Bladder reconstruction: The past, present and future (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Omar M.S. El‑Taji
    • Altaf Q. Khattak
    • Syed A. Hussain
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 28, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3161
  • Pages: 3-10
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Ileal conduit urinary diversion is the gold standard treatment for urinary tract reconstruction following cystectomy. This procedure uses gastrointestinal segments for bladder augmentation, a technique that is often associated with significant complications. The substantial progression in the fields of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine over the previous two decades has resulted in the development of techniques that may lead to the construction of functional de novo urinary bladder substitutes. The present review identifies and discusses the complications associated with current treatment options post‑cystectomy. The current techniques, achievements and perspectives of the use of biomaterials and stem cells in the field of urinary bladder reconstruction are also reviewed.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-2015
Volume 10 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
El‑Taji OM, Khattak AQ and Hussain SA: Bladder reconstruction: The past, present and future (Review). Oncol Lett 10: 3-10, 2015.
APA
El‑Taji, O.M., Khattak, A.Q., & Hussain, S.A. (2015). Bladder reconstruction: The past, present and future (Review). Oncology Letters, 10, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3161
MLA
El‑Taji, O. M., Khattak, A. Q., Hussain, S. A."Bladder reconstruction: The past, present and future (Review)". Oncology Letters 10.1 (2015): 3-10.
Chicago
El‑Taji, O. M., Khattak, A. Q., Hussain, S. A."Bladder reconstruction: The past, present and future (Review)". Oncology Letters 10, no. 1 (2015): 3-10. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3161