Epigenetic editing and tumor‑dependent immunosuppressive signaling in head and neck malignancies (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 4, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2022.13317
- Article Number: 196
-
Copyright: © Gougousis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Head and neck cancers (HNCs) constitute a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors characterized by a high mortality rate (1). Aggressive biologic behavior and strong resistance to therapy lead to >650,000 cases and 330,000 deaths worldwide in 2020 (2).
Genetic mutations and environmental factors are associated with the genesis and progression of these malignancies. Tobacco use, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human papillomavirus (HPV), alcohol consumption and exposure to environmental carcinogenic factors are associated with DNA mutations and lead to dysplastic lesions in the head and neck area (3,4). Over the last decades, specific genes, which are responsible for hereditary types of HNC, have been identified (5). Currently, there are several treatment options available; however, due to the high rate of relapses, the search for systemic and local alternative treatments is becoming more and more important in modern days (6,7). Entities such as familial oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), nasopharyngeal cancer and familial malignant melanoma are strongly related to hereditary DNA mutations (8).
Furthermore, immune dysfunction serves a vital role in the development and progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (9). Previous data have revealed that immunosuppression signaling (via myeloid cells or M2 macrophages) prompts the development and progression of the disease, which is characterized by intra-tumoral heterogeneity, high mortality and poor prognosis for patients with HNSCC (10).
In the past few years, several epigenetics mechanisms have been revealed to influence the carcinogenesis of the head and neck region (11). Gene silencing by epigenetic mechanisms and hypermethylation of CpG islands are active areas of research. Deep knowledge of epigenetic pathways and mechanisms is essential for establishing innovative approaches to diagnosis and treatment of HNC (12). Thus, epigenetic editing refers to all epigenetic mechanisms that regulate genome output and the potential future application of these epigenetic editing mechanisms for the diagnosis and treatment of HNC disease.
Cancer cells employ a variety of mechanisms to avoid the immune system and secure malignant progression. Specifically, distinct ligands on the cancer cell surface interact with immune cells and activate inhibitor pathways to stop the immune response (13). Epigenetic drugs (Vorinostat, Romidepsin) are able to prevent inhibition by enhancing the expression of tumor antigens, a fundamental function that restores normal immunogenicity (14). Thus, epigenetic agents can enhance the host immune system by boosting the immune responses triggered via immunotherapy (15). This innovative and promising finding will allow a combined approach (epigenetic therapy and immunotherapy) for the treatment of several types of HNC. Overall, the present review discusses the epigenetic editing mechanisms and the various tumor-related immunosuppressive signaling routes that trigger drug resistance (chemoresistance) and immunosuppression. Additionally, the present review discusses the immune modifications and examines the role of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), tumor macrophages and myeloid cells in tumor-related immunosuppression.
Current immunotherapy regimens
During the last few years, novel promising therapies for HNC, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have demonstrated encouraging results in several clinical trials (16–21). For instance, nivolumab and pembrolizumab are the main humanized antibodies specifically designed to block programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) from binding to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), allowing T cell activation (Table I). These drugs have also been used for the treatment of patients with metastatic HNSCC (22–24). In general, immune checkpoint signaling is triggered by ligand and receptor interactions (17), such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and its ligands CD80 and CD84, and PD-1 and its ligands PD-L1 and programmed cell death ligand 2 (25). Specifically, ipilimumab [Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for metastatic melanoma] a monoclonal antibody that can re-activate the immune system by targeting CTLA-4, has been demonstrated to be associated with overall survival improvements among patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) (26). Similarly, tremelimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against CTLA-4, which blocks the binding of the antigen-presenting cell ligands B7.1 and B7.2 to CTLA-4 (27). Furthermore, EGFR inhibitors are also used in HNC treatment. Cetuximab (Erbitux), a monoclonal antibody given by intravenous infusion, was approved by the FDA in 2006 as a combination with radiation therapy for the treatment of SCCHN (28). Blocking EGFR activity is vital, since EGFR expression is upregulated in 85% of all HNSCC cases and leads to tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, tumor recurrence and metastasis. Similarly, TNF receptor-targeted monoclonal antibodies, such as urelumab (29), target the extracellular domain of CD137, triggering activation of CD137-expressing immune cells and especially cytotoxic T cells. Furthermore, bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that acts as an angiogenesis inhibitor. It prevents new blood vessel formation by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor A (30). Similarly, ficlatuzumab is a potent hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) IgG1 antibody, which inhibits signaling through the HGF/c-Met signaling pathway and is already in phase II clinical trials (31,32). Finally, necrosis-targeted IL-12 immunocytokine is a novel immunocytokine designed for delivery of IL-12 to the tumor microenvironment, which has been demonstrated to be associated with increased overall antitumor efficacy and substantial reduction in tumor growth compared to standard chemotherapy (33).
Table I.List of drugs for the treatment of head and neck cancer currently undergoing clinical trials. |
Impact of DNA methylation on disease pathogenesis
DNA methylation is an epigenetic mechanism involving the transfer of a methyl group onto the C5 position of the cytosine to form 5-methylcytosine (34,35). Methylation usually occurs in CpG islands (Fig. 1) and characteristically acts to repress gene transcription in HNSCC (36–40). Aberrant methylation in the promoter region of tumor suppressor genes could induce their abnormal expression in order to influence carcinogenesis. Methylation of genes involved in DNA damage repair, detoxification, cell cycle regulation and apoptosis plays a key role in tumor development and progression (Table II). Previous studies have revealed that abnormal O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation can markedly increase the risk of tumorigenesis in HNC (41,42). Furthermore, promoter methylation of the MGMT, MutL homolog 1 and Ras association domain family 1 isoform A tumor suppressor genes contributes to HNSCC development (43). Similarly, somatic mutations and promoter methylation of the ryanodine receptor 2 are responsible for the invasive pathogenesis of HNSCC (44). Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) may also affect methylation levels in HNC. For instance, LNCAROD, an oncogenic lncRNA, is stabilized by m6A methylation and promotes cancer progression by forming a ternary complex with heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 1A (HSPA1A) and Y-box binding protein 1 (YBX1) in HNSCC (45). LNCAROD acts as a scaffold for the interaction between YBX1 and HSPA1A, preventing proteasomal degradation of YBX1 in HNSCC cells. Systematic analysis of differentially methylated expressed genes and site-specific methylation may also be used as potential prognostic markers in HNC. Specifically, abnormally differentially methylated genes, including paired box 9, serine/threonine kinase 33, G protein-coupled receptor 150, INSM transcriptional repressor 1 and epoxide hydrolase 3, have been recognized to be associated with overall survival, and this may aid the identification of diagnostic biomarkers for early-stage HNC (46). In addition, site-specific methylation patterns of galanin and galanin receptor 1/2 may serve as an important site-specific biomarker for the prediction of the clinical outcome in patients with HNSCC (47). Of note, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis may be important in early diagnosis and eventually improve the outcomes of patients with HNSCC. Specifically, ctDNA analysis in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer indicated that three genes, including calmodulin like 5, Dna heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C5γ and lymphocyte antigen 6 family member D, had a high predictive ability as emerging biomarkers and could determine patient prognosis and real-time surveillance for disease recurrences (48).
Regulation via histone modifications
Chromatin architecture is mainly regulated by histone proteins. DNA is wound around histones to form nucleosomes. Histone modifications are mostly post translational modifications to histone proteins and include methylation, phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation and sumoylation (49). In HNC, histone modifications can affect the molecular pathogenesis of the disease. Specifically, histones may be post-translationally modified at the amino-terminal ends by acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, sumoylation, ubiquitination, and ADP-ribosylation. Recently, the cancer driver genes isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP(+)] (IDH)1/2, lysine demethylase 5C (KDM5C) and KDM6A were revealed to prompt histone demethylation and hypoxic reprogramming in cancer metabolism (50). Similarly, a novel IFNα-induced lncRNA was observed to negatively regulate immunosuppression by interrupting H3K27 acetylation in HNSCC. Ectopic expression of lncMX1-215 markedly inhibits the expression of IFNα-induced, immunosuppression-related molecules, including PD-L1 and galectin-9 (51). In addition, enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2), a histone-lysine N-methyltransferase enzyme that participates in histone methylation and transcriptional repression, serves a key role in HNSCC progression. Specifically, targeting EZH2 enhances antigen presentation and antitumor immunity, and circumvents anti-PD-1 resistance in HNC. This is associated with increased antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation, IFNγ production and tumor cell cytotoxicity (52). Of note, EZH2 inhibition reduces the histone H3K27me3 modification on the β2-microglobulin promoter and suppresses tumor growth following combination therapy in an anti-PD-1-resistant model of HNSCC (52). Recently, the histone demethylases JARID1C/KDM5C and UTX/KDM6A and the gene-encoding metabolic enzymes IDH1/2 were identified as cancer driver genes that serve a key role in histone demethylation and hypoxic reprogramming in cancer metabolism in HNC (50). LncRNAs may also affect the histone modification mechanism. The lncRNA PVT1 can regulate nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell proliferation via activation of the lysine acetyltransferase 2A (KAT2A) acetyltransferase and stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF-1α) (53). PVT1 serves as a scaffold for the chromatin modification factor KAT2A, which mediates histone 3 lysine 9 acetylation, recruiting the nuclear receptor binding protein transcriptional intermediary factor 1β to activate nuclear factor 90 transcription, thereby increasing HIF-1α stability and promoting a malignant phenotype in neural progenitor cells (NPCs) (53). Another lncRNA, CCAT1, can promote H3K27-acetylation and modulate the histone methylation of SPRY4 (sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 4) and homeobox B13 in the nucleus and cytoplasm, which affects cell proliferation and migration in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (54).
