ASAP1 mediates the invasive phenotype of human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma to affect survival prognosis
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 23, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3150
- Pages: 2676-2682
Abstract
Introduction
ASAP1, also known as AMAP1, DDEF1, DEF1 or centaurin β4, is an ADP-ribosylation factor GTP-ase activating protein that induces the hydrolysis of GTP molecules (1–3). ASAP1 contains multiple domains, including BAR, Ankyrin repeat, proline-rich, SH3 and pleckstrin homology (PH) domains. The N-terminal BAR domain induces membrane tubulation and can function as a protein binding site (4,5), while the Ankyrin and SH3 domains facilitate signaling and interactions by ASAP1 with focal adhesion kinase (FAK), CD2AP, Src and paxillin (6–10). Using its pleckstrin homology domain, ASAP1 also regulates ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs) which cycle between GDP and GTP states (11).
Organization of the actin cytoskeleton represents a key factor in the formation of membrane ruffles, filopodia and actin-rich protrusions which occur in tumor cells (1,7,12–14). ASAP1 has been shown to have a role in the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton and in the regulation of intracellular membrane traffic (12). Correspondingly, overexpression of ASAP1 has proved to be a malignant indicator for a variety of tumors such as breast, colorectal, uveal melanomas and prostate (15–18). In addition, ASAP1 has been shown to play an important role in regulating the motility, invasion and metastasis of tumor cells (19,20).
Rac and Cdc42 are small GTP-binding proteins of the Rho family, a subset of the Ras superfamily (21). Rac1 and Cdc42 have been well-characterized, and similar to the other GTPases, they cycle between a GTP-bound and a GDP-bound form. It is hypothesized that their activity is regulated by a combination of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), guanine nucleotide exchange factors and guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs). As such, these small GTP-binding proteins serve as molecular switches within numerous signal transduction pathways and regulate a diverse set of cellular functions, including control of cell morphology, cell cycle progression, cell migration and invasion, cell growth and proliferation, actin dynamics and the transcriptional activation of apoptotic signaling (22–29). However, it is currently unknown whether ASAP1 affects the activation of Rac and Cdc42 in LSCC.
Carcinoma of the larynx is the most common malignant neoplasm of the head and neck and is associated with a high rate of mortality. Moreover, many of these patients are diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas. Currently, the treatment options for laryngeal carcinoma include radical laryngectomy and conservative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. However, despite advances in these treatment methods, the mortality rate of advanced stage laryngeal cancer remains largely unchanged. Metastasis of primary laryngeal cancers also contributes to the high mortality rates associated with these tumors, and the mechanisms associated with this process remain largely uncharacterized. Thus, mechanistic studies of LSCC metastasis continue to be an important area of research, as well as the identification of more effective biological markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of LSCC.
Currently, it remains unknown whether ASAP1 plays a role in laryngeal carcinoma. Therefore, in the present study, expression of ASAP1 mRNA was detected in laryngeal carcinoma tissues and matched non-tumor tissues using real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry assays. The potential for ASAP1 to regulate the invasive phenotype of Hep-2 cells in vitro was also evaluated using a lentivirus vector system. Finally, the prognostic value associated with ASAP1 mRNA levels was analyzed.
Materials and methods
Patients and specimens
A retrospective review of 80 adult patients with pathologically confirmed primary LSCC was carried out. Between 2006 and 2007, these patients underwent a partial or total laryngectomy at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. Cancer tissues and corresponding adjacent normal tissues were collected during surgery and were subsequently fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin (FFPE) according to standard pathology protocols. Patient characteristics for this cohort are listed in Table I. Following treatment, patients underwent follow-up through December 2007, with endpoints classified as: surviving without LSCC, death due to primary recurrent LSCC, death due to other causes and follow-up status unknown. Surviving patients were confirmed by phone or by checking census records. For 64/80 patients, complete clinicopathological data and tumor specimens in a good state of preservation were available. Therefore, these patients were examined in the present study. The study protocol used was in accordance with the institutional guidelines for human research and was approved by the ethics committee.
![]() | Table ILevels of ASAP1 mRNA and the clinicopathological characteristics of the LSCC patients examined. |
Lentiviral vector system
A recombinant lentivirus was generated that contained siRNA designed to target the human mRNA sequence of ASAP1 (siRNA-ASAP1) (5′-GACCAG AUCUCUGUCUCGGAGUUCA-3′ and 5′-UGAACUCCGA GACAGAGAUCUGGUC-3′), and these were synthesized by Shanghai GeneChem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). A control lentivirus was also generated. To monitor transfection efficiency, both lentiviruses included a green fluorescent protein (GFP) cassette. The lentiviruses containing siRNAs targeting ASAP1 and GFP control lentiviruses were titered to 109 U/ml according to the manufacturer’s guidelines (GeneChem).
Cell culture and transfection
The human LSCC cell line, Hep-2, was purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Shanghai Shenggong Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and were maintained at 37°C under a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Hep-2 cells in the logarithmic phase of growth were seeded in 6-well plates at a concentration of 1×105 cells/well for transfection. After 12 h, when cells reached ~40–50% confluency, 1 ml of complete medium containing lentivirus (108 TU/ml) preparations and polybrene (8 mg/ml) were added to each well. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 12 h. The supernatant from each cell was then removed, and DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin was added. After 24 h, the culture medium was replaced with fresh DMEM. Seventy-two hours post transfection, the mean percentage of GFP-positive cells observed in each well was calculated from three random fields of view (FOV) at ×200 magnification using a fluorescence microscope (IX70; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was isolated from well-preserved FFPE tissues using a High Pure RNA Paraffin kit (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was also isolated from Hep-2 cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentrations were determined by absorbance readings at 260 nm, while RNA purity was evaluated according to the OD260/OD280 absorption ratios obtained. cDNA was reverse transcribed using an All-in-One™ miRNA qPCR Detection kit (GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD, USA). The reverse transcription reactions were incubated at 37°C for 60 min, then at 70°C for 5 min. Real-time PCR was performed using a SYBR-Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Reactions were incubated at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles at 95°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 20 sec, and 72°C for 15 sec. Expression data were normalized to human U6 gene expression data obtained in parallel as an external reference using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The forward and reverse primers used for detection of ASAP1 included: 5′-TG TAGTCTTACTTGAAGAGGATGGACC-3′ and 5′-CCCTC CCAGCCCACTACCT-3′, respectively, and were synthesized by GeneCore BioTechnologies Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Each reaction was performed in triplicate.
Invasion assay
Seventy-two hours post-transduction, cells (2×104) were resuspended in 200 μl serum-free medium and were plated in the upper chambers of Boyden chambers (24-well, 8-mm pores) coated with Matrigel (Becton-Dickinson Labware, NJ, USA). The lower chambers contained 1 ml medium containing 10% FBS as a chemoattractant. Untreated Hep-2 cells were also plated as controls. After 24 h, cells were mechanically removed from the upper side of the filters, while cells that had migrated to the lower side of the filters were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The number of cells present in three ×200 microscopic fields for each well were averaged and reported. Five independent experiments were performed.
Western blotting
Cells from the siRNA lentivirus group, the GFP control lentivirus group, and untreated Hep-2 cells were harvested 72 h post-transfection and incubated in cell lysis buffer for 30 min on ice. Cell lysates were separated using 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. After incubating the membranes in 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST), the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The primary antibodies used included rabbit anti-human ASAP1 (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), rabbit anti-human rac1 (1:100; Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan), and rabbit anti-human Cdc42 (1:200; Bioss, Beijing, China). The membranes were then washed with TBTS and incubated with species-appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at 37°C. β-actin served as a loading control, and bands were quantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Three independent experiments were performed.
Immunohistochemistry
FFPE specimens were sequentially sectioned (4 μm each). After deparaffinization and rehydration, sections were treated with 0.3% H2O2, and then were incubated with 10% normal goat serum. Antigen retrieval was performed using EDTA (pH 8.0) at 100°C for 20 min. Sections were then washed, and incubated with the primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Sections were subsequently incubated at 37°C for 45 min before being washed and incubated with secondary antibodies at room temperature. After 1 h, sections were washed and incubated with diaminobenzidine tetrachloride for 10 min. Sections were also counterstained with haematoxylin. Negative controls were prepared in parallel and were incubated with PBS instead of the primary antibodies.
