Vatalanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, decreases hepatic fibrosis and sinusoidal capillarization in CCl4-induced fibrotic mice
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 15, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.6325
- Pages: 2604-2610
-
Copyright: © Kong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Hepatic fibrosis is a primary consequence of liver injury that results from chronic liver diseases, including chronic viral hepatitis, alcohol and metabolic liver disease (1,2). The ultimate aim is to treat the cause of the liver disease, which may lead to the reversal of fibrosis (3,4). With emerging novel technology and refined methodologies, knowledge concerning the mechanisms underlying liver fibrosis and its pathogenesis are continuously expanding (5). However, the development of anti-fibrotic compounds represents a major therapeutic challenge (6).
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important mediator of angiogenesis (7). In addition, VEGF and its receptors serve critical roles in chronic inflammation and liver fibrosis (8,9). Angiogenesis is involved in chronic inflammatory liver disease. The fact that these diseases respond poorly to conventional anti-inflammatory therapy suggests that angiogenesis may be an effective therapeutic target in reversing persistent, stable inflammation in chronic liver diseases (10). Intra-hepatic angiogenesis and sinusoidal remodeling occur in many chronic liver diseases (11). Anti-angiogenesis treatment may be a therapeutic approach in liver fibrosis and portal hypertension (11). It has been previously reported that anti-angiogenesis drugs, including sorafenib, sunitinib, and Endostar, which are used in the treatment of carcinoma, inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma and liver fibrosis (12–15).
Vatalanib, also known as PTK/ZK, is an orally active, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is effective against all VEGF receptors (16,17). It has been demonstrated that the combination of vatalanib and intravenous doxorubicin administration has encouraging activity in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients (18). In China, the majority of HCC patients have co-existing hepatitis B and liver cirrhosis (19). A previous study indicated that vatalanib had anti-fibrotic effects in experimental liver fibrosis in vivo (20). However, the underlying mechanism by which this occurs remains unclear. The aim of the current study was to determine the anti-fibrogenic effects of vatalanib in terms of pathological alterations of the liver and hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell (SEC) phenotypes in CCl4-induced fibrotic mice.
Materials and methods
Mouse model of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis
Vatalanib was purchased from LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA, USA; cat. no. V-8303), and dissolved in 100 mg/ml distilled water. A total of 32 male BALB/c mice weighing 18–20 g were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology (Beijing, China). The Animal Care and Use Committee of Harbin Medical University approved all protocols and procedures (Harbin, China). Animals were housed in an air-conditioned room at 23–25°C with a 12-h dark/light cycle for one week prior to the initiation of experiments. All animals received appropriate care during the study with unlimited access to food and water.
Liver fibrosis was induced in mice by intraperitoneal injection of CCl4 (40% CCl4 in olive oil, 0.2 ml/100 g body weight, twice weekly) for 6 weeks as previously reported (21). A total of four groups were studied: Group 1, normal control mice; group 2, CCl4 alone; group 3, CCl4 + vatalanib (50 mg/kg/d by gavage for 6 weeks, vatalanib was administered simultaneously with a CCl4 injection for 6 weeks); and group 4, CCl4 + vatalanib (50 mg/kg/d by gavage for 4 weeks, CCl4 alone was administered to mice for 2 weeks, following which vatalanib was administered to mice simultaneously with CCl4 injection for another 4 weeks). In the previous study, vatalanib (50 and 100 mg/kg/d) was well tolerated by the mice, and had no significant effects on body weight (22). Therefore, 50 mg/kg/d was used in the present study. Previous studies identified that CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis is present after 2 weeks (20). Group 1 received olive oil intraperitoneally at the same dose and conditions as the CCl4-treated mice.
Mice were euthanized (via 2% pentobarbital i.p. at 0.3 ml/ 100 g body weight) and liver samples were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until further use. An additional section was embedded in paraffin and sliced into 4–5 µm sections.
Histological examination
Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Sirius Red (Solarbio Life Sciences, Beijing, China) for histopathological analysis and liver fibrosis evaluation. Each sample was independently assessed and scored by two pathologists, blinded to the study protocol, according to a fibrosis score system (16). Liver fibrosis was divided into seven stages: 0, no fibrosis; 1, short fibrous tissue in central venule (C); 2, fibrous between central venule and central venule (C-C) septa appearance; 3, C-C fibrous septa incompletely developed; 4, C-C septa completely connected (pseudo-lobule); 5, C-P (portal tract) bridging fibrosis, nodular appearance ≤50%; and 6, nodular appearance >50%.
Hepatic hydroxyproline analyses
Hepatic hydroxyproline was measured using a hydroxyproline detection kit (Jiancheng Institute of Biotechnology, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The hydroxyproline content is expressed as mg/g wet liver.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Samples were processed for TEM as described previously (23). Fresh specimens were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde (Beijing Brilliance Biochemical Company, Beijing, China), washed with PBS, and fixed in 1% osmic acid for 60 min. The samples were dehydrated through an alcohol series, embedded in EPON 812 epoxy resin (Hede Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and then cut into 50 nm sections with an ultrathin microtome. Following staining with uranyl acetate and lead citrate for 30 min, the sections were examined using a transmission electron microscope (cat. no. H-7650; Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). A total of 10 hepatic sinusoids with a diameter of 2–3 µm were randomly selected from each group and subgroup, and the mean number of fenestrae per hepatic sinusoid was determined. Each sample was independently assessed and scored by two pathologists, both blinded to the study protocol.
Biochemical analyses
Blood was collected from the inferior vena cava. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL) and albumin were assayed using an automatic biochemical analyzer (cat. no. 7600; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
Immunohistochemistry staining for α-SMA and CD34
CD34 is a marker of newly-formed blood vessels. The vascular density in portal and peri-portal areas was assessed by determining the number of CD34-labeled vessel sections (24). Liver tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin for 1 week at room temperature, sliced into 4–6 mm pieces, dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in paraffin wax. α-SMA and CD34 were detected in paraffin-embedded liver sections (4–5 µm thick) using the following specific primary antibodies: α-SMA (cat. no. A2547; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and CD34 (cat no. ab81289; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and an avidin-biotin complex immunoperoxidase method (15). Following antigen retrieval by immersion in EDTA (1 mmol/l, pH 8.0) and boiling for 15 min, sections were pre-blocked with normal goat serum for 10 min, and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with specific antibodies (α-SMA, dilution 1:200; CD34, dilution, 1:200). PBS was used in place of the primary antibodies for the negative controls. Following rinsing, the biotinylated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG, cat no. ZDR-5307, goat anti-mouse IgG, cat. no. ZDR-5306, OriGene Technologies, Inc., Beijing, China), avidin-biotin complex and horseradish peroxidase (Strept ABComplex; Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) were applied. Finally, the sections were washed with PBS, developed with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride substrate (Strept ABComplex; Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) for 3 min, and counterstained with hematoxylin.
Computer-assisted semi-quantitative analysis was used to evaluate the areas of positive α-SMA and CD34 staining using Image-ProPlus software (version 4.5; Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). The data for the α-SMA and CD34 staining are expressed as the mean percentage of the positively stained area relative to the total tissue section area (17).
Measurement of mRNA levels of collagen I, α-SMA, TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 by RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from liver tissues and HSC-T6 cells using a TRIzol® Reagent kit (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The quality of total RNA was verified by ultraviolet absorbance spectrophotometry at 260 and 280 nm. cDNA was reversed transcribed using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The thermocycling parameters were as follows: 25°C for 10 min, 37°C for 150 min, 85°C for 5 sec, and 4°C for 5 min for one cycle, before chilling on ice. cDNA was stored at −20°C until further required. Collagen I, α-SMA, TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 mRNA levels were quantified using the primers presented in Tables I and II. GAPDH, a housekeeping gene, was used as an internal control primer for target genes. All primers were obtained from Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. The expression of mRNA was measured by SYBR Green Real-Time PCR using an ABI 7500 instrument (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). PCR was performed in 20 µl buffer that contained 2 µg cDNA, 1 µl each primer and 10 µl SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Comparative quantitation threshold (Cq) calculations were all relative to the control group. The expression of mRNA relative to the control was derived using the equation 2−∆∆Cq (25).
Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of one way analysis of variance and unpaired Student's t-test as appropriate. Non-parametric data were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Results
Vatalanib inhibits liver fibrosis in CCl4-induced mice
There were no collagen fibers along the central vein in control group 1 (Fig. 1A). In group 2, collagenous fibers extended from the central vein and the portal area to the hepatic lobules with pseudo-lobule formation (Fig. 1B). With administration of vatalanib (50 mg/kg/d, for 4 or 6 weeks) in groups 3 (Fig. 1C) and 4 (Fig. 1D), collagenous fibers were decreased compared with group 2. The fibrosis scores following vatalanib administration in groups 3 and 4 were significantly reduced when compared with those in group 2 (P<0.05; Table II). In addition, vatalanib reduced hydroxyproline concentrations in liver tissue, reflecting decreased total hepatic collagen content (P<0.01; Table III).
Vatalanib reduces liver inflammation
Serum ALT and AST levels were significantly decreased following vatalanib treatment (P<0.01), whereas no significant alterations in serum TBIL and albumin levels were observed (P>0.05; Table III).
Vatalanib inhibits α-SMA and CD34 protein levels
Levels of α-SMA, a typical marker of activated HSCs, were assessed by immunohistochemistry to evaluate the effect of vatalanib on HSC activation during hepatic fibrosis. There was no positive staining in control group 1 (Fig. 2A). CCl4 alone led to considerable increases in the amount of α-SMA positive cells, which were distributed throughout the fibrotic septa (Fig. 2B). Computer-assisted semi-quantitative analysis revealed that vatalanib-treated groups (groups 3 and 4) presented significantly decreased α-SMA-positive areas compared with group 2 (P<0.05; Fig. 2C-E). These results demonstrated that vatalanib decreased the number of activated HSCs.
There was little positive CD34 staining in the control group 1 (Fig. 2F). Following six weeks of CCl4 induction, this led to significant increases in the number of CD34 positive cells, while groups 3 and 4 presented significantly decreased CD34 positive areas compared with group 2 (P<0.05; Fig. 2G-J).
Ultrastructural changes in fibrotic mice after vatalanib treatment
There were significantly increased fenestrae per SEC in group 1 (Fig. 3A) compared with group 2 (Fig. 3B; P<0.01; Table IV). In group 2, the microvilli of hepatocytes in the perisinusoidal space and the intra-lobular bile ducts (cholangioles) disappeared (Fig. 3C), and the junctions between hepatocytes were destroyed (Fig. 3D). In group 3, the number of fenestrae was significantly increased compared with group 2 (P<0.01; Fig. 3E; Table IV), and cholangioles appeared morphologically healthy (Fig. 3F). Group 4 additionally had an increased number of fenestrae compared with group 2 (Fig. 3G; Table IV), and presented with cell junctions similar to normal control mice (Fig. 3H). There were no significant differences in the numbers of fenestrae between groups 3 and 4 (P>0.05). The extent of hepatocyte necrosis and inflammation was less so in groups 3 and 4 compared with group 2.
Vatalanib was associated with decreased collagen I, α-SMA, TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 mRNA levels
mRNA expression levels of collagen I, α-SMA, TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 were increased in group 2 compared with group 1 (P<0.01; Fig. 4). mRNA levels were reduced in groups 3 and 4 compared with group 2 (P<0.01).
