Open Access

Membrane mesothelin expression positivity is associated with poor clinical outcome of luminal‑type breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Takafumi Suzuki
    • Yoji Yamagishi
    • Takahiro Einama
    • Tomomi Koiwai
    • Tamio  Yamasaki
    • Makiko Fukumura‑koga
    • Yusuke Ishibashi
    • Yasuhiro  Takihata
    • Takehiro Shiraishi
    • Yoichi Miyata
    • Toshimitsu Iwasaki
    • Eiji Shinto
    • Kimiya  Sato
    • Hideki Ueno
    • Junji Yamamoto
    • Yoji Kishi
    • Hitoshi Tsuda
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 3, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12055
  • Article Number: 193
  • Copyright: © Suzuki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Mesothelin is expressed in various types of malignant tumors. The present study immunohistochemically investigated mesothelin expression and its clinicopathological significance in each subtype of breast cancer, with special reference to its cellular localization, in particular, membrane mesothelin expression. Using tissue specimens from 482 patients with breast cancer, immunohistochemistry was used to study mesothelin expression and help classify its localization as membrane or cytoplasmic expression. Mesothelin expression was detected in 77 (16.0%) cases and was the highest in triple‑negative breast cancer (31/75; 41.3%), followed by human epithelial growth factor receptor type 2 type (6/33, 18.2%) and luminal type (36/374; 9.6%). Among the 482 cases, membrane mesothelin expression was detected in 73 cases and was significantly associated with a negative hormone receptor status, higher Ki‑67 labeling index, nuclear grade 3 and a lower relapse‑free survival rate. Cytoplasmic mesothelin expression was not significantly associated with a lower relapse‑free survival rate (P=0.058). In the 343 cases of luminal type, the membrane mesothelin expression‑positive group had significantly worse prognosis than the membrane mesothelin‑expression‑negative group (P=0.042). There was no significant difference in the relapse‑free survival rate according to the membrane mesothelin expression status in the triple‑negative type and other types. It was suggested that membrane mesothelin expression in luminal type breast cancer is associated with a lower rate of relapse‑free survival.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2020
Volume 20 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Suzuki T, Yamagishi Y, Einama T, Koiwai T, Yamasaki T, Fukumura‑koga M, Ishibashi Y, Takihata Y, Shiraishi T, Miyata Y, Miyata Y, et al: Membrane mesothelin expression positivity is associated with poor clinical outcome of luminal‑type breast cancer. Oncol Lett 20: 193, 2020.
APA
Suzuki, T., Yamagishi, Y., Einama, T., Koiwai, T., Yamasaki, T., Fukumura‑koga, M. ... Tsuda, H. (2020). Membrane mesothelin expression positivity is associated with poor clinical outcome of luminal‑type breast cancer. Oncology Letters, 20, 193. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12055
MLA
Suzuki, T., Yamagishi, Y., Einama, T., Koiwai, T., Yamasaki, T., Fukumura‑koga, M., Ishibashi, Y., Takihata, Y., Shiraishi, T., Miyata, Y., Iwasaki, T., Shinto, E., Sato, K., Ueno, H., Yamamoto, J., Kishi, Y., Tsuda, H."Membrane mesothelin expression positivity is associated with poor clinical outcome of luminal‑type breast cancer". Oncology Letters 20.5 (2020): 193.
Chicago
Suzuki, T., Yamagishi, Y., Einama, T., Koiwai, T., Yamasaki, T., Fukumura‑koga, M., Ishibashi, Y., Takihata, Y., Shiraishi, T., Miyata, Y., Iwasaki, T., Shinto, E., Sato, K., Ueno, H., Yamamoto, J., Kishi, Y., Tsuda, H."Membrane mesothelin expression positivity is associated with poor clinical outcome of luminal‑type breast cancer". Oncology Letters 20, no. 5 (2020): 193. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12055