1
|
Li C, Xu YM, Liu ZS and Li HB: Urethral
reconstruction with tissue engineering and RNA interference
techniques in rabbits. Urology. 81:1075–1080. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2
|
Wang F, Liu T, Yang L, Zhang G, Liu H, Yi
X, Yang X, Lin TY, Qin W and Yuan J: Urethral reconstruction with
tissue-engineered human amniotic scaffold in rabbit urethral injury
models. Med Sci Monit. 20:2430–2438. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
3
|
Atala A, Bauer SB, Soker S, Yoo JJ and
Retik AB: Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients
needing cystoplasty. Lancet. 367:1241–1246. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4
|
Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell
JW, Katz AJ, Benhaim P, Lorenz HP and Hedrick MH: Multilineage
cells from human adipose tissue: Implications for cell-based
therapies. Tissue Eng. 7:211–228. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Li CY, Wu XY, Tong JB, Yang XX, Zhao JL,
Zheng QF, Zhao GB and Ma ZJ: Comparative analysis of human
mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue under
xeno-free conditions for cell therapy. Stem Cell Res Ther.
6:552015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6
|
Lotfy A, Salama M, Zahran F, Jones E,
Badawy A and Sobh M: Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells
derived from rat bone marrow and adipose tissue: A comparative
study. Int J Stem Cells. 7:135–142. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7
|
Bhargava S, Patterson JM, Inman RD,
MacNeil S and Chapple CR: Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa
urethroplasty-clinical outcomes. Eur Urol. 53:1263–1269. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
8
|
Lv X, Li Z, Chen S, Xie M, Huang J, Peng
X, Yang R, Wang H, Xu Y and Feng C: Structural and functional
evaluation of oxygenating keratin/silk fibroin scaffold and initial
assessment of their potential for urethral tissue engineering.
Biomaterials. 84:99–110. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
De Filippo RE, Kornitzer BS, Yoo JJ and
Atala A: Penile urethra replacement with autologous cell-seeded
tubularized collagen matrices. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 9:257–264.
2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
10
|
Murphy AR, John PS and Kaplan DL:
Modification of silk fibroin using diazonium coupling chemistry and
the effects on hMSC proliferation and differentiation.
Biomaterials. 29:2829–2838. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11
|
Kundu B, Rajkhowa R, Kundu SC and Wang X:
Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv Drug Deliv
Rev. 65:457–470. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
12
|
Koh LD, Cheng Y, Teng CP, Khin YW, Loh XJ,
Tee SY, Low M, Ye E, Yu HD, Zhang YW and Han MY: Structures,
mechanical properties and applications of silk fibroin materials.
Prog Polym Sci. 46:86–110. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar
|
13
|
Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano DR, Yoo JJ,
Lopez-Bayghen E, Soker S and Atala A: Tissue-engineered autologous
urethras for patients who need reconstruction: An observational
study. Lancet. 377:1175–1182. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
14
|
Chun SY, Kim BS, Kwon SY, Park SI, Song
PH, Yoo ES, Kim BW, Kwon TG and Kim HT: Urethroplasty using
autologous urethral tissue-embedded acellular porcine bladder
submucosa matrix grafts for the management of long-segment urethral
stricture in a rabbit model. J Korean Med Sci. 30:301–307. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
15
|
Kim BS, Kim HT, Kwon SY, Chun SY, Choi KH,
Park M, Kim DH, Song PH and Kwon TG: Nontransected ventral
onlay-augmented urethroplasty using autologous saphenous vein graft
in a rabbit model of urethral stricture. Urology. 83:225–231. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
16
|
Shokeir A, Osman Y, El-Sherbiny M, Gabr M,
Mohsen T and El-Baz M: Comparison of partial urethral replacement
with acellular matrix versus spontaneous urethral regeneration in a
canine model. Eur Urol. 44:603–609. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
17
|
Hu YF, Yang SX, Wang LL and Jin HM:
Curative effect and histocompatibility evaluation of reconstruction
of traumatic defect of rabbit urethra using extracellular matrix.
Chin J Traumatol. 11:274–278. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
18
|
El-Assmy A, El-Hamid MA and Hafez AT:
Urethral replacement: A comparison between small intestinal
submucosa grafts and spontaneous regeneration. BJU Int.
94:1132–1135. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
19
|
Sartoneva R, Nordback PH, Haimi S, Grijpma
DW, Lehto K, Niall R, Seppänen-Kaijansinkko R, Miettinen S and
Lahdes-Vasama T: Comparison of poly (L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone)
and poly (trimethylene carbonate) membranes for urethral
regeneration: An in vitro and in vivo study. Tissue Eng Part A.
24:117–127. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
20
|
Osman NI, Hillary C, Bullock AJ, MacNeil S
and Chapple CR: Tissue engineered buccal mucosa for urethroplasty:
Progress and future directions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 82–83:69–76.
2015. View Article : Google Scholar
|
21
|
Dal Pra I, Freddi G, Minic J, Chiarini A
and Armato U: De novo engineering of reticular connective tissue in
vivo by silk fibroin nonwoven materials. Biomaterials.
26:1987–1999. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
22
|
Fuchs S, Jiang X, Schmidt H, Dohle E,
Ghanaati S, Orth C, Hofmann A, Motta A, Migliaresi C and
Kirkpatrick CJ: Dynamic processes involved in the
pre-vascularization of silk fibroin constructs for bone
regeneration using outgrowth endothelial cells. Biomaterials.
30:1329–1338. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
23
|
Panilaitis B, Altman GH, Chen J, Jin HJ,
Karageorgiou V and Kaplan DL: Macrophage responses to silk.
Biomaterials. 24:3079–3085. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|