![Open Access](/resources/images/iconopenaccess.png)
Overexpression of dihydrofolate reductase is a factor of poor survival in acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 4, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8429
- Pages: 8405-8411
-
Copyright: © Organista‑Nava et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer and the most frequent cancer in Hispanic children (1). In Mexico, it has been observed that childhood ALL has a relatively higher frequency amongst patients with leukemia, accounting for ~85% of childhood leukemia, whereas acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents ~15% (2). Childhood ALL in Mexico has a mortality rate of 63.7 per million children, one of the highest rates reported globally (2).
Previously, methotrexate (MTX) has been used to target the folate metabolic pathway and is an important component for the treatment of cancer (3) including breast cancer (4), head and neck cancer (5), lung cancer (6) and osteosarcoma (7). Anti-folate therapies work against folate-dependent enzymes by inhibiting de novo pyrimidine and purine biosynthesis, resulting in cell death (8). At present, MTX is used in the chemotherapeutic treatment of patients with ALL. MTX functions as a binding inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), an enzyme that catalyzes the reduction of DHF to tetrahydrofolate (an essential process for the biosynthesis of purines and thymidylate precursors), and therefore inhibits de novo DNA synthesis (9,10). The molecular mechanisms which underlie MTX resistance are attributed to decreased accumulation of MTX due to impaired transport and decreased retention of MTX, and an increase in DHFR expression (10–12).
Previous studies have demonstrated that increased levels of DHFR mRNA result in resistance to MTX therapy (13–15). However, there are a limited number of studies on the function of DHFR expression in patients with childhood acute leukemia. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the expression of DHFR is associated with survival of patients with ALL and analyze whether the expression of DHFR may be used as a prognostic marker in acute leukemia.
Materials and methods
Patients
The present study was a hospital-based retrospective study that analyzed 96 children (60 males, 36 females; mean age, 7.78±4.97 years), with ALL validated by bone marrow aspirates and based on the French-American-British morphological criteria cytochemical staining properties and immunophenotyping of blast cells (16,17), who were admitted to the Pediatric Oncology Service of the State Cancer Institute (Arturo Beltran Ortega, Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico), between September 2005 and July 2015. The diagnosis of ALL was further subclassified as T-lineage (CD3+, CD7+plus CD2+ or CD5+ or both) or B-lineage (CD22+, CD19+, CD20+, CD79A+, HLA-DR+ and CD10+) according to the study by Gómez-Gómez et al (18). In addition, 100 healthy individuals were included in the present study as controls (53 males, 47 females; mean age, 10.21±5.53 years), all of whom had no familial history of cancer. All individuals (patients and controls) included in the study were aged between 1 and 17 years. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the State Cancer Institute (Arturo Beltran Ortega, Acapulco, Mexico).
Overall survival (OS) time was determined according to the study by Gómez-Gómez et al (18). Briefly, OS time was determined as the time between the day of registration into the study and the day of mortality (from any cause) or the day of last known contact. Patients with ALL were classified into one of the following two groups: Low-risk, aged between 1 and 10 years with <50,000 leucocytes/mm3 at diagnosis; high risk, aged <1 and >10 years with >50,000 leucocytes/mm3 at diagnosis.
Specimen collection and total RNA extraction
Bone marrow (patients) and blood (controls) samples from the 196 individuals were obtained and processed, according to the study by Gómez-Gómez et al (18). Different samples were used between patients and controls as bone marrow from healthy individuals was deemed ethically unacceptable. Total RNA was isolated from the bone marrow and/or blood samples using the TRIzol® method (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
Quantification of mRNA using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA (1 µg) was converted to cDNA using the Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol. In brief, a 20 ml cDNA reaction mix contained extracted total RNA (1 µg), 500 ng oligo (dT) (12–18) and dNTP mix (0.5 mM each). The mixture was heated at 65°C for 5 min and incubated on ice for 3 min. 1× first-strand RT buffer, 5 mM DTT and 5 U of RNase Inhibitor (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) were added into each tube. The tubes were incubated at 42°C for 2 min, 200 U of SuperScript III (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was added and tubes were incubated at 42°C for 50 min, and finally 70°C for 15 min.