Chromatin remodeling as a driver of cancer
Chromatin remodeling is vital for the rearrangement of chromatin from a condensed state to a transcriptionally active state. This allows access of genomic DNA to the regulatory transcription machinery proteins and regulates gene expression. Previous studies have demonstrated that chromatin hypoacetylation, histone 3 in HNSCC cells is hypoacetylated and that endothelial cells induce tumor acetylation (55). For instance, TP63 triggers chromatin remodeling and enhances reprogramming to epidermal differentiation and thus prompting squamous cell carcinoma development (56). In addition, zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 4 (ZSCAN4) prompts functional histone 3 hyperacetylation at the promoters of OCT3/4 and NANOG, leading to an upregulation of cancer stem cell (CSC) factors. Consistently, ZSCAN4 depletion leads to downregulation of CSC markers, a decrease in the formation of tumor spheres and inhibition of tumor growth (57). Chromatin remodeling is also initiated by lin-28 homolog B, which promotes HNC progression via regulation of the insulin-like growth factor genes (high mobility group AT-hook 2, cyclin D2, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor and insulin like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2) (58). Similarly, lymphoid-specific helicase (LSH) promotes cancer progression by regulating the expression of fumarate hydratase (FH), a core component of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (59). LSH binds to the FH promoter, recruiting the epigenetic silencer factor histone H3 Lys 9-specific histone methyltransferase, known as G9a, to repress FH transcription. Loss-of-function mutations in SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling subunit genes are also detected in HNSCC (60). Actin-like 6A (ACTL6A), encoding an SWI/SNF subunit linked to stem cell function, drives Yes1-associated transcriptional regulator (YAP) activation and is highly expressed together with the p53 family member p63 in HNSCC This molecular mechanism reveals that ACTL6A and p63 collaborate as oncogenic drivers in HNSCC.
Molecular role of lncRNAs
LncRNAs are RNA isoforms larger than 200 nucleotides that act as regulators of gene expression (61). They are involved in numerous cellular processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis and cellular metabolism, as well as differentiation and development (62). LncRNA MIR31HG has been reported to target HIF-1α and P21 to facilitate HNC cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis by promoting cell-cycle progression (63). Furthermore, lncRNA LINC00460 enhances HNSCC cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related metastasis by facilitating peroxiredoxin-1transfer into the nucleus and transcription of EMT-related genes, including zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1, zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2 and vimentin (64). On the other hand, lncRNA SLC26A4-AS1 can act as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting the migration, invasion and metastasis of tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Of note, SLC26A4-AS1 is able to interact with DEAD-box helicase 5 (DDX5) and the E3 ligase tripartite motif containing 25, and promote DDX5 degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (65). In particular, SLC26A4-AS1 inhibits the expression of multiple DNA double-strand break repair genes and thyroid cancer metastasis by destabilizing DDX5. In addition, other lncRNAs have been reported to function as promoters or inhibitors of cancer metastasis. Specifically, MYOSLID promotes invasion and metastasis of HNSCC by modulating partial EMT via regulation of metastasis-related genes, including Slug, podoplanin and laminin subunit β3 (66).
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) in HNC progression
HNC tumor development may also be controlled by circRNAs present in the tumor microenvironment (67). CircRNAs are single-stranded, covalently closed RNA molecules that can act as microRNA (miR) sponges (68). Furthermore, specific non-coding RNA members (circRNA, lncRNA and miRNA) are also involved in various tumor-promoting mechanisms like methylation, hypoxia signaling, immune suppression and tumor-related inflammation (Fig. 2). CircRNA_102171 has been revealed to interact with catenin β interacting protein 1to block its interaction with the β-catenin/transcription factor 3/transcription factor 4/lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 complex, leading to activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in papillary thyroid cancer (69). Similarly, circRNA_100290 can function as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate CDK6 expression in oral cancer by sponging up miR-29b family members (70). CircPVT1 may act as an oncogene in HNSCC, where it is transcriptionally enhanced by the mut-p53/YAP/TEA domain transcription factor 1 complex and alters the expression of miR-497-5p and genes involved in regulation of cell proliferation (71). Another circRNA member, circGSK3β, may trigger ESCC cell migration and invasion via direct interaction with GSK3β and inhibition of GSK3β activity (72). Certain circRNAs also serve important roles in regulating the radioresistance of ESCC (73). In particular, circRNA_100367 enhances the radioresistance of ESCC cells (KYSE-150R) via the miR-217/Wnt3 signaling pathway.
CAFs in the tumor microenvironment
HNC development and progression are also regulated by the CAFs signaling cascade (Fig. 3). CAFs are a group of activated fibroblasts with marked heterogeneity and plasticity in the tumor microenvironment. They secrete a variety of active factors [inside the TME, that promote extensive angiogenesis signaling (via TGFb), increased matrix deposition (via PDGF, SDF-1), and tissue remodeling (a-SMA, PGE-2, periostin)]. CAF-derived exosomal miR-196a can confer cisplatin resistance in HNC by targeting cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1B and inhibitor of growth family member 5, indicating that miR-196a may serve as a promising predictor of and potential therapeutic target for cisplatin resistance in HNC (74). CAFs may also affect HNC stemness inside the tumor microenvironment. For instance, periostin secreted by CAFs promotes cancer stemness in HNC via activation of the protein tyrosine kinase 7 (inactive)-Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (75). Similarly, when HNSCC cells are cocultured with normal fibroblasts, this upregulates autophagy via IL6, IL8 and basic fibroblast growth factor, promoting HNC progression (76). CAF-derived IL-6 may also prompt HNC progression via osteopontin (OPN)-NF-κB signaling, which is associated with poor patient prognosis (77). CAFs may also affect the functional polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in OSCC. Specifically, CAFs promote an immunosuppressive microenvironment through the induction and accumulation of protumoral macrophages, which is also associated with lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, lymph node involvement and TNM stage (78).
Myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC)-related immunosuppression
MDSCs are a heterogeneous group of immature myeloid cells implicated in the regulation of immune responses. MDSCs are directly implicated in the pathogenesis of HNC. Therefore, studies target these myeloid cell subsets in order to reverse immunosuppression (79,80). Recently, STAT3 inhibition in combination with radiation, improved tumor growth delay in HNC via downregulation of MDSCs, decrease in Tregs and upregulation of effector T cells and M1 macrophage levels (81). In addition, distinct populations of immune-suppressive macrophages differentiate from monocytic MDSCs via increased expression of S100A9 protein and transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding proteinβ (82). Furthermore, stimulator of interferon response cGAMP interactor (STING) serves a vital role in both differentiation and regulation of MDSC expression levels. STING represses NPC-derived MDSC induction by enhancing suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) expression in both tumor cells and MDSCs (83). SOCS1 physically interacts with STAT3 through its SH2 domain to prevent STAT3 phosphorylation and dimerization, resulting in reduced MDSC induction via inhibition of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-6 production (83). The expansion of MDSCs is also critical for tumor propagation. EBV latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) may promote MDSC expansion in the tumor microenvironment by inducing extra-mitochondrial glycolysis in malignant cells, which triggers immune escape initially. Specifically, LMP1 promotes the expression of multiple glycolytic genes, including glucose transporter 1 (84). This metabolic reprogramming results in increased levels of the Nod-like receptor family protein 3 inflammasome, cyclooxygenase 2 and phosphorylated-p65 and, consequently, increased production of IL-1β, IL-6 and GM-CSF (84). T-cell immunoglobulin mucin 3 (TIM3) may also affect MDSC differentiation. TIM3 expression is increased in patients with recurrent HNSCC (85). CD8+ T cells and CD11b+ CD33+ MDSCs are associated with increased TIM3 expression and effector T-cell dysfunction in human HNSCC (85).
Crosstalk with TAMs
Another significant factor contributing to HNC development are TAMs, which exhibit important functions in facilitating the metastatic cascade of tumor cells (86). Specifically, Snail-overexpressing cancer cells may promote M2 polarization of TAMs by delivering miR-21-abundant exosomes in HNC (87). Furthermore, high miR-21 expression is associated with release of miR-21-abundant tumor-derived exosomes and a higher level of snail family transcriptional repressor 1and the M2 marker mannose receptor C-type 1b (87). In addition, CAFs may affect the functional polarization of TAMs. The expression of M2 biomarkers CD68, CD14, CD163, CD200R, CD206, major histocompatibility complex, class I, G, CD80 and CD86 is higher in CD14-positive cells co-cultured with the culture supernatants of CAFs in OSCC than in control cells (78). The gene expression levels of arginase-I, IL10 and TGF-β are increased in CAF-educated cells, and T cell proliferation is strongly suppressed, and the neutralization of TGF-β, IL-10 or arginase-I markedly restores T cell proliferation (78). Furthermore, interplay between cancer cells and M2 macrophages is necessary for miR-550a-3-5p downregulation and HPV-positive OSCC progression. MiR-550a-3-5p, downregulated by E6 oncoprotein, inhibits M2 macrophage polarization via YAP/C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 signaling, which in turn abrogates the EMT program in HPV-positive OSCC cells (88). Previous studies have revealed a novel paracrine loop between cancer cells and macrophages (89,90). M1-like TAMs activated by exosome-transferred thrombospondin 1 promote malignant migration in OSCC (91).
Conclusions
Understanding the epigenetic modifications and the molecular crosstalk between tumor and immune cells is vital for future therapeutic modalities against head and neck carcinogenesis. Additionally, targeting the tumor microenvironment to reverse drug resistance and inhibit immunosuppressive tumor networks emerges as a useful tool for current immunotherapeutic approaches. Targeting these aberrant patterns of signaling could provide biomarkers for early detection and diagnosis for HNSCC and will improve the therapy and extend overall survival. Furthermore, the deregulation of tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes by epigenetic mechanism is related to HNSCC tumorigenesis. Therefore, current trials are ongoing to evaluate the role of novel immune checkpoint inhibitors in order to retain effective tumor control and improve the quality of life for patients with HNSCC. Deciphering these signaling mechanisms and their crosstalk with immune and tumor cells may bring novel perspectives for HNSCC therapeutic approaches, and thus, a number of them may be used as potential therapeutic targets or in combination with current immunotherapy regimens.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Authors' contributions
SG, SP, AP, NT, PV, IS, NA, TK and KD contributed to manuscript drafting and to the critical revisions of the intellectual content. SG, SP and KD performed the literature search and selection and were responsible for the general study supervision. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published. Data authentication is not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Auperin A: Epidemiology of head and neck cancers: An update. Curr Opin Oncol. 32:178–186. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE and Jemal A: Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 71:7–33. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dos Santos ES, Wagner VP, Cabral Ramos J, Lambert DW, Castilho RM and Paes Leme AF: Epigenetic modulation of the tumor microenvironment in head and neck cancer: Challenges and opportunities. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 164:1033972021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Prime SS, Thakker NS, Pring M, Guest PG and Paterson IC: A review of inherited cancer syndromes and their relevance to oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 37:1–16. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bennardo L, Bennardo F, Giudice A, Passante M, Dastoli S, Morrone P, Provenzano E, Patruno C and Nisticò SP: Local chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in unresectable squamous cell carcinoma: What do we know so far? Curr Oncol. 28:2317–2325. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pentangelo G, Nisticò SP, Provenzano E, Cisale GY and Bennardo L: Topical 5% imiquimod sequential to surgery for HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma of the lip. Medicina (Kaunas). 57:5632021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Venugopal R, Bavle RM, Konda P, Muniswamappa S and Makarla S: Familial cancers of head and neck region. J Clin Diagn Res. 11:ZE01–ZE06. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Plavc G, Jesenko T, Oražem M and Strojan P: Challenges in combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Cancers (Basel). 12:31972020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Caudell JJ, Torres-Roca JF, Gillies RJ, Enderling H, Kim S, Rishi A, Moros EG and Harrison LB: The future of personalised radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol. 18:e266–e273. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bakhtiar SM, Ali A and Barh D: Epigenetics in head and neck cancer. Methods Mol Biol. 1238:751–769. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gazdzicka J, Golabek K, Strzelczyk JK and Ostrowska Z: Epigenetic modifications in head and neck cancer. Biochem Genet. 58:213–244. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Armeanu S, Bitzer M, Lauer UM, Venturelli S, Pathil A, Krusch M, Kaiser S, Jobst J, Smirnow I, Wagner A, et al: Natural killer cell-mediated lysis of hepatoma cells via specific induction of NKG2D ligands by the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium valproate. Cancer Res. 65:6321–6329. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chiappinelli KB, Zahnow CA, Ahuja N and Baylin SB: Combining epigenetic and immunotherapy to combat cancer. Cancer Res. 76:1683–1689. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dunn J and Rao S: Epigenetics and immunotherapy: The current state of play. Mol Immunol. 87:227–239. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Leemans CR, Snijders PJF and Brakenhoff RH: The molecular landscape of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 18:269–282. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferris RL: Immunology and immunotherapy of head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 33:3293–3304. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J, Rini B, Albiges L, Campbell MT, Venugopal B, Kollmannsberger C, Negrier S, Uemura M, et al: Avelumab plus Axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced Renal-Cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 380:1103–1115. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chu L, Chen Y, Liu Q, Liang F, Wang S, Liu Q, Yu H, Wu X, Zhang J, Deng J, et al: A phase II study of apatinib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESO-Shanghai 11). Oncologist. 26:e925–e935. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mollica Poeta V, Massara M, Capucetti A and Bonecchi R: Chemokines and Chemokine receptors: New targets for cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 10:3792019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pooler DB, Ness DB, Sarantopoulos J, Squittieri N, Ravichandran S, Britten CD, Amaravadi RK, Vaishampayan U, LoRusso P, Shapiro GI, et al: The effect of sonidegib (LDE225) on the pharmacokinetics of bupropion and warfarin in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 87:1291–1302. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Karam SD and Raben D: Radioimmunotherapy for the treatment of head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol. 20:e404–e416. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, Harrington K, Kasper S, Vokes EE, Even C, et al: Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N Engl J Med. 375:1856–1867. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, Soulières D, Tahara M, de Castro G Jr, Psyrri A, Basté N, Neupane P, Bratland Å, et al: Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 394:1915–1928. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Billan S, Kaidar-Person O and Gil Z: Treatment after progression in the era of immunotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 21:e463–e476. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, Garrido M, Salman P, Shen L, Wyrwicz L, Yamaguchi K, Skoczylas T, Campos Bragagnoli A, et al: First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 398:27–40. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tarhini AA: Tremelimumab: A review of development to date in solid tumors. Immunotherapy. 5:215–229. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu Y, Han L, Sheng Y and Wu S: Cetuximab monotherapy for relapsing high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 107:1048242020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chester C, Sanmamed MF, Wang J and Melero I: Immunotherapy targeting 4-1BB: Mechanistic rationale, clinical results, and future strategies. Blood. 131:49–57. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Garcia J, Hurwitz HI, Sandler AB, Miles D, Coleman RL, Deurloo R and Chinot OL: Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in cancer treatment: A review of 15 years of clinical experience and future outlook. Cancer Treat Rev. 86:1020172020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Scagliotti GV, Novello S and von Pawel J: The emerging role of MET/HGF inhibitors in oncology. Cancer Treat Rev. 39:793–801. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shih YH, Chen PC and Chu CY: Severe refractory scarring alopecia associated with combinational use of ficlatuzumab (AV-299) and gefitinib. J Clin Oncol. 31:e335–e337. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Greiner JW, Morillon YM II and Schlom J: NHS-IL12, a tumor-targeting immunocytokine. Immunotargets Ther. 10:155–169. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jones PA: Functions of DNA methylation: Islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 13:484–492. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Koch A, Joosten SC, Feng Z, de Ruijter TC, Draht MX, Melotte V, Smits KM, Veeck J, Herman JG, Van Neste L, et al: Analysis of DNA methylation in cancer: Location revisited. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 15:459–466. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Klutstein M, Nejman D, Greenfield R and Cedar H: DNA methylation in cancer and aging. Cancer Res. 76:3446–3450. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eads CA, Lord RV, Wickramasinghe K, Long TI, Kurumboor SK, Bernstein L, Peters JH, DeMeester SR, DeMeester TR, Skinner KA and Laird PW: Epigenetic patterns in the progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 61:3410–3418. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen Y, Jiang X, Li X, Yan D, Liu J, Yang J and Yan S: The methylation modification of m6A regulators contributes to the prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 9:13462021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou C, Ye M, Ni S, Li Q, Ye D, Li J, Shen Z and Deng H: DNA methylation biomarkers for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Epigenetics. 13:398–409. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hier J, Vachon O, Bernstein A, Ibrahim I, Mlynarek A, Hier M, Alaoui-Jamali MA, Maschietto M and da Silva SD: Portrait of DNA methylated genes predictive of poor prognosis in head and neck cancer and the implication for targeted therapy. Sci Rep. 11:100122021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao JJ, Li HY, Wang D, Yao H and Sun DW: Abnormal MGMT promoter methylation may contribute to the risk of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Tumour Biol. 35:10085–10093. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ji X, Guan C, Jiang X and Li H: Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation for head and neck cancer varies by sample type and number of markers tested. Oncotarget. 7:80019–80032. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Koutsimpelas D, Pongsapich W, Heinrich U, Mann S, Mann WJ and Brieger J: Promoter methylation of MGMT, MLH1 and RASSF1A tumor suppressor genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Pharmacological genome demethylation reduces proliferation of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Oncol Rep. 27:1135–1141. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schmitt K, Molfenter B, Laureano NK, Tawk B, Bieg M, Hostench XP, Weichenhan D, Ullrich ND, Shang V, Richter D, et al: Somatic mutations and promotor methylation of the ryanodine receptor 2 is a common event in the pathogenesis of head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer. 145:3299–3310. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ban Y, Tan P, Cai J, Li J, Hu M, Zhou Y, Mei Y, Tan Y, Li X, Zeng Z, et al: LNCAROD is stabilized by m6A methylation and promotes cancer progression via forming a ternary complex with HSPA1A and YBX1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Oncol. 14:1282–1296. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bai G, Song J, Yuan Y, Chen Z, Tian Y, Yin X, Niu Y and Liu J: Systematic analysis of differentially methylated expressed genes and site-specific methylation as potential prognostic markers in head and neck cancer. J Cell Physiol. 234:22687–22702. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Misawa K, Mochizuki D, Endo S, Mima M, Misawa Y, Imai A, Shinmura K, Kanazawa T, Carey TE and Mineta H: Site-specific methylation patterns of the GAL and GALR1/2 genes in head and neck cancer: Potential utility as biomarkers for prognosis. Mol Carcinog. 56:1107–1116. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Misawa K, Imai A, Matsui H, Kanai A, Misawa Y, Mochizuki D, Mima M, Yamada S, Kurokawa T, Nakagawa T and Mineta H: Identification of novel methylation markers in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: Genome-wide discovery, tissue verification and validation testing in ctDNA. Oncogene. 39:4741–4755. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Castilho RM, Squarize CH and Almeida LO: Epigenetic modifications and head and neck cancer: Implications for tumor progression and resistance to therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 18:15062017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chang S, Yim S and Park H: The cancer driver genes IDH1/2, JARID1C/KDM5C, and UTX/KDM6A: Crosstalk between histone demethylation and hypoxic reprogramming in cancer metabolism. Exp Mol Med. 51:1–17. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ma H, Chang H, Yang W, Lu Y, Hu J and Jin SA: Novel IFNα-induced long noncoding RNA negatively regulates immunosuppression by interrupting H3K27 acetylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 19:42020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou L, Mudianto T, Ma X, Riley R and Uppaluri R: Targeting EZH2 enhances antigen presentation, antitumor immunity, and circumvents anti-PD-1 resistance in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 26:290–300. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang Y, Chen W, Lian J, Zhang H, Yu B, Zhang M, Wei F, Wu J, Jiang J, Jia Y, et al: The lncRNA PVT1 regulates nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell proliferation via activating the KAT2A acetyltransferase and stabilizing HIF-1α. Cell Death Differ. 27:695–710. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang E, Han L, Yin D, He X, Hong L, Si X, Qiu M, Xu T, De W, Xu L, et al: H3K27 acetylation activated-long non-coding RNA CCAT1 affects cell proliferation and migration by regulating SPRY4 and HOXB13 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:3086–3101. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kadoch C: Diverse compositions and functions of chromatin remodeling machines in cancer. Sci Transl Med. 11:eaay10182019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yi M, Tan Y, Wang L, Cai J, Li X, Zeng Z, Xiong W, Li G, Li X, Tan P and Xiang B: TP63 links chromatin remodeling and enhancer reprogramming to epidermal differentiation and squamous cell carcinoma development. Cell Mol Life Sci. 77:4325–4346. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Portney BA, Arad M, Gupta A, Brown RA, Khatri R, Lin PN, Hebert AM, Angster KH, Silipino LE, Meltzer WA, et al: ZSCAN4 facilitates chromatin remodeling and promotes the cancer stem cell phenotype. Oncogene. 39:4970–4982. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Alajez NM, Shi W, Wong D, Lenarduzzi M, Waldron J, Weinreb I and Liu FF: Lin28b promotes head and neck cancer progression via modulation of the insulin-like growth factor survival pathway. Oncotarget. 3:1641–1652. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
He X, Yan B, Liu S, Jia J, Lai W, Xin X, Tang CE, Luo D, Tan T, Jiang Y, et al: Chromatin remodeling factor LSH drives cancer progression by suppressing the activity of fumarate hydratase. Cancer Res. 76:5743–5755. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Saladi SV, Ross K, Karaayvaz M, Tata PR, Mou H, Rajagopal J, Ramaswamy S and Ellisen LW: ACTL6A Is Co-Amplified with p63 in squamous cell carcinoma to drive YAP activation, regenerative proliferation, and poor prognosis. Cancer Cell. 31:35–49. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Quinn JJ and Chang HY: Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Genet. 17:47–62. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kopp F and Mendell JT: Functional classification and experimental dissection of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 172:393–407. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang R, Ma Z, Feng L, Yang Y, Tan C, Shi Q, Lian M, He S, Ma H and Fang J: LncRNA MIR31HG targets HIF1A and P21 to facilitate head and neck cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis by promoting cell-cycle progression. Mol Cancer. 17:1622017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jiangm Y, Cao W, Wu K, Qin X, Wang X, Li Y, Yu B, Zhang Z, Wang X, Yan M, et al: LncRNA LINC00460 promotes EMT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by facilitating peroxiredoxin-1 into the nucleus. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 38:3652019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yuan J, Song Y, Pan W, Li Y, Xu Y, Xie M, Shen Y, Zhang N, Liu J, Hua H, et al: LncRNA SLC26A4-AS1 suppresses the MRN complex-mediated DNA repair signaling and thyroid cancer metastasis by destabilizing DDX5. Oncogene. 39:6664–6676. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xiong HG, Li H, Xiao Y, Yang QC, Yang LL, Chen L, Bu LL, Zhang WF, Zhang JL and Sun ZJ: Long noncoding RNA MYOSLID promotes invasion and metastasis by modulating the partial epithelial-mesenchymal transition program in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 38:2782019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kristensen LS, Hansen TB, Venø MT and Kjems J: Circular RNAs in cancer: Opportunities and challenges in the field. Oncogene. 37:555–565. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Goodall GJ and Wickramasinghe VO: RNA in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 21:22–36. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bi W, Huang J, Nie C, Liu B, He G, Han J, Pang R, Ding Z, Xu J and Zhang J: CircRNA circRNA_102171 promotes papillary thyroid cancer progression through modulating CTNNBIP1-dependent activation of β-catenin pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 37:2752018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen L, Zhang S, Wu J, Cui J, Zhong L, Zeng L and Ge S: CircRNA_100290 plays a role in oral cancer by functioning as a sponge of the miR-29 family. Oncogene. 36:4551–4561. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Verduci L, Ferraiuolo M, Sacconi A, Ganci F, Vitale J, Colombo T, Paci P, Strano S, Macino G, Rajewsky N and Blandino G: The oncogenic role of circPVT1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is mediated through the mutant p53/YAP/TEAD transcription-competent complex. Genome Biol. 18:2372017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hu X, Wu D, He X, Zhao H, He Z, Lin J, Wang K, Wang W, Pan Z, Lin H and Wang M: circGSK3β promotes metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by augmenting β-catenin signaling. Mol Cancer. 18:1602019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu J, Xue N, Guo Y, Niu K, Gao L, Zhang S, Gu H, Wang X, Zhao D and Fan R: CircRNA_100367 regulated the radiation sensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas through miR-217/Wnt3 pathway. Aging (Albany NY). 11:12412–12427. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Qin X, Guo H, Wang X, Zhu X, Yan M, Wang X, Xu Q, Shi J, Lu E, Chen W and Zhang J: Exosomal miR-196a derived from cancer-associated fibroblasts confers cisplatin resistance in head and neck cancer through targeting CDKN1B and ING5. Genome Biol. 20:122019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yu B, Wu K, Wang X, Zhang J, Wang L, Jiang Y, Zhu X, Chen W and Yan M: Periostin secreted by cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes cancer stemness in head and neck cancer by activating protein tyrosine kinase 7. Cell Death Dis. 9:10822018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
New J, Arnold L, Ananth M, Alvi S, Thornton M, Werner L, Tawfik O, Dai H, Shnayder Y, Kakarala K, et al: Secretory autophagy in cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes head and neck cancer progression and offers a novel therapeutic target. Cancer Res. 77:6679–6691. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Qin X, Yan M, Wang X, Xu Q, Wang X, Zhu X, Shi J, Li Z, Zhang J and Chen W: Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived IL-6 promotes head and neck cancer progression via the osteopontin-NF-kappa B signaling pathway. Theranostics. 8:921–940. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takahashi H, Sakakura K, Kudo T, Toyoda M, Kaira K, Oyama T and Chikamatsu K: Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote an immunosuppressive microenvironment through the induction and accumulation of protumoral macrophages. Oncotarget. 8:8633–8647. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Davis RJ, Van Waes C and Allen CT: Overcoming barriers to effective immunotherapy: MDSCs, TAMs, and Tregs as mediators of the immunosuppressive microenvironment in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 58:59–70. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Greene S, Robbins Y, Mydlarz WK, Huynh AP, Schmitt NC, Friedman J, Horn LA, Palena C, Schlom J, Maeda DY, et al: Inhibition of MDSC trafficking with SX-682, a CXCR1/2 inhibitor, enhances NK-cell immunotherapy in head and neck cancer models. Clin Cancer Res. 26:1420–1431. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oweida AJ, Darragh L, Phan A, Binder D, Bhatia S, Mueller A, Court BV, Milner D, Raben D, Woessner R, et al: STAT3 modulation of regulatory T cells in response to radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 111:1339–1349. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kwak T, Wang F, Deng H, Condamine T, Kumar V, Perego M, Kossenkov A, Montaner LJ, Xu X, Xu W, et al: Distinct populations of immune-suppressive macrophages differentiate from monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer. Cell Rep. 33:1085712020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang CX, Ye SB, Ni JJ, Cai TT, Liu YN, Huang DJ, Mai HQ, Chen QY, He J, Zhang XS, et al: STING signaling remodels the tumor microenvironment by antagonizing myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion. Cell Death Differ. 26:2314–2328. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cai TT, Ye SB, Liu YN, He J, Chen QY, Mai HQ, Zhang CX, Cui J, Zhang XS, Busson P, et al: LMP1-mediated glycolysis induces myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS Pathog. 13:e10065032017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu JF, Ma SR, Mao L, Bu LL, Yu GT, Li YC, Huang CF, Deng WW, Kulkarni AB, Zhang WF and Sun ZJ: T-cell immunoglobulin mucin 3 blockade drives an antitumor immune response in head and neck cancer. Mol Oncol. 11:235–247. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Larionova I, Cherdyntseva N, Liu T, Patysheva M, Rakina M and Kzhyshkowska J: Interaction of tumor-associated macrophages and cancer chemotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 8:15960042019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hsieh CH, Tai SK and Yang MH: Snail-overexpressing cancer cells promote M2-Like polarization of tumor-associated macrophages by delivering MiR-21-Abundant Exosomes. Neoplasia. 20:775–788. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cao MX, Zhang WL, Yu XH, Wu JS, Qiao XW, Huang MC, Wang K, Wu JB, Tang YJ, Jiang J, et al: Interplay between cancer cells and M2 macrophages is necessary for miR-550a-3-5p down-regulation-mediated HPV-positive OSCC progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 39:1022020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rigo A, Gottardi M, Zamò A, Mauri P, Bonifacio M, Krampera M, Damiani E, Pizzolo G and Vinante F: Macrophages may promote cancer growth via a GM-CSF/HB-EGF paracrine loop that is enhanced by CXCL12. Mol Cancer. 9:2732010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang F, Li P, Liu S, Yang M, Zeng S, Deng J, Chen D, Yi Y and Liu H: β-Catenin-CCL2 feedback loop mediates crosstalk between cancer cells and macrophages that regulates breast cancer stem cells. Oncogene. 40:5854–5865. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xiao M, Zhang J and Chen W and Chen W: M1-like tumor-associated macrophages activated by exosome-transferred THBS1 promote malignant migration in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 37:1432018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |