Somatic GATA4 mutation contributes to tetralogy of Fallot
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 8, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2024.12379
- Article Number: 91
-
Copyright: © Abhinav et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Congenital heart disease is hypothesized to be the most prevalent type of birth anomaly in humans, occurring in ~1/100 live newborns and 10/100 early miscarriages worldwide (1,2). If minor cardiovascular developmental abnormalities are included, such as aortic bicuspid valve, which represents the most frequent congenital heart deformity with a prevalence of ~1% in the general pediatric population (3), the total prevalence of congenital heart defects is up to 5% in live newborns (4). As a global pediatric concern, congenital heart defects comprise a wide spectrum of cardiovascular developmental defects, which are categorized into >25 distinct clinical subtypes, including tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) (1). Although certain minor congenital heart defects spontaneously resolve, severe congenital heart disease may lead to poor health and quality of life (5-8), diminished physical exercise capacity (9-13), impaired neurodevelopment (the most prevalent extracardiac manifestation in patients with a congenital heart defect) and brain damage (14-18), thromboembolic complications (19-21), acute renal injury and chronic kidney disease (22-24), hepatic dysfunction (25), pulmonary arterial hypertension (26-28), infective endocarditis (29-31), congestive cardiac failure (32-34), miscellaneous cardiac dysrhythmia (35-37) and cardiovascular demise (38-40). Improvement has been made in cardiovascular surgery and transcatheter interventional treatment, which has allowed >90% of children with congenital heart defects to survive to adulthood; adults living with various congenital heart defects outnumber children affected by congenital heart defects (41-43). However, despite the lifespan of these survivors being markedly prolonged, the long-term prognostic effects are suboptimal because of complications, including cerebrovascular infarction, chronic renal dysfunction, hypertension, myocardial fibrosis, congestive cardiac failure, cardiac arrhythmias and death (44,45). Therefore, congenital heart disease has resulted in strikingly increased morbidity, mortality and socioeconomic burden, which underscores the need for defining the causes of congenital heart disease (1).
In vertebrates, embryonic cardiac organogenesis arises from complicated biological processes that involve cellular commitment, differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis and migration (46); both non-inheritable/environmental predisposing factors and heritable abnormal components may interrupt the finely controlled process, leading to congenital heart disease (2,47-51). Environmental precipitating factors may contribute to ~10% of congenital heart disease cases, although their underlying mechanisms are largely unclear (2). Non-inheritable factors predisposing congenital heart disease encompass maternal viral infection, folate deficiency, early-onset pre-eclampsia, obesity, diabetes mellitus, autoimmune imbalance and maternal consumption of alcohol, tobacco and medications as well as exposure to toxicants and air pollutants during gestation (47,52,53). However, ever-mounting evidence demonstrates that heritable pathogenic determinants are the leading cause of congenital heart disease (2,51). At present, in addition to copy number variations (loss or gain) and aneuploidies, mutations in >100 genes have been identified as responsible for congenital heart disease (2,51,54-75). Nevertheless, the definitive genetic components for congenital heart disease are identified in only a minority of patients (2,51,54-75), which highlights the genetic heterogeneity of congenital heart disease and makes it essential that new congenital heart disease-causing mutations or genes are investigated.
Recent aggregating evidence has underscored the key roles of some nuclear transcriptional factors in regulating proper cardiovascular morphogenesis, including the guanine-adenine-thymine-adenine (GATA) family of transcriptional factors (2,51,76). At present, six members of the GATA family have been categorized fundamentally into a cardiac subfamily (GATA4/5/6) and a hematopoietic subfamily (GATA1/2/3) (76). GATA4 and GATA6, as well as GATA5, are among the first genes expressed abundantly in the embryonic heart with a partially overlapping mode of expression spectrum, and these three cardiogenic GATA factors regulate cardiac organogenesis (76). In addition, germline mutations in all three cardiogenic GATA genes (GATA4/5/6) are associated with various forms of congenital heart disease, including TOF (77-81), the most prevalent type of cyanotic birth defect with an estimated prevalence of 3/10,000 in live newborns (46). Furthermore, somatic mutations in both GATA6 and GATA5 are causally related to TOF (46,82), which implies that somatic mutations in GATA4 may also play a role in TOF.
Materials and methods
Human research individuals
The present human case-control study adhered to ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (2013). The protocol was approved by The Medical Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital [approval no. LL(H)-09-07, Shanghai, China]. Informed consent was signed by each individual's legal guardian prior to recruitment. A total of 62 patients with sporadic TOF (33 male cases and 29 female cases) who underwent cardiac surgery were recruited from the Tongji Hospital (Shanghai, China) between March 2009 and October 2022. The age range of patients was 6-12 months, with a mean age of 0.91 years (~11 months) at the time of surgical treatment. TOF was diagnosed by echocardiographic images and validated by cardiologist direct view during surgery. The inclusion criteria for the patients included a diagnosis of sporadic TOF, available heart tissue and peripheral blood samples as well as clinical data, and informed consent. The exclusion criteria included a positive familial history of congenital heart disease, a known monogenic mutation or pathogenic copy number variation responsible for TOF, and presence of acquired risk factors predisposing to congenital heart disease. Cases with definite anomalous chromosomes or syndromic cardiac deformations, such as Marfan, Char, DiGeorge, Alagille, Noonan, Holt-Oram and Turner's syndrome, were also excluded. Controls comprised 68 patients with rheumatic heart disorder who underwent cardiac valve displacement (36 male and 32 female cases) and 216 healthy subjects (115 male and 101 female subjects). The age range and location and date range of recruitment for the control subjects were the same as those for the patients with TOF. In terms of echocardiograms, no control patients presented with cardiovascular developmental deformation. All the study subjects were unrelated and enrolled from the Chinese population of the Han race.
Sample preparation and DNA extraction
A section of heart tissue was routinely resected from the right ventricular outflow tract of patients with TOF during cardiac surgery. The right outflow tract tissue from TOF repair was collected and cleared of blood contaminants with sterile normal saline, then stored in a -80˚C refrigerator. The peripheral blood samples from the patients with TOF were collected (2 ml for each patient). The cardiac tissue from the heart valves and venous blood specimens of cases who underwent cardiac valve displacement because of rheumatic heart disorder, as well as venous blood specimens of healthy subjects, were collected as control specimens. Somatic genomic DNA was isolated from cardiac tissue samples using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (cat. no. 69504; Qiagen, Inc.) following the manufacturer's instructions. Purification of genomic DNA from blood leucocytes was performed using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (cat. no. A1125; Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Genetic investigation
The oligonucleotide primers applied to amplify coding exons and splicing donors/acceptors of the GATA4 gene via PCR, as well as the reaction mixtures and conditions for the PCR, were as previously described (83). Briefly, the HotStar Taq DNA Polymerase (cat. no. 203205; Qiagen, Inc.) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primers to amplify the whole coding regions of GATA4 by PCR were as follows: Exon 2 (part a) forward, 5'-GATCTTCGCGACAGTTCCTC-3' and reverse, 5'-GTCCCCGGGAAGGAGAAG-3' (amplicon size, 458 bp); exon 2 (part b) forward, 5'-GCTGGGCCTGTCCTACCT-3' and reverse, 5'-AAAAACAAGAGGCCCTCGAC-3' (amplicon size, 554 bp); exon 3 forward, 5'-GGGCTGAAGTCAGAGTGAGG-3' and reverse, 5'-GATGCACACCCTCAAGTTCC-3' (amplicon size, 437 bp); exon 4 forward, 5'-GAGATCTCATGCAGGGTCGT-3' and reverse, 5'-GCCCCTTCCAAATCTAAGTC-3' (amplicon size, 390 bp); exon 5 forward, 5'-TCTTTCTCGCTGAGTTCCAG-3' and reverse, 5'-GGGATGTCCGATGCTGTC-3' (amplicon size, 379 bp); exon 6 forward 5'-GCCATCCCTGTGAGAACTGT-3' and reverse, 5'-GAGGGTAGCTCACTGCTTGC-3' (amplicon size, 444 bp) and exon 7 forward, 5'-AAGTGCTCCTTGGTCCCTTC-3' and reverse, 5'-TTCCCCTAACCAGATTGTCG-3' (amplicon size, 479 bp). The PCR-amplified products were fragmented by electrophoresis on 1.3% agarose gel and isolated with the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (cat. no. 28704; Qiagen, Inc.). The amplicons were sequenced and analyzed as previously described (83). For each GATA4 variation detected, databases such as gnomAD (gnomad-sg.org/) and SNP (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP) were consulted to evaluate its novelty. Additionally, once a GATA4 mutation was identified, it would be deposited in a genetics database (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/GATA4).