All PCR assays were carried out in triplicate in a 25 µl reaction volume, including the following: 5 µl cDNA template (500 ng), 12.5 µl SYBR-Green PCR Master Mix (SYBR Green PCR Reagents kit; Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 0.5 µM of each oligonucleotide and ultrapure water. The following oligonucleotides were used: DHFR forward, 5′-TTCCTGAGAAGAATCGACCTTTAAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAGGCATCATCTAGACTTCTGGAAA-3′; hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) forward, 5′-AAGCTTGCTGGTGAAAAGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAACATGATTCAAATCCCTGA-3′. The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. All RT-qPCR reactions were performed in 96-well plates using the Applied Biosystems 7500 system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The expression levels of mRNA were determined according to the 2−ΔΔCq method (19), using HPRT mRNA expression as a reference. The DHFR level in the ALL samples was defined as the relative value, compared with that of samples from the healthy individuals.
Detection of translocations
The detection of BCR-ABL, ETV6-RUNX1, AML1-ETO and CBFΒ-MYH11 translocations was realized by PCR and according to the protocol previously reported by Organista-Nava et al (20).
Statistical analysis
SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) software were used to analyze the data obtained. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or median (25–75% quartiles). To compare medians and frequencies between groups, χ2 tests were used. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in the DHFR mRNA levels between ALL patients and healthy individuals. OS time was determined using the Kaplan-Meier estimator method. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to define the risk of relapse, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for ALL relapse. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Characteristics of the patients and controls
The healthy individuals (controls) exhibited a mean age of 10.21±5.53 years and a normal leukocyte count (between 4 and 10×103 leukocytes/mm3; median 8,000 leukocytes/mm3). The patients at diagnosis exhibited a mean age of 7.78±4.97 years, with a mean leukocyte count at diagnosis of 18,000 leukocytes/mm3. Characteristics of the controls and patients are outlined in Table I. Of the patients included in the present study, 44.79% were classified as low-risk (aged between 1 and 10 years with <50,000 leucocytes/mm3 at diagnosis) and the remaining 55.21% were classified as high-risk (aged <1 and >10 years with >50,000 leucocytes/mm3 at diagnosis). The results of the present study demonstrated that B-lineage ALL was observed in 90.63% patients. Breakpoint cluster region (BCR)/Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (ABL) fusion gene was identified in 7.29% (7/96) patients with ALL. The ETS variant 6 (ETV6)-runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) rearrangement was revealed in only 0.01% (1/96) patients with ALL, and 60.42% (58/96) did not exhibit either the BCR-ABL or ETV6-RUNX1 gene rearrangement. 30 of the 96 patients were not considered for rearrangement analysis as analysis was not possible due to insufficient sample (Table I).
![]() | Table I.Characteristic and clinical data for patients with ALL compared with those of healthy individuals. |
DHFR is significantly expressed patients with ALL
As presented in Table I and Fig. 1, the expression of DHFR was significantly increased in ALL, compared with that in the controls (Fig. 1A; P<0.001). The median expression of DHFR in the control group was 1.07-fold (25–75 percentile, 0.84–1.24), whereas the median DHFR expression in the ALL group was 9.38 (3.39–27.48). No statistically significant difference was identified between the male and female patients (P=0.401; Fig. 1B). it was observed that DHFR was significantly increased in patients with B-lineage ALL, compared in with patients with T-lineage ALL (P=0.005); the mean was 18.63-fold (B-lineage) vs. 4.36-fold (T-lineage) (fold vs. control mean DHFR expression; Fig. 1C). In addition, no statistically significant difference between the low- and high-risk groups was observed (P=0.543; Fig. 1D).
Patients with ALL who exhibit increased DHFR expression have a higher risk of relapse during treatment
The associations between DHFR expression and the risk of relapse are presented in Table II. The ALL patients were divided into either the high or low DHFR expression groups, using as the median expression level of DHFR (9.38) as the threshold value. A total of 43/96 patients with ALL were classified in the low expression group and the remaining 53/96 were considered to exhibit high levels of DHFR expression. Patients in the high expression group exhibited a 2.81-fold [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09–7.24; P=0.033] increased risk of relapse during treatment, compared with the low expression group (Table II).
![]() | Table II.Association between DHFR expression level, clinical features and the risk of relapse for patients with ALL. |
Expression of DHFR and survival in ALL patients
The Kaplan-Meier estimator survival curves were performed to calculate the differences between the survival of ALL patients with high and low expression of DHFR. As presented in Fig. 2A, ALL patients in the high DHFR expression group exhibited poorer survival, compared with the low expression group. Similarly, in Fig. 2B and C, male and female patients with high levels of DHFR expression exhibited poorer survival, compared with patients with low DHFR expression (log-rank test, P=0.035 in females; P<0.0001 in males).
Patients with B-lineage ALL and high DHFR expression exhibited decreased survival, compared with patients with B-lineage ALL and low DHFR expression (Fig. 3A). Although a decrease in OS was observed in patients with T-lineage ALL and high DHFR expression, compared with patients with T-lineage ALL and low DHFR expression, no significant association was identified (log-rank test, P=0.115; Fig. 3B). In addition, patients with ALL classified as low- or high-risk, and with high DHFR expression, exhibited decreased survival, compared with patients with low DHFR expression (log-rank test; P<0.05; Fig. 3C and D).
Discussion
MTX is an important component in the chemotherapeutic treatment of several neoplasm types, including childhood ALL (15). The primary causes of MTX-resistance include alterations to its receptor (reduced folate carrier) and increased DHFR expression (9,21). MTX principally exhibits effects by inhibiting DHFR, which has an important function in folate metabolism (11). DHFR is involved in DNA biosynthesis and cell replication (9,22). If there is an increase in the expression of DHFR, DNA becomes more unstable, which may lead to abnormal cell proliferation (23). Therefore, it is important to identify novel biomarkers for patients with a high-risk of treatment failure (relapse), so the appropriate chemotherapeutic scheme may be selected and the survival time of these patients improved.
The overexpression of DHFR in certain cancer cell lines was identified to be a mechanism underlying resistance to MTX chemotherapy (9,21). However, limited information is available regarding the function of DHFR expression in patients with ALL. In the present study, the expression of DHFR was analyzed in samples from patients with ALL, which determined an association between clinical characteristics and patient survival. In addition, the results of the present study revealed that DHFR mRNA was expressed at a significantly increased level in patients with ALL, compared with in the controls (P<0.001), which was similar to the results of prior studies where high levels of DHFR were observed in acute leukemia (13,21).
To determine the clinical significance of DHFR expression in acute leukemia, a logistic regression analysis was performed to determine associations between the clinical characteristics of patients with ALL and the risk of relapse. The results of the present study demonstrated a significant association between the level of DHFR expression and the risk of relapse of leukemia [odds ratio (OR), 2.50; 95% CI, 1.01–6.16; P=0.047). Concordant with the results of Matheson et al (21), the results of the present study revealed that increased expression of DHFR in patients with ALL increased the risk of relapse. This suggests that DHFR expression levels may be important factor in ALL.
Similar to the results of previous studies (18,20,24), an association between age, sex, leukocyte count at diagnosis and prognosis was identified in the present study. The results of the present study revealed that patients in the high-risk group (aged <1 and >10 years with >50,000 leucocytes/mm3 at diagnosis) exhibited a poor prognosis, compared with patients in the low-risk group (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.16–7.26; P=0.02); these values have been established by the National Cancer Institute as the values to identify children with poor prognosis (25). Furthermore, DHFR expression was a poor independent prognostic factor (Table II).
The association between DHFR expression levels and the survival of patients with ALL was investigated in the present study. The results demonstrated that patients with high levels of DHFR expression exhibited decreased survival compared with patients with low DHFR expression levels (log-rank, P<0.05). Similar to the reports of Matherly et al (13), Matheson et al (21) demonstrated an association between the high expression of the DHFR and reduced survival in patients with ALL; this indicates that high levels of DHFR expression are an important prognostic factor in childhood ALL.
The results of the present study have supported the use of genetic factors to complement known biological or disease-based prognostic indicators in ALL. The demonstration of an increase in the expression of the DHFR in ALL is indicative of poor prognosis for patients with ALL.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr Victor Hugo Garzón Barrientos (State Cancer Institute, Arturo Beltran Ortega, Acapulco, Mexico) for their contribution of biological material and facilitating access to clinical data.
References
Crazzolara R and Bendall L: Emerging treatments in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 9:19–31. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pérez-Saldivar ML, Fajardo-Gutiérrez A, Bernáldez-Ríos R, Martínez-Avalos A, Medina-Sanson A, Espinosa-Hernández L, Jde Flores-Chapa D, Amador-Sánchez R, Peñaloza-González JG, Alvarez-Rodríguez FJ, et al: Childhood acute leukemias are frequent in Mexico City: Descriptive epidemiology. BMC Cancer. 11:3552011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gonen N and Assaraf YG: Antifolates in cancer therapy: Structure, activity and mechanisms of drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 15:183–210. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Moliterni A, Zambetti M and Brambilla C: Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast Cancer: The results of 20 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med. 332:901–906. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guardiola E, Peyrade F, Chaigneau L, Cupissol D, Tchiknavorian X, Bompas E, Madroszyk A, Ronchin P, Schneider M, Bleuze JP, et al: Results of a randomised phase II study comparing docetaxel with methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer. 40:2071–2076. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, Biesma B, Vansteenkiste J, Manegold C, Serwatowski P, Gatzemeier U, Digumarti R, Zukin M, et al: Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 26:3543–3551. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fuchs N, Bielack SS, Epler D, Bieling P, Delling G, Körholz D, Graf N, Heise U, Jürgens H, Kotz R, et al: Long-term results of the co-operative German-Austrian-Swiss osteosarcoma study group's protocol COSS-86 of intensive multidrug chemotherapy and surgery for osteosarcoma of the limbs. Ann Oncol. 9:893–899. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Visentin M, Zhao R and Goldman ID: The Antifolates. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 26(629–648): ix2012. | |
Gorlick R, Goker E, Trippett T, Waltham M, Banerjee D and Bertino JR: Intrinsic and acquired resistance to methotrexate in acute leukemia. N Engl J Med. 335:1041–1048. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
de Jonge R, Tissing WJ, Hooijberg JH, et al: Polymorphisms in folate-related genes and risk of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 113:2284–2289. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Assaraf YG: Molecular basis of antifolate resistance. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 26:153–181. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bertino JR, Göker E, Gorlick R, Li WW and Banerjee D: Resistance mechanisms to methotrexate in tumors. Stem Cells. 14:5–9. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Matherly LH, Taub JW, Wong SC, Simpson PM, Ekizian R, Buck S, Williamson M, Amylon M, Pullen J, Camitta B and Ravindranath Y: Increased frequency of expression of elevated dihydrofolate reductase in T-cell versus B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Blood. 90:578–589. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chauhan PS, Bhushan B, Singh LC, Mishra AK, Saluja S, Mittal V, Gupta DK and Kapur S: Expression of genes related to multiple drug resistance and apoptosis in acute leukemia: Response to induction chemotherapy. Exp Mol Pathol. 92:44–49. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dulucq S, St-Onge G, Gagné V, Ansari M, Sinnett D, Labuda D, Moghrabi A and Krajinovic M: DNA variants in the dihydrofolate reductase gene and outcome in childhood ALL. Blood. 111:3692–3700. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR and Sultan C: Proposals for the Classification of the Acute Leukaemias French-American-British (FAB) Co-operative Group. Br J Haematol. 33:451–458. 1976. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, Harris NL, Le Beau MM, Hellström-Lindberg E, Tefferi A and Bloomfield CD: The 2008 revision of the World health organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: Rationale and important changes. Blood. 114:937–951. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gómez-Gómez Y, Organista-Nava J, Saavedra-Herrera MV, Rivera-Ramírez AB, Terán-Porcayo MA, Del Carmen Alarcón-Romero L, Illades-Aguiar B and Leyva-Vázquez MA: Survival and risk of relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a Mexican population is affected by dihydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms. Exp Ther Med. 3:665–672. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nolan T, Hands RE and Bustin SA: Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nat Protoc. 1:1559–1582. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Organista-Nava J, Gómez-Gómez Y, Illades-Aguiar B, Del Carmen Alarcón-Romero L, Saavedra-Herrera MV, Rivera-Ramírez AB, Garzón-Barrientos VH and Leyva-Vázquez MA: High miR-24 expression is associated with risk of relapse and poor survival in acute leukemia. Oncol Rep. 33:1639–1649. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Matheson EC, Hogarth LA, Case MC, Irving JA and Hall AG: DHFR and MSH3 co-amplification in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, in vitro and in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 28:1341–1346. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Abali EE, Skacel NE, Celikkaya H and Hsieh YC: Regulation of human dihydrofolate reductase activity and expression. Vitam Horm. 79:267–292. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Galbiatti AL, Castro R, Caldas HC, Padovani JA Jr, Pavarino ÉC and Goloni-Bertollo EM: Alterations in the expression pattern of MTHFR, DHFR, TYMS, and SLC19A1 genes after treatment of laryngeal cancer cells with high and low doses of methotrexate. Tumor Biol. 34:3765–3771. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ng SM, Lin HP, Ariffin WA, Zainab AK, Lam SK and Chan LL: Age, sex, haemoglobin level, and white cell count at diagnosis are important prognostic factors in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with BFM-type protocol. J Trop Pediatr. 46:338–343. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith M, Arthur D, Camitta B, Carroll AJ, Crist W, Gaynon P, Gelber R, Heerema N, Korn EL, Link M, et al: Uniform approach to risk classification and treatment assignment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 14:18–24. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |