Open Access

Prognostic values of EDNRB in triple‑negative breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Shaoqing Liu
    • Jingyang Zhang
    • Jiujun Zhu
    • Dechuang Jiao
    • Zhenzhen Liu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 24, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12012
  • Article Number: 149
  • Copyright: © Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Triple‑negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a high degree of malignancy. The endothelin B receptor (EDNRB) serves an important role in the occurrence and development of cancer. The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of EDNRB in TNBC. A total of 99 cases of TNBC were collected from the Henan Cancer Hospital database and 159 cases of TNBC were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. A χ2 test was used to analyze the association between EDNRB and clinicopathological data. Kaplan‑Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to analyze the association between EDNRB and prognosis, and to establish two models. The discrimination degree of the models was evaluated using time‑dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and concordance index (C‑index), whereas the accuracy and net benefit of the models were evaluated using integrated discriminant improvement (IDI) and decision curves. EDNRB expression was low in TNBC samples (P<0.01). Age (P=0.01), tumor size (P=0.04) and N stage (P=0.01) were associated with EDNRB expression. EDNRB expression was positively associated with stromal score (P<0.01), but not immune score. High expression levels of EDNRB indicated favorable disease‑free survival time (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15‑0.98; P=0.04). The integrated area under the curve and C‑index of the new model were increased compared with the old model following the addition of EDNRB expression as a parameter. The IDI values for prediction of the 3‑ and 5‑year survival rates were 0.04 (P=0.02) and 0.05 (P=0.01), respectively. The results of decision curve analysis showed that the new model had higher clinical net benefit than the old model in the range of 3‑year survival rate <0.52. In conclusion, EDNRB was associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with TNBC, and may be used as a novel prognostic biomarker.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2020
Volume 20 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Liu S, Zhang J, Zhu J, Jiao D and Liu Z: Prognostic values of EDNRB in triple‑negative breast cancer. Oncol Lett 20: 149, 2020.
APA
Liu, S., Zhang, J., Zhu, J., Jiao, D., & Liu, Z. (2020). Prognostic values of EDNRB in triple‑negative breast cancer. Oncology Letters, 20, 149. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12012
MLA
Liu, S., Zhang, J., Zhu, J., Jiao, D., Liu, Z."Prognostic values of EDNRB in triple‑negative breast cancer". Oncology Letters 20.5 (2020): 149.
Chicago
Liu, S., Zhang, J., Zhu, J., Jiao, D., Liu, Z."Prognostic values of EDNRB in triple‑negative breast cancer". Oncology Letters 20, no. 5 (2020): 149. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12012