Treatment options in recurrent cervical cancer (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Angiolo Gadducci
    • Roberta Tana
    • Stefania Cosio
    • Luca Cionini
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 1, 2010     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol_00000001
  • Pages: 3-11
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The management of recurrent cervical cancer depends mainly on previous treatment and on the site and extent of recurrence. Concurrent cisplatin-based chemo-radiation is the treatment of choice for patients with pelvic failure after radical hysterectomy alone. However, the safe delivery of high doses of radiotherapy is much more difficult in this clinical setting compared with primary radiotherapy. Pelvic exenteration usually represents the only therapeutic approach with curative intent for women with central pelvic relapse who have previously received irradiation. In a recent series, the 5-year overall survival and operative mortality after pelvic exenteration ranged from 21 to 61% and from 1 to 10%, respectively. Free surgical margins, negative lymph nodes, small tumour size and long disease-free interval were associated with a more favourable prognosis. Currently, pelvic reconstructive procedures (continent urinary conduit, low colorectal anastomosis, vaginal reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps) are strongly recommended after exenteration. Concurrent cisplatin-based chemo-radiation is the treatment of choice for isolated para-aortic lymph node failure, with satisfactory chances of a cure in asymptomatic patients. Chemotherapy is administered with palliative intent to women with distant or loco-regional recurrences not amenable by surgery or radiotherapy. Cisplatin is the most widely used drug, with a response rate of 17-38% and a median overall survival of 6.1-7.1 months. Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy achieves higher response rates (22-68%) when compared with single-agent cisplatin, but median overall survival is usually less than one year. In a recent Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trial the combination topotecan + cisplatin obtained a significantly longer overall survival than single-agent cisplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. A subsequent GOG study showed a trend in terms of longer overall survival and better quality of life for the doublet cisplatin + paclitaxel vs. the doublets cisplatin + topotecan, cisplatin + vinorelbine, and cisplatin + gemcitabine. Molecularly targeted therapy may represent a novel therapeutic tool, but its use alone or in combination with chemotherapy is still investigational.
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-February 2010
Volume 1 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Gadducci A, Tana R, Cosio S and Cionini L: Treatment options in recurrent cervical cancer (Review) . Oncol Lett 1: 3-11, 2010.
APA
Gadducci, A., Tana, R., Cosio, S., & Cionini, L. (2010). Treatment options in recurrent cervical cancer (Review) . Oncology Letters, 1, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol_00000001
MLA
Gadducci, A., Tana, R., Cosio, S., Cionini, L."Treatment options in recurrent cervical cancer (Review) ". Oncology Letters 1.1 (2010): 3-11.
Chicago
Gadducci, A., Tana, R., Cosio, S., Cionini, L."Treatment options in recurrent cervical cancer (Review) ". Oncology Letters 1, no. 1 (2010): 3-11. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol_00000001