Coexistence of adenomyosis and endometrioid endometrial cancer: Role in surgical guidance and prognosis estimation

  • Authors:
    • Salvatore Gizzo
    • Tito Silvio Patrelli
    • Andrea Dall'Asta
    • Stefania Di Gangi
    • Giovanna Giordano
    • Costanza Migliavacca
    • Michela Monica
    • Carla Merisio
    • Giovanni Battista Nardelli
    • Michela Quaranta
    • Marco Noventa
    • Roberto Berretta
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 15, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.4032
  • Pages: 1213-1219
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the current study was to diagnose the concomitant presence of adenomyosis (AM) in endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) in order to evaluate its value as an oncological prognostic marker. A retrospective analysis of 289 patients diagnosed with EEC who underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo‑oophorectomy and pelvic-lymphadenectomy was conducted. The total cohort included 37 patients in Group A (those with concomitant AM and EEC) and 252 patients in Group B (those affected only by EEC). The following factors were evaluated: Presence or absence of AM, tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, tumor size, lymphovascular space involvement, lymph node status, peritoneal cytology, concomitant detection of endometrial atypical‑hyperplasia or polypoid endometrial features and tumor stage according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification. Uterine examination of different sections of uterine cervix, corpus, myomas and cervical or endometrial polyps was performed. The diagnosis of AM was confirmed when the distance between the lower border of the endometrium and the foci of the endometrial glands and stroma was >2.5 mm. Parametric and nonparametric statistical tests were performed when possible; continuous variables were analyzed using a Student's t‑test, and categorical variables were analyzed by the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. The association between FIGO stage and group was determined to be significant: 83.8% of Group A patients were categorized as FIGO stage I, vs. 68.7% of Group B patients. In addition, Group A was associated with lower grades in FIGO stage, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space involvement, lymph node involvement and tumor size. The findings suggest that the intraoperative evaluation of the presence of AM in patients with EEC may aid surgeons in estimating oncological risk and in selecting the most appropriate surgical treatment.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2016
Volume 11 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Gizzo S, Patrelli TS, Dall'Asta A, Di Gangi S, Giordano G, Migliavacca C, Monica M, Merisio C, Nardelli GB, Quaranta M, Quaranta M, et al: Coexistence of adenomyosis and endometrioid endometrial cancer: Role in surgical guidance and prognosis estimation. Oncol Lett 11: 1213-1219, 2016.
APA
Gizzo, S., Patrelli, T.S., Dall'Asta, A., Di Gangi, S., Giordano, G., Migliavacca, C. ... Berretta, R. (2016). Coexistence of adenomyosis and endometrioid endometrial cancer: Role in surgical guidance and prognosis estimation. Oncology Letters, 11, 1213-1219. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.4032
MLA
Gizzo, S., Patrelli, T. S., Dall'Asta, A., Di Gangi, S., Giordano, G., Migliavacca, C., Monica, M., Merisio, C., Nardelli, G. B., Quaranta, M., Noventa, M., Berretta, R."Coexistence of adenomyosis and endometrioid endometrial cancer: Role in surgical guidance and prognosis estimation". Oncology Letters 11.2 (2016): 1213-1219.
Chicago
Gizzo, S., Patrelli, T. S., Dall'Asta, A., Di Gangi, S., Giordano, G., Migliavacca, C., Monica, M., Merisio, C., Nardelli, G. B., Quaranta, M., Noventa, M., Berretta, R."Coexistence of adenomyosis and endometrioid endometrial cancer: Role in surgical guidance and prognosis estimation". Oncology Letters 11, no. 2 (2016): 1213-1219. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.4032