ASAP1 scoring
ASAP1 immunoreactivity was evaluated in blinded analyses performed by two pathologists. Staining intensity was graded from 1 to 4, and these scores indicated an absence of staining (receiving a score of 1) up to strong staining of ASAP1 (receiving a score of 4). Mean score values for each sample were reported.
Statistical analysis
The SPSS statistical software package was used for all calculations. An independent t-test was used to analyze differences in ASAP1 mRNA levels, ASAP1 protein scoring, and the invasive phenotype between groups. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time period from the date of surgery to the date of death due to LSCC or other causes, or to the end of the study (2011-12-31). The log-rank test was used to evaluate the association of risk factors with time-to-event endpoints. OS curves were also calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.
Results
ASAP1 is overexpressed in human LSCC both in vivo and in vitro
Real-time PCR was used to determine the expression status of ASAP1 mRNA for both FFPE LSCC tissue samples and matched normal tissue samples obtained from 64 patients diagnosed with LSCC. For the LSCC samples, the mean mRNA level for ASAP1 was 4.45-fold higher than that of the corresponding matched samples (range, 3.76–4.97; median, 4.41) (P<0.05). Based on these data, the LSCC patients were divided into a low expression group (ASAP1 mRNA level ≤4.41) and a high expression group (ASAP1 mRNA >4.47). A similar observation was made in vitro, where the Hep-2 cells exhibited higher levels of ASAP1 mRNA than the 16HBE cells (Fig. 1).
Consistent with the mRNA levels detected for ASAP1, immunohistochemistry assays detected stronger expression of ASAP1 in tissue sections from the high expression group compared to tissue sections from the low expression group. Moreover, the mean ASAP1 score for the high expression group (2.63±0.87) was significantly higher than that of the low expression group (2.19±0.82) (P<0.05). ASAP1 expression was also detected in a subset of the normal tissues stained, although the staining intensity was much weaker compared to that observed for the cancer tissues, particularly in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2).
Levels of ASAP1 mRNA and clinicopathological factors
We analyzed the relationships between levels of ASAP1 mRNA in the LSCC tumors and the clinical data from these patients (Table I). There were no obvious differences in the mRNA levels associated with gender, tumor grade and patient age. However, significantly higher levels of ASAP1 mRNA present in LSCC tissues were associated with lymph node metastasis and clinical tumor stage. For example, patients with higher ASAP1 mRNA levels tended to have an advanced clinical stage of LSCC or lymph node metastasis. These results suggest that upregulated expression of ASAP1 mRNA correlates with the progression of LSCC and an invasive phenotype.
Targeting of ASAP1 mRNA in the Hep-2 cells
In order to investigate the biological function of ASAP1 in LSCC, recombinant lentiviruses containing specific siRNA designed to target the human mRNA sequence of ASAP1, as well as a GFP cassette, were created. Seventy-two hours after Hep-2 cells were transfected with siRNA-ASAP1 and GFP control lentiviruses, >80% of the Hep-2 cells were observed to express GFP, indicating the efficiency and stability of the transductions performed (Fig. 3A). These cells were then subjected to quantitative real-time PCR. Levels of ASAP1 mRNA were found to be considerably lower in the cells transfected with the siRNA-ASAP1 lentivirus compared to the GFP control and untreated cells, thereby validating the use of this lentiviral vector system for studies of ASAP1 (P<0.05) (Fig. 3B).
Downregulation of ASAP1 suppresses the invasion of Hep-2 cells in vitro
To investigate whether ASAP1 contributes to the invasive phenotype of Hep-2 cells, invasion assays were performed using 24-well Boyden chambers coated with Matrigel. As shown in Fig. 4, the number of siRNA-ASAP1-treated Hep-2 cells exhibiting an invasive phenotype 72 h after transfection (35.8±4.49) was less than that observed for GFP control-treated Hep-2 cells (44.8±5.07) and untreated Hep-2 cells (46.4±5.32) (P<0.05). These data strongly suggest that downregulation of ASAP1 may mediate a reduction in the invasiveness of laryngeal carcinoma cells.
ASAP1 expression positively correlates with Rac1 and Cdc42 expression
Western blotting was used to measure expression levels of ASAP1, Rac1 and Cdc42 in the Hep-2 cells transfected with siRNA-ASAP1 and GFP control lentiviruses. When Hep-2 cells were transfected with the siRNA-ASAP1 lentivirus, lower levels of ASAP1 were detected compared to cells transfected with the GFP control lentivirus or untransfected cells (P<0.05) (Fig. 5). In these cells, lower levels of Rac1 and Cdc42 expression were also detected. In contrast, cells transfected with the GFP control lentivirus did not show any significant changes in the expression of these three proteins compared to the untransfected Hep-2 cells (P>0.05).
Prognostic significance of ASAP1 mRNA levels
Of the 64 patients examined, 26 died during the follow-up period. Depending on the levels of ASAP1 that were detected, the 3-year survival probability was 65.6 and 81.3% for cases with high vs. low levels of ASAP1 mRNA, respectively. The 5-year survival probability for the same groups was 43.8 and 75.0%, respectively (P<0.05) (Fig. 6). Taken together, these results suggest that patients with LSCC tumors that express high levels of ASAP1 have a poor prognosis and will experience a shorter survival period compared with patients presenting with LSCC tumors that express low levels of ASAP1.
Discussion
Despite advances achieved in the diagnosis and treatment of LSCC in recent years, the long-term survival rate for LSCC, and especially the survival rate for advanced stages of LSCC, have not significantly improved. In addition, metastasis of LSCC still represents a significant challenge, and contributes to the mortality rates reported for LSCC patients each year. While the expression of various genes has been correlated with the development of metastatic LSCC, and some of these have the potential to serve as markers of tumor progression in the clinic (30,31), the mechanistic details for LSCC remain to be determined.
Previously, Miyata et al (32) identified a region in the 5′-UTR of AMAP1 that exhibits a significant internal ribosome entry site (IRES) activity in differentiated U937 cells. Moreover, this activity appears to be necessary for enhanced AMAP1 expression in this cell line. However, this IRES-dependent mechanism for AMAP1 expression may not be conserved in all tumor cells. Currently, the role of ASAP1 in LSCC remains largely uncharacterized. In colorectal tumors, ASAP1 expression is strongly upregulated (16), and Lin et al (18) reported that levels of ASAP1 were elevated in 80% of primary prostate cancer samples. The results of the present study are consistent with these results, and further demonstrated that both mRNA and protein levels of ASAP1 were upregulated in LSCC tissues compared to paired normal tissues. A similar observation was made in vitro for the Hep-2 and 16HBE cell lines. Based on these findings, it is hypothesized that high levels of ASAP1 expression contribute to LSCC.
Cell dissemination is a complex cell motility phenomenon that requires the coordination of protrusion, chemotaxis, invasion and contractile activities of cancer cells in order to achieve directed cell migration. Roles for ASAP1 in actin cytoskeleton remodeling and local adhesion have previously been demonstrated (6,12). More recently, ASAP1 has been implicated in mediating the invasive phenotypes of tumor cells (33,34). In the present study, Boyden chamber assays were used to characterize the role of ASAP1 in relation to the invasive phenotype of LSCC in vitro, and overexpression of ASAP1 was found to promote the invasive activity of Hep-2 cells. Similarly, ASAP1 has been shown to mediate the invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells via the EGFR-GEP100-Arf6-AMAP1 signaling pathway, or in cooperation with CIN85 or Rab5c (35–37). Overexpression of ASAP1 has also been associated with increased invasion and metastatic potential of high-grade uveal melanomas (17). Therefore, the findings of the present study are consistent with the results obtained using other tumor models, and further support a role for ASAP1 in tumor invasion.
Directed cell migration involves modulation of the actin cytoskeleton by Rho GTPases. In fibroblasts, Rac proteins regulate the formation of lamellipodia and membrane ruffles, as well as the subsequent formation of stress fibers (38,39). In contrast, Cdc42 plays a key role in the formation of filopodia at the cell periphery, and this is followed by the formation of lamellipodia and membrane ruffles (40). When ASAP1 was downregulated in Hep-2 cells using an siRNA targeting ASAP1 lentivirus, cell invasion was inhibited. Furthermore, reduced ASAP1 expression also positively correlated with the protein levels detected for Rac1 and Cdc42. Taken together, these results suggest that decreased expression of Rac1 and Cdc42 may also contribute to the invasive phenotype of Hep-2 cells.
To determine whether ASAP1 expression levels affect the prognosis of laryngeal cancer patients, the median level of ASAP1 mRNA that was identified in 64 LSCC patients was used to establish a high ASAP1 expression level group and a low ASAP1 expression level group. The former was associated with a higher mortality rate, as well as a higher rate of relapse. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effect of ASAP1 expression on the recurrence and mortality of LSCC. Given the small sample size of this study, additional studies are needed to validate the present results. However, the results of the present study do highlight the potential for ASAP1 to be considered as a risk factor for human laryngeal carcinoma.
Based on the results obtained, ASAP1 appears to have an oncogenic role in the metastasis of laryngeal tumors. Therefore, it is hypothesized that ASAP1 mRNA and ASAP1 represent therapeutic targets and prognostic biomarkers that should be considered and evaluated for LSCC.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University for providing human laryngeal tissue samples. The present study was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation of China (81241085); the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (ZD201215/H1302); the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20102307110007) and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LBH-Z11087).
References
Inoue H and Randazzo PA: Arf GAPs and their interacting proteins. Traffic. 8:1465–1475. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Buffart TE, Coffa J, Hermsen MA, et al: DNA copy number changes at 8q11–24 in metastasized colorectal cancer. Cell Oncol. 27:57–65. 2005. | |
Martin RK and Jackson TR: Centaurin β4 in cancer. Biochem Soc Trans. 33:1282–1284. 2005. | |
Inoue H, Ha VL, Prekeris R and Randazzo PA: Arf GTPase-activating protein ASAP1 interacts with Rab11 effector FIP3 and regulates pericentrosomal localization of transferrin receptor-positive recycling endosome. Mol Biol Cell. 19:4224–4237. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jian X, Brown P, Schuck P, et al: Autoinhibition of Arf GTPase-activating protein activity by the BAR domain in ASAP1. J Biol Chem. 284:1652–1663. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Y, Loijens JC, Martin KH, Karginov AV and Parsons JT: The association of ASAP1, an ADP ribosylation factor-GTPase activating protein, with focal adhesion kinase contributes to the process of focal adhesion assembly. Mol Biol Cell. 13:2147–2156. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Y, Yerushalmi GM, Grigera PR and Parsons JT: Mislocalization or reduced expression of Arf GTPase-activating protein ASAP1 inhibits cell spreading and migration by influencing Arf1 GTPase cycling. J Biol Chem. 280:8884–8892. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brown MT, Andrade J, Radhakrishna H, et al: ASAP1, a phospholipid-dependent arf GTPase-activating protein that associates with and is phosphorylated by Src. Mol Cell Biol. 18:7038–7051. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bharti S, Inoue H, Bharti K, et al: Src-dependent phosphorylation of ASAP1 regulates podosomes. Mol Cell Biol. 27:8271–8283. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
King FJ, Hu E, Harris DF, Sarraf P, Spiegelman BM and Roberts TM: DEF-1, a novel Src SH3 binding protein that promotes adipogenesis in fibroblastic cell lines. Mol Cell Biol. 19:2330–2337. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kam JL, Miura K, Jackson TR, et al: Phosphoinositide-dependent activation of the ADP-ribosylation factor GTase-activating protein ASAP1. Evidence for the pleckstrin homology domain functioning as an allosteric site. J Biol Chem. 275:9653–9663. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Randazzo PA, Andrade J, Miura K, et al: The Arf GTPase-activating protein ASAP1 regulates the actin cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:4011–4016. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nie Z and Randazzo PA: Arf GAPs and membrane traffic. J Cell Sci. 119:1203–1211. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Donaldson JG and Jackson CL: ARF family G protein and their regulators: roles in membrane transport, development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 12:362–375. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Onodera Y, Hashimoto S, Hashimoto A, et al: Expression of AMAP1, an ArfGAP, provides novel targets to inhibit breast cancer invasive activities. EMBO J. 24:963–973. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Muller T, Stein U and Poletti A: ASAP1 promotes tumor cell motility and invasiveness, stimulates metastasis formation in vivo, and correlates with poor survival in colorectal cancer patients. Oncogene. 29:2393–2403. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ehlers JP, Worley L, Onken MD and Harbour JW: DDEF1 is located in an amplified region of chromosome 8q and is overexpressed in uveal melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 11:3609–3613. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lin D, Watahiki A, Bayani J, et al: ASAP1, a gene at 8q24, is associated with prostate cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 68:4352–4359. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Randazzo PA, Inoue H and Bharti S: Arf GAPs as regulators of the actin cytoskeleton. Biol Cell. 99:583–600. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Furman C, Short SM, Subramanian RR, Zetter BR and Roberts TM: DEF-1/ASAP1 is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for ARF1 that enhances cell motility through a GAP-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem. 277:7962–7969. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bar-Sagi D and Hall A: Ras and Rho GTPases: a family reunion. Cell. 103:227–238. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wagner AC and Williams JA: Low molecular weight GTP-binding proteins: molecular switches regulating diverse cellular functions. Am J Physiol. 266:G1–G14. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Waschke J, Burger S, Curry FR, Drenckhahn D and Adamson RH: Activation of Rac-1 and Cdc42 stabilizes the microvascular endothelial barrier. Histochem Cell Biol. 125:397–406. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lamarche N, Tapon N, Stowers L, et al: Rac and Cdc42 induce actin polymerization and G1 cell cycle progression independently of p65PAK and the JNK/SAPK MAP kinase cascade. Cell. 87:519–529. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang FC, Atkinson SJ, Gu Y, et al: Rac and Cdc42 GTPases control hematopoietic stem cell shape, adhesion, migration, and mobilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:5614–5618. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang M, Satchell L, Duhadaway JB, Prendergast GC and Laury-Kleintop LD: RhoB links PDGF signaling to cell migration by coordinating activation and localization of Cdc42 and Rac. J Cell Biochem. 112:1572–1584. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kaibuchi K, Kuroda S and Amano M: Regulation of the cytoskeleton and cell adhesion by the Rho family GTPases in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Biochem. 68:459–486. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Engers R, Springer E, Michiels F, Collard JG and Gabbert HE: Rac affects invasion of human renal cell carcinomas by up-regulating tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 and TIMP-2 expression. J Biol Chem. 276:41889–41897. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Filipenko NR, Attwell S, Roskelley C and Dedhar S: Integrin-linked kinase activity regulates Rac- and Cdc42-mediated actin cytoskeleton reorganization via α-PIX. Oncogene. 24:5837–5849. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
Fidler IJ: The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer. 3:453–458. 2003. | |
Foley R, Hollywood D and Lawler M: Molecular pathology of prostate cancer: the key to identifying new biomarkers of disease. Endocr Relat Cancer. 11:477–488. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miyata M, Raven JF, Baltzis D, Koromilas AE and Sabe H: IRES-mediated translational control of AMAP1 expression during differentiation of monocyte U937 cells. Cell Cycle. 7:3273–3281. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jackson TR, Brown FD, Nie Z, et al: ACAPs are arf6 GTPase-activating proteins that function in the cell periphery. J Cell Biol. 151:627–638. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kondo A, Hashimoto S, Yano H, Nagayama K, Mazaki Y and Sabe H: A new paxillin-binding protein, PAG3/Papα/KIAA0400, bearing an ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein activity, is involved in paxillin recruitment to focal adhesions and cell migration. Mol Biol Cell. 11:1315–1327. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Sabe H, Hashimoto S, Morishige M, et al: The EGFR-GEP100-Arf6-AMAP1 signaling pathway specific to breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Traffic. 10:982–993. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nam JM, Onodera Y, Mazaki Y, Miyoshi H, Hashimoto S and Sabe H: CIN85, a Cbl-interacting protein, is a component of AMAP1-mediated breast cancer invasion machinery. EMBO J. 26:647–656. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Onodera Y, Nam JM, Hashimoto A, et al: Rab5c promotes AMAP1-PRKD2 complex formation to enhance beta1 integrin recycling in EGF-induced cancer invasion. J Cell Biol. 197:983–996. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ridley AJ, Paterson HF, Johnston CL, Diekmann D and Hall A: The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell. 70:401–410. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chianale F, Cutrupi S, Rainero E, et al: Diacylglycerol kinase-alpha mediates hepatocyte growth factor-induced epithelial cell scatter by regulating Rac activation and membrane ruffling. Mol Biol Cell. 18:4859–4871. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nobes CD and Hall A: Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell. 81:53–62. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar |