Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for a lower rectal tumor Corrigendum in /10.3892/ol.2017.7397

Matsuhashi,Nobuhisa; Takahashi,Takao; Tanahashi,Toshiyuki; Matsui,Satoshi; Imai,Hisashi; Tanaka,Yoshihiro; Yamaguchi,Kazuya; Osada,Shinji; Yoshida,Kazuhiro

doi:10.3892/ol.2017.6664

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for a lower rectal tumor

Corrigendum in: /10.3892/ol.2017.7397

Authors:
- Nobuhisa Matsuhashi
- Takao Takahashi
- Toshiyuki Tanahashi
- Satoshi Matsui
- Hisashi Imai
- Yoshihiro Tanaka
- Kazuya Yamaguchi
- Shinji Osada
- Kazuhiro Yoshida
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu 501‑1194, Japan
Published online on: July 25, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6664
Pages: 4142-4150
Copyright: © Matsuhashi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the short‑term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) for a lower rectal tumor in comparison with a case‑control series of patients undergoing open ISR. Quality of life factors and anal function were also evaluated. Between July 2008 and April 2013, 103 patients with lower rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic surgery at the Surgical Oncology Department of Gifu University School of Medicine. A total of 25 patients with lower rectal cancer underwent ISR, and 19/25 patients who underwent laparoscopic ISR were compared with the control group of 6 patients who underwent open ISR. The technical feasibility and safety of ISR, and the short‑ and long‑term outcomes following laparoscopic ISR were evaluated. Additional data associated with fecal incontinence conditions of the postoperative patients were evaluated using the Modified Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale. There was no recorded perioperative mortality, three complications were observed to occur in three patients and the morbidity rate was 15.8%. The postoperative complications detected included bleeding in one patient and ileus in two patients of the laparoscopic ISR group. The rate of severe complications of grade ≥3a was 15.8% and that of grade ≥3b was 5.3%. In the matched case‑control study, blood loss was significantly lower in the laparoscopic ISR group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14.1 days in the laparoscopic ISR group, which was significantly shorter compared with in the open ISR group (18.7 days). Cancer recurrence was detected in one (5%) patient in a single inguinal lymph node. No significant differences between the ISR and ultra‑low anterior resection (ULAR) groups were observed in the maximum resting and maximum squeeze pressures; the outcomes for anal function and fecal incontinence were the same for ISR and ULAR. Thus, laparoscopic ISR for lower rectal cancer may provide a benefit in the early postoperative period without increasing morbidity or mortality.

View Figures

View References

1	Jacobs M, Verdeja JC and Goldstein HS: Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1:144–150. 1991.PubMed/NCBI
2	Lord SA, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Lago CP and Lube MW: Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma. A three-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 39:148–154. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM and Visa J: Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomized trial. Lancet. 359:2224–2229. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group, . Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M and Flanagan R Jr: A comparison laparoscopic assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 350:2050–2059. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P and Di Carlo V: Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: A randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg. 236:759–767. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Yamamoto S, Yoshimura K, Konishi F and Watanabe M: Phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for stage 0/I rectal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 38:497–500. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Miyajima N, Fukunaga M, Hasegawa H, Tanaka J, Okuda J and Watanabe M: Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 23:113–118. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM and Brown JM: MRC CLASICC trial group: Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 365:1718–1726. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM and Guillou PJ: Five-year follow-up of the medical research council CLASICC trial of randomized trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 97:1638–1645. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, Rosen HR, Renner K, Hölbling N, Feil W and Urban M: Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 48:1858–1867. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Watanabe M, Teramoto T, Hasegawa H and Kitajima M: Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection combined with per anus intersphincteric rectal dissection for lower rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 43:(10 Suppl). S94–S97. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Saito N, Sugito M, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Yoneyama Y, Nishizawa Y and Minagawa N: Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. World J Surg. 33:1750–1756. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Yamada K, Ogata S, Saiki Y, Fukunaga M, Tsuji Y and Takano M: Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 52:1065–1071. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Yamada K, Ogata S, Saiki Y, Fukunaga M, Tsuji Y and Takano M: Functional results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 94:1272–1277. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15	Oliveira L, Pfeifer J and Wexner SD: Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg. 83:502–505. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Kienle P, Abend F, Dueck M, Abel U, Treiber M and Riedl S: Influence of intraoperative and postoperative radiotherapy on functional outcome in patients undergoing standard and deep anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 49:557–567. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17	Hashimoto H, Shiokawa H, Funahashi K, Saito N, Sawada T, Shirouzu K, Yamada K, Sugihara K, Watanabe T, Sugita A, et al: Development and validation of a modified fecal incontinence quality of life scale for Japanese patients after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. J Gastroenterol. 45:928–935. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma (2nd English). 2009.
19	Fujimoto Y, Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Konishi T, Ueno M, Oya M and Yamaguchi T: Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 14:645–650. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Inada R, Takawa M and Moriya Y: Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach. Dig Surg. 28:404–409. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Lim SW, Huh JW, Kim YJ and Kim HR: Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. World J Surg. 35:2811–2817. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Chamlou R, Parc Y, Simon T, Bennis M, Dehni N, Parc R and Tiret E: Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 246:916–922. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23	Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, Guimbaud R, Rives M and Lazorthes F: Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 94:341–345. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24	Dindo D, Demartines N and Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complication: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 240:205–213. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Jeong O, Park YK, Ryu SY and Kim YJ: Effect of age on surgical outcomes of extended gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma: Prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 17:1589–1596. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
26	Fujii S, Yamamoto S, Ito M, Yamaguchi S, Sakamoto K, Kinugasa Y, Kokuba Y, Okuda J, Yoshimura K and Watanabe M: Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection from a phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for stage 0/I rectal cancer: Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Lap RC. Surg Endosc. 26:3067–3076. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
27	Barisic G, Markovic V, Popovic M, Dimitrijevic I, Gavrilovic P and Krivokapic Z: Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life. Colorectal Dis. 13:638–643. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
28	Rockwood TH: Incontinence severity and QOL scales for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology. 126:(1 Suppl 1). S106–S113. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
29	Hirano A, Koda K, Kosugi C, Yamazaki M and Yasuda H: Damage to anal sphincter/levator ani muscles caused by operative procedure in anal sphincter-preserving operation for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 201:508–513. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
30	Koda K, Yasuda H, Hirano A, Kosugi C, Suzuki M, Yamazaki M, Tezuka T, Higuchi R, Tsuchiya H and Saito N: Evaluation of postoperative damage to anal sphincter/levator ani muscles with three-dimensional vector manometry after sphincter-preserving operation for rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 208:362–367. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
31	Fitz-Henry J: The ASA classification and peri-operative risk. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 93:185–187. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI