Open Access

Response of human cancer cells to simultaneous treatment with sorafenib and radiofrequency current

  • Authors:
    • María Luisa Hernández‑Bule
    • María Antonia Martínez
    • María Ángeles Trillo
    • Lidia Martínez
    • Elena Toledano‑Macías
    • Alejandro Úbeda
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 23, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.13068
  • Article Number: 807
  • Copyright: © Hernández‑Bule et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Due to their alleged analgesic, anti‑inflammatory and tissue regenerative effects, capacitive‑resistive electrothermal therapy (CRET), which is based on non‑invasive exposure to radiofrequency (RF) currents, is often applied to chemotherapeutically treated patients with cancer. Our previous studies have demonstrated that subthermal CRET currents can elicit a number of cell responses, including anti‑proliferative effects, in the human liver cancer cell line HepG2. Such effects involve significant changes in the regulation of proteins involved in MAPK signaling pathways, which are also implicated in the cancer cell response to standard anticancer drugs such as sorafenib. This overlap in response pathways may lead to competitive, neutralizing or blocking interactions between the electrical and chemical treatments, thus raising questions on the advisability of CRET treatment for their analgesic, anti‑inflammatory or other purposes in patients undergoing chemotherapy. The present study analyzed the effects of simultaneous treatment with sorafenib and 448‑kHz, subthermal CRET current on the proliferation and viability of HepG2 cell cultures. Cell viability was assessed through Trypan blue or XTT assays, while flow cytometry was applied for cell cycle and apoptosis analysis. The expression of proteins involved in cell proliferation were assessed by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence. The results revealed no evidence to suggest that the electrical treatment counteracted or neutralized the cellular response to sorafenib at the different conditions evaluated. Furthermore, at the standard pharmacological sorafenib concentration, 5 µM, the combined treatment elicited an anti‑proliferative response significantly stronger than that induced by each of the treatments when applied separately in HepG2 cells. These data do not support the hypothesis that CRET exposure may inhibit or diminish the effects of a chemotherapeutic drug used in cancer treatment, and highlights the requirement for further investigation into the cell response to the combined action of electrical and chemical treatments.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2021
Volume 22 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hernández‑Bule ML, Martínez MA, Trillo MÁ, Martínez L, Toledano‑Macías E and Úbeda A: Response of human cancer cells to simultaneous treatment with sorafenib and radiofrequency current. Oncol Lett 22: 807, 2021.
APA
Hernández‑Bule, M.L., Martínez, M.A., Trillo, M.Á., Martínez, L., Toledano‑Macías, E., & Úbeda, A. (2021). Response of human cancer cells to simultaneous treatment with sorafenib and radiofrequency current. Oncology Letters, 22, 807. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.13068
MLA
Hernández‑Bule, M. L., Martínez, M. A., Trillo, M. Á., Martínez, L., Toledano‑Macías, E., Úbeda, A."Response of human cancer cells to simultaneous treatment with sorafenib and radiofrequency current". Oncology Letters 22.5 (2021): 807.
Chicago
Hernández‑Bule, M. L., Martínez, M. A., Trillo, M. Á., Martínez, L., Toledano‑Macías, E., Úbeda, A."Response of human cancer cells to simultaneous treatment with sorafenib and radiofrequency current". Oncology Letters 22, no. 5 (2021): 807. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.13068