Construction of expression vectors
The expression vectors of GATA-binding protein 4 (GATA4)-pSSRa, T-box transcription factor 5 (TBX5)-pcDNA3.1 and K2 homeobox 5 (NKX2.5)-pEFSA, which express human GATA4, TBX5 and NKX2.5, respectively, reporter vector of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP)-luciferase (Luc), where the ANP promoter drives the expression of firefly luciferase, and the reporter plasmid of myosin heavy chain 6 (MYH6)-luciferase (Luc), where the promoter of MYH6 (expressing myosin heavy chain 6) drives the expression of firefly luciferase, were generated as previously described (84). Expression vectors of GATA4-pSSRa and NKX2.5-pEFSA as well as the reporter vector ANP-Luc were provided by Dr Ichiro Shiojima at The Department of Cardiovascular Science and Medicine of Chiba University (Chiba, Japan). The mutant-type GATA4-pSSRa plasmid harboring the c.708T>G (p.Tyr236*) mutation was created via site-directed mutagenesis using the GeneArt Site-Directed Mutagenesis System (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and an overlapping pair of primers containing the target mutation (forward, 5'-TGGGACGGGTCACTAGCTGTGCAACGCCTGC-3' and reverse, 5'-GCAGGCGTTGCACAGCTAGTGACCCGTCCCA-3') and was validated via PCR-sequencing assay performed as aforementioned. The primers used for site-directed mutagenesis are located in the cDNA of human GATA4 (Fig. S1).
Cellular transient transfection with vectors and reporter activity assay
COS-7 cells (an African green monkey kidney fibroblast-like cell line) from the Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences were maintained as previously described (84). COS-7 cells plated onto a 24-well plate at an initial density of 1x105 cells/well were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37˚C with 5% CO2. COS-7 cells at ~80% confluency were transiently transfected with the aforementioned expression vectors using Lipofectamineâ 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), as described previously (84). As an internal control, the vector pGL4.75 (Promega Corporation), which expresses Renilla luciferase, was used for normalized transfection efficiency. A total of 1.0 µg wild-type GATA4-pSSRa was used to mimic the human physiological status, 1.0 µg Tyr236*-mutant GATA4-pSSRa was used to mimic pathogenic status of patients harboring the homozygous mutation and 0.5 µg wild-type GATA4-pSSRa + Tyr236*-mutant GATA4-pSSRa was used to mimic the pathogenic status of patients harboring the heterozygous mutation. Additionally, 0.5 µg wild-type GATA4-pSSRa + empty pcDNA3.1 was compared with 0.5 µg wild-type GATA4-pSSRa + Tyr236*-mutant GATA4-pSSRa to determine whether the Tyr236*-mutant GATA4 exerted a dominant-negative effect on the wild-type GATA4. For each transfection, three independent replicates were performed. Cells were collected 48 h after transfection and lysed. The lysate was used to assess dual-luciferase activity under a microplate luminometer (Promega Corporation) with the Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay System (cat. no. E1910; Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The activity of the MYH6 or ANP promoter was expressed as a relative value of firefly luciferase activity divided by Renilla luciferase activity. The results were representative of three independent experiments in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
Analyses of categorical data (such as demographic data, including ethnicity, sex and family history) between two groups were performed by χ2 or Fisher's exact test. For the quantitative parameters given as mean ± standard deviation (such as age and the MYH6 or ANP promoter activity), Student's unpaired t-test was applied to perform comparisons between two groups. For comparisons between ≥3 groups, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was applied. Statistical analysis was performed employing SPSS version 16.0 (IBM Corp.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Clinical data of patients
The present research included 62 non-familial cases affected with TOF who underwent cardiac surgery, 68 sporadic cases who underwent cardiac valve displacement because of rheumatic heart disorder and 216 healthy patients as controls. All research subjects, who were of Han race, had no known family history of congenital heart defect and had no identified environmental factors contributing to congenital heart disease, such as maternal disease, medication and exposure to ionizing radiation, chemicals and toxins during pregnancy. There was no significant difference in the ages (t=-0.104976, P=0.9165) between the case group of 62 patients with TOF (with an average of 0.91±0.59) and the control group of 216 healthy individuals (with an average of 0.92±0.68). The baseline phenotypical data of the 62 non-familial cases with sporadic TOF are summarized in Table I.
Discovery of a somatic GATA4 mutation causative for TOF
Sequencing analysis of the GATA4 gene was performed with the genomic DNA isolated from the diseased cardiac tissue (the resected right ventricular outflow tract muscle to release right ventricular outflow tract obstruction) of 62 non-familial patients with TOF and the heart valve tissues of 68 patients with rheumatic heart disorder, as well as the blood leucocytes of all the 346 research participants. A heterozygous GATA4 mutation, NM_002052.5: c.708T>G; p.(Tyr236*), was discovered in the pathological myocardial tissue from an 11-month-old male patient with TOF. The sequencing chromatograms illustrating the detected GATA4 mutation (G/T) as well as its corresponding control counterpart (T/T) are exhibited in Fig. 1A. The schematic diagrams delineating the key structural domains of wild-type GATA4 and Tyr236*-mutant GATA4 are presented in Fig. 1B. The discovered heterozygous GATA4 mutation was not detected in the heart valve tissue samples from 68 cases with rheumatic heart disorder or blood cells of all 346 patients and was not released in the SNP and gnomAD databases (accessed August 2023).
Functional insufficiency of Tyr236*-mutant GATA4
In the cultured COS-7 cells transiently transfected with various expression vectors, wild-type GATA4 (GATA4) and Tyr236*-mutant GATA4 (Tyr236*) transcriptionally activated MYH6 by ~13-fold and ~1-fold, respectively (t=14.6834; P=0.00013; Fig. 2). When Tyr236* and GATA4 were co-expressed, transactivation on MYH6 was ~6-fold (t=7.69231; P=0.00154). Wild-type GATA4 retained its activity in the presence of Tyr236*-mutant GATA4, indicating no significant dominant-negative effect for this GATA4 mutation. Similar results were obtained when the comparison of multiple groups (among all the control and experimental groups) was performed (P=6.555x10-8; F=94.859). Specifically, multiple comparisons were conducted between pcDNA3.1 and GATA4 (t=11.6767, P<0.00001), pcDNA3.1 and Tyr236* (t=0.03, P=1.0), pcDNA3.1 and pcDNA3.1 + GATA4 (t=5.3767, P=0.00013), pcDNA3.1 and pcDNA3.1 + Tyr236* (t=5.01, P=0.00023), GATA4 and Tyr236* (t=11.6467, P<0.00001), GATA4 and pcDNA3.1 + GATA4 (t=6.3, P=0.00003), GATA4 and GATA4 + Tyr236* (t=6.6667, P=0.00002), Tyr236* and GATA4 + pcDNA3.1 (t=5.3467, P=0.00013), Tyr236* and GATA4 + Tyr236* (t=4.98, P=0.00024) and GATA4 + pcDNA3.1 and GATA4 + Tyr236* (t=0.3667, P=0.98237).
Synergistic transactivation dysfunction of Tyr236*-mutant GATA4 with NKX2.5 or TBX5
Cultivated COS-7 cells transiently transfected with multiple expression vectors, GATA4 and Tyr236* transcriptionally activated ANP by ~7-fold and ~2-fold, respectively (t=9.7248, P=0.00063; Fig. 3). In the presence of NKX2.5, GATA4 and Tyr236* transactivated ANP by ~32- and ~11-fold, respectively (t=13.4306, P=0.00018); while in the presence of TBX5, GATA4 and Tyr236* transactivated ANP by ~38- and ~15-fold, respectively (t=12.4266, P=0.00024). Additionally, similar results were obtained when the comparisons of multiple groups were conducted [P=2.249x10-11 (F=220.56) for the synergy of GATA4 with NKX2.5 and P=2.852x10-11 (F=211.89) for the synergy of GATA4 with TBX5]. Specifically, multiple comparisons were conducted between pcDNA3.1 (-) and GATA4 (t=5.92, P=0.00123), pcDNA3.1 and Tyr236* (t=0.04, P=1.0), pcDNA3.1 and NKX2.5 (t=9.92, P=0.00001), pcDNA3.1 and GATA4 + NKX2.5 (t=30.02, P<0.00001), pcDNA3.1 and Tyr236* + NKX2.5 (t=9.5533, P=0.00001), GATA4 and Tyr236* (t=5.88, P=0.00130), GATA4 and NKX2.5 (t=4.0, P=0.02408), GATA4 and GATA4 + NKX2.5 (t=24.1, P<0.00001), GATA4 and Tyr236* + NKX2.5 (t=3.6333, P=0.04329), Tyr236* and NKX2.5 (t=9.88, P=0.00001), Tyr236* and GATA4 + NKX2.5 (t=29.98, P<0.00001), Tyr236* and Tyr236* + NKX2.5 (t=9.5133, P=0.00001), NKX2.5 and GATA4 + NKX2.5 (t=20.1, P<0.00001), NKX2.5 and Tyr236* + NKX2.5 (t=0.3667, P=0.99914), GATA4 + NKX2.5 and Tyr236* + NKX2.5 (t=20.4667, P<0.00001); pcDNA3.1 and TBX5 (t=14.7533, P<0.00001), pcDNA3.1 and GATA4 + TBX5 (t=36.72, P<0.00001), pcDNA3.1 and Tyr236* + TBX5 (t=13.52, P<0.00001), GATA4 and TBX5 (t=8.8333, P=0.00028), GATA4 and GATA4 + TBX5 (t=30.8, P<0.00001), GATA4 and Tyr236* + TBX5 (t=7.6, P=0.00109), Tyr236* and TBX5 (t=14.7133, P<0.00001), Tyr236* and GATA4 + TBX5 (t=36.68, P<0.00001), Tyr236* and Tyr236* + TBX5 (t=13.48, P<0.00001), TBX5 and GATA4 + TBX5 (t=21.9667, P<0.00001), TBX5 and Tyr236* + TBX5 (t=1.2333, P=0.93282) and GATA4 + TBX5 and Tyr236* + TBX5 (t=23.2, P<0.00001).
Discussion
In the present study, through sequencing analysis a new GATA4 mutation in a heterozygous status, NM_002052.5:c.708T>G;p.(Tyr236*), was found in diseased heart tissue derived from one male patient out of 62 non-familial patients with sporadic TOF. The mutant allele was not detected in the diseased heart tissues of 68 cases with rheumatic heart disorder or in the blood cells of all the 346 research subjects, encompassing 216 healthy participants matched for ethnicity and sex, suggesting the identified mutation was somatic in origin. This mutation in GATA4 was absent from gnomAD and SNP databases. Quantitative reporter gene measurements unveiled that Tyr236*-mutant GATA4 was unable to trans-activate the key target genes of MYH6 and ANP, singly or in synergy with NKX2.5 or TBX5, two other TOF-causative genes (85-88). ANP and MYH6 are well-characterized downstream target genes of GATA4 and GATA4 loss-of-function mutations decrease the transcription of ANP or MYH6 (89-91). Additionally, GATA4, alone or in synergy with transcriptionally cooperative partners such as NKX2.5 and TBX5, has been shown to activate transcription of target genes such as ANP and MYH6, highlighting the important role of physical and functional interactions between GATA4 and NKX2.5 as well as TBX5 in proper heart development (89,92,93). Furthermore, multiple germline deleterious mutations in GATA4 cause cardiac developmental deformations, including bicuspid aortic valve, atrial septal defect, double-outlet right ventricle, Ebstein's anomaly, ventricular septal defect and TOF (77,78,94). The present results strongly support that somatic GATA4 mutation is responsible for the molecular pathogenesis underpinning TOF in the mutation carrier, although the mechanism by which the somatic GATA4 mutation causes TOF remains to be elucidated.
Although progress has been made in the discovery of germline mutations contributing to occurrence of congenital heart defects (2,51,54-75) and the significant effects of somatic mutations on genesis and progression of cancer and aging are well defined (95-97), the roles of somatic mutations in the development of congenital heart disease are unclear. Furthermore, depending on the type of disease and class of mutation (insertion/deletion, single nucleotide substitution, copy number variation, chromosomal aberration and transposon-mediated mutation), somatic mutations may be causative in 6-20% of patients and the frequency of gene mutation in embryonic cells is not significantly different from that in germline cells (98). Given the intensive oxidative metabolism of cardiomyocytes, increased oxidative DNA damage and/or decreased base excision repair as well as defective mismatch repair of damaged DNA may lead to somatic mutations in cardiomyocytes, and emerging evidence indicates that non-inherited/acquired mutations involving somatic cells are key in cardiovascular disorder (99,100). In agreement with this evidence, the present sequencing analysis of GATA4 on genomic DNA from resected cardiac tissue along with peripheral blood leucocytes of a patient with TOF identified a somatic mutation responsible for TOF, suggesting that TOF could be partially due to cardiac somatic mutations and somatic mosaicism may be an alternative molecular mechanism of TOF.
