10 μl CCK. Subsequently, the cells were incubated at 37°C away from light for 4 h. The absorbance was then measured at 450 nm for each well using a microplate reader (EL×808™; BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). Cell viability was calculated using the following formula: Cell viability (%) = (Absorbance in treated sample / Absorbance in control) × 100%. Three independent experiments were performed with triplicate wells.
Flow cytometric analysis
Following the transfection of MCF-7 cells with HOXB7-S3 and Sn for 48 h, 1×106 cells were collected and then resuspended in 500 μl binding buffer containing 5 μl Annexin V-EGFP conjugated antibody and 5 μl PI for exactly 5 min in the dark at room temperature. Cells were transferred into flow test tubes within 1 h and then detected on a BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). The data were analyzed using FlowJo software version 6.0 (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
Cell invasion assay
Transwell membranes were purchased from Corning Inc. Matrigel (100 μl), which was diluted in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium following thawing at 4°C overnight, was placed into the upper chamber of a 24-well transwell and the transwell was incubated at 37°C for at least 4–5 h for gelling. Three groups of MCF-7 cells grouped as described above with a given concentration of 5×103 cells/ml were prepared, 100 μl of which was added to the upper chamber at 37°C. At 24 and 48 h post-incubation, the cells were fixed with formaldehyde, stained and counted under a microscope (37XB; Zhonghen Instrument, Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The invasion activity of the carcinoma cells was characterized with the average transmembrane cell numbers. Each experiment was repeated three times.
Statistical analysis
Each experiment was repeated three times. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and undertaken using the statistical software SPSS 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparisons were made using an independent samples t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference (*P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001).
Results
HOXB7 mRNA is overexpressed in two breast cancer cells
To detect the mRNA expression level of HOXB7 in breast cancer cells, RT-qPCR was used in two human breast cancer cell lines, including MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells. The results of the RT-qPCR revealed that HOXB7 mRNA was overexpressed in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines and the expression level in MCF-7 breast cancer cells was significantly higher compared with that in MDA-231 breast cancer cells (***P<0.001; Fig. 1).
HOXB7 protein is overexpressed in two breast cancer cells
To detect whether the protein expression level of HOXB7 was in accordance with the results of the mRNA expression level in breast cancer cells, western blotting was used in the same two human breast cancer cell lines, namely MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells. The results of the western blotting revealed that HOXB7 protein was also overexpressed in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines and the expression level in MCF-7 breast cancer cells was significantly higher compared with that in MDA-231 breast cancer cells (***P<0.001; Fig. 2). Therefore, combined with the result in Fig. 1, the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line was selected for further experiments.
Detection of the optimal conditions of transfection into MCF-7 cells with HOXB7-siRNA
To optimize conditions of transfection, three different concentrations of HOXB7-siRNA-NC-CY3 (fluorescent negative control) were transfected into MCF-7 breast cancer cells. As shown in Fig. 3, all MCF-7 cells transfected with HOXB7-siRNA for 4–6 h exhibited red fluorescence under a fluorescence microscope. It was observed that the untransfected MCF-7 exhibited no red fluorescence (Fig. 3A) and the MCF-7 cells transfected with 0.1 μM siRNA demonstrated a little red fluorescence (Fig. 3B). By contrast, ~80% infected cells exhibited red fluorescence at an siRNA concentration of 0.2 μM as shown in Fig. 3C, while 90% exhibited red fluorescence at an siRNA concentration of 0.4 μM as shown in Fig. 3D, suggesting successful transfection. Thus, the concentration of 0.4 μM siRNA that exhibited the highest transfection efficiency was selected for the following experiments.
HOXB7 mRNA expression level is downregulated following siRNA transfection
To determine the interference efficiency of HOXB7-siRNA on MCF-7 cells, RT-qPCR was used following transfection for 48 h. The results demonstrated that HOXB7 mRNA was overexpressed in Con-B and Sn groups following transfection and no clear difference was observed in the two groups (P>0.05). However, the mRNA expression levels of HOXB7 in the S1, S2 and S3 groups were significantly downregulated compared with the Con-B and Sn groups with interference efficiencies of 63.38±0.02, 81.53±0.01 and 84.87±0.02%, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (**P<0.01 and ***P<0.001; Fig. 4). The mRNA expression level of HOXB7 was the lowest in the S3 group and differed markedly from that in the Con-B and Sn groups (***P<0.001; Fig. 4).
HOXB7 protein expression level is downregulated following siRNA transfection
To further determine the interference efficiency of HOXB7-siRNA on MCF-7 cells, western blotting was used following transfection for 72 h. The results demonstrated that HOXB7 protein was overexpressed in the Con-B and Sn groups following transfection and no differences were observed between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the expression of HOXB7 protein in the S1, S2 and S3 groups was significantly downregulated compared with the Con-B and Sn groups with interference efficiencies of 53.88±0.0001, 65.22±0.004 and 65.25±0.001%, respectively. The differences were all statistically significant (***P<0.001; Fig. 5). The HOXB7 protein expression level was the lowest in the S3 group and differed markedly from that in the Con-B and Sn groups (***P<0.001; Fig. 5). Combined with the result in Fig. 4, S3 had the maximum inhibition efficiency of HOXB7 and therefore S3 was used in the following experiments.
Downregulation of HOXB7 gene expression effectively inhibits MCF-7 cell proliferation
To determine the effect of HOXB7-S3 on cell proliferation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, a CCK-8 assay was used. As shown in Fig. 6, the cell viability of the three groups demonstrated no significant difference following transfection with HOXB7-S3 or HOXB7-Sn for 24 h. Between 48 and 72 h, the cell viability of the S3 group was significantly decreased compared with that of the Con-B groups. In particular, the cell viability of the S3 group (74.43±2.55%) at 48 h post-transfection was significantly decreased compared with that of the Con-B group (111.97±3.66%) and Sn group (100±1.58%). The difference was statistically significant (***P<0.001). The cell viability of the S3 group at 96 h post-transfection demonstrated a partially decreased cell survival, however, this decease was not so pronounced. This result demonstrated that HOXB7-S3 could effectively and significantly inhibit the proliferation of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells.
Downregulation of HOXB7 gene expression effectively enhances MCF-7 cell apoptosis
To detect whether the effect of HOXB7-S3 on cell proliferation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells occurred by apoptosis, the percentage of early-stage apoptotic cells and late-stage apoptotic cells was measured in three groups by FCM. At 48 h post-transfection of siRNA, the total number of apoptotic cells (12.70±1.75%) was markedly increased in the S3 group, compared with 7.83±0.47% in the Con-B group and 6.46±0.49% in the Sn group, respectively (Fig. 7). The differences between the three groups were statistically significant (**P<0.01). These results indicated that HOXB7-S3 enhanced MCF-7 cell apoptosis.
Downregulation of HOXB7 gene expression inhibits MCF-7 cell invasion
To determine the effect of HOXB7-S3 on cell proliferation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, the number of cells that had migrated through the Matrigel membrane was measured at 24 and 48 h post-transfection of MCF-7 cells with HOXB7-S3 by Transwell assay. As shown in Fig. 8A and B, the number of migrated cells in the S3 group was markedly reduced compared with in the Sn and Con-B groups. The number of migrated cells in the S3, Con-B and Sn groups 24 h post-transfection was 31±3.63, 46±1.87 and 47±2.27, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (**P<0.01; Fig. 8C). At 48 h post-transfection, the number of migrated cells in the S3 group was 75±3.49, which was apparently reduced compared with 125±7.18 in the Con-B group and 121±3.25 in the Sn group (Fig. 8B). The difference was statistically significant (***P<0.001; Fig. 8D). This suggested that HOXB7-S3 markedly inhibited the invasiveness of MCF-7 cells.
Discussion
Breast cancer is characterized by a multiphasic process in which a series of changes occur in sequence, leading to the loss of control of cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and DNA repair (19). To date, there have been numerous studies demonstrating a possible association between the abnormal expression of HOX genes and breast cancer. For example, Ramen et al and Chu et al found that HOXA5 and HOXA10 are underexpressed in breast cancer (20,21). Conversely, Jansen et al suggested that HOXB13 is overexpressed in breast cancer (22,23).
Initially identified in Drosophila (24), the HOX genes encode a family of highly conserved transcription factors that normally regulate temporospatial development of the extremities and organs (25). Aberrant expression of these genes in different tissues has been demonstrated to be associated with tumorigenesis (26,27), particularly HOXB7, a member of the HOX gene family, which is reported to be overexpressed in numerous cancer cells, including melanoma cells, ovarian epithelial cells and SkBr3 breast carcinoma cells (15,28,29) has a key role in tumorigenesis. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to demonstrate that the mRNA and protein expression of HOXB7 was overexpressed in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines.
Additionally, it was reported that as a transcription factor, HOXB7 has two opposite functions in different cellular contexts. The majority of studies supported that HOXB7 may be important in promoting the multistep process of tumor formation and progression, including transformation, proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis (12,14,17,30,31). By contrast, another study observed a promoting role of HOXB7 in differentiation in hematopoietic stem cells and multipotent mesenchymal cells (32). In order to investigate the role HOXB7 in breast cancer cells, three pairs of HOXB7-siRNA were transfected into MCF-7 breast cancer cells and the mRNA and protein expression levels of HOXB7 were effectively downregulated. In particular, HOXB7-S3 significantly and specifically inhibited HOXB7 expression at the mRNA and protein levels with interference efficiencies of 84.87±0.02 and 65.25±0.001%, respectively. Thus, it was concluded that HOXB7-S3 could effectively induce gene RNA interference (RNAi) and HOXB7-S3 was selected to downregulate HOXB7 gene expression in the following experiments. The results of the CCK-8 assay and transwell chambers demonstrated that downregulation of HOXB7 gene expression effectively inhibited MCF-7 cell proliferation and invasion in MCF-7 cells, which contributed to malignant transformation and tumorigenesis. The present data predominantly support the pro-tumorigenic function of HOXB7. In addition, understanding the molecular abnormalities of HOXB7 involved in the pathogenesis of breast cancer cells may reveal new targets for therapy and HOXB7-siRNA and antagonists could be used to inhibit the proliferation and invasion capacity of breast cancer cells.
Although HOXB7 has been associated with the regulation of proliferation and invasion of cancer cells, the molecular mechanisms remain poorly identified. Certain studies reported that bFGF, one of the direct targets of HOXB7, contributed to HOXB7-induced cellular proliferation and transformation (14,15). In addition to bFGF, Carè et al found that HOXB7 can also induce the expression of other genes, particularly those associated with angiogenesis and tumor invasion, including vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin-8, angiopoietin-2 and metalloproteases 2 and 9 (31). Wu et al demonstrated that HOXB7 could activate the Ras-RAF-MAPK pathway in breast cancer cell lines, thereby promoting cell proliferation (16). In the current study, whether the effect of HOXB7-S3 on cell proliferation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells occurred by apoptosis was detected using FCM and the results demonstrated that at 48 h post-transfection of siRNA, the total number of apoptotic cells (12.70±1.75%) was markedly increased in the S3 group, compared with 7.83±0.47% in the Con-B groups and 6.46±0.49% in the Sn groups, respectively (Fig. 7), which was in accordance with the result of the CCK-8 assay demonstrating that the cell viability of the S3 groups (74.43±2.55%) at 48 h post-transfection was significantly decreased compared with that of the Con-B groups (111.97±3.66%) and Sn groups (100±1.58%; Fig. 6), which indicated that HOXB7-S3 may inhibit the proliferation of MCF-7 breast cancer cells through enhancing the apoptotic rate.
In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that HOXB7-S3 decreased the mRNA and protein expression levels of HOXB7 and inhibited the cell proliferation and invasion of MCF-7 breast cancer cells, indicating that HOXB7 RNAi is a potential treatment for breast cancer. HOXB7 may be a potential and valuable therapeutic target in human breast cancer.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the Science and Technology of Hubei Province Funds (no. 2011 CHB 020[SP1]). The authors would like to thank all members of our laboratories for their technical assistance and advice during the experiments.
References
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Walsh T, Casadei S, Coats KH, Swisher E, Stray SM, Higgins J, Roach KC, Mandell J, Lee MK, Ciernikova S, et al: Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 295:1379–1388. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mantzourani M, Gogas H, Katsandris A and Meletis J: Severe thrombocytopenia related to trastuzumab infusion. Med Sci Monit. 17:CS85–CS87. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nunes FD, de Almeida FC, Tucci R and de Sousa SC: Homeobox genes: A molecular link between development and cancer. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 17:94–98. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Grier DG, Thompson A, Kwasniewska A, McGonigle GJ, Halliday HL and Lappin TR: The pathophysiology of HOX genes and their role in cancer. J Pathol. 205:154–171. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bhatlekar S, Fields JZ and Boman BM: HOX genes and their role in the development of human cancers. J Mol Med (Berl). 92:811–823. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nguyen Kovochich A, Arensman M, Lay AR, Rao NP, Donahue T, Li X, French SW and Dawson DW: HOXB7 promotes invasion and predicts survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 119:529–539. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cantile M, Pettinato G, Procino A, Feliciello I, Cindolo L and Cillo C: In vivo expression of the whole HOX gene network in human breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 39:257–264. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
McGinnis W and Krumlauf R: Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell. 68:283–302. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pineault N, Abramovich C, Ohta H and Humphries RK: Differential and common leukemogenic potentials of multiple NUP98-Hox fusion proteins alone or with Meis1. Mol Cell Biol. 24:1907–1917. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hong JH, Lee JK, Park JJ, Lee NW, Lee KW and Na JY: Expression pattern of the class I homeobox genes in ovarian carcinoma. J Gynecol Oncol. 21:29–37. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chile T, Fortes MA, Corrêa-Giannella ML, Brentani HP, Maria DA, Puga RD, de Paula Vde J, Kubrusly MS, Novak EM, Bacchella T, et al: HOXB7 mRNA is overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and its knockdown induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. BMC Cancer. 13:4512013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen KN, Gu ZD, Ke Y, Li JY, Shi XT and Xu GW: Expression of 11 HOX genes is deregulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 11:1044–1049. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
De Souza Setubal Destro MF, Bitu CC, Zecchin KG, Graner E, Lopes MA, Kowalski LP and Coletta RD: Overexpression of HOXB7 homeobox gene in oral cancer induces cellular proliferation and is associated with poor prognosis. Int J Oncol. 36:141–149. 2010. | |
Naora H, Yang YQ, Montz FJ, Seidman JD, Kurman RJ and Roden RB: A serologically identified tumor antigen encoded by a homeobox gene promotes growth of ovarian epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:4060–4065. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu X, Chen H, Parker B, Rubin E, Zhu T, Lee JS, Argani P and Sukumar S: HOXB7, a homeodomain protein, is overexpressed in breast cancer and confers epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res. 66:9527–9534. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen H, Lee JS, Liang X, Zhang H, Zhu T, Zhang Z, Taylor ME, Zahnow C, Feigenbaum L, Rein A, et al: Hoxb7 inhibits transgenic HER-2/neu-induced mouse mammary tumor onset but promotes progression and lung metastasis. Cancer Res. 68:3637–3644. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)). Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Vogelstein B and Kinzler KW: The multistep nature of cancer. Trends Genet. 9:138–141. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Raman V, Martensen SA, Reisman D, Evron E, Odenwald WF, Jaffee E, Marks J and Sukumar S: Compromised HOXA5 function can limit p53 expression in human breast tumours. Nature. 405:974–978. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chu MC, Selam FB and Taylor HS: HOXA10 regulates p53 expression and matrigel invasion in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 3:568–572. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jansen MP, Sieuwerts AM, Look MP, Ritstier K, Meijer-van Gelder ME, van Staveren IL, Klijn JG, Foekens JA and Berns EM: HOXB13-to-IL17BR expression ratio is related with tumor aggressiveness and response to tamoxifen of recurrent breast cancer: A retrospective study. J Clin Oncol. 25:662–668. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shah N, Jin K, Cruz LA, Park S, Sadik H, Cho S, Goswami CP, Nakshatri H, Gupta R, Chang HY, et al: HOXB13 mediates tamoxifen resistance and invasiveness in human breast cancer by suppressing ERα and inducing IL-6 expression. Cancer Res. 73:5449–5458. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Krumlauf R: Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell. 78:191–201. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Garaulet DL, Castellanos MC, Bejarano F, Sanfilippo P, Tyler DM, Allan DW, Sánchez-Herrero E and Lai EC: Homeotic function of Drosophila Bithorax-complex miRNAs mediates fertility by restricting multiple Hox genes and TALE cofactors in the CNS. Dev Cell. 29:635–648. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bhatlekar S, Addya S, Salunek M, Orr CR, Surrey S, McKenzie S, Fields JZ and Boman BM: Identification of a developmental gene expression signature, including HOX genes, for the normal human colonic crypt stem cell niche: Overexpression of the signature parallels stem cell overpopulation during colon tumorigenesis. Stem Cells Dev. 23:167–179. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Cantile M, Scognamiglio G, La Sala L, La Mantia E, Scaramuzza V, Valentino E, Tatangelo F, Losito S, Pezzullo L, Chiofalo MG, et al: Aberrant expression of posterior HOX genes in well differentiated histotypes of thyroid cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 14:21727–21740. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Caré A, Silvani A, Meccia E, Mattia G, Stoppacciaro A, Parmiani G, Peschle C and Colombo MP: HOXB7 constitutively activates basic fibroblast growth factor in melanomas. Mol Cell Biol. 16:4842–4851. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Caré A, Silvani A, Meccia E, Mattia G, Peschle C and Colombo MP: Transduction of the SkBr3 breast carcinoma cell line with the HOXB7 gene induces bFGF expression, increases cell proliferation and reduces growth factor dependence. Oncogene. 16:3285–3289. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liao WT, Jiang D, Yuan J, Cui YM, Shi XW, Chen CM, Bian XW, Deng YJ and Ding YQ: HOXB7 as a prognostic factor and mediator of colorectal cancer progression. Clin Cancer Res. 17:3569–3578. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Carè A, Felicetti F, Meccia E, Bottero L, Parenza M, Stoppacciaro A, Peschle C and Colombo MP: HOXB7: A key factor for tumor-associated angiogenic switch. Cancer Res. 61:6532–6539. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Boström K, Tintut Y, Kao SC, Stanford WP and Demer LL: HOXB7 overexpression promotes differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells to smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biochem. 78:210–221. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |