Sonic hedgehog protein regulates fibroblast growth factor 8 expression in metanephric explant culture from BALB/c mice: Possible mechanisms associated with renal morphogenesis
- Authors:
- Published online on: August 9, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5614
- Pages: 2929-2936
-
Copyright: © Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
The permanent (also know as the metanephric) kidney begins to develop on embryonic day 11 (E11) in mice, and around E35 in humans (1). At this stage, the metanephric blastema induces the caudal portion of the Wolffian (or mesonephric) duct to evaginate. An epithelial tubule forms, which is known as the ureteric bud, and invades the adjacent metanephric mesenchyme. During development, the branching ureteric bud tips induce the surrounding nephron progenitors of the metanephric blastema to proliferate and differentiate into nephrons. Signaling between the ureteric tip and the surrounding metanephric mesenchyme regulates the development of structures within the kidney (2,3). The absorption of the ureteric bud, a process termed renal branching morphogenesis, ultimately constitutes the mature collecting duct system and is regulated by this signaling pathway (3). In addition, signaling between these tissues promotes the transformation of the metanephric mesenchyme to form the epithelial components, including the glomerulus and the distal tubule, in a process known as nephrogenesis (2,4).
The morphogen sonic hedgehog-smoothened (SHH-SMO) signaling pathway serves an important role during mammalian kidney development. Binding of the SHH ligand to its receptor, patched (PTC), activates the transmembrane protein SMO, resulting in the modulation of the glioma-associated oncogene 1 (GLI1), GLI2 and GLI3, as well as in the processing and binding of GLI activators and repressors to SHH target genes (5,6). Antagonists of SMO have been demonstrated to affect downstream SHH-SMO pathway regulation, and the most clinically advanced SMO targeting agents compete with cyclopamine, an SHH-SMO receptor inhibitor (7). SHH gene deletion mutations in humans have been linked to kidney malformations, such as hydroureter (8,9). Aberrant SHH signaling is considered to be associated with VACTERL syndrome, which is characterized by renal anomalies (10). In mice, homozygous inactivation of SHH generates a series of defects, including renal aplasia or dysplasia (11). The presence of renal hypoplasia/dysplasia in the ureteric bud lineage of SHH-deficient mice demonstrates a crucial role for SHH signaling during mammalian renal development (11). However, the mechanisms by which the SHH protein modulates kidney development in mice remain to be elucidated. Therefore, understanding the functional role of the SHH protein in renal morphogenesis may provide a novel strategy for preventing and alleviating congenital renal diseases.
Fibroblast growth factors (Fgfs) and their receptors are also known to serve key roles in kidney morphogenesis. A number of Fgf ligands, particularly Fgf2, Fgf7, Fgf8 and Fgf10, are secreted by the mesenchymal and ureteric epithelium in the developing kidney (12–15). Knockout studies in mice have demonstrated the importance of Fgf signaling in the embryonic kidney. Targeted deletion of Fgf7 or Fgf10 (13,14), or their corresponding receptors (Fgfr1 and Fgfr2, respectively) (16,17), results in a reduction in the number of collecting duct branches and loss of the metanephric mesenchyme. The absence of Fgf8 from the metanephric mesenchyme also leads to a decrease in kidney size due to the disruption in nephron formation subsequent to the renal vesicle stage (12,18).
In nonrenal tissues, an increasing number of studies have been investigating the interaction between SHH and Fgf proteins during embryonic development (19–22). However, the functional association between SHH and Fgf proteins in the kidney has not been elucidated. In the present study, the effects of exogenous SHH on Fgf8 and Fgf10 expression levels were investigated using mouse embryonic kidney tissue culture techniques, in order to further understand the regulation of Fgf gene expression during the kidney development.
