c‑MET inhibition enhances the response of the colorectal cancer cells to irradiation in vitro and in vivo

  • Authors:
    • Yitao Jia
    • Guangyao Dai
    • Jinxi Wang
    • Xing Gao
    • Zhaolong Zhao
    • Zhihui Duan
    • Bin Gu
    • Weiguang Yang
    • Jianhua Wu
    • Yingchao Ju
    • Mingxia Wang
    • Zhongxin Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 3, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4303
  • Pages: 2879-2885
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c‑Met) inhibition on the viability of colon cancer cells and xenografts exposed to irradiation using short hairpin (sh)RNA or the c‑MET inhibitor PHA665752. The underlying mechanisms were also investigated. Human colorectal adenocarcinoma HT‑29 cells were infected with a lentivirus expressing shRNAs against c‑Met and were irradiated at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 Gy. The viability of the cells was assessed by alamarBlue® assays. Mice bearing human colon carcinoma SW620 xenografts were randomly selected to receive 2.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 25 mg/kg PHA665752 intraperitoneally once every 2 days for 3 weeks, irradiation at 10 Gy, or 25 mg/kg PHA665752 intraperitoneally once every 2 days for 3 weeks followed 24 h later by irradiation at 10 Gy. The mean tumor volume (MTV) was measured. The apoptotic rate of cells was detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase‑mediated dUTP nick‑end labeling (TUNEL) assays, and double stranded break marker antibody γ‑H2AX and hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)‑1α expression was examined by immunohistochemistry. alamarBlue assays revealed that c‑Met downregulation by shRNA markedly accentuated the irradiation‑induced reduction in the viability of HT‑29 cells compared with HT‑29 cells irradiated at the same doses (P<0.05). A combination of irradiation and PHA665752 caused an additional reduction in the MTV (382.8±42.4 mm3; P<0.01 vs. irradiation and PHA665752, 998.0±180.6 and 844.8±190.0 mm3, respectively). TUNEL assays revealed that irradiation and PHA665752 alone caused significant apoptosis of the SW620 cells in the tumor xenografts (P<0.01 vs. DMSO). The apoptotic index in the tumor xenografts of mice treated with a combination of irradiation and PHA665752 was significantly increased compared with mice treated with either agent alone (P<0.01). The combination of irradiation and PHA665752 was also associated with a marked increase in γ‑H2AX levels and a significant decrease in HIF‑1α expression in the xenografts (P<0.01). In conclusion, c‑Met inhibition sensitizes colorectal cancer cells to irradiation by enhancing the formation of DNA double strand breaks and possibly alleviating tumor hypoxia.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2016
Volume 11 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Jia Y, Dai G, Wang J, Gao X, Zhao Z, Duan Z, Gu B, Yang W, Wu J, Ju Y, Ju Y, et al: c‑MET inhibition enhances the response of the colorectal cancer cells to irradiation in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Lett 11: 2879-2885, 2016.
APA
Jia, Y., Dai, G., Wang, J., Gao, X., Zhao, Z., Duan, Z. ... Li, Z. (2016). c‑MET inhibition enhances the response of the colorectal cancer cells to irradiation in vitro and in vivo. Oncology Letters, 11, 2879-2885. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4303
MLA
Jia, Y., Dai, G., Wang, J., Gao, X., Zhao, Z., Duan, Z., Gu, B., Yang, W., Wu, J., Ju, Y., Wang, M., Li, Z."c‑MET inhibition enhances the response of the colorectal cancer cells to irradiation in vitro and in vivo". Oncology Letters 11.4 (2016): 2879-2885.
Chicago
Jia, Y., Dai, G., Wang, J., Gao, X., Zhao, Z., Duan, Z., Gu, B., Yang, W., Wu, J., Ju, Y., Wang, M., Li, Z."c‑MET inhibition enhances the response of the colorectal cancer cells to irradiation in vitro and in vivo". Oncology Letters 11, no. 4 (2016): 2879-2885. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4303