IMP3 and p16 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A comparative immunohistochemical analysis

  • Authors:
    • Marc‑Oliver Riener
    • Josef Hoegel
    • Heinrich Iro
    • Arndt Hartmann
    • Abbas Agaimy
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 8, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6352
  • Pages: 1665-1670
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Expression of p16 has been established as a good surrogate marker for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients, and it has been associated with an improved prognosis, irrespective of the actual HPV status. Conversely, the human insulin‑like growth factor II mRNA binding protein 3 (IMP3) has been related to aggressiveness in several types of tumors. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare p16 and IMP3 as markers of favorable and unfavorable behavior, respectively, in head and neck SCC (HNSCC), with particular reference to the HPV status. Both markers were analyzed by immunohistochemical analysis of 156 HNSCC samples originating from the oropharynx (n=81), oral cavity (n=44), larynx (n=15), hypopharynx (n=10) and nasopharynx (n=6). The HPV status was examined in a randomly selected representative subcohort (n=38) using polymerase chain reaction. Of the 156 HNSCC samples, 81 (51.9%) and 54 (34.6%) were positive for IMP3 and p16, respectively. IMP3 expression (P=0.022), p16 expression (P<0.001) and the combination of these markers (P<0.001) were significantly associated with tumor site. In particular, 69/81 (85%) OPSCC samples were positive for either one or both markers compared with 36/75 (48%) SCC samples from other sites. p16 expression was significantly associated with HPV infection (P=0.017) and a trend towards a negative association between IMP3 expression and HPV infection was observed (P=0.053). The results of the present study suggested that IMP3 and p16 are more frequently expressed in OPSCC compared with other HNSCCs. The prognostic impact of IMP3 on OPSCC remains to be investigated in a larger series with an extended follow‑up period.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2017
Volume 14 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Riener MO, Hoegel J, Iro H, Hartmann A and Agaimy A: IMP3 and p16 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A comparative immunohistochemical analysis . Oncol Lett 14: 1665-1670, 2017.
APA
Riener, M., Hoegel, J., Iro, H., Hartmann, A., & Agaimy, A. (2017). IMP3 and p16 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A comparative immunohistochemical analysis . Oncology Letters, 14, 1665-1670. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6352
MLA
Riener, M., Hoegel, J., Iro, H., Hartmann, A., Agaimy, A."IMP3 and p16 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A comparative immunohistochemical analysis ". Oncology Letters 14.2 (2017): 1665-1670.
Chicago
Riener, M., Hoegel, J., Iro, H., Hartmann, A., Agaimy, A."IMP3 and p16 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A comparative immunohistochemical analysis ". Oncology Letters 14, no. 2 (2017): 1665-1670. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6352