Materials and methods
Animal preparation
A total of 28 virgin female BALB/c mouse (obtained from and bred at Biomedical Facility of Shandong University, Jinan, China; 12 h light/dark cycle; temperature, 24°C; weight, 20–35 g; age, 60 days) were naturally mated overnight and vaginal plugs were identified the following morning. Plug-positive females were transferred to single cages and then sacrificed by cervical dislocation at embryonic day 11.5 (E11.5). Embryonic kidney tissues were obtained between E11.5 and E14.5 and then randomly divided into the control [8 female mice; 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in culture medium for 4 days], SHH-treatment (10 female mice; 1.0 µg/ml SHH protein in culture medium for 4 days) and cyclopamine-treatment groups (10 female mice; 1.0 µg/ml SHH protein and 10 µM cyclopamine in culture medium for 4 days). At least 5 fetuses were obtained from 1 pregnant mouse and 2 embryonic kidneys were obtained from each fetal mouse.
Metanephric explant cultures and surface area measurements
BALB/c mouse kidney tissues were obtained from E11.5 embryos using a fine needle syringe and cultured for up to 4 days on polycarbonate filters (0.45 µm; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and on simple Trowell culture grids, as described in a previous paper. The tissues were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium-Ham's F12 nutrient mixture, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chalfont, UK) and penicillin/streptomycin solution (100 U/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin; Beyotime, Institute of Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China). Cyclopamine (cat. no. 239803; EMD Millipore) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and added to the culture medium at a final concentration of 10 µM. SHH protein (cat. no. 461-SH; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was dissolved in 1% BSA (cat. no. ST023; Beyotime, Institute of Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China) and added to the culture medium at a final concentration of 1 µg/ml for 96 h. The planar surface area was calculated from images of the tissues using the Scion Image version 4.03 software (Scion Co., Frederick, MD, USA), and converted to measurements in mm2 (23). All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (publication no. 85–23, revised 1996; US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), and were approved by the Institutional Committee for Use and Care of Laboratory Animals of Shandong University (Jinan, China).
Histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Mouse embryonic kidney tissue specimens were fixed in 4% formaldehyde at 4°C, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin wax and cut into 5-µm sections. Following hematoxylineosin (HE) staining, tissue sections were analyzed for histological features. For IHC and immunofluorescence analyses, the tissue sections were dewaxed using xylene and rehydrated using a graded ethanol series. Antigens were retrieved by boiling the tissue sections in citrate buffer at 98°C for 30 min. The sections were then incubated in 3% H2O2 for 30 min to inhibit endogenous peroxidase activity, and blocked with 3% BSA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Subsequently, sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with polyclonal rabbit anti-Fgf8 (dilution, 1:100; cat. no. ABIN1107218; Bioss Inc., Woburn, MA, USA) and polyclonal rabbit anti-Fgf10 (dilution, 1:100; cat. no. ABIN392510; Bioss Inc.) primary antibodies. Goat anti-rabbit antibodies IgG (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. ZDR5209; Zhongshanjinqiao, Beijing, China) were used as secondary antibodies. The tetramethylrhodamine (TRITC)-conjugated Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA)-lectin (dilution, 1:2,000; cat. no. L9658; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for immunofluorescence analysis. Nuclei were then counterstained with DAPI.
Calculation of ureteric bud branch points and the number of nephrons
A total of 20 tissue culture explants were embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 5 µm. Half of the samples were stained with HE to determine the number of nephrons according to the method described by Hoy et al (24), while others were stained with TRITC-conjugated DBA-lectin to visualize the ureteric buds. The branch points of the nephric duct were then counted in a double-blind study (4 pregnant mice were included in each group).
Microscope and image analysis
Sections of metanephric kidney were visualized and images were captured using a JVC KY-F70 digital camera (JVC, Wayne, NJ, USA) attached to a Leitz DMRB microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), or a Nikon DXM1200 digital camera on a Nikon SMZ1500 stereoscope (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Fgf8 and Fgf10 protein expression levels in metanephric explant tissue sections were subjected to microscopic analysis. Briefly, following IHC staining, tissues that were stained purple were selected for analysis. These regions were visualized and staining intensities were quantified using the Image-Pro Plus image analysis software version 7.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA). The mean densitometries of the digital images (magnification, ×400) were considered to represent the Fgf8/Fgf10 staining intensities, and were used to quantify the relative protein expression levels. The staining intensities of tissue areas from 10 randomly-selected fields of view were counted blindly and subjected to statistical analysis.
Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Mouse embryonic kidneys were harvested between E11.5 and E14.5, and tissues were collected for culturing. Total RNA was extracted using the RNAiso Plus Reagent (cat. no. 9108; Takara Bio, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). A total of 500 ng RNA was reverse transcribed into first strand cDNA using the Primescript RT reagent kit (cat. no. DRR037A; Takara Bio, Inc.). SYBR Premix Ex Taq (10 µl; cat. no. DRR041A; Takara Bio, Inc.) was added to the qPCR reaction mixture, including 0.4 µl forward primer (10 µM; Takara Bio Inc.), 0.4 µl reverse primer (10 µM; Takara Bio Inc.), 2 µl cDNA and 7.2 µl distilled H2O, at a final volume of 20 µl. The primers used to detect SHH, Fgf8 and Fgf10 mRNA expression levels are listed in Table I. Thermal cycling was performed using the Roche LightCycler 480 system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The mRNA expression levels of each target gene were determined using a calibration curve of standards, and expressed relative to GAPDH expression levels.
Western blot analysis
Mouse metanephric kidney tissue samples were homogenized and protein expression levels were determined using western blot analysis, as previously described (7). Briefly, frozen (−80°C) kidney tissues were washed with PBS and lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China) containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mM sodium chloride, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 100 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride. Protein concentrations were determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA), with BSA as the protein standards. Equal amounts of 50 µg total protein were subjected to 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electrotransferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (EMD Millipore). The membranes were the blocked using 5% skimmed milk and incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Subsequently, the membranes were washed three times with Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20 for 10 min, then treated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 60 min at 37°C and visualized using an electrochemical-luminescence method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Antibodies used for western blot analysis included the following: polyclonal rabbit anti-Fgf8 (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. ABIN1107218; Bioss Inc.), polyclonal rabbit anti-Fgf10 (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. ab71794; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (dilution, 1:5,000; cat. no. A5441; Sigma-Aldrich) primary antibodies, and secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG (dilution, 1:2,000; cat. no. SA00001-2; ProteinTech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) or goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies (dilution, 1:2,000; cat. no. SA00001-1; ProteinTech Group, Inc.).
Statistical analysis
Statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups were calculated using the Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance followed by pair-wise multiple comparisons with the least-significant difference method using SPSS software (version 13.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Planar surface areas of metanephric explants
Embryonic metanephric explants were obtained under sterile conditions from pregnant BALB/c mice at the E11.5 developmental stage. Between E11.5 and 14.5, the planar surface area of metanephric explants, which is a valid approximation of kidney size, increased in a time-dependent manner (P=0.012; Fig. 1). The increase in the planar surface area of the explants was used to monitor growth due to its correlation with kidney volume and ureteric bud branching.
Expression levels of SHH, Fgf8 and Fgf10 mRNA between E11.5 and E14.5
As shown in Fig. 2, the expression levels of SHH, Fgf8 and Fgf10 mRNA in mouse embryonic metanephric explants increased between E11.5 and E14.5, as determined by RT-qPCR. At E11.5, the expression levels of all three genes were relatively low. As demonstrated in Fig. 2A, the expression of SHH increased at E12.5, however, this did not reach statistical significance when compared with other developmental time points (P=0.140; Fig. 2A). By contrast, at E13.5 and E14.5, SHH expression increased significantly compared with the E11.5 time points (P=0.041 and P=0.0008, respectively; Fig. 2A). Similarly, the expression of Fgf8 increased at E12.5, but with no statistically significant difference observed (P=0.067; Fig. 2B). By contrast, at E13.5 and E14.5, the expression levels of Fgf8 increased significantly compared with those at E11.5 or E12.5 (P=0.032 and P=0.006, respectively; Fig. 2B). Furthermore, the expression levels of Fgf10 mRNA at E12.5, E13.5 and E14.5 were significantly increased compared with the level at E11.5 (P=0.0008, P=0.006 and P=0.0009, respectively; Fig. 2C); however, no significant diference in Fgf10 expression was observed between the E12.5 and E14.5 time points (P=0.110; Fig. 2C).
Effect of exogenous SHH on ureteric bud branching morphogenesis and nephrogenesis
Compared with the control tissues, mouse embryonic kidney explants treated with exogenous SHH protein demonstrated a significant increase in the number of ureteric bud branches (Fig. 3A–C) and the number of nephrons (Fig. 3D–F). The number of formed ureteric bud branch points increased by 25% following treatment with SHH (P=0.032; Fig. 3C). In addition, histological analysis of the embryonic kidney sections revealed that SHH protein treatment significantly increased the number of nephrons by 35% (P=0.022; Fig. 3F). These results suggest that SHH-SMO signaling serves a crucial role during ureteric bud branching morphogenesis and nephrogenesis.
Effect of exogenous SHH on Fgf8 and Fgf10 mRNA expression levels
Compared with the control tissues, treatment of embryonic kidney explants with exogenous SHH protein significantly reduced the Fgf8 mRNA expression by 71% (P=0.007; Fig. 4A). By contrast, exposure to cyclopamine was associated with a significant increase in Fgf8 mRNA expression by 417% (P=0.009; Fig. 4A) compared with the SHH-group. However, no significant alterations in the expression levels of Fgf10 mRNA were observed following the addition of SHH protein alone or in combination with cyclopamine (P=0.31 and P=0.27, respectively; Fig. 4B). These results indicate that exogenous SHH protein reduced Fgf8 mRNA expression but had little effect on Fgf10 expression.
Effect of exogenous SHH on Fgf8 and Fgf10 protein expression levels
IHC staining demonstrated positive Fhg8 expression primarily in the nephrons and regions of the renal tubules of mouse embryonic kidney tissue explants (Fig. 5A). Compared with control group, the integral optical density (IOD) values of Fgf8 staining decreased by 24% in the SHH-treated group (P=0.028; Fig. 5B), while the IOD values were increased by 46% in the SHH + cyclopamine-treated group (P=0.013; Fig. 5B). In contrast to Fgf8, Fgf10 protein expression was detected primarily in the renal tubules (Fig. 5A). However, no significant difference in the IOD values for Fgf10 was observed between the control and treatment groups (Fig. 5B). Western blot analysis demonstrated that SHH treatment was associated with a significant reduction in Fgf8 protein expression levels by 40% compared with the control group (P=0.006; Fig. 5C and D), whereas the addition of cyclopamine significantly increased the Fgf8 protein expression levels compared with the group treated with SHH alone (P=0.005; Fig. 5C and D). However, no significant alterations in the protein expression levels of Fgf10 were observed in the groups treated with SHH alone or with SHH + cyclopamine compared with the control group (P=0.093; Fig. 5C and D).
Discussion
In the present study, it was demonstrated that exogneous SHH protein treatment of mouse embryonic kidney explants was associated with a significant increase in the number of the ureteric bud branches and the number of nephrons. In addition, exogenous SHH protein treatment significantly reduced the Fgf8 mRNA and protein expression levels, but had no significant effect on the Fgf10 levels. These results demonstrated that SHH is involved in the modulation of renal morphogenesis and Fgf8 expression in BALB/c mouse metanephric explant cultures, thus suggesting that SHH is an important developmental regulator of renal morphogenesis.
A previous study has demostrated that kidney development and gene expression patterns in ex vivo organ culture recapitulates early development in vivo (25). The ureteric bud grows and branches as part of a process known as branching morphogenesis, which establishes the collecting duct network of the kidney. A reciprocal signaling network exists between the ureteric bud and the metanephric mesenchymal tissues, which is responsible for establishing the final structure of the kidney and forming the majority of nephrons. Mouse metanephric explant models have been used extensively for the analysis of branching morphogenesis and nephron formation in response to exogenous factors that can be directly added to the culture medium, such as growth factors, agonists or inhibitors (23,25).
SHH is an inhibitory ligand for the PTC receptor, which constituitively inhibits SMO. Following activation by SHH binding, SMO inhibits the processing of full-length GLI3 to a smaller protein product that functions to repress target gene transcription, and stimulates translocation of GLI1 and GLI2 to the nucleus. In the nucleus, GLIs activate transcription of multiple downstream effectors, such as Pax2 and Sall1 (1). These factors are required for nephron development, and loss of their function in the developing metanephric mesenchyme results in renal agenesis or hypoplasia (26,27). According to the results of the present study, SHH gene expression levels were low at the E11.5 and E12.5 developmental stages, and increased at E13.5 and at E14.5. This suggests that SHH serves an important role during the formation of ureteric bud branches and nephrons, but may not be required for the development of mesonephros and its derivatives. This is consistent with the findings of previous in vivo studies (11,28). The number of ureteric bud branches has been demonstrated to affect the number of formed nephrons (2–4). Following addition of SHH protein into the culture, there was an increase in ureteric bud formation, which may have led to the observed increase in nephron formation. Based on the DBA and HE staining results of the present study, the addition of SHH protein to the culture of explanted mouse embryonic kidney tissues increased the number of ureteric bud branches and enhanced the formation of nephrons. Consistent with these observations, the results of the in vitro experiments suggested that enhancing SHH signaling may promote kidney development.
Fgf8 is expressed in the early metanephric mesenchyme, and is therefore an attractive candidate ligand for regulating nephron development. A previous study demonstrated that Fgf8 promotes renal mesenchymal-epithelial transformation and condensation; however, early kidney development is not dependent on Fgf8 signaling (12). In the absence of Fgf8, mouse embryonic kidney development is normal until the vesicle formation stage (12). According to the results of the present study, there was no significant difference in Fgf8 mRNA expression between E11.5 and E12.5. However, the expression of Fgf8 mRNA increased significantly at E13.5 and E14.5, which is consistent with its established function in nephron formation (12). In a previous study, Fgf8 was demonstrated to be expressed in metanephric mesenchymal tissues around the ureteric bud at E11.5, in the tubule precursor at E12.0, and in the small tubule precursor condensates, comma-shaped and s-shaped bodies, and glomerular epithelial cells at E14.5 (29). Knockout of Fgf8 (Fgf8−/−) in mice has been shown to lead to prenatal lethality, and to be associated with the development of small kidneys and abnormal nephron formation (30). By contrast, Fgf10 is widely expressed in mesenchymal and epithelial tissues, which suggests that Fgf10 may function as an epithelial-mesenchymal signaling molecule (13,31). Global targeting of Fgf10 led to perinatal lethality caused by severe dysgenesis/agenesis of the lungs and limbs (32). Furthermore, Fgf10 knockout mice were observed to develop smaller kidneys and fewer collecting ducts (13). As demonstrated in the present study, Fgf10 mRNA expression levels were relatively low at E11.5; however, they increased and remained high between E12.5 and E14.5. Consistent with a previous study (33), this suggests that Fgf10 primarily functions to regulate the formation of ureteric buds but not nephron formation. In addition, during the process of limb induction and heart formation, Fgf8 and Fgf10 have reciprocal regulatory functions, which emphasizes the critical role of Fgf proteins in organ development (34,35). Therefore, the results of the present study provide evidence demonstrating that Fgf8 and Fgf10 serve key functional roles at distinct stages of kidney development.
The effect of exogenous SHH protein on Fgf8 and Fgf10 protein and mRNA expression levels in mouse embryonic kidney tissue explants were investigated in the present study. The culture medium of tissue explants was supplemented with cyclopamine (an SMO receptor inhibitor) to block SHH signal transduction, and a mouse recombinant SHH protein to stimulate SHH-SMO signaling. The results demonstrated that treatment with SHH protein was associated with a significant decrease in Fgf8 mRNA and protein expression levels, whereas treatment with SHH in combination with cyclopamine was associated with no significant alterations in these expression levels compared with the control group. This suggests that SHH may negatively regulate Fgf8 expression levels, which is consistent with the results presented by Urban et al (36), demonstrating that ectopic SHH treatment inhibited the Fgf8 expression in aquatic larvae. Reduced Fgf8 signals may increase nephron precursor cell apoptosis, thereby decreasing the number of nephrons during the advanced stages of kidney development (36).
In conclusion, the results of the present study suggested that the SHH protein serves a crucial role in regulating ureteric branching and nephron formation in metanephric explant tissues from BALB/c mice. In addition, SHH may inhibit Fgf8 expression in the developing kidney. This signaling interaction may explain, in part, the regulatory effects of SHH protein expression on Fgf signaling in vitro (37). The results of the present study also suggest that SHH may serve an indirect functional role during nephrogenesis, similar to its indirect role during head ectoderm development (21). Despite the fact that the association between SHH and Fgf signaling in vivo remains unclear, the present study demonstrated the presence of an SHH-Fgf signaling pathway that functions to regulate embryonic kidney development. These observations may provide valuable information for the prevention and therapeutic targeting of congenital kidney malformations.
Acknowledgments
The present study was financially supported by the Scientific and Technological Projects of Shandong Province (grant no. 2008-01-03-41-01).
References
Gill PS and Rosenblum ND: Control of murine kidney development by sonic hedgehog and its GLI effectors. Cell cycle. 5:1426–1430. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shah MM, Sampogna RV, Sakurai H, Bush KT and Nigam SK: Branching morphogenesis and kidney disease. Development. 131:1449–1462. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reidy KJ and Rosenblum ND: Cell and molecular biology of kidney development. Semin Nephrol. 29:321–337. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Piscione TD and Rosenblum ND: The molecular control of renal branching morphogenesis: Current knowledge and emerging insights. Differentiation. 70:227–246. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bai CB, Auerbach W, Lee JS, Stephen D and Joyner AL: Gli2, but not Gli1, is required for initial Shh signaling and ectopic activation of the Shh pathway. Development. 129:4753–4761. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Park HL, Bai C, Platt KA, Matise MP, Beeghly A, Hui CC, Nakashima M and Joyner AL: Mouse Gli1 mutants are viable but have defects in SHH signaling in combination with a Gli2 mutation. Development. 127:1593–1605. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ding H, Zhou D, Hao S, Zhou L, He W, Nie J, Hou FF and Liu Y: Sonic hedgehog signaling mediates epithelial-mesenchymal communication and promotes renal fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 23:801–813. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lurie IW, Ilyina HG, Podleschuk LV, Gorelik LB and Zaletajev DV: Chromosome 7 abnormalities in parents of children with holoprosencephaly and hydronephrosis. Am J Med Genet. 35:286–288. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nowaczyk MJ, Huggins MJ, Tomkins DJ, Rossi E, Ramsay JA, Woulfe J, Scherer SW and Belloni E: Holoprosencephaly, sacral anomalies, and situs ambiguus in an infant with partial monosomy 7q/trisomy 2p and SHH and HLXB9 haploinsufficiency. Clin Genet. 57:388–393. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim PC, Mo R and Hui Cc C: Murine models of VACTERL syndrome: Role of sonic hedgehog signaling pathway. J Pediatr Surg. 36:381–384. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu J, Carroll TJ and McMahon AP: Sonic hedgehog regulates proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal cells in the mouse metanephric kidney. Development. 129:5301–5312. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Grieshammer U, Cebrián C, Ilagan R, Meyers E, Herzlinger D and Martin GR: FGF8 is required for cell survival at distinct stages of nephrogenesis and for regulation of gene expression in nascent nephrons. Development. 132:3847–3857. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohuchi H, Hori Y, Yamasaki M, Harada H, Sekine K, Kato S and Itoh N: FGF10 acts as a major ligand for FGF receptor 2 IIIb in mouse multi-organ development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 277:643–649. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Qiao J, Uzzo R, Obara-Ishihara T, Degenstein L, Fuchs E and Herzlinger D: FGF-7 modulates ureteric bud growth and nephron number in the developing kidney. Development. 126:547–554. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Barasch J, Qiao J, McWilliams G, Chen D, Oliver JA and Herzlinger D: Ureteric bud cells secrete multiple factors, including bFGF, which rescue renal progenitors from apoptosis. Am J Physiol. 273:F757–F767. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Poladia DP, Kish K, Kutay B, Hains D, Kegg H, Zhao H and Bates CM: Role of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in the metanephric mesenchyme. Dev Biol. 291:325–339. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao H, Kegg H, Grady S, Truong HT, Robinson ML, Baum M and Bates CM: Role of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in the ureteric bud. Dev Biol. 276:403–415. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Perantoni AO, Timofeeva O, Naillat F, Richman C, Pajni-Underwood S, Wilson C, Vainio S, Dove LF and Lewandoski M: Inactivation of FGF8 in early mesoderm reveals an essential role in kidney development. Development. 132:3859–3871. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
White AC, Xu J, Yin Y, Smith C, Schmid G and Ornitz DM: FGF9 and SHH signaling coordinate lung growth and development through regulation of distinct mesenchymal domains. Development. 133:1507–1517. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang Z, Verheyden JM, Hassell JA and Sun X: FGF-regulated Etv genes are essential for repressing Shh expression in mouse limb buds. Dev Cell. 16:607–613. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mukhopadhyay A, Krishnaswami SR, Cowing-Zitron C, Hung NJ, Reilly-Rhoten H, Burns J and Yu BD: Negative regulation of Shh levels by Kras and Fgfr2 during hair follicle development. Devel Biol. 373:373–382. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Haworth KE, Wilson JM, Grevellec A, Cobourne MT, Healy C, Helms JA, Sharpe PT and Tucker AS: Sonic hedgehog in the pharyngeal endoderm controls arch pattern via regulation of Fgf8 in head ectoderm. Dev Biol. 303:244–258. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gupta IR, Lapointe M and Yu OH: Morphogenesis during mouse embryonic kidney explant culture. Kidney Int. 63:365–376. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hoy WE, Douglas-Denton RN, Hughson MD, Cass A, Johnson K and Bertram JF: A stereological study of glomerular number and volume: Preliminary findings in a multiracial study of kidneys at autopsy. Kidney Int Suppl. S31–S37. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Barak H and Boyle SC: Organ culture and immunostaining of mouse embryonic kidneys. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2011:pdb.prot55582011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Narlis M, Grote D, Gaitan Y, Boualia SK and Bouchard M: Pax2 and pax8 regulate branching morphogenesis and nephron differentiation in the developing kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 18:1121–1129. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chai L, Yang J, Di C, Cui W, Kawakami K, Lai R and Ma Y: Transcriptional activation of the SALL1 by the human SIX1 homeodomain during kidney development. J Biol Chem. 281:18918–18926. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Murashima A, Akita H, Okazawa M, Kishigami S, Nakagata N, Nishinakamura R and Yamada G: Midline-derived Shh regulates mesonephric tubule formation through the paraxial mesoderm. Dev Biol. 386:216–226. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Pedersen A, Skjong C and Shawlot W: Lim 1 is required for nephric duct extension and ureteric bud morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 288:571–581. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun X, Meyers EN, Lewandoski M and Martin GR: Targeted disruption of Fgf8 causes failure of cell migration in the gastrulating mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 13:1834–1846. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Igarashi M, Finch PW and Aaronson SA: Characterization of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-10 reveals functional similarities with keratinocyte growth factor (FGF-7). J Biol Chem. 273:13230–13235. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sekine K, Ohuchi H, Fujiwara M, Yamasaki M, Yoshizawa T, Sato T, Yagishita N, Matsui D, Koga Y, Itoh N and Kato S: Fgf10 is essential for limb and lung formation. Nat Genet. 21:138–141. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Michos O, Cebrian C, Hyink D, Grieshammer U, Williams L, D'Agati V, Licht JD, Martin GR and Costantini F: Kidney development in the absence of Gdnf and Spry1 requires Fgf10. PLoS Genet. 6:e10008092010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu X, Weinstein M, Li C, Naski M, Cohen RI, Ornitz DM, Leder P and Deng C: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2)-mediated reciprocal regulation loop between FGF8 and FGF10 is essential for limb induction. Development. 125:753–765. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
Watanabe Y, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Vincent SD, Kelly RG, Moon AM and Buckingham ME: Role of mesodermal FGF8 and FGF10 overlaps in the development of the arterial pole of the heart and pharyngeal arch arteries. Circ Res. 106:495–503. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Urban AE, Zhou X, Ungos JM, Raible DW, Altmann CR and Vize PD: FGF is essential for both condensation and mesenchymal-epithelial transition stages of pronephric kidney tubule development. Dev Biol. 297:103–117. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guo W, Yi X, Ren F, Liu L, Wu S and Yang J: Activation of SHH signaling pathway promotes vasculogenesis in post-myocardial ischemic-reperfusion injury. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 8:12464–12472. 2015. |