The prevalence of somatic GATA4 variations in patients suffering from congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery has been examined. Salazar et al (101) analyzed the GATA4 gene in fresh-frozen pathological heart tissues as well as corresponding non-diseased tissue obtained from 62 patients with sporadic congenital heart disease (35 cases with cardiac septal defects and 27 cases presented with other heart deformities), and detected six rare variants as well as two frequent polymorphisms in GATA4 in both the cardiac and the corresponding normal tissues, indicating that they were constitutional variations rather than somatically derived mutations. Wang et al (102) performed a sequencing assay of GATA4 derived from muscle tissue of the right ventricular outflow tract as well as peripheral venous blood leucocytes of 38 patients with isolated TOF undergoing routine cardiac surgery and identified a previously reported GATA4 mutation (p.Pro407Gln) in an affected child, both in the diseased heart tissue and in blood lymphocytes, implying that a germline GATA4 mutation contributes to non-syndromic TOF. Cheng et al (103) sequenced GATA4 on DNA samples obtained from cardiac tissue and peripheral blood leucocytes of 20 patients undergoing surgery for ventricular septal defects; seven novel variations in a heterozygous status were observed in the heart tissues but none in the blood leucocytes of patients or in the control samples of 500 healthy individuals, indicating that they are of somatic origin. Esposito et al (104) utilized freshly frozen cardiac tissue samples of right ventricular myocardium and matched blood samples from nine cases undergoing surgical treatment for TOF and 24 patients with left heart hypoplasia to evaluate the incidence of somatic GATA4 mutations in heart tissue by direct sequencing analysis; no somatic or germline mutations were identified. Yin et al (105) performed direct PCR-sequencing analysis of GATA4 on genomic DNA purified from heart tissue and peripheral blood cells of 98 cases with sporadic congenital heart disease and found two well-known SNPs (rs3729856 and rs56166237) in GATA4 in both heart tissue and blood samples, indicating a role of germline GATA4 variations in development of congenital heart disease. Given these conflicting reports on the contribution of somatic mutations to congenital heart disease, the finding of a somatic mutation of GATA4 in a case of TOF is rare and may depend on various factors such as analytical methods, ethnicity and environmental factors. More in-depth investigations with larger samples sizes from individuals of different ethnicities are required to determine the genetic contribution of somatic mosaicism to pathogenesis of congenital heart defects.
A number of germline GATA4 mutations have been causally implicated in distinct forms of congenital heart disease, including TOF. Nemer et al (94) screened exon 2 of GATA4 in 26 patients with TOF and 94 cases with other types of congenital heart defect and identified a novel heterozygous GATA4 mutation, namely NM_002052.5: c.648C>G; p.(Asp216Glu), in two of 26 patients with TOF. Asp216Glu-mutant GATA4 decreases transactivation of a downstream target gene, ANP, although this mutation has no effect on the binding affinity of GATA4 to its target gene promoter DNA or the physical and functional interaction of GATA4 with zinc finger protein FOG family member 2. Yang et al (77) sequenced GATA4 in 52 probands with TOF with a positive family history and found three novel heterozygous mutations, namely p.Ala9Pro, p.Leu51Val and p.Asn285Ser, in three TOF families. Functional analysis indicated that all three GATA4 mutants had markedly reduced DNA-binding ability and significantly diminished transcriptional activity. Moreover, Asn285Ser mutation prevented the functional interplay of GATA4 with TBX5. Additionally, Dixit et al (78) screened GATA4 in 285 probands with congenital heart defects and detected nine heterozygous mutations (p.Pro407Gln, p.Trp228Arg, p.Ala8Asp, p.Ala75Ser, p.Glu128Val, p.Thr355Ser, p.Ser358Thr, p.Ser133Cys and p.Ala9Thr) in 22 unrelated patients with congenital heart disease. Notably, GATA4 mutants were more commonly involved in TOF (45%) and pulmonary stenosis (22.7%) regardless of the profusion of cardiac septal defects in the research cohort. Biochemical measurements showed that three of the nine GATA4 mutants, p.Trp228Arg, p.Ser133Cys and p.Glu128Val, had impaired combinatorial synergy with TBX5, NKX2.5 or serum response factor (SRF) and diminished DNA-binding affinity. Here, no germline GATA4 mutations were found except for one somatic GATA4 mutation, highlighting a somatic mosaic basis of TOF in a minority of patients.
In humans, GATA4 is located at chromosome 8p23.1 and comprises seven exons, coding for a protein with 442 amino acids (77). GATA4, one of the earliest genetic markers expressed in the developing heart, is amply expressed in the embryonic heart; GATA4 transactivates expression of multiple target genes in the cardiovascular system during embryonic development, including genes that encode MYH6, ANP, β myosin heavy chain, brain natriuretic factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin C, alone or synergistically with cofactors such as TBX5, NKX2.5, GATA6, heart and neural crest derivatives expressed 2 and SRF, which indicates the key role of GATA4 in embryogenic cardiac organogenesis (77,106,107). In chick embryos, knockdown of Gata4 by small interfering RNAs targeting Gata4 in the cardiac mesodermal cells inhibits ability of bilateral cardiac rudiments to migrate to the midline, resulting in development of two isolated hearts at lateral locations, a deformity of cardia bifida, due to the downregulated expression of N-cadherin (108). In mice, knockout of Gata4 causes embryonic lethality due to anomalous morphogenesis of the heart tube, including TOF, endocardial cushion defect, cardiac septal defect, right ventricular hypoplasia, double-outlet right ventricle and cardiomyopathy (109-111). In a transgenic murine model overexpressing Val217Gly-mutant GATA4, embryonic death occurs, manifesting similar cardiovascular developmental defects with those observed in humans carrying GATA4 mutations (112). In a knock-in mouse model expressing Gly295Ser-mutant GATA4, homozygous mice manifested a single ventricular chamber, thin ventricular myocardium and embryonic lethality while heterozygous mice are viable, with minor structural aberrations of the atrial septum and semilunar valve stenosis (113). Moreover, Gata4 is required for normal cardiovascular morphogenesis in the xenopus, fly and fish (114). Collectively, these observations from experimental animals highlight the sensitivity of the heart to GATA4 mutants during cardiac organogenesis, suggesting that GATA4 exerts a pivotal role in the developing heart and functionally defective GATA4 predisposes humans to numerous types of congenital heart disease, including TOF.
Notably, in addition to a range of congenital heart defects, germline GATA4 mutations cause dilated cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation in humans (115,116). As indicated by the present research findings and others (46,82), a higher rate of gene mutations in heart tissue and peripheral blood samples suggests a genetic contribution to dilated cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation. Sequencing analysis of GATA4 from resected cardiac tissue of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation may reveal cardiac somatic mutations contributing to dilated cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation.
There are some limitations to this investigation. Firstly, the sample size of the study is relatively small, and larger sample sizes may lead to the discovery of more pathogenic mutations. Secondly, in this study, a pathogenic GATA4 mutation was identified through candidate gene analysis, hence it cannot be ruled out that other genetic defects may also play a pathogenic role. Whole exome or genome sequencing analysis can help address this problem. Thirdly, the subcellular localization and distribution of the mutated GATA4 protein, as well as the changes in its ability to bind target gene promoters, remain to be clarified. Finally, the pathogenicity of the GATA4 mutation is still to be further explored at the level of genetically modified animal models.
In conclusion, the present study identified a somatic GATA4 loss-of-function mutation predisposing TOF, which indicated that somatic mosaicism plays a prominent role in the molecular pathogenesis of TOF in a minority of cases.
Supplementary Material
Locations of the primers used for site-directed mutagenesis in the cDNA of human GATA4. The cDNA sequences of the human GATA4 gene derived from the Nucleotide database with an accession number of NM_002052.5 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NM_002052.5). The red color marks the coding region and the green color marks the wild-type forward primer. A rectangle marks the nucleotide where the mutation occurs.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: The present study was supported by The Basic Research Project of Shanghai, China (grant no. 20JC1418800) and The Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, China (grant no. 18ZR1431000).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. The GATA4 mutation, NM_002052.5: c.708T>G; p.(Tyr236*), was deposited in a genetics database (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/GATA4), having an individual ID of 00436129 (phenotype ID: 0000326313; screening ID: 0000437610; variant ID: 0000932923).
Authors' contributions
JW and YQY conceived the study and wrote the manuscript. PA, YJL, RTH, XYL, JNG, CXY, YJX, JW and YQY performed clinical research including collection and analysis of clinical data. PA, YJL, JNG, CXY, JW and YQY performed genetic and biochemical experiments. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. JW and YQY confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by The Medical Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital [approval no. LL(H)-09-07; Shanghai, China]. Informed consent was signed by the legal guardians of all patients.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, Baker-Smith CM, Beaton AZ, Boehme AK, Buxton AE, et al: Heart disease and stroke statistics-2023 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 147:e93–e621. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Diab NS, Barish S, Dong W, Zhao S, Allington G, Yu X, Kahle KT, Brueckner M and Jin SC: Molecular genetics and complex inheritance of congenital heart disease. Genes (Basel). 12(1020)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Spaziani G, Girolami F, Arcieri L, Calabri GB, Porcedda G, Di Filippo C, Surace FC, Pozzi M and Favilli S: Bicuspid aortic valve in children and adolescents: A comprehensive review. Diagnostics (Basel). 12(1751)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Martin LJ and Benson DW: Focused strategies for defining the genetic architecture of congenital heart defects. Genes (Basel). 12(827)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Brudy L, Meyer M, Oberhoffer R, Ewert P and Müller J: Move more-be happier? Physical activity and health-related quality of life in children with congenital heart disease. Am Heart J. 241:68–73. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Moons P, Luyckx K, Thomet C, Budts W, Enomoto J, Sluman MA, Lu CW, Jackson JL, Khairy P, Cook SC, et al: Physical functioning, mental health, and quality of life in different congenital heart defects: Comparative analysis in 3538 patients from 15 countries. Can J Cardiol. 37:215–223. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Freiberger A, Busse A, Ewert P, Huntgeburth M, Kaemmerer H, Kohls N, Nagdyman N, Richter C, Röhrich C, von Scheidt F, et al: Quality of life in adults with congenital heart disease with and without pulmonary hypertension: A comparative study. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 12:758–766. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ly R, Karsenty C, Amedro P, Cohen S, Domanski O, Godart F, Radojevic J, Vaksmann G, Naccache N, Boubrit A, et al: Health-Related quality of life and its association with outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease and heart failure: Insight From FRESH-ACHD Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 12(e027819)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Meyer M, Brudy L, Fuertes-Moure A, Hager A, Oberhoffer-Fritz R, Ewert P and Müller J: E-Health exercise intervention for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease: A randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 233:163–168. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fritz C, Hock J, Oberhoffer R, Hager A, Ewert P and Müller J: reduced parasympathetic activity in patients with different types of congenital heart disease and associations to exercise capacity. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 41:35–39. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sheng SP, Feinberg JL, Bostrom JA, Tang Y, Sweeney G, Pierre A, Katz ES, Whiteson JH, Haas F, Dodson JA and Halpern DG: Adherence and exercise capacity improvements of patients with adult congenital heart disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation. J Am Heart Assoc. 11(e023896)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Masood IR, Detterich J, Cerrone D, Lewinter K, Shah P, Kato R and Sabati A: Reduced forced vital capacity and the number of chest wall surgeries are associated with decreased exercise capacity in children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 43:54–61. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Willinger L, Hock J, Hager A, Oberhoffer-Fritz R, Ewert P and Müller J: Heart-Focused anxiety is prevalent in adults with congenital heart disease and associated with reduced exercise capacity. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 43:277–281. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sadhwani A, Wypij D, Rofeberg V, Gholipour A, Mittleman M, Rohde J, Velasco-Annis C, Calderon J, Friedman KG, Tworetzky W, et al: Fetal brain volume predicts neurodevelopment in congenital heart disease. Circulation. 145:1108–1119. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Parekh SA, Cox SM, Barkovich AJ, Chau V, Steurer MA, Xu D, Miller SP, McQuillen PS and Peyvandi S: The effect of size and asymmetry at birth on brain injury and neurodevelopmental outcomes in congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 43:868–877. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Peyvandi S and Rollins C: Fetal brain development in congenital heart disease. Can J Cardiol. 39:115–122. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Brossard-Racine M and Panigrahy A: Structural brain alterations and their associations with function in children, adolescents, and young adults with congenital heart disease. Can J Cardiol. 39:123–132. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cromb D, Bonthrone AF, Maggioni A, Cawley P, Dimitrova R, Kelly CJ, Cordero-Grande L, Carney O, Egloff A, Hughes E, et al: Individual assessment of perioperative brain growth trajectories in infants with congenital heart disease: Correlation with clinical and surgical risk factors. J Am Heart Assoc. 12(e028565)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Karsenty C, Waldmann V, Mulder B, Hascoet S and Ladouceur M: Thromboembolic complications in adult congenital heart disease: the knowns and the unknowns. Clin Res Cardiol. 10:1380–1391. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Giang KW, Fedchenko M, Dellborg M, Eriksson P and Mandalenakis Z: Burden of ischemic stroke in patients with congenital heart disease: A nationwide, case-control study. J Am Heart Assoc. 10(e020939)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yeh HR, Kim EH, Yu JJ, Yun TJ, Ko TS and Yum MS: Arterial ischemic stroke in children with congenital heart diseases. Pediatr Int. 64(e15200)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kourelis G, Kanakis M, Samanidis G, Tzannis K, Bobos D, Kousi T, Apostolopoulou S, Kakava F, Kyriakoulis K, Bounta S, et al: Acute kidney injury predictors and outcomes after cardiac surgery in children with congenital heart disease: An observational cohort study. Diagnostics (Basel). 12(2397)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Xie Y, Jiang W, Cao J and Xie H: Dexmedetomidine attenuates acute kidney injury in children undergoing congenital heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass by inhibiting the TLR3/NF-κB signaling pathway. Am J Transl Res. 13:2763–2773. 2021.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gillesén M, Fedchenko M, Giang KW, Dimopoulos K, Eriksson P, Dellborg M and Mandalenakis Z: Chronic kidney disease in patients with congenital heart disease: A nationwide, register-based cohort study. Eur Heart J Open. 2(oeac055)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Reiter FP, Hadjamu NJ, Nagdyman N, Zachoval R, Mayerle J, De Toni EN, Kaemmerer H and Denk G: Congenital heart disease-associated liver disease: A narrative review. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 11:577–590. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rosenzweig EB and Krishnan U: Congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary hypertension. Clin Chest Med. 42:9–18. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chiu SN, Lu CW, Lin MT, Chen CA, Wu MH and Wang JK: Pulmonary hypertension in adult congenital heart disease in Asia: A distinctive feature of complex congenital heart disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 11(e022596)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lindberg L: Long-Term follow-up of pediatric patients with severe postoperative pulmonary hypertension after correction of congenital heart defects. Pediatr Cardiol. 43:827–836. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Snygg-Martin U, Giang KW, Dellborg M, Robertson J and Mandalenakis Z: Cumulative incidence of infective endocarditis in patients with congenital heart disease: A nationwide, case-control study over nine decades. Clin Infect Dis. 73:1469–1475. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
van Melle JP, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bansal M, Kamp O, Meshaal M, Pudich J, Luksic VR, Rodriguez-Alvarez R, Sadeghpour A, Hanzevacki JS, et al: Infective endocarditis in adult patients with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 370:178–185. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Havers-Borgersen E, Butt JH, Østergaard L, Petersen JK, Torp-Pedersen C, Køber L and Fosbøl EL: Long-term incidence of infective endocarditis among patients with congenital heart disease. Am Heart J. 259:9–20. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Arnaert S, De Meester P, Troost E, Droogne W, Van Aelst L, Van Cleemput J, Voros G, Gewillig M, Cools B, Moons P, et al: Heart failure related to adult congenital heart disease: prevalence, outcome and risk factors. ESC Heart Fail. 8:2940–2950. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Egbe AC, Miranda WR, Jain CC, Bonnichsen CR, Anderson JH, Dearani JA, Warnes CA, Crestanello J and Connolly HM: Incidence and outcomes of advanced heart failure in adults with congenital heart disease. Circ Heart Fail. 15(e009675)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lu CW, Wang JK, Yang HL, Kovacs AH, Luyckx K, Ruperti-Repilado FJ, Van De Bruaene A, Enomoto J, Sluman MA, Jackson JL, et al: Heart failure and patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease from 15 countries. J Am Heart Assoc. 11(e024993)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fischer AJ, Enders D, Wasmer K, Marschall U, Baumgartner H and Diller GP: Impact of specialized electrophysiological care on the outcome of catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardias in adults with congenital heart disease: Independent risk factors and gender aspects. Heart Rhythm. 18:1852–1859. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Casteigt B, Samuel M, Laplante L, Shohoudi A, Apers S, Kovacs AH, Luyckx K, Thomet C, Budts W, Enomoto J, et al: Atrial arrhythmias and patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: An international study. Heart Rhythm. 18:793–800. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wasmer K, Eckardt L, Baumgartner H and Köbe J: Therapy of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart disease-narrative review. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 11:550–562. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Vehmeijer JT, Koyak Z, Leerink JM, Zwinderman AH, Harris L, Peinado R, Oechslin EN, Robbers-Visser D, Groenink M, Boekholdt SM, et al: Identification of patients at risk of sudden cardiac death in congenital heart disease: The PRospEctiVE study on implaNTable cardIOverter defibrillator therapy and suddeN cardiac death in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease (PREVENTION-ACHD). Heart Rhythm. 18:785–792. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Diller GP, Orwat S, Lammers AE, Radke RM, De-Torres-Alba F, Schmidt R, Marschall U, Bauer UM, Enders D, Bronstein L, et al: Lack of specialist care is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in adult congenital heart disease: A population-based study. Eur Heart J. 42:4241–4248. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Williams JL, Torok RD, D'Ottavio A, Spears T, Chiswell K, Forestieri NE, Sang CJ, Paolillo JA, Walsh MJ, Hoffman TM, et al: Causes of death in infants and children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 42:1308–1315. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Triedman JK and Newburger JW: Trends in congenital heart disease: The next decade. Circulation. 133:2716–2733. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bouma BJ and Mulder BJ: Changing landscape of congenital heart disease. Circ Res. 120:908–922. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rao PS and Agarwal A: Advances in the diagnosis and management of congenital heart disease in children. Children (Basel). 9(1056)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Williams RG: Late causes of death after congenital heart defects: A population-based study from finland. J Am Coll Cardiol. 68:499–501. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Niwa K, Kaemmerer H and von Kodolitsch Y: Current diagnosis and management of late complications in adult congenital heart disease. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 11:478–480. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Huang RT, Xue S, Xu YJ, Zhou M and Yang YQ: Somatic GATA5 mutations in sporadic tetralogy of Fallot. Int J Mol Med. 33:1227–1235. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Boyd R, McMullen H, Beqaj H and Kalfa D: Environmental exposures and congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 149(e2021052151)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
García-Flores E, Rodríguez-Pérez JM, Borgonio-Cuadra VM, Vargas-Alarcón G, Calderón-Colmenero J, Sandoval JP, García-Montes JA, Espinoza-Gutiérrez VM, Reyes-García JG, Cazarín-Santos BG, et al: DNA Methylation Levels of the TBX5 gene promoter are associated with congenital septal defects in mexican paediatric patients. Biology (Basel). 11(96)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhou J, Xiong Y, Dong X, Wang H, Qian Y, Ma D and Li X: Genome-wide methylation analysis reveals differentially methylated CpG sites and altered expression of heart development-associated genes in fetuses with cardiac defects. Exp Ther Med. 22(1032)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hu C, Huang S, Wu F and Ding H: MicroRNA-219-5p participates in cyanotic congenital heart disease progression by regulating cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Exp Ther Med. 21(36)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Choudhury TZ and Garg V: Molecular genetic mechanisms of congenital heart disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 75(101949)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sharma V, Goessling LS, Brar AK, Joshi CS, Mysorekar IU and Eghtesady P: Coxsackievirus B3 infection early in pregnancy induces congenital heart defects through suppression of fetal cardiomyocyte proliferation. J Am Heart Assoc. 10(e017995)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Han X, Wang B, Jin D, Liu K, Wang H, Chen L and Zu Y: Precise dose of folic acid supplementation is essential for embryonic heart development in zebrafish. Biology (Basel). 11(28)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang C, Lv H, Ling X, Li H, Diao F, Dai J, Du J, Chen T, Xi Q, Zhao Y, et al: Association of assisted reproductive technology, germline de novo mutations and congenital heart defects in a prospective birth cohort study. Cell Res. 31:919–928. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lahrouchi N, Postma AV, Salazar CM, De Laughter DM, Tjong F, Piherová L, Bowling FZ, Zimmerman D, Lodder EM, Ta-Shma A, et al: Biallelic loss-of-function variants in PLD1 cause congenital right-sided cardiac valve defects and neonatal cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest. 131(e142148)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Roifman M, Chung BHY, Reid DM, Teitelbaum R, Martin N, Nield LE, Thompson M, Shannon P and Chitayat D: Heterozygous NOTCH1 deletion associated with variable congenital heart defects. Clin Genet. 99:836–841. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ekure EN, Adeyemo A, Liu H, Sokunbi O, Kalu N, Martinez AF, Owosela B, Tekendo-Ngongang C, Addissie YA, Olusegun-Joseph A, et al: Exome sequencing and congenital heart disease in sub-saharan Africa. Circ Genom Precis Med. 14(e003108)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
van Walree ES, Dombrowsky G, Jansen IE, Mirkov MU, Zwart R, Ilgun A, Guo D, Clur SB, Amin AS, Savage JE, et al: Germline variants in HEY2 functional domains lead to congenital heart defects and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Gene Med. 23:103–110. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fu F, Li R, Lei TY, Wang D, Yang X, Han J, Pan M, Zhen L, Li J, Li FT, et al: Compound heterozygous mutation of the ASXL3 gene causes autosomal recessive congenital heart disease. Hum Genet. 140:333–348. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhao L, Jiang WF, Yang CX, Qiao Q, Xu YJ, Shi HY, Qiu XB, Wu SH and Yang YQ: SOX17 loss-of-function variation underlying familial congenital heart disease. Eur J Med Genet. 64(104211)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Shi HY, Xie MS, Yang CX, Huang RT, Xue S, Liu XY, Xu YJ and Yang YQ: Identification of SOX18 as a new gene predisposing to congenital heart disease. Diagnostics (Basel). 12(1917)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Huang RT, Guo YH, Yang CX, Gu JN, Qiu XB, Shi HY, Xu YJ, Xue S and Yang YQ: SOX7 loss-of-function variation as a cause of familial congenital heart disease. Am J Transl Res. 14:1672–1684. 2022.PubMed/NCBI | |
Abhinav P, Zhang GF, Zhao CM, Xu YJ, Wang J and Yang YQ: A novel KLF13 mutation underlying congenital patent ductus arteriosus and ventricular septal defect, as well as bicuspid aortic valve. Exp Ther Med. 23(311)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Paszkowska A, Piekutowska-Abramczuk D, Ciara E, Mirecka-Rola A, Brzezinska M, Wicher D, Kostrzewa G, Sarnecki J and Ziółkowska L: Clinical presentation of left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy and bradycardia in three families carrying HCN4 pathogenic variants. Genes (Basel). 13(477)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ke ZP, Zhang GF, Guo YH, Sun YM, Wang J, Li N, Qiu XB, Xu YJ and Yang YQ: A novel PRRX1 loss-of-function variation contributing to familial atrial fibrillation and congenital patent ductus arteriosus. Genet Mol Biol. 45(e20210378)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Debiec RM, Hamby SE, Jones PD, Safwan K, Sosin M, Hetherington SL, Sprigings D, Sharman D, Lee K, Salahshouri P, et al: Contribution of NOTCH1 genetic variants to bicuspid aortic valve and other congenital lesions. Heart. 108:1114–1120. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang Z, Qiao XH, Xu YJ, Liu XY, Huang RT, Xue S, Qiu HY and Yang YQ: SMAD1 Loss-of-Function variant responsible for congenital heart disease. Biomed Res Int. 2022(9916325)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Meerschaut I, Steyaert W, Bové T, François K, Martens T, De Groote K, De Wilde H, Muiño Mosquera L, Panzer J, Vandekerckhove K, et al: Exploring the mutational landscape of isolated congenital heart defects: An exome sequencing study using cardiac DNA. Genes (Basel). 13(1214)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
De Ita M, Gaytán-Cervantes J, Cisneros B, Araujo MA, Huicochea-Montiel JC, Cárdenas-Conejo A, Lazo-Cárdenas CC, Ramírez-Portillo CI, Feria-Kaiser C, Peregrino-Bejarano L, et al: Clustering of genetic anomalies of cilia outer dynein arm and central apparatus in patients with transposition of the great arteries. Genes (Basel). 13(1662)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Okashah S, Vasudeva D, El Jerbi A, Khodjet-El-Khil H, Al-Shafai M, Syed N, Kambouris M, Udassi S, Saraiva LR, Al-Saloos H, et al: Investigation of genetic causes in patients with congenital heart disease in qatar: Findings from the Sidra Cardiac Registry. Genes (Basel). 13(1369)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Azab B, Aburizeg D, Ji W, Jeffries L, Isbeih NJ, Al-Akily AS, Mohammad H, Osba YA, Shahin MA, Dardas Z, et al: TBX5 variant with the novel phenotype of mixed-type total anomalous pulmonary venous return in Holt-Oram Syndrome and variable intrafamilial heart defects. Mol Med Rep. 25(210)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Li YJ, Wang J, Ye WG, Liu XY, Li L, Qiu XB, Chen H, Xu YJ, Yang YQ, Bai D and Huang RT: Discovery of GJC1 (Cx45) as a new gene underlying congenital heart disease and arrhythmias. Biology (Basel). 12(346)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang H, Xiao F, Qian Y, Wu B, Dong X, Lu Y, Cheng G, Wang L, Yan K, Yang L, et al: Genetic architecture in neonatal intensive care unit patients with congenital heart defects: a retrospective study from the China Neonatal Genomes Project. J Med Genet. 60:247–253. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang Y, Xu YJ, Yang CX, Huang RT, Xue S, Yuan F and Yang YQ: SMAD4 loss-of-function mutation predisposes to congenital heart disease. Eur J Med Genet. 66(104677)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Deng Q, Wang X, Gao J, Xia X, Wang Y, Zhang Y and Chen Y: Growth restriction and congenital heart disease caused by a novel TAB2 mutation: A case report. Exp Ther Med. 25(258)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Afouda BA: Towards understanding the gene-specific roles of GATA factors in heart development: Does GATA4 lead the way? Int J Mol Sci. 23(5255)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yang YQ, Gharibeh L, Li RG, Xin YF, Wang J, Liu ZM, Qiu XB, Xu YJ, Xu L, Qu XK, et al: GATA4 loss-of-function mutations underlie familial tetralogy of fallot. Hum Mutat. 34:1662–1671. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dixit R, Narasimhan C, Balekundri VI, Agrawal D, Kumar A and Mohapatra B: Functionally significant, novel GATA4 variants are frequently associated with Tetralogy of Fallot. Hum Mutat. 39:1957–1972. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wei D, Bao H, Liu XY, Zhou N, Wang Q, Li RG, Xu YJ and Yang YQ: GATA5 loss-of-function mutations underlie tetralogy of fallot. Int J Med Sci. 10:34–42. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lin X, Huo Z, Liu X, Zhang Y, Li L, Zhao H, Yan B, Liu Y, Yang Y and Chen YH: A novel GATA6 mutation in patients with tetralogy of Fallot or atrial septal defect. J Hum Genet. 55:662–667. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang J, Luo XJ, Xin YF, Liu Y, Liu ZM, Wang Q, Li RG, Fang WY, Wang XZ and Yang YQ: Novel GATA6 mutations associated with congenital ventricular septal defect or tetralogy of fallot. DNA Cell Biol. 31:1610–1617. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Huang RT, Xue S, Xu YJ and Yang YQ: Somatic mutations in the GATA6 gene underlie sporadic tetralogy of Fallot. Int J Mol Med. 31:51–58. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu XY, Wang J, Zheng JH, Bai K, Liu ZM, Wang XZ, Liu X, Fang WY and Yang YQ: Involvement of a novel GATA4 mutation in atrial septal defects. Int J Mol Med. 28:17–23. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jiang WF, Xu YJ, Zhao CM, Wang XH, Qiu XB, Liu X, Wu SH and Yang YQ: A novel TBX5 mutation predisposes to familial cardiac septal defects and atrial fibrillation as well as bicuspid aortic valve. Genet Mol Biol. 43(e20200142)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Benson DW, Silberbach GM, Kavanaugh-McHugh A, Cottrill C, Zhang Y, Riggs S, Smalls O, Johnson MC, Watson MS, Seidman JG, et al: Mutations in the cardiac transcription factor NKX2.5 affect diverse cardiac developmental pathways. J Clin Invest. 104:1567–1573. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Goldmuntz E, Geiger E and Benson DW: NKX2.5 mutations in patients with tetralogy of fallot. Circulation. 104:2565–2568. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
McElhinney DB, Geiger E, Blinder J, Benson DW and Goldmuntz E: NKX2.5 mutations in patients with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 42:1650–1655. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Baban A, Postma AV, Marini M, Trocchio G, Santilli A, Pelegrini M, Sirleto P, Lerone M, Albanese SB, Barnett P, et al: Identification of TBX5 mutations in a series of 94 patients with Tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Med Genet A. 164A:3100–3107. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Amodio V, Tevy MF, Traina C, Ghosh TK and Capovilla M: Transactivation in Drosophila of human enhancers by human transcription factors involved in congenital heart diseases. Dev Dyn. 241:190–199. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Charron F, Paradis P, Bronchain O, Nemer G and Nemer M: Cooperative interaction between GATA-4 and GATA-6 regulates myocardial gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 19:4355–4365. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jiang Y and Evans T: The Xenopus GATA-4/5/6 genes are associated with cardiac specification and can regulate cardiac-specific transcription during embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 174:258–270. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Garg V, Kathiriya IS, Barnes R, Schluterman MK, King IN, Butler CA, Rothrock CR, Eapen RS, Hirayama-Yamada K, Joo K, et al: GATA4 mutations cause human congenital heart defects and reveal an interaction with TBX5. Nature. 424:443–447. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Durocher D, Charron F, Warren R, Schwartz RJ and Nemer M: The cardiac transcription factors Nkx2-5 and GATA-4 are mutual cofactors. EMBO J. 16:5687–5696. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nemer G, Fadlalah F, Usta J, Nemer M, Dbaibo G, Obeid M and Bitar F: A novel mutation in the GATA4 gene in patients with Tetralogy of Fallot. Hum Mutat. 27:293–294. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Martincorena I and Campbell PJ: Somatic mutation in cancer and normal cells. Science. 349:1483–1489. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Maslov AY and Vijg J: Somatic mutation burden in relation to aging and functional life span: Implications for cellular reprogramming and rejuvenation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 83(102132)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Vijg J and Dong X: Pathogenic mechanisms of somatic mutation and genome mosaicism in aging. Cell. 182:12–23. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Erickson RP: Somatic gene mutation and human disease other than cancer: An update. Mutat Res. 705:96–106. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Walsh C, Choudhury S and Chen MH: Landscape of somatic mutations in aging human heart muscle cells. Nat Aging. 2:686–687. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Choudhury S, Huang AY, Kim J, Zhou Z, Morillo K, Maury EA, Tsai JW, Miller MB, Lodato MA, Araten S, et al: Somatic mutations in single human cardiomyocytes reveal age-associated DNA damage and widespread oxidative genotoxicity. Nat Aging. 2:714–725. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Salazar M, Consoli F, Villegas V, Caicedo V, Maddaloni V, Daniele P, Caianiello G, Pachón S, Nuñez F, Limongelli G, et al: Search of somatic GATA4 and NKX2.5 gene mutations in sporadic septal heart defects. Eur J Med Genet. 54:306–309. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang J, Lu Y, Chen H, Yin M, Yu T and Fu Q: Investigation of somatic NKX2-5, GATA4 and HAND1 mutations in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. Pathology. 43:322–326. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cheng C, Lin Y, Yang F, Wang W, Wu C, Qin J, Shao X and Zhou L: Mutational screening of affected cardiac tissues and peripheral blood cells identified novel somatic mutations in GATA4 in patients with ventricular septal defect. J Biomed Res. 25:425–430. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Esposito G, Butler TL, Blue GM, Cole AD, Sholler GF, Kirk EP, Grossfeld P, Perryman BM, Harvey RP and Winlaw DS: Somatic mutations in NKX2–5, GATA4, and HAND1 are not a common cause of tetralogy of Fallot or hypoplastic left heart. Am J Med Genet A. 155A:2416–2421. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yin J, Qian J, Dai G, Wang C, Qin Y, Xu T, Li Z, Zhang H and Yang S: Search of Somatic Mutations of NKX2-5 and GATA4 Genes in Chinese patients with sporadic congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 40:17–22. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Heineke J, Auger-Messier M, Xu J, Oka T, Sargent MA, York A, Klevitsky R, Vaikunth S, Duncan SA, Aronow BJ, et al: Cardiomyocyte GATA4 functions as a stress-responsive regulator of angiogenesis in the murine heart. J Clin Invest. 117:3198–3210. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pikkarainen S, Tokola H, Kerkelä R and Ruskoaho H: GATA transcription factors in the developing and adult heart. Cardiovasc Res. 63:196–207. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhang H, Toyofuku T, Kamei J and Hori M: GATA-4 regulates cardiac morphogenesis through transactivation of the N-cadherin gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 312:1033–1038. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kuo CT, Morrisey EE, Anandappa R, Sigrist K, Lu MM, Parmacek MS, Soudais C and Leiden JM: GATA4 transcription factor is required for ventral morphogenesis and heart tube formation. Genes Dev. 11:1048–1060. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Molkentin JD, Lin Q, Duncan SA and Olson EN: Requirement of the transcription factor GATA4 for heart tube formation and ventral morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 11:1061–1072. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Watt AJ, Battle MA, Li J and Duncan SA: GATA4 is essential for formation of the proepicardium and regulates cardiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:12573–12578. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Crispino JD, Lodish MB, Thurberg BL, Litovsky SH, Collins T, Molkentin JD and Orkin SH: Proper coronary vascular development and heart morphogenesis depend on interaction of GATA-4 with FOG cofactors. Genes Dev. 15:839–844. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Misra C, Sachan N, McNally CR, Koenig SN, Nichols HA, Guggilam A, Lucchesi PA, Pu WT, Srivastava D and Garg V: Congenital heart disease-causing Gata4 mutation displays functional deficits in vivo. PLoS Genet. 8(e1002690)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Epstein JA and Parmacek MS: Recent advances in cardiac development with therapeutic implications for adult cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 112:592–597. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jiang JQ, Shen FF, Fang WY, Liu X and Yang YQ: Novel GATA4 mutations in lone atrial fibrillation. Int J Mol Med. 28:1025–1032. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhao L, Xu JH, Xu WJ, Yu H, Wang Q, Zheng HZ, Jiang WF, Jiang JF and Yang YQ: A novel GATA4 loss-of-function mutation responsible for familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Int J Mol Med. 33:654–660. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |