Role of right/left ventricular diameter ratio in therapy selection for high and low intermediate‑risk pulmonary embolism in the Emergency Department

  • Authors:
    • Emir Karakaya
    • Bedriye Müge Sönmez
    • Gülsen Cigsar
    • Ilker Sirin
    • Ihsaniye Süer Dogan
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 12, 2025     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2025.12823
  • Article Number: 73
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Patients with intermediate‑risk pulmonary embolism (PE) comprise a significant patient population. Computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) plays a crucial role in diagnosis and determining the prognosis. Right ventricular diameter/left ventricular diameter (RVD/LVD) ratio measured through CTPA provides insight into right ventricular overload. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of RVD/LVD ratio on decision of treatment between high and low intermediate‑risk PE. A retrospective observational study was conducted between May 2018 and May 2022 on patients with intermediate‑risk PE at the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital. The demographic information, risk factors, vital signs at presentation, laboratory data, CTPA images and treatment modality of the patients were obtained. RVD/LVD was calculated from the CTPA images. All‑cause mortality at 24 h, 7 and 30 days were recorded. A total of 127 patients were included. In total, 52 (40.9%) patients were in the low‑intermediate risk group, and 75 (59.1%) patients were in the intermediate‑high risk group. A total of 54 patients were administered thrombolytic therapy while 73 patients were not. The mean RVD/LVD was 1.35±0.25 in patients who were administered thrombolytic therapy and 1.17±0.34 in those who were not. A significant association was identified between RVD/LVD and the administration of thrombolytic therapy (P<0.001). RVD/LVD and mortality were not significantly correlated (P=0.248). No significant association was found between the administration of thrombolytic therapy and mortality (P=0.569). RVD/LVD assessed through CTPA was found to be significantly decisive for administering thrombolytic therapy but not significantly predictive for mortality in intermediate‑risk patients with PE presenting to the ED.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2025
Volume 29 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Karakaya E, Sönmez B, Cigsar G, Sirin I and Süer Dogan I: Role of right/left ventricular diameter ratio in therapy selection for high and low intermediate‑risk pulmonary embolism in the Emergency Department. Exp Ther Med 29: 73, 2025.
APA
Karakaya, E., Sönmez, B., Cigsar, G., Sirin, I., & Süer Dogan, I. (2025). Role of right/left ventricular diameter ratio in therapy selection for high and low intermediate‑risk pulmonary embolism in the Emergency Department. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 29, 73. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2025.12823
MLA
Karakaya, E., Sönmez, B., Cigsar, G., Sirin, I., Süer Dogan, I."Role of right/left ventricular diameter ratio in therapy selection for high and low intermediate‑risk pulmonary embolism in the Emergency Department". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 29.4 (2025): 73.
Chicago
Karakaya, E., Sönmez, B., Cigsar, G., Sirin, I., Süer Dogan, I."Role of right/left ventricular diameter ratio in therapy selection for high and low intermediate‑risk pulmonary embolism in the Emergency Department". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 29, no. 4 (2025): 73. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2025.12823