Discussion
Intrahepatic hypoxia may occur during the liver inflammatory and fibrotic processes that characterize several chronic liver diseases (26). As a consequence, intrahepatic vascular angiogenesis and sinusoidal remodeling may occur in these chronic liver diseases (8,26). In previous years, numerous studies have examined the expression of various anti-angiogenic molecules in chronic liver disease (26). Among these molecules, VEGF and its receptors are of the most important, and have been fully studied in terms of their roles in liver inflammation and fibrosis (26,27). Anti-VEGF treatment may represent a potential therapeutic approach in liver fibrosis and portal hypertension (10,28).
Vatalanib has been previously identified to specifically block VEGF-induced phosphorylation of VEGFR-1, −2 and −3 and inhibit endothelial cell proliferation, differentiation and tumor angiogenesis (29). It is considered safe for patients in previous cancer studies (30,31). The most common grade 3 and 4 non-hematological toxicities are mucositis and alopecia (17,18,32).
In addition, Liu et al (20) investigated the role of vatalanib in CCl4-induced mice. They identified that vatalanib decreases liver fibrosis in a CCl4-induced liver fibrosis model. This result is consistent with current findings. However, they examined the effect of vatalanib in liver fibrosis and HSCs, not SECs. The present study examined the effects of vatalanib on the number of hepatic SEC fenestrae, and levels of VEGFR in liver tissues. The results suggested that vatalanib may exert its effects via the VEGF signaling pathway. The present results reinforced the concept that angiogenesis has a major role in liver fibrogenesis (8,10,33,34).
The underlying molecular mechanism by which vatalanib decreases liver injury remains unknown. It has been demonstrated that, in primary HSCs, vatalanib decreases the levels of α-SMA, collagen, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, and reduces cell proliferation, migration and actin filament formation. This effect was associated with inhibition of VEGF, PDGF and TGF-β1 signaling and their downstream target, protein kinase B (35). In the current study, vatalanib was identified to inhibit TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2.
Dysfunction of SECs is likely to be one of the initial events in liver injury (36). Defenestration and capillarization of the sinusoidal endothelium may be major contributors to hepatic failure in hepatic cirrhosis (36). Two studies from 2010 suggested that intrahepatic angiogenesis and sinusoidal remodeling may be involved in sinusoidal resistance, fibrosis and portal hypertension (11,37). In the present study, vatalanib altered the SEC phenotype, leading to decreased sinusoidal capillarization. Microvilli disappearance, inflammation, hepatocyte necrosis and bile duct alterations were decreased in all vatalanib-treated groups. These results indicated that anti-angiogenic agents may inhibit SECs, and that they may be involved in sinusoidal capillarization and hepatocyte damage. SECs may be potential target cells in the inhibition of this process. Furthermore, it is understood that paracrine signaling between SECs and HSCs regulates fibrogenesis, angiogenesis and portal hypertension in chronic liver disease (8,9,14,38). In the present study, the underlying mechanism of vatalanib on SECs was not addressed. Therefore, the nature of the interactions between SECs and HSCs in chronic liver disease following vatalanib treatment requires further investigation.
In conclusion, vatalanib treatment was associated with decreased hepatic sinusoidal capillarization, hepatocyte damage and liver fibrosis in CCl4-induced fibrotic mice. Vatalanib may represent a potential therapeutic agent for counteracting hepatic fibrosis.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (grant no. H2015099).
Glossary
Abbreviations
Abbreviations:
TGF-β |
transforming growth factor-β |
HSC |
hepatic stellate cell |
α-SMA |
α-smooth muscle actin |
VEGF |
vascular endothelial growth factor |
VEGFR |
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor |
ALT |
alanine aminotransferase |
AST |
aspartate aminotransferase |
TBIL |
total bilirubin |
TEM |
transmission electron microscopy |
References
Friedman SL: Cellular networks in hepatic fibrosis. Digestion. 59:368–371. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Friedman SL: Hepatic fibrosis-overview. Toxicology. 254:120–129. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ghiassi-Nejad Z and Friedman SL: Advances in antifibrotic therapy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2:803–816. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jiao J, Friedman SL and Aloman C: Hepatic fibrosis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 25:223–229. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Friedman SL: Liver fibrosis: From mechanisms to treatment. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 31:812–814. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Friedman SL and Bansal MB: Reversal of hepatic fibrosis-fact or fantasy? Hepatology. 43:(2 Suppl 1). S82–S88. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferrara N and Davis-Smyth T: The biology of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocr Rev. 18:4–25. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Coulon S, Heindryckx F, Geerts A, Van Steenkiste C, Colle I and Van Vlierberghe H: Angiogenesis in chronic liver disease and its complications. Liver Int. 31:146–162. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fernández M, Semela D, Bruix J, Colle I, Pinzani M and Bosch J: Angiogenesis in liver disease. J Hepatol. 50:604–620. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lai WK and Adams DH: Angiogenesis and chronic inflammation; The potential for novel therapeutic approaches in chronic liver disease. J Hepatol. 42:7–11. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Thabut D and Shah V: Intrahepatic angiogenesis and sinusoidal remodeling in chronic liver disease: New targets for the treatment of portal hypertension? J Hepatol. 53:976–980. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mejias M, Garcia-Pras E, Tiani C, Miquel R, Bosch J and Fernandez M: Beneficial effects of sorafenib on splanchnic, intrahepatic and portocollateral circulations in portal hypertensive and cirrhotic rats. Hepatology. 49:1245–1256. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Majumder S, Piguet AC, Dufour JF and Chatterjee S: Study of the cellular mechanism of Sunitinib mediated inactivation of activated hepatic stellate cells and its implications in angiogenesis. Eur J Pharmacol. 705:86–95. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Thabut D, Routray C, Lomberk G, Shergill U, Glaser K, Huebert R, Patel L, Masyuk T, Blechacz B, Vercnocke A, et al: Complementary vascular and matrix regulatory pathways underlie the beneficial mechanism of action of sorafenib in liver fibrosis. Hepatology. 54:573–585. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen J, Liu DG, Yang G, Kong LJ, Du YJ, Wang HY, Li FD, Pei FH, Song JT, Fan YJ, et al: Endostar, a novel human recombinant endostatin, attenuates liver fibrosis in CCl4-induced mice. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 239:998–1006. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jones SF, Spigel DR, Yardley DA, Thompson DF and Burris HA III: A phase I trial of vatalanib (PTK/ZK) in combination with bevacizumab in patients with refractory and/or advanced malignancies. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 9:845–852. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Thomas AL, Morgan B, Drevs J, Unger C, Wiedenmann B, Vanhoefer U, Laurent D, Dugan M and Steward WP: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: PTK787/ZK 222584. Semin Oncol. 30:(3 Suppl 6). S32–S38. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yau T, Chan P, Pang R, Ng K, Fan ST and Poon RT: Phase 1–2 trial of PTK787/ZK222584 combined with intravenous doxorubicin for treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Implication for antiangiogenic approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 116:5022–5029. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang Y, Jin L, He YL, Wang K, Ma XH, Wang J, Yan Z, Feng YL, Li YQ, Chen TY, et al: Hepatitis B virus infection in clustering of infection in families with unfavorable prognoses in northwest China. J Med Virol. 85:1893–1899. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Y, Lui EL, Friedman SL, Li L, Ye T, Chen Y, Poon RT, Wo J, Kok TW and Fan ST: PTK787/ZK22258 attenuates stellate cell activation and hepatic fibrosis in vivo by inhibiting VEGF signaling. Lab Invest. 89:209–221. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang H, Zhang Y, Wang T, You H and Jia J: N-methyl-4-isoleucine cyclosporine attenuates CCl-induced liver fibrosis in rats by interacting with cyclophilin B and D. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 26:558–567. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Y, Poon RT, Li Q, Kok TW, Lau C and Fan ST: Both antiangiogenesis- and angiogenesis-independent effects are responsible for hepatocellular carcinoma growth arrest by tyrosine kinase inhibitor PTK787/ZK222584. Cancer Res. 65:3691–3699. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu H, Shi BM, Lu XF, Liang F, Jin X, Wu TH and Xu J: Vascular endothelial growth factor attenuates hepatic sinusoidal capillarization in thioacetamide-induced cirrhotic rats. World J Gastroenterol. 14:2349–2357. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Elpek GÖ, Unal B and Bozova S: H-ras oncogene expression and angiogenesis in experimental liver cirrhosis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013:8689162013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Medina J, Arroyo AG, Sánchez-Madrid F and Moreno-Otero R: Angiogenesis in chronic inflammatory liver disease. Hepatology. 39:1185–1195. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Calderone V, Gallego J, Fernandez-Miranda G, Garcia-Pras E, Maillo C, Berzigotti A, Mejias M, Bava FA, Angulo-Urarte A, Graupera M, et al: Sequential functions of CPEB1 and CPEB4 regulate pathologic expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis in chronic liver disease. Gastroenterology. 150:982–997.e30. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fernandez M, Vizzutti F, Garcia-Pagan JC, Rodes J and Bosch J: Anti-VEGF receptor-2 monoclonal antibody prevents portal-systemic collateral vessel formation in portal hypertensive mice. Gastroenterology. 126:886–894. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schomber T, Zumsteg A, Strittmatter K, Crnic I, Antoniadis H, Littlewood-Evans A, Wood J and Christofori G: Differential effects of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor PTK787/ZK222584 on tumor angiogenesis and tumor lymphangiogenesis. Mol Cancer Ther. 8:55–63. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kircher SM, Nimeiri HS and Benson AB III: Targeting angiogenesis in colorectal cancer: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer J. 22:182–189. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dragovich T, Laheru D, Dayyani F, Bolejack V, Smith L, Seng J, Burris H, Rosen P, Hidalgo M, Ritch P, et al: Phase II trial of vatalanib in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after first-line gemcitabine therapy (PCRT O4-001). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 74:379–387. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Langenberg MH, Witteveen PO, Lankheet NA, Roodhart JM, Rosing H, van den Heuvel IJ, Beijnen JH and Voest EE: Phase 1 study of combination treatment with PTK 787/ZK 222584 and cetuximab for patients with advanced solid tumors: Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics analysis. Neoplasia. 12:206–213. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vanheule E, Geerts AM, Van Huysse J, Schelfhout D, Praet M, Van Vlierberghe H, De Vos M and Colle I: An intravital microscopic study of the hepatic microcirculation in cirrhotic mice models: Relationship between fibrosis and angiogenesis. Int J Exp Pathol. 89:419–432. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferrara N and Kerbel RS: Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. Nature. 438:967–974. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Y, Wen XM, Lui EL, Friedman SL, Cui W, Ho NP, Li L, Ye T, Fan ST and Zhang H: Therapeutic targeting of the PDGF and TGF-beta-signaling pathways in hepatic stellate cells by PTK787/ZK22258. Lab Invest. 89:1152–1160. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Braet F and Wisse E: Structural and functional aspects of liver sinusoidal endothelial cell fenestrae: A review. Comp Hepatol. 1:12002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huebert RC, Jagavelu K, Liebl AF, Huang BQ, Splinter PL, LaRusso NF, Urrutia RA and Shah VH: Immortalized liver endothelial cells: A cell culture model for studies of motility and angiogenesis. Lab Invest. 90:1770–1781. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Friedman SL: Preface. Hepatic fibrosis: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and emerging therapies. Clin Liver Dis. 12:xiii–xiv. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |