Stereotactic image‑based histological analysis reveals a correlation between 11C‑methionine uptake and MGMT promoter methylation in non‑enhancing gliomas

  • Authors:
    • Yoshiko Okita
    • Tomoko Shofuda
    • Daisuke Kanematsu
    • Ema Yoshioka
    • Yoshinori Kodama
    • Masayuki Mano
    • Manabu Kinoshita
    • Masahiro Nonaka
    • Shin Nakajima
    • Toshiyuki Fujinaka
    • Yonehiro Kanemura
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 31, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8866
  • Pages: 1924-1930
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Gliomas are genetically and histopathologically heterogeneous. Intratumoral heterogeneity in the MGMT promoter methylation status is an important clinical biomarker of glioblastoma. A higher uptake of 11C‑methionine in positron‑emission tomography (PET) reportedly reflects increased MGMT promoter methylation; however, non‑stereotactic comparison of MGMT methylation and 11C‑methionine PET images may not be accurate. The present study examined the correlation between 11C‑methionine uptake and MGMT promoter methylation in non‑enhancing gliomas using stereotactic image‑based histological analysis. Data were collected from 9 patients with newly diagnosed non‑enhancing glioma who underwent magnetic resonance imaging and 11C‑methionine PET during pre‑surgical examination. Clinical data were also collected from 3 patients during repeat surgery. The correlation between 11C‑methionine uptake and MGMT methylation or cell density was analyzed using histological specimens obtained by multiple stereotactic sampling and an exact local comparison of 11C‑methionine PET images and histological specimens was made. A total of 31 stereotactic sample sites were identified. In newly diagnosed cases, the tumor to normal uptake (T/N) ratio revealed a significant positive correlation with MGMT methylation (R=0.54, P=0.009) and a marginal correlation with cell density (R=0.42, P=0.05). In recurrent cases, the T/N ratio demonstrated no correlation with MGMT methylation (R=0.01, P=0.97) or cell density (R=0.15, P=0.70). An increased uptake of 11C‑methionine in PET may reflect increased MGMT promoter methylation according to stereotactic image‑based histological analysis. 11C‑methionine PET could therefore be a useful tool for detecting regional MGMT promoter methylation in non‑enhancing primary glioma.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2018
Volume 16 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Okita Y, Shofuda T, Kanematsu D, Yoshioka E, Kodama Y, Mano M, Kinoshita M, Nonaka M, Nakajima S, Fujinaka T, Fujinaka T, et al: Stereotactic image‑based histological analysis reveals a correlation between 11C‑methionine uptake and MGMT promoter methylation in non‑enhancing gliomas. Oncol Lett 16: 1924-1930, 2018.
APA
Okita, Y., Shofuda, T., Kanematsu, D., Yoshioka, E., Kodama, Y., Mano, M. ... Kanemura, Y. (2018). Stereotactic image‑based histological analysis reveals a correlation between 11C‑methionine uptake and MGMT promoter methylation in non‑enhancing gliomas. Oncology Letters, 16, 1924-1930. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8866
MLA
Okita, Y., Shofuda, T., Kanematsu, D., Yoshioka, E., Kodama, Y., Mano, M., Kinoshita, M., Nonaka, M., Nakajima, S., Fujinaka, T., Kanemura, Y."Stereotactic image‑based histological analysis reveals a correlation between 11C‑methionine uptake and MGMT promoter methylation in non‑enhancing gliomas". Oncology Letters 16.2 (2018): 1924-1930.
Chicago
Okita, Y., Shofuda, T., Kanematsu, D., Yoshioka, E., Kodama, Y., Mano, M., Kinoshita, M., Nonaka, M., Nakajima, S., Fujinaka, T., Kanemura, Y."Stereotactic image‑based histological analysis reveals a correlation between 11C‑methionine uptake and MGMT promoter methylation in non‑enhancing gliomas". Oncology Letters 16, no. 2 (2018): 1924-1930. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8866